
Signature
"He come in the night when one sleep on a bed.
With a hand he have the basket and foods."
- David Sedaris explains the Easter rabbit
> Fulio Pen filted:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> love with the thesaurus; it's not always a bad thing to use the same word more
> than once....
I agree. I don't know about American high schools, but as a Brit I'm
quite impressed that they're studying Balzac. I think he would be
regarded as impossibly (a) old-hat, and (b) "difficult" over here.
Dumbing down, innit?
Mike M
David Combs - 31 Dec 2007 02:33 GMT
>> Fulio Pen filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> love with the thesaurus; it's not always a bad thing to use the same word more
>> than once....
What a horrible rule, never use the same word twice (eg in same sentence,
in a series, ...).
So I'm reading along and come across such a case:
(I can't think up a good one now -- I did see one
yesterday, though :-( .)
A try, just for the idea:
they brought a delicious chocolate cake,
and a scruptious vanilla cake.
(if those aren't synomyms, then substitute two that are.)
"Just what is he saying here, that the cakes don't taste
equally good?"
David
> Fulio Pen filted:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >the writing of American high school students in general? Thanks for
> >your time.
For comparison, the original poster may be interested in the SAT sample
essays here:
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/sat/prep_one/essay/pracStart.
html
The SAT is an American college entrance examination. One section is a
short five paragraph essay in response to a question. The essay is
scored on a scale of 1 to 6, with 6 being the best. Students who take
this test are planning on post-secondary education, and are usually 16
to 17 years old or so.
If you look at the samples in the 4-6 range, you'll see what passes as
"good" high school writing in this very limited context. Based on what
we saw, I'd expect the original poster's student to score in that range
WITH ONE IMPORTANT WARNING:
The SAT essay is timed. You have 25 minutes from the time you see the
question until you must stop writing, and you are allowed no reference
material. This is hard enough for native English speakers (writers);
non-native writers of English often (in my experience) find the time
constraint very difficult.
Steve
R.H. Draney:
> It's quite good, actually, although I sense the hand of a writer too
> much in love with the thesaurus; it's not always a bad thing to use
> the same word more than once....
I agree. Many of the sentences are perfect, and either they show off
an extensive vocabulary or someone spent a lot of time looking up words.
> The only thing that feels distinctly odd is the use of "fiction" as
> a count noun in the summarizing paragraph.
There are several other small errors of that kind, and one bad sentence
at the very end (I guess R.H. skimmed over that one).
| Mme Beauseant
Since you specifically mentioned American students: in North America
we'd write "Mme." with a period.
| An episode in the novel is profoundly impressive. In deep grief,
| Mme Beauseant was determined to leave the aristocratic life forever.
Even though stories are conventionally written in the past tense,
discussions about plot events are conventionally written in the present.
Mme. Beauseant *is* determined to leave that life; she *holds* a party.
| At the party, gleaming with each other were
People dance with each other, but objects don't gleam with each other;
they just gleam.
| Her desolate dismay was strikingly pronounced by the sumptuousness
| of the party.
"Pronounced" has the desired meaning when it's an adjective, but not
when it's a verb. "Was made strikingly pronounced" would be one
possible correction.
| I felt very sorry for her when reading came to this point.
Not a natural use of "reading". "When my reading came to this point"
is possible, but "when I had read to this point" is more natural.
| The answer is an uncertainty.
The answer is uncertain.
| Power of a fiction is in the experience of its characters.
This is the bit that R.H. remarked on. "A fiction" is possible,
although "a work of fiction" is more common. But since you're
talking about a specific work, "power" requires a definite article.
"The power of."
| Big ups and downs in the fate of characters in some fictions
| are tremendously amazing.
The rest of the essay is using a rather formal tone, and the informal
usage "ups and downs" clashes with this. Also, this would definitely
read better with "fiction" as a mass noun, and then that clashes with
the use in the previous sentence, so they should both be changed to
use it as a mass noun.
| And more shockingly, that like mirrors, these characters reflect
| the true colors of people in reality, which makes me to think
| over in depth.
All the errors up to now are minor, but this sentence is just bad.
First, if the modifier "like mirrors" is set off by commas, it needs
them before and after. Then when you get to the end you realize that
there were are two subordinate clauses and no main verb. The simplest
grammatical fix is to delete the word "that", but the construction
still doesn't seem natural. Then "makes me" does not take "to", and
"think over" requires a direct object.

Signature
Mark Brader, Toronto | Some people like my advice so much that they frame it
msb@vex.net | upon the wall instead of using it. --Gordon R. Dickson
My text in this article is in the public domain.
Fulio Pen - 19 Dec 2007 03:08 GMT
> R.H. Draney:
>
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> My text in this article is in the public domain.
I want to thank all of you very, very much for your responses. I felt
bad after posting the essay. I thought I had broken the etiquette of
this group. I even had no courage to come back. My teacher friend
will definitely be very happy. God bless you all.
Fulio Pen