
Signature
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
In our last episode,
<647hvvc6hffaaf1bcdbt0hmm05dfdp9726@4ax.com>,
the lovely and talented Spehro Pefhany
broadcast on alt.usage.english:
>
> What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> especially a negative review"?
> Is it a metaphor for "frying" the recipient of the pan in a hot
> cooking utensil?
No. It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."

Signature
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/
War on Terrorism: Treat Readers like Mushrooms
"DO NOT USE photos on Page 1A showing civilian casualties from the U.S. war
on Afghanistan." -Memo, _Panama City_ (FL) _News Herald_
Mark Brader - 04 Jan 2004 23:32 GMT
Spehro Pefhany asks about "panning":
> > What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> > especially a negative review"?
> > Is it a metaphor for "frying" the recipient of the pan in a hot
> > cooking utensil?
> No. It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
> by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."
That doesn't make sense to me. Reviewing the OED1 and Supplement,
it seems to me that the following sense development is possible:
1. "To pan" for gold, as above.
2. "To pan out" -- to produce a good result
3. "To pan out" -- to produce a result of any kind
4. "To pan out" -- to speak at length on a subject
5. "To pan" -- to speak critically of
Step 4 here is the missing link -- I've never heard it before (the last
cite in the Supplement is from 1928), but it makes sense as a transition
between 3 and 5. However, 5 is identified as U.S., and 4 isn't, so this
reasoning might be wrong.

Signature
Mark Brader, Toronto "History will be kind to me, for I intend
msb@vex.net to write it." -- Churchill
My text in this article is in the public domain.
Adrian Bailey - 05 Jan 2004 03:52 GMT
> In our last episode,
> <647hvvc6hffaaf1bcdbt0hmm05dfdp9726@4ax.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> No. It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
> by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."
Mark doesn't agree, but I do. And I think figurative "to pan" is a
back-formation from figurative "panned".
Adrian
> What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> especially a negative review"?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
For those who have suffered such ignominious treatment, it is like being hit
over the head with a *really* heavy frying pan.
Whenever I see the word used in such circumstances, I can hear the *boing*.
Not that I speak from experience, of course.
Cheers, Sage