Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looking at "panned" critically

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Spehro Pefhany - 04 Jan 2004 23:06 GMT
   
What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
especially a negative review"?  

Is it a metaphor for "frying" the recipient of the pan in a hot
cooking utensil?

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Signature

"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

Lars Eighner - 04 Jan 2004 23:15 GMT
In our last episode,
<647hvvc6hffaaf1bcdbt0hmm05dfdp9726@4ax.com>,
the lovely and talented Spehro Pefhany
broadcast on alt.usage.english:

>    
> What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> especially a negative review"?  

> Is it a metaphor for "frying" the recipient of the pan in a hot
> cooking utensil?

No.  It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."

Signature

Lars Eighner -finger for geek code-  eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/
              War on Terrorism: Treat Readers like Mushrooms
"DO NOT USE photos on Page 1A showing civilian casualties from the U.S. war
         on Afghanistan." -Memo, _Panama City_ (FL) _News Herald_

Mark Brader - 04 Jan 2004 23:32 GMT
Spehro Pefhany asks about "panning":
> > What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> > especially a negative review"?  

> > Is it a metaphor for "frying" the recipient of the pan in a hot
> > cooking utensil?

> No.  It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
> by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."

That doesn't make sense to me.  Reviewing the OED1 and Supplement,
it seems to me that the following sense development is possible:

  1. "To pan" for gold, as above.
  2. "To pan out" -- to produce a good result
  3. "To pan out" -- to produce a result of any kind
  4. "To pan out" -- to speak at length on a subject
  5. "To pan" -- to speak critically of

Step 4 here is the missing link -- I've never heard it before (the last
cite in the Supplement is from 1928), but it makes sense as a transition
between 3 and 5.  However, 5 is identified as U.S., and 4 isn't, so this
reasoning might be wrong.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto          "History will be kind to me, for I intend
msb@vex.net                    to write it."            -- Churchill

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Adrian Bailey - 05 Jan 2004 03:52 GMT
> In our last episode,
> <647hvvc6hffaaf1bcdbt0hmm05dfdp9726@4ax.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> No.  It is a metaphor for separating good stuff from bad stuff
> by washing in a pan, as in "panning for gold."

Mark doesn't agree, but I do. And I think figurative "to pan" is a
back-formation from figurative "panned".

Adrian
sage - 05 Jan 2004 22:49 GMT
> What is the origin of this word, in the sense of "Severe criticism,
> especially a negative review"?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
For those who have suffered such ignominious treatment, it is like being hit
over the head with a *really* heavy frying pan.

Whenever I see the word used in such circumstances, I can hear the *boing*.

Not that I speak from experience, of course.

Cheers, Sage
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.