What does BWA-HAHAHAHAHA! mean?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Joe Fineman - 06 Jan 2004 22:24 GMT Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying?
 Signature --- Joe Fineman jcf@TheWorld.com
||: Bores punish kindness. :|| mUs1Ka - 06 Jan 2004 22:27 GMT > Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a > mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >>>> Bores punish kindness. :|| Baby crying. mwa-hahaha. m.
Robert Bannister - 07 Jan 2004 00:56 GMT >>Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a >>mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Baby crying. mwa-hahaha. I still can't see it. The "mwa" spelling seems as unlikely as the "bwa" one. Still, I've never heard a dog say "woof" or "bow-wow" either.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Can you still buy - 07 Jan 2004 07:28 GMT > >> ... What sound, in the nonverbal world, > >>are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I still can't see it. The "mwa" spelling seems as unlikely as the "bwa" > one. Still, I've never heard a dog say "woof" or "bow-wow" either. "hahaha" is often used, especially in the north of England, as a sarcastic way of saying "boo hoo hoo" but used to ridicule people crying (esp. children). I know one man in the North of England who used to beat his two boys whilst singing a song; the words went:
"Feet up, pat him on the bo bo, Let's hear him laugh, ha ha ha ha haa."
Unfortunately that was the only verse of the song he knew, so he would repeat it incessantly during the period of the "jolly good spanking". "Bwa hahahaha" is a little less subtle in that the "Bwa" makes it more obvious that the author is referring to babyish bawling/sobbing. The subtelty probably didn't survive the journey across the atlantic!
H
Robert Lieblich - 08 Jan 2004 02:03 GMT [all text snipped]
Never thought I'd be replying to a nom de net, but what the hey ...
*Spangle* by Gary Jennings is available from most large sellers of used books on the Net. Half.com offers several hardback copies in the US$3.00 range (plus S&H, of course). The complete text is in that single hardback volume. The book was not released in paperback until several years after initial publication, and then in a series of three mass-market volumes. So you need to buy three different paperbacks to get the complete text.
Or were you asking about something else?
 Signature Bob Lieblich Always trying to help
Frances Kemmish - 09 Jan 2004 12:47 GMT > [all text snipped] > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Or were you asking about something else? I assumed he was asking about the sweets. It made me wonder if you *can* still buy Spangles.
It seems that you can't:
http://www.aquarterof.co.uk/acatalog/whatever.html
 Signature Frances Kemmish Production Manager East Coast Youth Ballet www.byramartscenter.com
Simon R. Hughes - 09 Jan 2004 13:30 GMT
> I assumed he was asking about the sweets. It made me wonder if you *can* > still buy Spangles. > > It seems that you can't: > > http://www.aquarterof.co.uk/acatalog/whatever.html <http://www.aquarterof.co.uk/acatalog/boiled.html>
Sherbert pips and cola cubes!
 Signature Simon R. Hughes
Laura F Spira - 09 Jan 2004 15:28 GMT >> [all text snipped] >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://www.aquarterof.co.uk/acatalog/whatever.html What a brilliant site! I hope the OP sees it.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
sand - 07 Jan 2004 09:55 GMT >I still can't see it. The "mwa" spelling seems as unlikely as the "bwa" >one. Still, I've never heard a dog say "woof" or "bow-wow" either. Little Orphan Annie's dog Sandy used to say "arf" (no relation to me) whereas in Pogo, some dogs used to say "Ralph".
S&
sand - 07 Jan 2004 10:01 GMT >Little Orphan Annie's dog Sandy used to say "arf" (no relation to me) >whereas in Pogo, some dogs used to say "Ralph". On the other hand, Finnish comic strip dogs say "how, how" which may indicate a curiousity more characteristic of cats.
S&
R H Draney - 07 Jan 2004 16:10 GMT sand filted:
>>Little Orphan Annie's dog Sandy used to say "arf" (no relation to me) >>whereas in Pogo, some dogs used to say "Ralph". > >On the other hand, Finnish comic strip dogs say "how, how" which may >indicate a curiousity more characteristic of cats. To my eventual regret, I once *taught* a dog how to bark...a first pass at transcription would be /ro:/, but I'd need Evan's advanced course to properly identify the non-cardinal vowel I actually used...the key to sounding properly doglike lies in approximating the shape of the canine vocal apparatus, which is much more elongated than that of the human...the sound-effects person on "An American Werewolf In London" seemed to realize this; David Naughton's cries of pain during his transformation changed timbre as his snout elongated....r
Robert Bannister - 08 Jan 2004 01:17 GMT >>Little Orphan Annie's dog Sandy used to say "arf" (no relation to me) >>whereas in Pogo, some dogs used to say "Ralph". > > On the other hand, Finnish comic strip dogs say "how, how" which may > indicate a curiousity more characteristic of cats. I think the sound French dogs make (oua, oua or ouah, ouah) is more doggy.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Harvey Van Sickle - 06 Jan 2004 22:33 GMT On 06 Jan 2004, Joe Fineman wrote
> Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting > with a mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the > subject heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's > & p's get mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the > nonverbal world, are such strings intended to suggest? > Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? I've always taken it to be "Diabolical and Maniacal Laugh by Evil Master with Nefarious Plan" -- probably accompanied by the twirl of a metaphorical moustache.
In other words, a rather "luzers" sort of cliché...
 Signature Cheers, Harvey
Ottawa/Toronto/Edmonton for 30 years; Southern England for the past 21 years. (for e-mail, change harvey to whhvs)
Dr Robin Bignall - 07 Jan 2004 12:29 GMT >On 06 Jan 2004, Joe Fineman wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Master with Nefarious Plan" -- probably accompanied by the twirl of a >metaphorical moustache. It fits. I'm growing a moustache. My wife says BWA-HAHAHAHAHA! - just the maniacal laughter bit - every time she sees it.
 Signature wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall
Quiet part of Hertfordshire England
Mike Lyle - 07 Jan 2004 19:46 GMT > >On 06 Jan 2004, Joe Fineman wrote > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > It fits. I'm growing a moustache. My wife says BWA-HAHAHAHAHA! - just the > maniacal laughter bit - every time she sees it. Lose the moustache, dear boy, lose it! Too gay these days.
Mike.
Ray Heindl - 07 Jan 2004 21:35 GMT >> >I've always taken it to be "Diabolical and Maniacal Laugh by >> >Evil Master with Nefarious Plan" -- probably accompanied by the >> >twirl of a metaphorical moustache. I always envision a mad-scientist type, rubbing his hands together as he contemplates his plan to annihilate the Earth.
>> It fits. I'm growing a moustache. My wife says BWA-HAHAHAHAHA! - >> just the maniacal laughter bit - every time she sees it. > > Lose the moustache, dear boy, lose it! Too gay these days. Better yet, grow a beard to keep it company and throw away your razor.
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Dr Robin Bignall - 08 Jan 2004 17:39 GMT >>> >I've always taken it to be "Diabolical and Maniacal Laugh by >>> >Evil Master with Nefarious Plan" -- probably accompanied by the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Better yet, grow a beard to keep it company and throw away your razor. It's gradually becoming a reasonable colour and shape. But my hair grows so slowly. Herself and I go to the same hairdresser, and last Monday when I got my New Year haircut, he pointed out that she had been 4 times (once per month) since my last haircut, and mine had hardly grown. The last beard I grew (quite involuntarily) was, after two years, bright red in places (my mother was a redhead), dark in others (my father had black hair) and had large white patches. It looked quite artificial and straggly. No beard, thanks.
 Signature wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall
Quiet part of Hertfordshire England
Charles Riggs - 09 Jan 2004 07:54 GMT >The last beard I >grew (quite involuntarily) was, after two years, bright red in places (my >mother was a redhead), dark in others (my father had black hair) and had >large white patches. It looked quite artificial and straggly. No beard, >thanks. My first beard was like that. It looked awful because of the colour variation. After shaving it off, waiting a few months, and growing another, it came out quite well. Of course it has some white in it now, but it doesn't look too shabby. The women don't seem to mind it, anyway, and why else would we grow a beard if not to please the ladies? Vanity. All is vanity.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Ray Heindl - 09 Jan 2004 22:37 GMT > My first beard was like that. It looked awful because of the > colour variation. After shaving it off, waiting a few months, and > growing another, it came out quite well. Of course it has some > white in it now, but it doesn't look too shabby. The women don't > seem to mind it, anyway, and why else would we grow a beard if not > to please the ladies? Vanity. All is vanity. Or practicality: shaving is a pain, both literally and figuratively. When I grew a beard I figured I could get an extra 16 hours of sleep per year.
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Charles Riggs - 10 Jan 2004 05:25 GMT >> My first beard was like that. It looked awful because of the >> colour variation. After shaving it off, waiting a few months, and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >When I grew a beard I figured I could get an extra 16 hours of sleep >per year. Unfortunately, I have to use those 16 hours for trimming it.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
R H Draney - 10 Jan 2004 16:57 GMT Charles Riggs filted:
>>Or practicality: shaving is a pain, both literally and figuratively. >>When I grew a beard I figured I could get an extra 16 hours of sleep >>per year. > >Unfortunately, I have to use those 16 hours for trimming it. On the up side, you no longer spend any of your disposable income on bubble gum....r
Ray Heindl - 10 Jan 2004 21:45 GMT >>Or practicality: shaving is a pain, both literally and >>figuratively. When I grew a beard I figured I could get an extra >>16 hours of sleep per year. > > Unfortunately, I have to use those 16 hours for trimming it. True, but trimming needn't be done first thing in the morning, before going to work. At least, I never did so. So trimming doesn't cut into sleep time.
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Charles Riggs - 11 Jan 2004 05:43 GMT >>>Or practicality: shaving is a pain, both literally and >>>figuratively. When I grew a beard I figured I could get an extra [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >going to work. At least, I never did so. So trimming doesn't cut into >sleep time. Neither does shaving, for me, although I must shave even though I keep a beard. I trim and shave, sometimes, when I think I'll be meeting people I know during the next several hours, or if I want to look respectable to a bank manager I don't know -- otherwise I don't generally bother.
Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a three-day-old beard?
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Ray Heindl - 11 Jan 2004 22:08 GMT >>True, but trimming needn't be done first thing in the morning, >>before going to work. At least, I never did so. So trimming [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a > three-day-old beard? I thought that was the Don Johnson look, but I don't know its current inness or outness.
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Tony Cooper - 11 Jan 2004 22:49 GMT >>>True, but trimming needn't be done first thing in the morning, >>>before going to work. At least, I never did so. So trimming [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >I thought that was the Don Johnson look, but I don't know its current >inness or outness. Judging by the males that appear on David Letterman and Jay Leno's show, yes. Evidently, the modish thing to do is to take a great deal of care to look as if you took no care about your looks.
I recently purchased a new leather "bomber" style jacket. It's been cold enough here in Florida to wear one almost daily. However, it warms up in the afternoon and the jacket becomes uncomfortably warm.
This type of jacket is often seen on guests of Dave and Jay. Every time I see someone wearing one, though, I think of how hot it must be under the studio lights and think they must be sweating like pigs. Fashion is a cruel master.
R J Valentine - 12 Jan 2004 03:41 GMT ... } This type of jacket is often seen on guests of Dave and Jay. Every } time I see someone wearing one, though, I think of how hot it must be } under the studio lights and think they must be sweating like pigs. } Fashion is a cruel master.
I think Dave keeps his studio (The Ed Sullivan Theater) down around forty or fifty degrees (practically Florida weather). I don't know about Jay.
 Signature R. J. Valentine <mailto:arjay@wicked.smart.net> Fahrenheit
R H Draney - 12 Jan 2004 04:19 GMT R J Valentine filted:
>... >} This type of jacket is often seen on guests of Dave and Jay. Every [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >I think Dave keeps his studio (The Ed Sullivan Theater) down around forty >or fifty degrees (practically Florida weather). I don't know about Jay. Dave's penchant for keeping the theatre cold is legendary...when asked about it, he often says it's to "keep the comedy fresh"...whatever the official reason, it's often the source of additional entertainment when someone like (say) Cameron Diaz comes on the show dressed in such a way that viewers can *see* how cold it is....r
Tony Cooper - 12 Jan 2004 04:37 GMT >... >} This type of jacket is often seen on guests of Dave and Jay. Every [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >I think Dave keeps his studio (The Ed Sullivan Theater) down around forty >or fifty degrees (practically Florida weather). I don't know about Jay. If that's the case, then the bimbo guests must freeze. I wouldn't think this would be right, though. We'd see goosebumps on the bumpy things.
R J Valentine - 12 Jan 2004 06:10 GMT } On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:41:49 -0000, R J Valentine <rj@smart.net> } wrote: } }>... }>} This type of jacket is often seen on guests of Dave and Jay. Every }>} time I see someone wearing one, though, I think of how hot it must be }>} under the studio lights and think they must be sweating like pigs. }>} Fashion is a cruel master. }> }>I think Dave keeps his studio (The Ed Sullivan Theater) down around forty }>or fifty degrees (practically Florida weather). I don't know about Jay. } } If that's the case, then the bimbo guests must freeze. I wouldn't } think this would be right, though. We'd see goosebumps on the bumpy } things.
Only if we look carefully. You can take it for granite, though.
 Signature R. J. Valentine <mailto:arjay@wicked.smart.net>
Ray Heindl - 12 Jan 2004 21:44 GMT >>I thought that was the Don Johnson look, but I don't know its >>current inness or outness. > > Judging by the males that appear on David Letterman and Jay Leno's > show, yes. Does that mean "yes, it's in", or "yes, it's out"?
> Evidently, the modish thing to do is to take a great > deal of care to look as if you took no care about your looks. Sounds a bit metrosexualish to me. Or maybe suburbosexualish.
> I recently purchased a new leather "bomber" style jacket. It's > been cold enough here in Florida to wear one almost daily. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > it must be under the studio lights and think they must be sweating > like pigs. Fashion is a cruel master. They might have tubes with chilled water running through them, like NASA's space underwear.
Studio lights aren't as hot as they used to be. As I understand it, many of them are either fluorescent or metal halide, neither of which puts out near as much heat as the old incandescent ones. I expect that Letterman and Leno could afford state-of-the-art lighting.
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Raymond S. Wise - 13 Jan 2004 00:02 GMT > >>I thought that was the Don Johnson look, but I don't know its > >>current inness or outness. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > puts out near as much heat as the old incandescent ones. I expect that > Letterman and Leno could afford state-of-the-art lighting. It was very often pointed out by David Letterman and his guests that it is cold in his studio during taping. I haven't heard anyone make mention of it recently, however, and I never did find out what the reason was for its being cold. That the stage lights were extremely hot would serve as a possible explanation, although I got the impression that people up on stage felt cold as well.
 Signature Raymond S. Wise Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
Maria Conlon - 13 Jan 2004 08:22 GMT > Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a > three-day-old beard? That's one style I never particularly liked. I could generally tell the difference between an actual three-day beard and the not-very-cheap imitation, but only if I bothered to look for more than a couple of seconds.
(Well, you asked, and you didn't specify "young" ladies, you know.)
 Signature Maria Conlon Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.
Louisa Hennessy - 13 Jan 2004 11:07 GMT >> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a >> three-day-old beard? I like that look, it's very rakish.
 Signature Louisa Essex, England, Europe
Sara Lorimer - 13 Jan 2004 18:27 GMT > >> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a > >> three-day-old beard? > > I like that look, it's very rakish. Wait wait wait, these are two different things. There's the George Michael look, which involves carefullly trimming the beard to look like it's three days old and shaving the cheeks and neck (witness <http://www.wmmx.com/george%20michael.jpg>, the horror, the horror...). Then there's just not bothering to shave for three days.
 Signature SML
ess el five six zero at columbia dot edu <http://pirate-women.com>
Louisa Hennessy - 13 Jan 2004 18:55 GMT >> >> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a >> >> three-day-old beard? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] ><http://www.wmmx.com/george%20michael.jpg>, the horror, the horror...). >Then there's just not bothering to shave for three days. I like them both. I think George looks pretty damned groovy in that pic, and I like a bit of stubble too.
 Signature Louisa Essex, England, Europe
Charles Riggs - 14 Jan 2004 04:12 GMT >>> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a >>> three-day-old beard? > >I like that look, it's very rakish. I'll keep that in mind, Louisa, when not shaving this morning.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Reinhold (Rey) Aman - 14 Jan 2004 07:55 GMT Louisa Hennessy wrote:
> >>> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? > >>> You know: a three-day-old beard?
> I like that look, it's very rakish. A three-day-old beard is also very rakish in the "garden rake" sense. I take it that you have never experienced cunnilingus with an unshaven chap. The stubbles rake and scrape your tender inner thighs, which turn red and make you walk funny for a week.
 Signature Dr. Reinhold (Rey) Aman Just trying to help, as always
Charles Riggs - 14 Jan 2004 04:12 GMT >> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a >> three-day-old beard? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >imitation, but only if I bothered to look for more than a couple of >seconds. Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown.
>(Well, you asked, and you didn't specify "young" ladies, you know.) At this stage I can't be all that fussy.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Maria Conlon - 14 Jan 2004 05:31 GMT >>> Is that George Michael look still in with the ladies? You know: a >>> three-day-old beard? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown. To explain my terms: The "not-very-cheap imitation" of an actual three-day beard would be the groomed three-day beard. The "actual three-day beard" would just be three days' worth of beard, ungroomed.
>> (Well, you asked, and you didn't specify "young" ladies, you know.) > > At this stage I can't be all that fussy. "Mature" is better, in any event.
 Signature Maria Conlon Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.
Ray Heindl - 14 Jan 2004 21:37 GMT >> Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown.
> To explain my terms: The "not-very-cheap imitation" of an actual > three-day beard would be the groomed three-day beard. The "actual > three-day beard" would just be three days' worth of beard, ungroomed. How does one groom such a short beard? Or do you mean shaving a longer beard short so it looks like a 3-day stubble?
> "Mature" is better, in any event. The first time I got my hair cut after growing a beard, the barber looks at me and says "It makes you look older." Then he quickly backpedaled with "I mean, more mature."
 Signature Ray Heindl (remove the Xs to reply)
Maria Conlon - 15 Jan 2004 00:55 GMT >>> Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > How does one groom such a short beard? Well, tidy it up a bit, or have the barber tidy it up, especially around the edges. Factor: Not all beards or parts of beards grow at the same pace.
>......Or do you mean shaving a > longer beard short so it looks like a 3-day stubble? I guess that could work, too. I don't know. I just think a natural three-day beard isn't very attractive without a little work being done.
 Signature Maria Conlon Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.
Charles Riggs - 15 Jan 2004 01:36 GMT >>>> Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >the edges. Factor: Not all beards or parts of beards grow at the same >pace. Barbers, even the female ones I prefer, won't do a better job than the wearer himself, once he is practiced at it. It isn't difficult: simply shave to create a regularly curved, well-defined transition from skin to hair, above and below the beard, but it must be done with a degree of precision. Even a three-day beard looks straggly if not 'coiffured'.
>>......Or do you mean shaving a >> longer beard short so it looks like a 3-day stubble? > >I guess that could work, too. I don't know. That's a very hairy thing to attempt. I don't recommend it unless one has an electric razor with the proper attachment for the job.
>I just think a natural >three-day beard isn't very attractive without a little work being done. Dead right.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Spehro Pefhany - 15 Jan 2004 01:48 GMT >>>> Huh? Why would anyone fake a beard? Hair is free and easily grown. >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >I guess that could work, too. I don't know. I just think a natural >three-day beard isn't very attractive without a little work being done. I thought clippers were the answer to perfecting the "Yasser Arafat" look.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
 Signature "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Michael Hamm - 06 Jan 2004 22:35 GMT > Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a > mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject > heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get > mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, > are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? I've always read it as a laugh, of the evil-villain sort. ("Bwahahahaha! I will send more suicide bombers into densely populated areas -- *then* we'll drive them into the sea! Bwahahahaha!")
Michael Hamm Since mid-September of 2003, AM, Math, Wash. U. St. Louis I've been erasing too much UBE. msh210@math.wustl.edu Of a reply, then, if you have been cheated, http://math.wustl.edu/~msh210/ Likely your mail's by mistake been deleted.
Lars Eighner - 06 Jan 2004 22:52 GMT In our last episode, <btfd75$gcf$1@newsreader.wustl.edu>, the lovely and talented Michael Hamm broadcast on alt.usage.english:
>> Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a >> mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject >> heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get >> mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, >> are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying?
> I've always read it as a laugh, of the evil-villain sort. ("Bwahahahaha! > I will send more suicide bombers into densely populated areas -- *then* > we'll drive them into the sea! Bwahahahaha!") I first found it in Final Fantasy IV(?) in which the evil Kefka goes on like that for several screens.
 Signature Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/ There is a set of religious, or rather moral, writings which teach that virtue is the certain road to happiness, and vice to misery in this world. A very wholesome and comfortable doctrine, and to which we have but one objection, namely, that it is not true. --Henry Fielding
Brian Wickham - 06 Jan 2004 23:19 GMT >Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a >mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject >heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get >mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, >are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? Fiendish laughter. You can hear examples used by Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies, and by Kang the ET monster on "The Simpsons".
Brian Wickham
Steve Hayes - 07 Jan 2004 07:28 GMT >Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a >mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject >heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get >mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, >are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? Much the same as ROTFLMAO, I should imagine.
 Signature Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
Mingmong - 08 Jan 2004 01:05 GMT > Every once in a while, somebody responds to a newsgroup posting with a > mixture of labial consonants & open vowels, of which the subject > heading of this posting contains one example. (Often, m's & p's get > mixed in as well as b's & w's.) What sound, in the nonverbal world, > are such strings intended to suggest? Sputtering? Vomiting? Crying? It's a guffaw - the BWA is the slight attempt to suppress laughter from bursting out, and the hahaha is the irrepressible laughter bursting forth. Generally it's a type of ridicule. The is also the variation MUHAHAHAHA which is the mock-villainous laughter of the cartoon villain, with the implied meaning "ain't I evil?"
Mingmong
|
|
|