Do ALL sentences need subject, verb, object?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Can you still buy - 09 Jan 2004 05:55 GMT The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only object and verb!
MC - 09 Jan 2004 07:18 GMT > The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only object and > verb! OK. I'll bite.
How do you reckon '"Jesus"' (or 'Jesus' for that matter) is an object and not the subject?
Can you still buy - 09 Jan 2004 06:56 GMT > .. is an object and not the subject? Sorry, "object" (English) = "subjektiv" (Norwegian)
Simon R. Hughes - 09 Jan 2004 08:14 GMT >> .. is an object and not the subject? > > Sorry, "object" (English) = "subjektiv" (Norwegian) Does not.
"Jesus wept" consists of a subject (Norwegian "subjekt") and a verbal (Norwegian "verbal"). The verse (John 11:35) in Norwegian reads "Jesus gråt."
Norwegian "subjektiv" = English "subjective".
I'm not sure why you brought in the Norwegian, though.
 Signature Simon R. Hughes
david56 - 09 Jan 2004 11:47 GMT a57998.not.this.bit@yahoo.no spake thus:
> >> .. is an object and not the subject? > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I'm not sure why you brought in the Norwegian, though. He seems to be in Sweden. Hmmm, that doesn't help, though.
 Signature David =====
Jim Ward - 09 Jan 2004 18:07 GMT > How do you reckon '"Jesus"' (or 'Jesus' for that matter) is an object > and not the subject? If Jesus is God, can't he be both object and subject?
MC - 09 Jan 2004 18:24 GMT > > How do you reckon '"Jesus"' (or 'Jesus' for that matter) is an object > > and not the subject? > > If Jesus is God, can't he be both object and subject? That recalls David Frost's response when asked if he thought Queen Elizabeth would make a good interview subject: "The Queen is not a subject."
DE781 - 09 Jan 2004 20:56 GMT MC:
>That recalls David Frost's response when asked if he thought Queen >Elizabeth would make a good interview subject: "The Queen is not a >subject." But, she *is* a c.nt, as we all already concluded.
Pat Durkin - 09 Jan 2004 23:06 GMT > MC: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > But, she *is* a c.nt, as we all already concluded. I reserve the use of that word for people I know all too well.
Like you, maybe?
DE781 - 11 Jan 2004 03:38 GMT Durkin:
>> But, she *is* a c.nt, as we all already concluded. > >I reserve the use of that word for people I know all too well. > >Like you, maybe? You think I'm a c.nt?
Charles Riggs - 10 Jan 2004 05:25 GMT >MC: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >But, she *is* a c.nt, as we all already concluded. What a stupid thing to say. You should have your mouth washed out with soap, whippersnapper.
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
R H Draney - 09 Jan 2004 19:40 GMT Jim Ward filted:
>> How do you reckon '"Jesus"' (or 'Jesus' for that matter) is an object >> and not the subject? > >If Jesus is God, can't he be both object and subject? ObCaptializationConventions: make it "can't He be both object and subject?"...
If one is a pantheist, are all pronouns referring to God reflexive by definition?...r
Charles Riggs - 10 Jan 2004 05:25 GMT >> How do you reckon '"Jesus"' (or 'Jesus' for that matter) is an object >> and not the subject? > >If Jesus is God, can't he be both object and subject? Being the Trinity, isn't He a verb as well?
 Signature Charles Riggs Email address: chriggs¦at¦eircom¦dot¦net
Stewart Gordon - 09 Jan 2004 11:07 GMT While it was 9/1/04 5:55 am throughout the UK, Can you still buy "Spangles"? sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell thus:
> The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only object and > verb! I've seen it said that "I am." is the shortest possible complete sentence. Not quite. But it's the shortest possible complete _statement_.
A command can go even shorter: "Be."
Stewart.
 Signature My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Tony Mountifield - 09 Jan 2004 13:20 GMT > While it was 9/1/04 5:55 am throughout the UK, Can you still buy > "Spangles"? sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I've seen it said that "I am." is the shortest possible complete > sentence. Not quite. No.
> But it's the shortest possible complete _statement_. What is the definition of _statement_?
> A command can go even shorter: "Be." Interesting command to try disobeying :-)
Cheers, Tony
 Signature Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
Evan Kirshenbaum - 09 Jan 2004 17:12 GMT > > A command can go even shorter: "Be." > > Interesting command to try disobeying :-) Anybody got a bodkin?
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |If the human brain were so simple 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |That we could understand it, Palo Alto, CA 94304 |We would be so simple |That we couldn't. kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Mike Lyle - 09 Jan 2004 20:33 GMT > While it was 9/1/04 5:55 am throughout the UK, Can you still buy > "Spangles"? sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Stewart. Go!
Mike.
nmstevens - 10 Jan 2004 04:10 GMT > > While it was 9/1/04 5:55 am throughout the UK, Can you still buy > > "Spangles"? sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Mike. Of course, exclamations and questions, can achieve the ultimate in shortness.
I? I!!
NMS
Mark Brader - 10 Jan 2004 10:00 GMT Mike Lyle:
>>> I've seen it said that "I am." is the shortest possible complete >>> sentence. Not quite. ... >>> >>> A command can go even shorter: "Be." Stewart Gordon:
>> Go! N.M. Stevens:
> Of course, exclamations and questions, can achieve the ultimate in shortness. > > I? I!! !
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto |"--", Paul said, and then repeated it for emphasis. msb@vex.net | --Spider Robinson, "Lifehouse"
My "!" in this article is in the public domain.
Jim Ward - 09 Jan 2004 18:08 GMT > The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only object and > verb! Wow!
Dr. Jai Maharaj - 09 Jan 2004 19:14 GMT In article <btlj7s$l2v$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "Can you still buy \"Spangles\"?" <john.smith@micro$oft.com> posted:
> The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only object and > verb! *---===== English is Munglish =====---*
Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti
Carter Jefferson - 09 Jan 2004 20:35 GMT >In article <btlj7s$l2v$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, > "Can you still buy \"Spangles\"?" <john.smith@micro$oft.com> posted: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >http://www.mantra.com/jai >Om Shanti Nope. I'm sure it was a mere slip of your pen, but it's *subject* and verb.
Carter Jefferson carterj98@mindspring.com http://carterj.homestead.com/
Dr. Jai Maharaj - 09 Jan 2004 20:53 GMT In article <e34uvvsj2aohrq8mdih4rdjbndu0p2m09d@4ax.com>, carterj98@mindspring.com posted:
>> In article <btlj7s$l2v$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, >> "Can you still buy \"Spangles\"?" <john.smith@micro$oft.com> posted: >>> >>> The shortest complete sentence in the bible is "Jesus wept." Only >>> object and verb!
>> *---===== English is Munglish =====---* >> Jai Maharaj
> Nope. I'm sure it was a mere slip of your pen, but it's *subject* > and verb. > Carter Jefferson Forwarded message from: david56 <bass.c.voice@ntlworld.com> follows:
> a57998.not.this.bit@yahoo.no spake thus: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > He seems to be in Sweden. Hmmm, that doesn't help, though. > David *---===== English is Munglish =====---*
Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti
DE781 - 09 Jan 2004 20:57 GMT >*---===== English is Munglish =====---* As is yo momma's chocha.
|
|
|