In our last episode,
<aa575f14.0401130043.60061221@posting.google.com>, the lovely and
talented skatty broadcast on alt.usage.english:
> From a review on "Mona Lisa Smile"
> The solid cast does what it can with the cut-and-dried material.
> Maggie Gyllenhaal is _the_ self-destructive party girl; Julia
> Stiles, _the_ smart girl who stifles her own ambitions for
> convention's sake; Marcia Gay Harden, _the_ prissy, pathetic
> professor of poise and elocution, and Dominic West, _the_
> womanizing Italian prof our heroine takes as a temporary lover.
> Why the "the"s? I would expect "a"s, because all those characters
> are mentioned here for the first time, but actually I think I see
> "the" more often "a" in contexts of this kind. What nuance do
> they add that "a"s wouldn't?
In this context, "the" implies the characters are trite. "Cut-and-dried
material" in the first sentence, which happens to be the topic sentence,
might give you a clue. "A" self-destructive party girl might be one
of several such possible characters, but by using "the" the critic
claims this is much the same stereotypic party girl that we have
seen in many other motion pictures, dramas, or novels.
"The" does not always have this implication. In other cases it
may simply be the most appropriate article. "William Howard played
the brother," for example, means that there was only one brother
of the principal and William Howard played that part. In many
kinds of drama and fiction there are certain parts which are
necessary for the genre. A detective story will have a detective
(although possibly not a professional one), and in describing such
a story you might begin speaking of "the detective" without necessarily
meaning that the character lacks orginality. When the detective is
a consulting detective or a nosey old woman it almost always is the
case that principal police officer is a vainglorious moron, so if
you continue to describe such a story and mention "the bumbling
chief inspector" you are likely to mean to imply that the character
is something of a stereotype.
Unless you are very familiar with a genre, you may not know what
the critic means to imply, which is why the topic sentence in the
example you provided is so useful.

Signature
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/
There is no subject so old that something new cannot be said about it.
--Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky
skatty - 14 Jan 2004 14:47 GMT
<snip>
> Unless you are very familiar with a genre, you may not know what
> the critic means to imply, which is why the topic sentence in the
> example you provided is so useful.
Thanks for the clear explanation!
skatty