Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

$4.29

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nick - 14 Jan 2004 19:39 GMT
In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29
other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four
twenty-nine'?
Pat Durkin - 14 Jan 2004 20:22 GMT
> In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29
> other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four
> twenty-nine'?

Yes.  Also, "four bucks" (plus the 29 cents.)
Bob G - 14 Jan 2004 20:26 GMT
>In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29
>other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four
>twenty-nine'?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
We are a free nation and therefore we can say just about anything we want
without fear of reprisal.

Of course, we may not shout "Fire!" in a theater without cause, or slander
people.

But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways you mention. The last
expression is OK within the proper context, as, for instance, if you're telling
your customer the price of your merchandise. Otherwise, it could be interpreted
as the time of day and even the month and day of the year.

Bob G
Armond Perretta - 14 Jan 2004 20:45 GMT
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> We are a free nation and therefore we can say just about anything
> we want without fear of reprisal.

Watchit, buddo.

Signature

Good luck and good sailing.
s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat
http://kerrydeare.tripod.com

Adrian Bailey - 15 Jan 2004 02:04 GMT
> But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways

Dare I suggest there's a mistake here?

Adrian
Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 02:13 GMT
>> But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways
>
> Dare I suggest there's a mistake here?

Go ahead -- I'll back you.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/  

Maria Conlon - 15 Jan 2004 17:19 GMT
>>> But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways
>>
>> Dare I suggest there's a mistake here?
>
> Go ahead -- I'll back you.

Ditto. Any of you two.

Signature

Maria Conlon
Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.

james - 15 Jan 2004 00:34 GMT
>In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29

In real life, it's perceived as stodgy to say "one hundred fourteen
dollars", and less formal to say "a hundred and fourteen dollars."

"and" in this case is a schwa-n.  Hundred'n fourteen dollars.

You'll be understood regardless.  Everywhere I've been in the US,
that is, just about everywhere, you would expect "four twenty-nine"
in most cash-transaction situations.  The only exception is the case
where "four twenty-nine" could reasonably be confused with "four hundred
twenty-nine dollars."

Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars",
"One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed
variations, somewhat dependent on the writer's generation and whether
the check is being written by hand or printed by machine.

James "Two Fifty" M.
Maria Conlon - 15 Jan 2004 17:19 GMT
> Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars",
> "One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed
> variations, somewhat dependent on the writer's generation and whether
> the check is being written by hand or printed by machine.

"Four and 29/100 Dollars," I would think. Also: "One hundred fourteen
and no/100 Dollars."

I'm not sure whether using "/00" rather than "/100" could be called a
"variation"; "/00" would seem to be an error.

However, usage is king, and there are definitely variations abounding
out there when writing sums/numbers.

Signature

Maria Conlon
Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.

Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 18:56 GMT
>> Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars",
>> "One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'm not sure whether using "/00" rather than "/100" could be called a
> "variation"; "/00" would seem to be an error.

Well, I'd never write the "/00" version, as it makes no sense, but I'm sure
that others use it, and it works.  The "00/XX" version is total nonsense,
the way I see it.

> However, usage is king, and there are definitely variations abounding
> out there when writing sums/numbers.

Right.  For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a small and
underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write "XX/100" (yes, I
write exes).  It's just a habit, and it makes alterations quite difficult,
not that it would really matter if someone changed those small amounts.  It
could cause me to chase the error, though, and to waste my time doing so.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/

Mark Raymond - 15 Jan 2004 22:46 GMT
[snip]

> Right.  For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a small and
> underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write "XX/100" (yes, I
> write exes).  It's just a habit, and it makes alterations quite difficult,
> not that it would really matter if someone changed those small amounts.  It
> could cause me to chase the error, though, and to waste my time doing so.

When I write cheques for whole numbers of dollars (increasingly more
valuable ones,  these days,  I'm pleased to add - the dollars,  not
the cheques),  the text section ends with the word "only",  eg
"fourteen dollars only".   If I were to write "XX/100",  it wouldn't
be a text-only section,  now,  would it?!

Mark@work
Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 23:06 GMT
>> Right.  For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a
>> small and underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> "fourteen dollars only".   If I were to write "XX/100",  it wouldn't
> be a text-only section,  now,  would it?!

I didn't write "text-only", did I?  I try to conform to the usual format for
writing the hundredths of a dollar, even for the whole-dollar amounts.

Your method is fine, of course, and many people use it.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/

Evan Kirshenbaum - 15 Jan 2004 23:24 GMT
> > Right.  For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a
> > small and underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> dollars only".  If I were to write "XX/100", it wouldn't be a
> text-only section, now, would it?!

I presume that your checks don't come with the word "dollars" printed
on them (following the blank) as ours do.   Ours say  "Pay to the
order of ___________ ___________ dollars".

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |In the beginning, there were no
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |reasons, there were only causes.
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |                   Daniel Dennet

   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.