$4.29
|
|
Thread rating:  |
nick - 14 Jan 2004 19:39 GMT In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29 other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four twenty-nine'?
Pat Durkin - 14 Jan 2004 20:22 GMT > In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29 > other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four > twenty-nine'? Yes. Also, "four bucks" (plus the 29 cents.)
Bob G - 14 Jan 2004 20:26 GMT >In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29 >other than 'four dollars and twentry-nine cents' and 'four >twenty-nine'? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- We are a free nation and therefore we can say just about anything we want without fear of reprisal.
Of course, we may not shout "Fire!" in a theater without cause, or slander people.
But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways you mention. The last expression is OK within the proper context, as, for instance, if you're telling your customer the price of your merchandise. Otherwise, it could be interpreted as the time of day and even the month and day of the year.
Bob G
Armond Perretta - 14 Jan 2004 20:45 GMT > ----------------------------------------------------------- > We are a free nation and therefore we can say just about anything > we want without fear of reprisal. Watchit, buddo.
 Signature Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com
Adrian Bailey - 15 Jan 2004 02:04 GMT > But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways Dare I suggest there's a mistake here?
Adrian
Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 02:13 GMT >> But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways > > Dare I suggest there's a mistake here? Go ahead -- I'll back you.
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) www.geocities.com/opus731/
Maria Conlon - 15 Jan 2004 17:19 GMT >>> But yes, you can say $4.29 in either of the three ways >> >> Dare I suggest there's a mistake here? > > Go ahead -- I'll back you. Ditto. Any of you two.
 Signature Maria Conlon Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.
james - 15 Jan 2004 00:34 GMT >In the States, can we say 'four dollars twenty-nine cents' for $4.29 In real life, it's perceived as stodgy to say "one hundred fourteen dollars", and less formal to say "a hundred and fourteen dollars."
"and" in this case is a schwa-n. Hundred'n fourteen dollars.
You'll be understood regardless. Everywhere I've been in the US, that is, just about everywhere, you would expect "four twenty-nine" in most cash-transaction situations. The only exception is the case where "four twenty-nine" could reasonably be confused with "four hundred twenty-nine dollars."
Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars", "One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed variations, somewhat dependent on the writer's generation and whether the check is being written by hand or printed by machine.
James "Two Fifty" M.
Maria Conlon - 15 Jan 2004 17:19 GMT > Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars", > "One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed > variations, somewhat dependent on the writer's generation and whether > the check is being written by hand or printed by machine. "Four and 29/100 Dollars," I would think. Also: "One hundred fourteen and no/100 Dollars."
I'm not sure whether using "/00" rather than "/100" could be called a "variation"; "/00" would seem to be an error.
However, usage is king, and there are definitely variations abounding out there when writing sums/numbers.
 Signature Maria Conlon Please send any email to the Hot Mail address.
Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 18:56 GMT >> Proper bank usage, e.g., on checks, is "Four and 29/00 Dollars", >> "One hundred fourteen and 00/XX Dollars", with numerous allowed [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I'm not sure whether using "/00" rather than "/100" could be called a > "variation"; "/00" would seem to be an error. Well, I'd never write the "/00" version, as it makes no sense, but I'm sure that others use it, and it works. The "00/XX" version is total nonsense, the way I see it.
> However, usage is king, and there are definitely variations abounding > out there when writing sums/numbers. Right. For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a small and underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write "XX/100" (yes, I write exes). It's just a habit, and it makes alterations quite difficult, not that it would really matter if someone changed those small amounts. It could cause me to chase the error, though, and to waste my time doing so.
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) www.geocities.com/opus731/
Mark Raymond - 15 Jan 2004 22:46 GMT [snip]
> Right. For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a small and > underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write "XX/100" (yes, I > write exes). It's just a habit, and it makes alterations quite difficult, > not that it would really matter if someone changed those small amounts. It > could cause me to chase the error, though, and to waste my time doing so. When I write cheques for whole numbers of dollars (increasingly more valuable ones, these days, I'm pleased to add - the dollars, not the cheques), the text section ends with the word "only", eg "fourteen dollars only". If I were to write "XX/100", it wouldn't be a text-only section, now, would it?!
Mark@work
Skitt - 15 Jan 2004 23:06 GMT >> Right. For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a >> small and underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I write [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > "fourteen dollars only". If I were to write "XX/100", it wouldn't > be a text-only section, now, would it?! I didn't write "text-only", did I? I try to conform to the usual format for writing the hundredths of a dollar, even for the whole-dollar amounts.
Your method is fine, of course, and many people use it.
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) www.geocities.com/opus731/
Evan Kirshenbaum - 15 Jan 2004 23:24 GMT > > Right. For even dollar amounts, in the numbers section I write a > > small and underlined pair of zeroes, and in the text section I [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > dollars only". If I were to write "XX/100", it wouldn't be a > text-only section, now, would it?! I presume that your checks don't come with the word "dollars" printed on them (following the blank) as ours do. Ours say "Pay to the order of ___________ ___________ dollars".
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |In the beginning, there were no 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |reasons, there were only causes. Palo Alto, CA 94304 | Daniel Dennet
kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
|
|
|