Thanks John for your answer!
>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> The idea that a 'user supports a bit rate' sounds wrong. A user
> connection could do that. Still, A and B sound alright.
You have right, but I have thought the link/connection on which the user
is connected.
> I There is only one user connection, which supports selectable bit
> rates (how many can there be?).
Any number of bit rates, but always more than two bit rates.
Are the follwing correct for this case?
Ia. the user bit rates (attributive)
Ib. the user's bit rates (possessive)
> II This one doesn't make sense- why would each user have a unique bit
> rate?
Why not? Suppose the case where there are two users connected in the
internet
and one of them is downloading a big program and the second one is
reading the news. To have the best usage of the link to one of them
we assign for instance 5 Mbps (Mega-bit per second) and to another
one 0.5 Mbps.
> III There are many users, and the user bit rate is independently
> selectable for each.
> Or you could just say "The bit rate is selectable per user".
> --
> john
Thanks again,
Driton
John O'Flaherty - 16 Jan 2004 18:42 GMT
>Thanks John for your answer!
>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>we assign for instance 5 Mbps (Mega-bit per second) and to another
>one 0.5 Mbps.
What you wrote in II would mean that no two users could share the same
bit rate, not just that it could be tailored to each user, or to each
user's current needs. To say that the bit rate could be set
appropriately for each user would be conveyed by the following...
>> III There are many users, and the user bit rate is independently
>> selectable for each.
>> Or you could just say "The bit rate is selectable per user".
--
john