Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Price, quality and satisfaction

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alex Bod - 21 Jan 2004 17:51 GMT
Does the phrase below make some sence? The meaning's weird for me. I suppose
"the best combination of price and quality" can be perceived, but
"satisfaction" doesn't fit the list here. The context is a company's
profile.
*****
...provides the very best combination of price, quality and satisfaction for
its customers
*****
Marc - 21 Jan 2004 19:25 GMT
I'm a buyer by profession and the term makes perfect sense to me.  The
company is targeting a "best value" audience.  They concede that there are
better quality products available but that the increased cost of those
products exceeds the value of the increased quality.
A Rolls Royce Silver Phantom  may be better quality than a 1987 VW Beetle.
But if you are delivering pizzas the VW has a better combination of price
and quality than a Rolls Royce.

Caveat Emptor
Marc

> Does the phrase below make some sence? The meaning's weird for me. I suppose
> "the best combination of price and quality" can be perceived, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> its customers
> *****
Jonathan Miller - 21 Jan 2004 21:02 GMT
> Does the phrase below make some sence? The meaning's weird for me. I suppose
> "the best combination of price and quality" can be perceived, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> its customers
> *****

I suppose it makes some sense.  The truth is, quality really means quality
*for some purpose*.  For one person a quality automobile may mean low
maintenance, for another durability, for a third that it's a babe magnet,
for a fourth comfortable ride, and for the next hundred customers a hundred
different things.  Or even combinations of things.

Satisfaction is usually a result of expectations.  If you buy a Kia (just
for example), you expect it to not be very good because it's so cheap.  If
it turns out to be a nice car, you are ecstatic.  Conversely, if you buy a
Mercedes, you expect it to be excellent just because it's so expensive.  If
the slightest thing goes wrong, you get upset.

So there's a post hoc explanation of why it might make sense.

More likely is that the writer couldn't really think of what he wanted to
say, was up against a deadline, and let something he wasn't really proud of
get by.  But he remembered that you need three (examples, supporting
sentences, good things, etc.).

It is also possible that it's just corporate gobbledygook.  You're not
supposed to actually believe those mission statement thingys, are you?

Jon Miller
Robert Lieblich - 22 Jan 2004 03:18 GMT
> Does the phrase below make some sence? The meaning's weird for me. I suppose
> "the best combination of price and quality" can be perceived, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> its customers
> *****

This is almost a syllepsis.  That is, it's a list of things that
don't quite fit together.  But the sense is still reasonably clear.
A customer wants a good price and good quality, and in the long run
the customer wants to be satisfied with the result of the
transaction.  The real problem comes with
"combination," which implies a trade-off of these three
characteristics -- if we give you a low price, you won't get as much
quality, and you may not be as satisfied as if you'd paid more and
received a higher quality product.

If I were trying to fix this, I'd get rid of "combination" and
modify the list as follows: "We provide low prices, high quality,
and complete satisfaction."  It's all puffery anyway.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Who obviously is not in the ad biz

Alex Bod - 23 Jan 2004 09:42 GMT
Please look at the sentence below. How does it sound? "Complete" is an
adjective here.
*****
Through its experience and partner network, the company provides the very
best combination of price and quality and, ultimately, complete satisfaction
for its customers.
*****
Alec McKenzie - 23 Jan 2004 10:09 GMT
> Please look at the sentence below. How does it sound? "Complete" is an
> adjective here.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> for its customers.
> *****

I would question the use of the word 'ultimately'. To me it suggests "it
could be a long wait, but would be worth it in the end".

Signature

Alec McKenzie
mckenzie@despammed.com

Alex Bod - 23 Jan 2004 10:28 GMT
> I would question the use of the word 'ultimately'. To me it suggests "it
> could be a long wait, but would be worth it in the end".

Thank you for your remark, but could you suggest some other word? I would
like to separate "the very
best combination of price and quality" and "complete satisfaction" in some
way or other.
Alec McKenzie - 23 Jan 2004 10:44 GMT
> > I would question the use of the word 'ultimately'. To me it suggests "it
> > could be a long wait, but would be worth it in the end".
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> for its customers.
> *****

Well, I often find the shorter the word the better, so how about

"...the very best combination of price and quality, with complete
satisfaction..."

Signature

Alec McKenzie
mckenzie@despammed.com

Alex Bod - 23 Jan 2004 10:47 GMT
> "...the very best combination of price and quality, with complete
> satisfaction..."

Nothing could be better! Thanks!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.