In alt.usage.english, Rushtown wrote:
>"Aroo from "x"?
>"I am. aroo?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>"Does that not harm ya?"
>"Nah ha all"
Cork?
>(Don't answer if you're Irish.)
Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.

Signature
Mickwick
Ross Howard - 26 Jan 2004 13:04 GMT
>In alt.usage.english, Rushtown wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
So 1970s, more like. (I trust you are did as you were told and read
*The Rotters' Club*.)
--
Ross Howard
Mickwick - 26 Jan 2004 15:00 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Ross Howard wrote:
>(I trust you are did as you were told and read *The Rotters' Club*.)
Um ... The dog ate my car keys, so I haven't been out much recently.

Signature
Mickwick
Robert Lieblich - 26 Jan 2004 13:27 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Rushtown wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
Might we describe it, YJ fashion, as gay?

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Neither Irish nor (he thinks) gay
Mickwick - 26 Jan 2004 15:00 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Robert Lieblich wrote:
>> Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
>
>Might we describe it, YJ fashion, as gay?
We might, to be sure.

Signature
Mickwick
John Dean - 26 Jan 2004 16:12 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Rushtown wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
Danish is the new Irish.
--
John Dean
Oxford
Mickwick - 29 Jan 2004 19:20 GMT
In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>> Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
>
>Danish is the new Irish.
And Tallinn is the new Prague.

Signature
Mickwick
Robert Lieblich - 30 Jan 2004 01:04 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> And Tallinn is the new Prague.
Skitt will be heartbroken; he was rooting for Riga.
Vagrant thought: Is it tru that the Estonian and Latvian are as
distantly related as English and Spanish?

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Who hasn't even made it to Prague yet -- or Vienna, FTM
Don Aitken - 30 Jan 2004 02:03 GMT
>> In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Vagrant thought: Is it tru that the Estonian and Latvian are as
>distantly related as English and Spanish?
More distantly; Estonian isn't even Indo-European.

Signature
Don Aitken
Mail to the addresses given in the headers is no longer being
read. To mail me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com".
Skitt - 30 Jan 2004 03:29 GMT
>>>> Nobody's Irish these days. Irish is, like, so 1990s.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Skitt will be heartbroken; he was rooting for Riga.
How did you guess?
> Vagrant thought: Is it tru that the Estonian and Latvian are as
> distantly related as English and Spanish?
Yup. Many, many times removed. Now, speaking of the Lithuanians ...

Signature
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/
Simon R. Hughes - 30 Jan 2004 07:25 GMT
>> In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Vagrant thought: Is it tru that the Estonian and Latvian are as
> distantly related as English and Spanish?
Estonian is related to Finnish, Saami, Hungarian, and not a lot
else. These langauges are not Indo-European, as Latvian is.

Signature
Simon R. Hughes