Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Purse for holding coins

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
cyberdude - 18 May 2008 11:09 GMT
Hi,

I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?

Mike
John Dean - 18 May 2008 12:48 GMT
> Hi,
>
> I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
> Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?

I believe I've heard 'coin-purse' but I couldn't say where. In the UK,
'purse' on its own suggests a receptacle for coins with possible capacity
for notes. North American usage of 'purse' is more to do with what
UKoGBaNIians call a handbag so maybe 'coin-purse' is the usage there.
Signature

John "A HANDbag?!?!" Dean
Oxford

Leslie Danks - 18 May 2008 13:56 GMT
> Hi,
>
> I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
> Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?

You could always call it "Eric".

Signature

Les

tony cooper - 18 May 2008 14:02 GMT
>Hi,
>
>I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
>Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?

In the US, it would be a coin purse.  A coin purse would be a small
container used to carry coins in one's pocket.  A coin bag would be a
larger container used by businesses to take coins to the bank.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Glenn Knickerbocker - 18 May 2008 14:42 GMT
>In the US, it would be a coin purse.

Or, more commonly in my experience, a change purse.

¬R                  Blather, Rinse, Repeat.
http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/telecom.html
tony cooper - 18 May 2008 15:29 GMT
>>In the US, it would be a coin purse.
>
>Or, more commonly in my experience, a change purse.

Two different things to me.  A coin purse is a small container* that
is used to hold coins and only coins.  A change purse is larger and
usually has at least two compartments.  Other things from coupons to
currency to credit cards could be stored in the other compartment.

Before someone jumps on this saying that "coins" and "change" are the
same thing, I readily admit that what a person calls this container is
a purely personal thing based on the name that the person is used to
because that's what the containers were called the first time they
saw/used one.

*Container...not a good word for this, but the best I can come up with
at the moment.  Since there is no set design for either a coin purse
or a change purse, they can be anything from cloth to plastic to
leather, and any shape.  They can fold closed or snap closed.  They
can be used to contain coins.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

James Silverton - 18 May 2008 16:16 GMT
tony  wrote  on Sun, 18 May 2008 10:29:51 -0400:

>>> In the US, it would be a coin purse.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> compartments.  Other things from coupons to currency to credit
> cards could be stored in the other compartment.

> Before someone jumps on this saying that "coins" and "change"
> are the same thing, I readily admit that what a person calls
> this container is a purely personal thing based on the name
> that the person is used to because that's what the containers
> were called the first time they saw/used one.

> *Container...not a good word for this, but the best I can come
> up with at the moment.  Since there is no set design for
> either a coin purse or a change purse, they can be anything
> from cloth to plastic to leather, and any shape.  They can
> fold closed or snap closed.  They can be used to contain
> coins.

I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
35mm canister will hold 40 quarters and is this a "purse"? I
don't carry any coin change at the beginning of a day except for
8 quarters for meters. Change accumulated during the day
including the ridiculous pennies goes into a bowl on my
dresser.Once a month, I take the accumulation to my bank's free
counting machine. It used to be surprising how much there was:
about USD40.
Signature


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

tony cooper - 18 May 2008 17:01 GMT
> tony  wrote  on Sun, 18 May 2008 10:29:51 -0400:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
>35mm canister will hold 40 quarters and is this a "purse"?

Not to me.  It's a 35mm canister that is being used to hold coins.   A
coin purse or change purse is a contained designed to hold coins (and
maybe some other small stuff).

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

the Omrud - 18 May 2008 18:01 GMT
>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> coin purse or change purse is a contained designed to hold coins (and
> maybe some other small stuff).

I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking bassoon
reeds.

Signature

David

Mike Lyle - 18 May 2008 21:39 GMT
>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking
> bassoon reeds.

They do have a secondary purpose, though: they're also for writing
letters to the Guardian about what you can use them for.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Roland Hutchinson - 19 May 2008 03:56 GMT
>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> They do have a secondary purpose, though: they're also for writing
> letters to the Guardian about what you can use them for.

What are we going to use to soak bassoon reeds and write to the
Grauniad about when chemical photographic film becomes totally obsolete (or
near enough as makes no nevermind)?

Is the crisis yet upon us?

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Frank ess - 19 May 2008 04:06 GMT
>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Is the crisis yet upon us?

Some of us have been hoarding for twenty years. Hidden in plain sight
as containers for tiny screws, aspirin in a purse, single-dose shampoo
for travel, excetera. Never leave home without one. Or more.

The quarters thing is kind of outside the pocket-change joy of coins
that jingle jangle jingle and accommodate to the palm.

Signature

Frank ess

Oleg Lego - 19 May 2008 05:18 GMT
>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Is the crisis yet upon us?

Better start hoarding the cannisters, and learn about ways of
obtaining film...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_orange/sets/72157603226919391/

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

Roland Hutchinson - 19 May 2008 16:58 GMT
>>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_orange/sets/72157603226919391/

Seems an awful lot of trouble.  Fortunately, we don't actually need to have
the film in order to soak the bassoon reeds or write letters to the editor.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

the Omrud - 19 May 2008 08:59 GMT
>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Is the crisis yet upon us?

We have kept enough canisters to satisfy our requirement for reed
soaking for the rest of our life.  I will leave the future to the next
generation.  Daughter plays the oboe - I will have to ask her what she
uses for soaking her puny and easily-damaged reeds;  perhaps I will have
to leave my remaining canisters to her in my will.

Signature

David

Frances Kemmish - 19 May 2008 16:22 GMT
> We have kept enough canisters to satisfy our requirement for reed
> soaking for the rest of our life.  I will leave the future to the next
> generation.  Daughter plays the oboe - I will have to ask her what she
> uses for soaking her puny and easily-damaged reeds;  perhaps I will have
> to leave my remaining canisters to her in my will.

My daughter's boarding school roommate was (well, still is) an oboist. I
recall the complaints about stepping on bits of whittled reed in the
middle of the night.

My daughter reports that her roommate's reeds were stored in a long
shallow Tupperware container (actually, she said it was "long and
short", but we managed to  get a more accurate description after some
discussion), but she uses the film canisters to store her "in use" reeds
during concerts.

Fran
the Omrud - 19 May 2008 16:27 GMT
>> We have kept enough canisters to satisfy our requirement for reed
>> soaking for the rest of our life.  I will leave the future to the next
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> discussion), but she uses the film canisters to store her "in use" reeds
> during concerts.

There we go.  It's the same all round the world.

Signature

David

Mike Lyle - 19 May 2008 22:55 GMT
[...]

>>> I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking
>>> bassoon reeds.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Is the crisis yet upon us?

The bassoon reeds are going to be the bigger problem. But we could write
to the Grauniad about it. We shall, of course, be able to write to the
Grauniad about what to write to the Grauniad about, so that won't be a
problem at all.

Actually, if they start packing Marmite in little plastic jars ...

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

HVS - 19 May 2008 22:58 GMT
On 19 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

> [...]
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Actually, if they start packing Marmite in little plastic jars
> ...

They've made it squeezy, y'know.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Mike Lyle - 20 May 2008 12:56 GMT
> On 19 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

[...]
>> The bassoon reeds are going to be the bigger problem. But we
>> could write to the Grauniad about it. We shall, of course, be
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> They've made it squeezy, y'know.

Now look what you've done! I deliberately avoided mentioning that, in
order not to upset viewers of a nervous disposition.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

HVS - 20 May 2008 13:03 GMT
On 20 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

>> On 19 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Now look what you've done! I deliberately avoided mentioning
> that, in order not to upset viewers of a nervous disposition.

Anything's fair in the Marmite wars.

(My wife likes it;  guess who doesn't.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Robin Bignall - 26 May 2008 23:26 GMT
>On 20 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>(My wife likes it;  guess who doesn't.)

Me.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

the Omrud - 20 May 2008 23:10 GMT
> On 19 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > able to write to the Grauniad about what to write to the
> > Grauniad about, so that won't be a problem at all.

I watched the woodwind heat of Young Musician of the Year last night.  
No bassoons for some strange reason, but the oboist put her reeds in the
very 35mm film can.

> > Actually, if they start packing Marmite in little plastic jars
> > ...
>
> They've made it squeezy, y'know.

It's pleasing to note that the shelf inches given to the heretical stuff
is reducing.  I don't think people are buying it.

Signature

David
a Hilton

Roland Hutchinson - 19 May 2008 23:01 GMT
> [...]
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Actually, if they start packing Marmite in little plastic jars ...

...we can start writing to the Grauniad about that!  

(If we haven't already.)

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Oleg Lego - 19 May 2008 04:53 GMT
>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>They do have a secondary purpose, though: they're also for writing
>letters to the Guardian about what you can use them for.

They are for blocking the hole in the telescope focuser when a lens is
not in place.

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

John Varela - 19 May 2008 17:53 GMT
>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> They are for blocking the hole in the telescope focuser when a lens is
> not in place.

I've seen them used to represent fuel drums in an HO model railroad layout.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Matthew Huntbach - 19 May 2008 09:58 GMT
>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
>>>> 35mm canister will hold 40 quarters and is this a "purse"?

>>> Not to me.  It's a 35mm canister that is being used to hold coins.
>>> A coin purse or change purse is a contained designed to hold coins
>>> (and maybe some other small stuff).

>> I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking
>> bassoon reeds.

> They do have a secondary purpose, though: they're also for writing
> letters to the Guardian about what you can use them for.

A 35mm canister holds just enough pound coins and 20p coins to do a load
of washing, with spinning and drying at the launderette. Why use a launderette
when there's a washing machine at home? It's what I do on a Saturday morning
while my wife is having her hair done, I quite like just sitting there
surrounded by members of the community, and it's a chance to observe life
and read the Saturday Guardian.

BTW, my wife has her hair done in a place in Burnt Ash Road in Lee,
south-east London, and the launderette I use is just up the road
opposite the Three Cooks Bakery. Sometimes one feels one just has to let
people know these things (non-British readers note - this was the site of
the killing of a teenager just a week ago which has been a big thing in
the news, I would have witnessed it had my washing been done an hour later
than it was).

Matthew Huntbach
the Omrud - 19 May 2008 10:05 GMT
> A 35mm canister holds just enough pound coins and 20p coins to do a load
> of washing, with spinning and drying at the launderette. Why use a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> surrounded by members of the community, and it's a chance to observe life
> and read the Saturday Guardian.

Every week?  She has her hair done every week?  What opulent lives are
lived by those in the South.

I think I would have to drive 3 miles or more to find a launderette.
Like phone boxes, there wouldn't be much call for them round here.

> BTW, my wife has her hair done in a place in Burnt Ash Road in Lee,
> south-east London, and the launderette I use is just up the road
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the news, I would have witnessed it had my washing been done an hour later
> than it was).

It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed by the
mother's measured response.

Signature

David

Matthew Huntbach - 19 May 2008 11:06 GMT
>> A 35mm canister holds just enough pound coins and 20p coins to do a load
>> of washing, with spinning and drying at the launderette. Why use a
>> launderette when there's a washing machine at home? It's what I do on a
>> Saturday morning while my wife is having her hair done, I quite like just
>> sitting there surrounded by members of the community, and it's a chance to
>> observe life and read the Saturday Guardian.

> Every week?  She has her hair done every week?  What opulent lives are lived
> by those in the South.

It's a women's thing. "Hair done" also involves sitting round chatting,
and other women's things. Best not to enquire. "Hair done" for my
wife is a fairly simple procedure compared to "hair done" for African
ladies, which is generally an all-day affair.

> I think I would have to drive 3 miles or more to find a launderette. Like
> phone boxes, there wouldn't be much call for them round here.

There still seem to be quite a few round where I live, and they can't all
be patronised by people like myself who just like the idea of being a
bit communal.

>> BTW, my wife has her hair done in a place in Burnt Ash Road in Lee,
>> south-east London, and the launderette I use is just up the road opposite
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> the news, I would have witnessed it had my washing been done an hour later
>> than it was).

> It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed by the
> mother's measured response.

Indeed.

Matthew Huntbach
Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:52 GMT
>It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed by the
>mother's measured response.

If something probably goes without saying, why bother saying it?

Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The roots of
the idiom in speech and informal writing make little sense to me.
Since most speakers and informal writers wouldn't expect to be accused
of lying, why do some of them feel the need to apply it to a routine
statement of fact?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

HVS - 19 May 2008 14:54 GMT
On 19 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote

>> It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed
>> by the mother's measured response.
>
> If something probably goes without saying, why bother saying it?

Ummm...because of that "probably" qualifier that's in there?  That
implies "but there's a remote chance it may not go without saying" in
my version of the language.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 16:59 GMT
>On 19 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>implies "but there's a remote chance it may not go without saying" in
>my version of the language.

That's a good point, Harvey. I had a good laugh just now, too. Tnx.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

the Omrud - 19 May 2008 15:14 GMT
>> It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed by the
>> mother's measured response.
>
> If something probably goes without saying, why bother saying it?

It's one of those fairly meaningless phrases which oil the wheels of
communication.  Nothing wrong with that.

> Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The roots of
> the idiom in speech and informal writing make little sense to me.
> Since most speakers and informal writers wouldn't expect to be accused
> of lying, why do some of them feel the need to apply it to a routine
> statement of fact?

I use something like that in communication with Japan (usually "Frankly"
or "To be honest".  It communicates very clearly to my colleagues there
that I am about to say something slightly contentious and that I may not
be as diplomatic as usual but that I am not being deliberately rude.

Signature

David

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 17:02 GMT
>>> It probably goes without saying, but I was immensely impressed by the
>>> mother's measured response.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>that I am about to say something slightly contentious and that I may not
>be as diplomatic as usual but that I am not being deliberately rude.

"To be honest" still irks me. Why would an honest man or woman ever
need to say it?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Barbara Bailey - 20 May 2008 19:10 GMT
>>> Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The roots of
>>> the idiom in speech and informal writing make little sense to me.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> "To be honest" still irks me. Why would an honest man or woman ever
> need to say it?

Like Omrud, when I use it, or its siblings "frankly" and "to tell the
truth", it means that I'm going to give a completely honest answer, as
opposed to a socially-conventional half-truth or "white lie." I expect it
to serve as a warning that the answer may not be complimentary or pleasant
to the asker.

"What do you think of my new haircut?"
"Frankly, it isn't *bad*, but it isn't particularly *good*, either."
or
"To tell you the truth, it looks like a poodle."
or
"Honestly? I don't like it."
Chuck Riggs - 21 May 2008 16:42 GMT
>>>> Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The roots of
>>>> the idiom in speech and informal writing make little sense to me.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>or
>"Honestly? I don't like it."  

Don't "white lies" often create more problems than they solve?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

aspasia - 21 May 2008 17:07 GMT
[...]

>Don't "white lies" often create more problems than they solve?

No.  They mostly lubricate the gears of social intercourse.

(wow!  did I really say that??!!)

A white lie *could* create a problem if it encourages or
tacitly permits one's vis-a-vis to pursue a dangerous
or harmful course.  It's to be hoped*  that the speaker
would take that into account.

* I can't!  I just CAN'T use "hopefully" in this sense.

Aspasia
Mike Lyle - 21 May 2008 18:02 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> * I can't!  I just CAN'T use "hopefully" in this sense.

Quite right, too. But I'd rather not use "it's to be hoped" instead of
"I hope" or "I would hope".

White lies are by definition intended to be harmless; so Charles's
objection would fall at the first fence, except that our old enemy the
Law of Unintended Consequences may roar in, with effects ranging from
hilarious to tragic.

I certainly except "white lies" under the definition applied by a person
of my acquaintance who used the expression to mean lies she told to
protect herself!

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

HVS - 21 May 2008 18:18 GMT
On 21 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

>> [...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> White lies are by definition intended to be harmless; so
> Charles's

Is that oy-able?  (Presumably just a slip from days gone by...)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Mike Lyle - 21 May 2008 23:21 GMT
> On 21 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

[...]

>> White lies are by definition intended to be harmless; so
>> Charles's
>
> Is that oy-able?  (Presumably just a slip from days gone by...)

Oh, sorry! "Oy!" accepted, with contrition. "New larger pack! Now with
added contrition!"

(If there's detritus, why isn't there contritus?)
Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Chuck Riggs - 22 May 2008 16:08 GMT
>> On 21 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Oh, sorry! "Oy!" accepted, with contrition. "New larger pack! Now with
>added contrition!"

Nada, but danke.

>(If there's detritus, why isn't there contritus?)

Sadly, I don't do Latin.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Chuck Riggs - 22 May 2008 16:05 GMT
>I certainly except "white lies" under the definition applied by a person
>of my acquaintance who used the expression to mean lies she told to
>protect herself!

Neither that nor any argument justifies immorality. For example, the
"White lies are lies that cause no harm" circular argument, is for
lesser minds than yours.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Mike Lyle - 22 May 2008 17:44 GMT
>> I certainly except "white lies" under the definition applied by a
>> person of my acquaintance who used the expression to mean lies she
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "White lies are lies that cause no harm" circular argument, is for
> lesser minds than yours.

I hope you noted that in the sentence quoted above I had written
"except", not "accept". The behaviour of the person referred to was
often contemptible.

But "White lies are lies that cause no harm"  isn't an argument, but a
partial definition. Of course you may or may not find the definition
accurate. I really don't see how to sustain the position that it's
/immoral/ to tell a lie, any lie, regardless of the reason.

At the extreme, I can't imagine you'd hold with telling the Gestapo
about the Gipsies hidden in next-door's cellar and the Jews in their
attic: telling the truth would in that case be immoral, and lying would
be courageous and virtuous. Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

the Omrud - 22 May 2008 18:33 GMT
> At the extreme, I can't imagine you'd hold with telling the Gestapo
> about the Gipsies hidden in next-door's cellar and the Jews in their
> attic: telling the truth would in that case be immoral, and lying would
> be courageous and virtuous. Coming down to trivial examples, why is it

Did you hear about the play of Anne Frank where the actress was so bad
that when the Nazis came round, the audience shouted "She's in the attic!"

Signature

David

Donna Richoux - 22 May 2008 21:20 GMT
> > At the extreme, I can't imagine you'd hold with telling the Gestapo
> > about the Gipsies hidden in next-door's cellar and the Jews in their
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Did you hear about the play of Anne Frank where the actress was so bad
> that when the Nazis came round, the audience shouted "She's in the attic!"

Yeah, cute, but Snopes (if you believe Snopes!) says it's not true. They
say that versions of this anecdote circulate that are older than any of
the named acresses, and there's never been a theatrical version where
the Nazis were on stage.
 http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/zadora.asp

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

the Omrud - 22 May 2008 22:46 GMT
>>> At the extreme, I can't imagine you'd hold with telling the Gestapo
>>> about the Gipsies hidden in next-door's cellar and the Jews in their
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the Nazis were on stage.
>   http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/zadora.asp

Pity, but I don't think I particularly believed it;  I will however aver
that beauty is truth.

Signature

David

tony cooper - 22 May 2008 20:01 GMT
>>> I certainly except "white lies" under the definition applied by a
>>> person of my acquaintance who used the expression to mean lies she
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>be courageous and virtuous. Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?

What about the classic "Does this dress make me look fat?"?

There is such a difference between husbands and wives in this area.
To the above question, the husband will lie in a heart beat.  However,
if the husband asks the wife "Do I look OK?" when he's chosen an
outfit to go out in, he should be prepared to change clothes.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Mike Lyle - 23 May 2008 12:02 GMT
[...]

> What about the classic "Does this dress make me look fat?"?
>
> There is such a difference between husbands and wives in this area.
> To the above question, the husband will lie in a heart beat.  However,
> if the husband asks the wife "Do I look OK?" when he's chosen an
> outfit to go out in, he should be prepared to change clothes.

Absolutely right. But not only wives. I had a new jacket vetoed (wisely)
by one of my daughters yesterday, and duly took it back to the shop. I'd
be most unlikely to return the service, for fear of domestic discord of
appreciable magnitude.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Chuck Riggs - 23 May 2008 17:30 GMT
>[...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>be most unlikely to return the service, for fear of domestic discord of
>appreciable magnitude.

I  have tried to tell everyone the truth, put as nicely (usually) as I
could manage at the time and I have expected no less in return. It has
been my experience that most people appreciate honesty, even when the
remarks are minor, such as saying "There is a tiny spot of food on
your chin".
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Chuck Riggs - 23 May 2008 17:18 GMT
>Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?

Children, being early versions of ourselves, are anything but stupid.
She'll know you are lying from your body language, if not from knowing
what good cards look like, when you tell her a poorly-drawn card is
pretty. The message you gave her is that it is all right to lie under
some circumstances. Simply put, that is not the message I want to give
anyone.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

HVS - 23 May 2008 17:28 GMT
On 23 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote

>> Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>> immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> not from knowing what good cards look like, when you tell her a
> poorly-drawn card is pretty.

But he didn't say he was telling the child it was "pretty" -- just
that he "likes" it.  It's more in the nature of misleading rather
than lying, as it leaves open what is "liked" about it.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Chuck Riggs - 24 May 2008 14:50 GMT
>On 23 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>that he "likes" it.  It's more in the nature of misleading rather
>than lying, as it leaves open what is "liked" about it.

Nitpicking is a form of obfuscation. Telling it like a man (or a
woman) is always the simplest, and usually the best, way.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

HVS - 24 May 2008 14:56 GMT
On 24 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote

>> On 23 May 2008, Chuck Riggs wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Nitpicking is a form of obfuscation. Telling it like a man (or a
> woman) is always the simplest, and usually the best, way.

I think reading with precision is the simplest, and usually the
best, thing to do before responding, and that it beats assuming
that a response based on sloppy reading will be deciphered
properly.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Lewis - 23 May 2008 17:47 GMT
>>Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>>immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?

> Children, being early versions of ourselves, are anything but stupid.
> She'll know you are lying from your body language, if not from knowing
> what good cards look like, when you tell her a poorly-drawn card is
> pretty. The message you gave her is that it is all right to lie under
> some circumstances. Simply put, that is not the message I want to give
> anyone.

But I'd rather have a badly drawn hand-made card than one with music,
singing, dancing, confetti, and a three piece brass band that was
bought at a Hallmark store.

Wouldn't most people?

Signature

...in the long run there's still time to change the road you're on

aspasia - 23 May 2008 18:12 GMT
>>>Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>>>immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> some circumstances. Simply put, that is not the message I want to give
>> anyone.

You're projecting youradult (specious)  reasoning into the mind of a
child!

There are so many sincere way to thank the child for its precious,
precious efforts!  A smile, a hug, words like "Sweetheart, I
appreciate so much the trouble you took to make this card for me!"

That is the TRUTH!  Not a white lie, not any kind of lie!

Followed by, but not essential:  "Look at that little kitty you drew!
Kind of looks like our cat, doesn't it?!

Or other nice words, picking out an element of the card to
convey that you HAVE studied it all.

What the hell would YOU say?!   "I can't lie to you, dear;  your
poorly-drawn card is not pretty."  Such poisonous words go
deep and have their effect all through the victim's life.

For shame!

>But I'd rather have a badly drawn hand-made card than one with music,
>singing, dancing, confetti, and a three piece brass band that was
>bought at a Hallmark store.
>
>Wouldn't most people?

The line forms here!

Aspasia
tony cooper - 23 May 2008 21:54 GMT
>You're projecting youradult (specious)  reasoning into the mind of a
>child!
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Followed by, but not essential:  "Look at that little kitty you drew!
>Kind of looks like our cat, doesn't it?!

The problem is that the "kitty" was supposed to be an elephant or
something.  Best to say "Look at that lovely drawing!".

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Nell - 24 May 2008 04:48 GMT
tony cooper wrote :

>> You're projecting youradult (specious)  reasoning into the mind of a
>> child!
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> The problem is that the "kitty" was supposed to be an elephant or
> something.  Best to say "Look at that lovely drawing!".

If you misidentify what it is, they look at you like you're stupid that
you couldn't tell what it was.

Nell
Chuck Riggs - 24 May 2008 14:56 GMT
>>>Coming down to trivial examples, why is it
>>>immoral to tell the child you like the home-made birthday card?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Wouldn't most people?

Of course, but wouldn't you prefer a hand-made card that met some, or
even all, of those specifications to one that met none?  Excellence,
however defined, should be encouraged.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Barbara Bailey - 21 May 2008 18:04 GMT
>>>>> Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The
>>>>> roots of the idiom in speech and informal writing make little
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Don't "white lies" often create more problems than they solve?

Some do, many don't. But despite that, in many cases, they are socially
expected, and providing the unvarnished truth instead, with no warning,
can also cause problems. Different problems, usually, but problems
nonetheless. "To tell the truth, "frankly", "honestly" are warning flags
that cost me nothing to use and avoid problems.
Chuck Riggs - 22 May 2008 16:11 GMT
>>>>>> Another often-heard phrase is "To tell you the truth..."  The
>>>>>> roots of the idiom in speech and informal writing make little
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>nonetheless. "To tell the truth, "frankly", "honestly" are warning flags
>that cost me nothing to use and avoid problems.

Please give us an example, Barbara, where "To tell the truth" avoids
problems, social or otherwise.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:22 GMT
<Snip>

>Sometimes one feels one just has to let
>people know these things...

I understand. Take two tablets and apply for dual citizenship at the
American Embassy, in the morning. Tell the officials all about
personal things most Brits would never want to hear, and they'll
accept you as a provisional American str...right away, guaranteed.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Matthew Huntbach - 19 May 2008 14:49 GMT
>> Sometimes one feels one just has to let
>> people know these things...

> I understand. Take two tablets and apply for dual citizenship at the
> American Embassy, in the morning. Tell the officials all about
> personal things most Brits would never want to hear, and they'll
> accept you as a provisional American str...right away, guaranteed.

It's not a particularly personal thing, and actually I was more addressing
Brits who would have heard of this incident in the news.

What happened was that in a quiet suburban street, a 19 year old lad picked
on a 16 year old lad, started acting in a violent way, and within minutes
the 16 year old had bled to death. I was in the very place where this happened,
just an hour before. Other people I know who work around there saw the body
lying in the street, and the blood everywhere. The assistant priest at the
church I go to was called in to anoint the body when the police allowed it
to be moved, some hours later. There does seem to be something in one which
means if one has come close to this sort of thing, one feels the urge to tell
people.

Matthew Huntbach
the Omrud - 19 May 2008 15:15 GMT
> What happened was that in a quiet suburban street, a 19 year old lad picked
> on a 16 year old lad, started acting in a violent way, and within minutes
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> which means if one has come close to this sort of thing, one feels the
> urge to tell people.

Yes, I wonder why that is.  Any psychologists in the room?

Signature

David

Maria C. - 20 May 2008 04:13 GMT
>> What happened was that in a quiet suburban street, a 19 year old lad
>> picked on a 16 year old lad, started acting in a violent way, and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Yes, I wonder why that is.  Any psychologists in the room?

Not that I know of, but I understand what Matthew is saying.

By telling people of certain incidents that have made an impression
because of their proximity to us, I think we are practicing, unknowingly
perhaps, the therapy of working our way through the impact of the
incident, and thus bringing relief of a sort.

I have reacted similarly in the not-too-distant past.

Signature

Maria C.

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 15:25 GMT
>>> Sometimes one feels one just has to let
>>> people know these things...
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>means if one has come close to this sort of thing, one feels the urge to tell
>people.

That's awful, Matthew. When having fun with your post yesterday I
didn't know anything about this crime. The world can be cruel, and it
seems to getting crueler. I apologize for appearing insensitive.
Perhaps I should have, but I didn't know anything about the incident
you were writing about.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Richard Bollard - 27 May 2008 00:52 GMT
>>>> Sometimes one feels one just has to let
>>>> people know these things...
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>Perhaps I should have, but I didn't know anything about the incident
>you were writing about.

Is it really getting crueler or is it that we now have the opportunity
to share stories of the bad things rather more than we did in the
past?
Signature

Richard Bollard
Canberra Australia

To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.

Robin Bignall - 27 May 2008 22:28 GMT
>>>>> Sometimes one feels one just has to let
>>>>> people know these things...
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>to share stories of the bad things rather more than we did in the
>past?

That's a very good question that we've had some threads on in the
past.  Last weekend there were several fatal stabbings
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4011723.ece
and the total for London stands at 14 so far this year according to
the article.  In my almost 69 years I've only met one person who has
been stabbed when "having a go" during a mugging in Paris.  I've never
knowingly met anyone who carried a serious knife (as opposed to a
small penknife) as a matter of course, but if they didn't use it I
wouldn't have known. I can't remember, from my youth, the fear that
people have today about going out at night, and I come from a tough
working-class housing estate in a fairly tough city.  Nottingham was
the first British city in which policemen doing routine patrols
started carrying firearms.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

Mark Brader - 29 May 2008 01:48 GMT
> In my almost 69 years I've only met one person who has
> been stabbed when "having a go" during a mugging in Paris.

I'm guessing that the "when" clause is supposed to be nonrestrictive
despite the punctuation, but even with that, I can't figure out exactly
what "having a go" means here.
Signature

Mark Brader                 "Men are animals."
Toronto                     "What are women?  Plants, birds, fish?"
msb@vex.net                         -- Spider Robinson, "Night of Power"
                           "Definitely birds."
                                   -- Rodney Boyd

Nick - 29 May 2008 06:48 GMT
>> In my almost 69 years I've only met one person who has
>> been stabbed when "having a go" during a mugging in Paris.
>
> I'm guessing that the "when" clause is supposed to be nonrestrictive
> despite the punctuation, but even with that, I can't figure out exactly
> what "having a go" means here.

Intervening to help.
Robin Bignall - 29 May 2008 23:20 GMT
>>> In my almost 69 years I've only met one person who has
>>> been stabbed when "having a go" during a mugging in Paris.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Intervening to help.

In this case, fighting the mugger and getting stabbed in the stomach.
The mugger was a young, wiry Algerian and the muggee was a large and
quite fit German, who ended up in hospital for a couple of months.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

Mark Brader - 30 May 2008 04:03 GMT
Mark Brader:
> > I can't figure out exactly what "having a go" means here.

"Nick":
> Intervening to help.

Thanks.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto   |  "Men!  Give them enough rope and they'll dig
msb@vex.net            |   their own grave."    -- EARTH GIRLS ARE EASY

JF - 31 May 2008 05:00 GMT
>Mark Brader:
>> > I can't figure out exactly what "having a go" means here.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Thanks.

To 'Have a Go' originates from the title of a BBC radio quiz show
compered by Wilfred Pickles in the 1950s. Contestants were invited to
chance their arm and 'have a go'. The term was used by Home Secretary,
Jack Straw, in the 1990s to encourage people to tackle footpads.

Signature

James Follett

Don Aitken - 31 May 2008 07:57 GMT
>>Mark Brader:
>>> > I can't figure out exactly what "having a go" means here.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>chance their arm and 'have a go'. The term was used by Home Secretary,
>Jack Straw, in the 1990s to encourage people to tackle footpads.

I'm sure it goes back further than Straw. The conventional term, at
least in the press, for people who do this is "have a go hero", for
which Google offers more than 17,000 hits, almost all from British
newspaper headlines - a fair number of which report their funerals.

Signature

Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"

JF - 31 May 2008 10:22 GMT
>>>Mark Brader:
>>>> > I can't figure out exactly what "having a go" means here.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>which Google offers more than 17,000 hits, almost all from British
>newspaper headlines - a fair number of which report their funerals.

I'm awfully sorry but I didn't say that Jack Straw was an original user
or even an early user. I cited him because I remember him saying it
therefore I didn't have to go grubbing around hunting for ludicrous
trifling googliods.

I used the Google search motor once and never went near it again.

Signature

James Follett

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 31 May 2008 12:29 GMT
>>>>Mark Brader:
>>>>> > I can't figure out exactly what "having a go" means here.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>I used the Google search motor once and never went near it again.

Using OED's search motor:

   [4.] [a.] Hence (esp. in Journalistic usage)
   have-a-go attrib. phr., that 'has a go'; characterized by a
   courageous, single-handed, and opportunistic display of
   bravery against criminals; plucky, 'gung-ho', intrepid.

   1971 Daily Tel. 14 Apr. 15 (heading) Have-a-go paratrooper
   aids stabbed doctor.

   1986 Sun 17 June 2 (heading) Baby-face gun bandit blinded
   have-a-go hero. [That's the Sun newspaper]

   1987 Telegraph (Brisbane) 25 Feb. 4/1 The have-a-go battler
   has decided to go it alone after his bid to form a new
   political party failed.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Robin Bignall - 26 May 2008 23:24 GMT
>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>They do have a secondary purpose, though: they're also for writing
>letters to the Guardian about what you can use them for.

I knew there must be at least one good reason for not reading the
Guardian.

Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:09 GMT
>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking bassoon
>reeds.

No container is needed, IMO. Coins go directly into the front right
pocket of a man's trousers, where they can be quickly retrieved. FLP,
if left-handed.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

John Kane - 20 May 2008 19:43 GMT
> >> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
> >> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I've explained this before: 35mm film canisters are for soaking bassoon
> reeds.

Nonsense, they are for storing latex gloves in the bicycle saddle bag.

John Kane Kingston ON Canada
Skitt - 20 May 2008 19:51 GMT

>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Nonsense, they are for storing latex gloves in the bicycle saddle bag.

My getaway vehicle is a car.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)
oops

Robin Bignall - 26 May 2008 23:39 GMT
>>>>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>>>>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>My getaway vehicle is a car.

Not for much longer.  You'll soon have to rob something like Fort Knox
just to pay for the gas you use in escaping.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

stremler@rohan.sdsu.edu - 19 May 2008 00:27 GMT
begin  quoting tony cooper <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> :

> >I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
> >meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> coin purse or change purse is a contained designed to hold coins (and
> maybe some other small stuff).

...such as pocket lint.

Signature

--Stewart Stremler--------------------------------stremler@rohan.sdsu.edu--
   The flesh is a worse enemy than the devil himself.  -- Isaac Ambrose

Mark Brader - 19 May 2008 07:22 GMT
James Silverton:
>> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
>> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
>> 35mm canister will hold 40 quarters and is this a "purse"?

Tony Cooper:
> Not to me.  It's a 35mm canister that is being used to hold coins.

Not to me either -- but it's a 35 mm *film* canister that is being
used to hold coins.  "35 mm canister" sounds like it's the dimensions
of the thing.
Signature

Mark Brader               The World Wide Web:
Toronto                   bringing you style over substance since 1993.
msb@vex.net                                             -- Steve Summit

Nick Spalding - 18 May 2008 17:56 GMT
James Silverton wrote, in <WKXXj.6218$%g.4049@trnddc08>
on Sun, 18 May 2008 15:16:06 GMT:

> I have a container for coins that I keep in my car since most
> meters around here will only accept quarters. An old-fashioned
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> counting machine. It used to be surprising how much there was:
> about USD40.

I have a container for coins in my kitchen that most of the inhabitants of
this house have contributed their coppers to for these many years.  I
weighed it recently and it came to just under three kilograms.  One of
these days I am going to cash it in.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

Mike Barnes - 18 May 2008 19:34 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Nick Spalding wrote:
>James Silverton wrote, in <WKXXj.6218$%g.4049@trnddc08>
> on Sun, 18 May 2008 15:16:06 GMT:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>weighed it recently and it came to just under three kilograms.  One of
>these days I am going to cash it in.

Impressive. Mine weighs only 2.3 kilos, but then it is all my own work.
Anything under 10p or 20 cents goes in there.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Glenn Knickerbocker - 21 May 2008 03:22 GMT
> is used to hold coins and only coins.  A change purse is larger and
> usually has at least two compartments.  Other things from coupons to
> currency to credit cards could be stored in the other compartment.

FWIW, that's more the image that "coin purse" conjures for me.  To me, a
change purse is either a single small leather pocket with a bypass-type
clasp on one edge or a flat, hollow rubber oval with a slot along its
major axis (and two holes at one end for a keychain).  I'm sure this is
all highly regional and idiolectal.

¬R
Nell - 21 May 2008 05:04 GMT
Glenn Knickerbocker wrote on 5/20/2008 :
>> is used to hold coins and only coins.  A change purse is larger and
>> usually has at least two compartments.  Other things from coupons to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ¬R

I've always thought of the second as giveaways, generally with
advertising on them.

Nell
HVS - 18 May 2008 18:03 GMT
On 18 May 2008, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote

>> In the US, it would be a coin purse.
>
> Or, more commonly in my experience, a change purse.

I use one all the time, and my wife and I refer to it as a "money
pouch".

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:53 GMT
>On 18 May 2008, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I use one all the time, and my wife and I refer to it as a "money
>pouch".

Can't she have her own?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

irwell - 18 May 2008 18:09 GMT
>Hi,
>
>I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
>Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?
>
>Mike

A back pocket.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Oleg Lego - 19 May 2008 04:53 GMT
>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>A back pocket.

Of all the places to keep something like coins, this one surprises me
the most. When I'm programming a UI, I try to think of all the ways a
person might try to use it, and no matter how many ways I implement,
someone will come up with a way I would not consider in a decade.
Keeping coins in "a back pocket" is only one of many examples of
things I would never think of.

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:57 GMT
>>>Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Keeping coins in "a back pocket" is only one of many examples of
>things I would never think of.

I thought of it and rejected the idea. If placed in a back pocket,
coins would fall out the first time you sat down. It is a ridiculous
place to keep them.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Amethyst Deceiver - 19 May 2008 15:13 GMT
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> coins would fall out the first time you sat down. It is a ridiculous
> place to keep them.

How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

irwell - 19 May 2008 15:43 GMT
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.

Never lost a coin yet from my back pocket, usually have up to $2 worth
in various coinage, the other back pocket contains a Swiss Army cadet
knife, a small flashlight and a magnifying glass.

The two front pockets have a money wallet, a credit card wallet,
a key folder, a comb and a (usually grubby) handkerchief.
Still room to plunge in both hands on cold days,

--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
LFS - 19 May 2008 16:13 GMT
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
> shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.

I read that last sentence far too quickly and conjured up a wonderful
picture of a sort of reverse kangaroo...

How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag! But
only the very slim could emulate your feat.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

the Omrud - 19 May 2008 16:32 GMT
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag! But
> only the very slim could emulate your feat.

You do all know we've done this before, don't you?  Let's see.  Yes, how
time flies.  16th Nov 2002:
http://tinyurl.com/5hm6pt

Signature

David

LFS - 19 May 2008 16:47 GMT
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> time flies.  16th Nov 2002:
> http://tinyurl.com/5hm6pt

How interesting. My handbag contents seem to have changed over the
intervening years. The banana has been replaced by ginger flavoured
oatcakes, the diary and calculator by a PDA and the Rescue Remedy by
ibuprofen tablets. I seem to have lost the sewing kit and a small book
of very difficult sudoku puzzles has crept in.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

the Omrud - 19 May 2008 17:04 GMT
>>>> How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>>>> shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> ibuprofen tablets. I seem to have lost the sewing kit and a small book
> of very difficult sudoku puzzles has crept in.

I'm afraid I'm very predictable.  The contents of my pockets and belt
(well, not contents, but you know what I mean) haven't changed in nearly
6 years, although I have gained a BlackBerry on my belt.  My main key
ring still has eight keys (one of these is the key to my bassoon case,
which I have never locked in 35 years), but I have added a One-Time
Password token and a USB memory.

Signature

David

Evan Kirshenbaum - 19 May 2008 23:43 GMT
> I'm afraid I'm very predictable.  The contents of my pockets and
> belt (well, not contents, but you know what I mean) haven't changed
> in nearly 6 years, although I have gained a BlackBerry on my belt.
> My main key ring still has eight keys (one of these is the key to my
> bassoon case, which I have never locked in 35 years), but I have
> added a One-Time Password token and a USB memory.

Let's see... mine currently has nine keys (two car, two mailbox, two
computer locking cable, one house, one desk, and one equipment shed).
Plus a remote car entry and a "Drop in any mailbox" tag.  My password
token is a credit card with circuitry on it.  The desk key rarely gets
used (the desk itself is unlocked, and most of the file drawers
haven't been unlocked in years).  The shed key will get taken off when
baseball season ends in a couple of weeks.  (We're 3-11 with one more
game to go before the playoffs.)

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |Society in every state is a blessing,
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |but government, even in its best
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |state is but a necessary evil; in its
                                      |worst state, an intolerable one.
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |                  Thomas Paine
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

R J Valentine - 20 May 2008 17:03 GMT
} the Omrud <usenet.omrud@gEXPUNGEmail.com> writes:
...
}> My main key ring still has eight keys (one of these is the key to my
}> bassoon case, which I have never locked in 35 years),
...
} Let's see... mine currently has nine keys (two car, two mailbox, two
} computer locking cable, one house, one desk, and one equipment shed).
...
Just to add to the diversity, I've got a gas-cap key, a garage-freezer
key, a trigger-lock key, and a handcuff key.  I used to carry a key from a
previous car because it happened to open a file cabinet at work, but I
don't like to be unreasonable about the stuff I carry (I found that I had
been carrying the camera attachment to a previous cell phone for a while,
but I pruned that, too).  I'm now down to just the one GPS.

I don't actually have any handcuffs, but I noticed one time that a key I
had been carrying for a lock box fit a standard set of handcuffs, and you
never know when it might come in handy.  There was an episode in the first
season (= BrE "series") of _Father Ted_ when Father Ted could have used a
handcuff key, not to be smug or anything.

Signature

rjv

LFS - 20 May 2008 17:22 GMT
> I don't actually have any handcuffs, but I noticed one time that a key I
> had been carrying for a lock box fit a standard set of handcuffs, and you
> never know when it might come in handy.  There was an episode in the first
> season (= BrE "series") of _Father Ted_ when Father Ted could have used a
> handcuff key, not to be smug or anything.

Perhaps the "vanilla" lady should meet rjv..

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

John Varela - 20 May 2008 20:00 GMT
> My main key ring still has eight keys

This implies the existence of an auxiliary key ring.  How many on that one?

(I carry two key rings: a main one and a second one with spares.  It's said
that the kind of person who carries spare keys never loses his keys.)

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Nell - 20 May 2008 20:58 GMT
John Varela wrote :

>> My main key ring still has eight keys
>
> This implies the existence of an auxiliary key ring.  How many on that one?
>
> (I carry two key rings: a main one and a second one with spares.  It's said
> that the kind of person who carries spare keys never loses his keys.)

A friend of mine didn't lose her keys. She locked both sets in her car.

Nell
Nick Spalding - 21 May 2008 10:28 GMT
Nell wrote, in <mn.a3be7d85cd344c63.63005@atnowhere.com>
on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:58:19 -0400:

> John Varela wrote :
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Nell

I once managed to lock the keys in my car, a MkIII Cortina, when on a
family picnic up in the Dublin mountains.  I flagged a passing Ford and
his key opened my car.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

Wood Avens - 21 May 2008 13:02 GMT
>Nell wrote, in <mn.a3be7d85cd344c63.63005@atnowhere.com>
> on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:58:19 -0400:

>> A friend of mine didn't lose her keys. She locked both sets in her car.

>I once managed to lock the keys in my car, a MkIII Cortina, when on a
>family picnic up in the Dublin mountains.  I flagged a passing Ford and
>his key opened my car.

Car locks ain't what they used to be.  On a visit to LA in 1980 we
locked the keys in the trunk (or, as we'd have said if we'd been at
home, the boot) of our hired car in the car park of our motel.  I went
back into the motel, appropriated a wire coat-hanger, re-shaped it and
opened the driver's door via the (closed) window and the release
button, all inside of about five minutes.  This was rather to the
horror of the other people in the car park, all upright US citizens,
who seemed never to have come across such an idea, and who apparently
deduced that all Brits must be crooks.

But I couldn't do it today.  Probably.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Mike Lyle - 21 May 2008 13:43 GMT
>> Nell wrote, in <mn.a3be7d85cd344c63.63005@atnowhere.com>
>> on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:58:19 -0400:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> But I couldn't do it today.  Probably.

They've changed the shape of the door-locking sticky-uppers so, to
appearances at any rate, you can't get a grip. The last car I did that
with was one of those Grandpa-ish big Rovers.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Glenn Knickerbocker - 22 May 2008 01:45 GMT
> They've changed the shape of the door-locking sticky-uppers so, to
> appearances at any rate, you can't get a grip.

But now most cars have electric controls for the locks, where all you
have to do is push a button, not grip anything.  My old Neon had
frameless windows (and no lock on the back seat to prevent access to the
trunk) and I could break into it in 17 seconds.  I timed it once when I
had locked my keys in my office, to demonstrate to my manager why I had
no desire to take home a laptop computer from work.

¬R
Skitt - 22 May 2008 01:58 GMT
>> They've changed the shape of the door-locking sticky-uppers so, to
>> appearances at any rate, you can't get a grip.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> when I had locked my keys in my office, to demonstrate to my manager
> why I had no desire to take home a laptop computer from work.

When it is not your car and theft is the goal, breaking a window is even
quicker.

We had our luggage taken that way once, in North Vancouver.  We got it all
back, as the thief didn't want any of the clothes there and dumped the two
suitcases in the bushes nearby.  A jogger spotted them and notified the
police, who, in turn, led us to them.

We had to wait an extra day (it was a weekend) in Vancouver to get the
driver's side window replaced.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)
an erstwhile crime victim

Default User - 22 May 2008 17:16 GMT
> > > They've changed the shape of the door-locking sticky-uppers so, to
> > > appearances at any rate, you can't get a grip.
> >
> > But now most cars have electric controls for the locks, where all
> > you have to do is push a button, not grip anything.

> When it is not your car and theft is the goal, breaking a window is
> even quicker.

My old Bronco (for that matter the newer one) had the triangular fly
window in each door. The one time that it was broken into, the thief
stuck in a pry bar and broke the catch that held it "secure". He
reached in through the little window to work the lock switch. At that,
relatively considerate for a thief.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Sara Lorimer - 27 May 2008 04:16 GMT
> > But now most cars have electric controls for the locks, where all you
> > have to do is push a button, not grip anything.  My old Neon had
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> When it is not your car and theft is the goal, breaking a window is even
> quicker.

Last summer someone smashed a window to break into our car... which was
unlocked at the time.

Signature

SML

Skitt - 27 May 2008 18:33 GMT
> Skitt wrote:

>>> But now most cars have electric controls for the locks, where all
>>> you have to do is push a button, not grip anything.  My old Neon had
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Last summer someone smashed a window to break into our car... which
> was unlocked at the time.

Ah, you have to put up a sign.  There's no time for lock-checking.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)

tony cooper - 21 May 2008 14:24 GMT
>Car locks ain't what they used to be.  On a visit to LA in 1980 we
>locked the keys in the trunk (or, as we'd have said if we'd been at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>who seemed never to have come across such an idea, and who apparently
>deduced that all Brits must be crooks.

Amazing.  Amazing that you feel that Americans would not know this
trick, that is.  Someone asking for a coat hanger because their car
has the keys locked inside is a fairly common thing in my experience.
The last time I came across it was a little old lady in a shopping
mall parking lot who had a bent coat hanger, but was asking passers-by
if they could help her juggle it.

>But I couldn't do it today.  Probably.

No, because newer cars don't have that thingy that is pulled up by the
coat hanger.  It takes a "slim jim" to open them, but many of the
newer cars have those special key systems that prevent the use of a
slim jim.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slim_Jim_

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Wood Avens - 21 May 2008 16:15 GMT
>>I went
>>back into the motel, appropriated a wire coat-hanger, re-shaped it and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>trick, that is.  Someone asking for a coat hanger because their car
>has the keys locked inside is a fairly common thing in my experience.

No, I was very much surprised that the Americans in the car park
appeared to be surprised.  Up to that point I'd have assumed that it
was as familiar to them as it was to me.  I'm glad to learn that it
must have been an atypical sample.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Roland Hutchinson - 21 May 2008 16:33 GMT
>>>I went
>>>back into the motel, appropriated a wire coat-hanger, re-shaped it and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> was as familiar to them as it was to me.  I'm glad to learn that it
> must have been an atypical sample.

A certain number of people who frequent Los Angeles hotels have lead
sheltered lives.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Leslie Danks - 21 May 2008 16:51 GMT
[...]

> A certain number of people who frequent Los Angeles hotels have lead
> sheltered lives.

Is this a countermeasure to many Los Angeles hotels having been built over
considerable uranium deposits.

Signature

Les

Roland Hutchinson - 21 May 2008 16:54 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Is this a countermeasure to many Los Angeles hotels having been built over
> considerable uranium deposits.

Well, there's no point in taking chances, is there?

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Mark Brader - 21 May 2008 18:14 GMT
Katy Jennison:
> Car locks ain't what they used to be.  On a visit to LA in 1980 we
> locked the keys in the trunk (or, as we'd have said if we'd been at
> home, the boot) of our hired car...

Cars don't pass the Turing test yet.  You mean "rented (or, as we'd
have said if we'd been at home, hired)".

I have also locked myself out of a rental car by locking the keys
(or key; I forget how many this one had) in the trunk.  This was
in the parking lot of a craft show in Albuquerque.  It was in some
sort of temporary structure and there were no pay phones, but one of
the staff lent me a cell phone so I could call the rental company,
which apparently put me on hold for 10-15 minutes, to the annoyance
of the phone's owner.  Eventually I decided the call might have been
dropped and tried again.  I got a human at once, and a locksmith
was dispatched.

What he did next impressed me -- he obtained the *specifications*
for the key (use blank JK34; notch 1 is 3 units deep, notch 2 is 1;
that sort of thing) and proceeded to cut a new one.

What was less impressive was that it didn't work.

He then did the practical thing that he wasn't supposed to do: he
broke into the car using a slim-jim or some such device, and pressed
the trunk-release button to retrieve the original key.  This did work.

I have also had it happen that I had to leave a rental car in a
parking lot with the key *in the ignition lock*, because it seemed
to be stuck in there.  This one was in Ann Arbor, in 1982; perhaps
I should start avoid cities starting with A when renting cars, like
people using London Underground stations as bomb shelters in WW2
needed to avoid ones starting with B(*). As I recall, on this car
the door and ignition keys were different, so I was at least able to
detach them and leave the doors locked.

Anyway, when I called the rental company for help, they informed me
that on this model of car there was a release button near the ignition
switch, which I had to press to withdraw the key.  Apparently this
was intended as protection against a malicious front-seat passenger
removing the key while the car was in motion.  I'd never encountered
such a thing before, and I never have since.

(*) Bomb hits penetrated the shelters at Balham, Bank, and Bounds Green
stations with considerable loss of life each time, and a crowd-crush
disaster at the unfinished Bethnal Green station killed more shelterers
than all three bombs put together(**).

(**) ObAUE: I don't mean that the bombs put together any number of people.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto         "A cow-orker of mine used to ood dogs."
msb@vex.net                                           -- Steve Hayes

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Paul Wolff - 21 May 2008 23:06 GMT
>On Wed, 21 May 2008 10:28:17 +0100, Nick Spalding <spalding@iol.ie>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>who seemed never to have come across such an idea, and who apparently
>deduced that all Brits must be crooks.

My wife found herself out-gelocked similarly, perhaps in the Waitrose
car park in Wallingford (if not there, somewhere of comparable social
standing).  Not having been trained in the Wood Avens school of
resource, she turned (for spiritual comfort, no doubt) to our vicar, who
just happened to be passing (as vicars do).  He had the same criminal
skills, and a pretty weak excuse for them too.
Signature

Paul

Skitt - 21 May 2008 23:46 GMT
>> Car locks ain't what they used to be.  On a visit to LA in 1980 we
>> locked the keys in the trunk (or, as we'd have said if we'd been at
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> who just happened to be passing (as vicars do).  He had the same
> criminal skills, and a pretty weak excuse for them too.

I don't look upon them as criminal skills -- just skills.  There was a time
when I took pride in being able to pick locks of various kinds.  It was very
satisfying that I could do it, when necessary.  Cars were easy.  That was
long ago, though.

Signature

Skitt
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/medec07.jpg

Paul Wolff - 22 May 2008 00:30 GMT
>Paul Wolff wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>It was very satisfying that I could do it, when necessary.  Cars were
>easy.  That was long ago, though.

I shouldn't have written 'criminal'.  It was criminal of me to do so.
But we did wonder which theological college had taught those techniques,
or more particularly how and why the vicar had acquired them.  It wasn't
the obvious method of hooking the little plastic locking arm with the
broader head that juts up through a hole in the metal sill inside the
window on many of those older cars, but of probing between the window
glass and seal on the inside of the door to hook a hidden lever which
could be pulled to trip the lock into unlocked mode.
Signature

Paul

tony cooper - 22 May 2008 04:47 GMT
>I don't look upon them as criminal skills -- just skills.  There was a time
>when I took pride in being able to pick locks of various kinds.  It was very
>satisfying that I could do it, when necessary.  Cars were easy.  That was
>long ago, though.

My wife locked herself out of her car in Chicago in the early 60s when
she was working as a Public Health nurse and had made a call in a
rather seedy neighborhood.  One man stopped to help her, and then two
more came over to the car.  The man with the coat hanger popped the
lock, but a second man re-locked the door and showed the other two a
better way to fish the door lock through the vent window.    

She was parked in front of a half-way house.

 
Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

irwell - 22 May 2008 16:01 GMT
>>I don't look upon them as criminal skills -- just skills.  There was a time
>>when I took pride in being able to pick locks of various kinds.  It was very
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>  
We visited our daughter when she was at Univ.of Chicago,
on the way from the airport the limo (more like a van really)
stopped to let some passengers off. The back door containing
the bags was locked and the driver's keys did not work on it, it took
over twenty five minutes to force that door open. I thought
of all the stories I had heard about Chicago and crime and wondered
why nobody was about to open this door in milli-seconds.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Mark Brader - 22 May 2008 18:06 GMT
> ... it took
> over twenty five minutes to force that door open. I thought
> of all the stories I had heard about Chicago and crime and wondered
> why nobody was about to open this door in milli-seconds.

It took me a few seconds to realize that "about" here meant "around"
and was not part of the expression "about to".  Is this poster British?
I think of that usage of "about" as mostly British.
Signature

Mark Brader | "And I won't like [this usage] any better if you
Toronto     |  produce examples from Shakespeare, Milton, Johnson ...
msb@vex.net |  Or, indeed, myself."                       --Mike Lyle

Mike Lyle - 23 May 2008 12:16 GMT
>> ... it took
>> over twenty five minutes to force that door open. I thought
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> and was not part of the expression "about to".  Is this poster
> British?

I don't know: you presumably snipped the identity to make it into an
amusing puzzle ...

> I think of that usage of "about" as mostly British.

... but it does raise a good usage question. In my English, "around"
does have an American or colloquial flavour, but I think I'd have
noticed the slight ambiguity in the example, and written my way round
it.

I would commonly use "around" in "around the house" (literal senses),
but only colloquially  in "lounging around the house" and "there's
nobody around", and almost never as a synonym for "approximately".

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

irwell - 23 May 2008 16:11 GMT
>>> ... it took
>>> over twenty five minutes to force that door open. I thought
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>but only colloquially  in "lounging around the house" and "there's
>nobody around", and almost never as a synonym for "approximately".

'What's it all about, Alfie?'
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
R H Draney - 23 May 2008 19:33 GMT
irwell filted:

>'What's it all about, Alfie?'

"It's all about the benjamins, baby"....r

Signature

What good is being an executive if you never get to execute anyone?

Nick Spalding - 22 May 2008 11:45 GMT
Skitt wrote, in <uoWdndF8R7WgO6nVnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@comcast.com>
on Wed, 21 May 2008 15:46:15 -0700:

> >> Car locks ain't what they used to be.  On a visit to LA in 1980 we
> >> locked the keys in the trunk (or, as we'd have said if we'd been at
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> satisfying that I could do it, when necessary.  Cars were easy.  That was
> long ago, though.

It was one of Richard Feynman's many skills, up to the level of
safe-cracking.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

John Varela - 22 May 2008 02:06 GMT
>> Nell wrote, in <mn.a3be7d85cd344c63.63005@atnowhere.com>
>> on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:58:19 -0400:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Car locks ain't what they used to be.

Sure they are.  In the late 1940s my father got into his rental car, a
Chevrolet, started the engine, then noticed that the car had a clock.  Rental
cars in those days didn't have clocks.  His similar car was elsewhere in the
parking lot.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Mark Brader - 22 May 2008 02:31 GMT
Katy Jennison:
> > Car locks ain't what they used to be.

John Varela:
> Sure they are.  In the late 1940s my father got into his rental car, a
> Chevrolet, started the engine, then noticed that the car had a clock.  Rental
> cars in those days didn't have clocks.  His similar car was elsewhere in the
> parking lot.

Clock, lock, what's the difference?
Signature

Mark Brader | "And I won't like [this usage] any better if you
Toronto     |  produce examples from Shakespeare, Milton, Johnson ...
msb@vex.net |  Or, indeed, myself."                       --Mike Lyle

Mike Barnes - 21 May 2008 22:09 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Nick Spalding wrote:
>I once managed to lock the keys in my car, a MkIII Cortina, when on a
>family picnic up in the Dublin mountains.  I flagged a passing Ford and
>his key opened my car.

Small world. I once managed to lock my keys in my car, a MkIII Cortina,
when going for a walk along a beach near Dublin. It started raining when
I was about half a mile away and I had no rainwear so you can imagine
how pleased I was to get back to the locked car and see the keys in the
ignition.

I broke off a piece of fence wire, forced it through the rubber seal,
and used it to pull the button up. I'd never done anything like that
before, but had heard the technique described. It was dead easy.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Nick Spalding - 22 May 2008 11:54 GMT
Mike Barnes wrote, in <fJzhgN2Z+INIFwwt@34klh41lk4h1lk34h3lk4h1k4.invalid>
on Wed, 21 May 2008 22:09:45 +0100:

> In alt.usage.english, Nick Spalding wrote:
> >I once managed to lock the keys in my car, a MkIII Cortina, when on a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> and used it to pull the button up. I'd never done anything like that
> before, but had heard the technique described. It was dead easy.

I worked my way through all the Cortinas over a period of twenty-some
years and the MkIII was my favourite.  I have fond memories of taking it
to France in about 1980 with wife and four children on board and a 15ft
caravan behind and grinding up the long hill southbound out of Limosges on
the N20 with everyone in the car gazing at the instrument panel to watch
the mileage roll round from 99999 to 100000.  It's no fun now, the
autoroute goes straight across the valley.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

Mark Brader - 22 May 2008 20:04 GMT
> I have fond memories of ... grinding up the long hill southbound out of
> Limosges on the N20 with everyone in the car gazing at the instrument
> panel to watch the mileage roll round from 99999 to 100000.  It's no fun
> now, the autoroute goes straight across the valley.

Well, autoroutes that go straight across a valley can also be fun:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/ViaducdeMillau.jpg
Signature

Mark Brader               The World Wide Web:
Toronto                   bringing you style over substance since 1993.
msb@vex.net                                             -- Steve Summit

Nick Spalding - 22 May 2008 20:46 GMT
Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:

> > I have fond memories of ... grinding up the long hill southbound out of
> > Limosges on the N20 with everyone in the car gazing at the instrument
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Well, autoroutes that go straight across a valley can also be fun:
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/ViaducdeMillau.jpg

Yes indeed, that is on my list of things to see next time I am anywhere
near the Tarn.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

irwell - 22 May 2008 22:12 GMT
>Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
> on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Yes indeed, that is on my list of things to see next time I am anywhere
>near the Tarn.

'A thing of beauty is a joy forever'. Keats.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
CDB - 22 May 2008 22:54 GMT
>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>> on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:

>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/ViaducdeMillau.jpg

> 'A thing of beauty is a joy forever'. Keats.

What I tell you two or more times is all ye need to know.  I once said
here that I intended to get hold of an academic article (bearing on a
relationship between "The Road Not Taken" and "She Dwelt Among The
Untrodden Ways") and that I would post anything interesting I found
there.  I have never reported back, because, apart from a
confirmation, with further examples, that Frost was a lover of the
Romantics, the most striking thing about the article was the
wretchedly pretentious academic prose in which it was written (content
was OK).

Leafing through the journal the article came in, I did see an
interesting suggestion, which I now report: that the earth in "that is
all ye know on earth" may be the material of which the urn is made.
It's certainly recognised that the statement may be addressed to the
figures on the urn, but I hadn't seen the suggestion that "earth" was
to be so concretely understood.

'Earth took of earth'.  Anonymous.
HVS - 22 May 2008 22:58 GMT
On 22 May 2008, CDB wrote

>>> Mark Brader wrote, in
>>> <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net> on Thu, 22 May 2008
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> 'Earth took of earth'.  Anonymous.

There just has to be an Eartha Kitt pun in here somewhere.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

CDB - 23 May 2008 21:09 GMT
> On 22 May 2008, CDB wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> There just has to be an Eartha Kitt pun in here somewhere.

Not by me.  You thought you couldn't bear "Santa Baby" one more time,
but then Eartha made ja.
the Omrud - 22 May 2008 22:48 GMT
> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Yes indeed, that is on my list of things to see next time I am anywhere
> near the Tarn.

It is breathtaking.   I slowed down so that I would be able to take a
good look and about a minute later I realised I was still on the bridge.
 Which, astonishingly, bends.

Signature

David

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 22 May 2008 23:56 GMT
>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>good look and about a minute later I realised I was still on the bridge.
>  Which, astonishingly, bends.

That's "bends" as in "is curved", rather than "is flexible", I
take it?

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

irwell - 23 May 2008 03:05 GMT
>>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>That's "bends" as in "is curved", rather than "is flexible", I
>take it?

Hope so, oscillations on suspension bridges are scary.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
the Omrud - 23 May 2008 07:34 GMT
>>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> That's "bends" as in "is curved", rather than "is flexible", I
> take it?

Yes, it is curved along its length, which is unusual in a bridge.  See
photo on this page:
http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

Signature

David

Mike Lyle - 23 May 2008 12:25 GMT
>>>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
[...]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/ViaducdeMillau.jpg
>>>> Yes indeed, that is on my list of things to see next time I am
>>>> anywhere near the Tarn.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> photo on this page:
> http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

While we're doing engineering, a couple of weeks ago I noticed a large
crew who seemed to be doing some sort of road works with what seemed to
be a huge truck load of fascines. Was I right? IIRC, it was just after
leaving the M40 for the A46.

Paddington station is built on bundles of sticks, as (says Griff
Rhys-Jones) is the railway across Rannoch Moor. I didn't realise the
technique was still in use.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 23 May 2008 12:43 GMT
>>>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>>>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>photo on this page:
>http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

Ah yes. I think I have seen a similar photo before.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Nick Spalding - 23 May 2008 14:43 GMT
the Omrud wrote, in <lAtZj.8069$DZ6.3058@text.news.virginmedia.com>
on Fri, 23 May 2008 06:34:57 GMT:

> >>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
> >>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> photo on this page:
> http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

I like this one:
<http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/01/wonders_bigdigs/image/millau_viaduct.jpg>
<http://tinyurl.com/29ks8r>
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

Frank ess - 23 May 2008 18:11 GMT
>>>> Mark Brader wrote, in <WNGdnY24Ja1YXqjVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@vex.net>
>>>>  on Thu, 22 May 2008 14:04:37 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> See photo on this page:
> http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

Here's another:
http://www.terragalleria.com/pictures-subjects/concrete-bridges/picture.concrete
-bridges.usca34520.html

or
http://tinyurl.com/5z26h8 and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CoronadoBridgeAbove.jpg
In the second image, Coronado Islands visible through the haze are in
Mexican waters.

I didn't read the Wiki article, but my memory of the bridge's
inauguration is it was named after Governor Edmund G. "Pat" Brown,
father of Governor Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown who is still emitting
occasional flashes of political light.

The bridge put paid to a workmanlike job done for decades by the
"Nickel-snatcher" automobile ferry, plying its humdrum course from
downtown San Diego to Coronado across the bay. And back. I made it a
point to use the service on its last day of scheduled operation,
driving my family aboard in our 1960 Morris Minor 1000 Traveller. A
very sweet and sad trip.

People ferries now make the crossings. Not even close to an acceptable
substitute.

Signature

Frank ess

Skitt - 23 May 2008 19:07 GMT
>>>>> Well, autoroutes that go straight across a valley can also be fun:
>>>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/ViaducdeMillau.jpg
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> photo on this page:
> http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

The San Mateo bridge across the SF Bay curves nicely.
http://www.fostercity.org/community_info/photos/uploaded_photos/sm_bridge_01.jpg

Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://home.comcast.net/~skitt99/

John Holmes - 24 May 2008 11:45 GMT
>> Yes, it is curved along its length, which is unusual in a bridge. See
>> photo on this page:
>> http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php
>
> The San Mateo bridge across the SF Bay curves nicely.
> http://www.fostercity.org/community_info/photos/uploaded_photos/sm_bridge_01.jpg

And the Westgate Bridge in Melbourne is a sort of stretched S shape, as
you can see on the googlemap here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Gate_Bridge

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

Nasti J - 24 May 2008 17:54 GMT
> Yes, it is curved along its length, which is unusual in a bridge.  See
> photo on this page:http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php

see also the San Diego - Coronado Island bridge:

http://www.arkitera.com/UserFiles/Image/competition/2008/bay_bridge_lighting.jpg
irwell - 24 May 2008 18:14 GMT
>> Yes, it is curved along its length, which is unusual in a bridge.  See
>> photo on this page:http://www.francethisway.com/places/millau-bridge.php
>
>see also the San Diego - Coronado Island bridge:
>
>http://www.arkitera.com/UserFiles/Image/competition/2008/bay_bridge_lighting.jpg

Nice picture, we had dinner at the Coronado Hotel some years back.
They had the Americas Cup on display in the lobby, the USA had just
won it again.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Default User - 20 May 2008 22:45 GMT
> > My main key ring still has eight keys
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It's said that the kind of person who carries spare keys never loses
> his keys.)

I have two, one is the prefab set for the Bronco, with the ignition and
rear window keys, along with the remote. The other set has a house key,
mailbox key, desk key, souvenir key from the first vehicle I owned, and
a spare ignition key for the Bronco. I did one time lock the keys in
the Bronco. After that I added the spare to the house key set.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

James Silverton - 20 May 2008 23:01 GMT
Default  wrote  on 20 May 2008 21:45:53 GMT:

> >> My main key ring still has eight keys
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> It's said that the kind of person who carries spare keys
>> never loses his keys.)

> I have two, one is the prefab set for the Bronco, with the
> ignition and rear window keys, along with the remote. The
> other set has a house key, mailbox key, desk key, souvenir key
> from the first vehicle I owned, and a spare ignition key for
> the Bronco. I did one time lock the keys in the Bronco. After
> that I added the spare to the house key set.

I don't carry a second set of keys and thus, inevitably, I will
lock myself out of the house at least once a year. My next door
neighbors do have a set but my solution is to keep house keys in
a real estate agent's combination-lock box in the garage and a
garage key in a fake rock in the garden. Complicated perhaps but
it works well!
Signature


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

Skitt - 20 May 2008 23:16 GMT
> I don't carry a second set of keys and thus, inevitably, I will
> lock myself out of the house at least once a year. My next door
> neighbors do have a set but my solution is to keep house keys in
> a real estate agent's combination-lock box in the garage and a
> garage key in a fake rock in the garden. Complicated perhaps but
> it works well!

There was a time when my wife and I locked ourselves out of our house.  She
had to slither through the doggie door to get in.  I've mentioned it here,
I'm sure.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)
too big a dog

Mike Barnes - 21 May 2008 07:15 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Skitt wrote:

>There was a time when my wife and I locked ourselves out of our house.
>She had to slither through the doggie door to get in.  I've mentioned
>it here, I'm sure.

AAMOI how did you *both* manage to do it? Or is that a question that
simply shouldn't be asked?

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

tony cooper - 21 May 2008 08:09 GMT
>In alt.usage.english, Skitt wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>AAMOI how did you *both* manage to do it? Or is that a question that
>simply shouldn't be asked?

"But I thought *you* brought your keys"

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Skitt - 21 May 2008 19:23 GMT
>> There was a time when my wife and I locked ourselves out of our
>> house. She had to slither through the doggie door to get in.  I've
>> mentioned it here, I'm sure.
>
> AAMOI how did you *both* manage to do it? Or is that a question that
> simply shouldn't be asked?

How did we both manage to do what?  Lock ourselves out of the house?
Easy -- the lock sets itself automatically, and I had left the house keys
on the kitchen table (they were separate from the car keys).  My wife hadn't
brought any keys with her.

As for slithering back in, I didn't do that, as my wife opened a door for
me, once she got in.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)

Mike Barnes - 21 May 2008 22:51 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Skitt wrote:

>>> There was a time when my wife and I locked ourselves out of our
>>> house. She had to slither through the doggie door to get in.  I've
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>keys on the kitchen table (they were separate from the car keys).  My
>wife hadn't brought any keys with her.

But only one of you actually closed the door? Probably not worth
pursuing, but that's what I meant.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Skitt - 21 May 2008 22:58 GMT
>>>> There was a time when my wife and I locked ourselves out of our
>>>> house. She had to slither through the doggie door to get in.  I've
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> But only one of you actually closed the door? Probably not worth
> pursuing, but that's what I meant.

Oh.  Well ... yeah, but the not bringing of any keys -- the action that
created the lock-out situation -- was a joint venture, innit?
Signature

Skitt
Ever ready to retract the aforesaid and aver the opposite.

Default User - 21 May 2008 17:33 GMT
> I don't carry a second set of keys and thus, inevitably, I will lock
> myself out of the house at least once a year. My next door neighbors
> do have a set but my solution is to keep house keys in a real estate
> agent's combination-lock box in the garage and a garage key in a fake
> rock in the garden. Complicated perhaps but it works well!

I've only locked myself out once. I normally exit through the door into
the garage. I never lock that door. I always bring both sets of keys.
So inevitably, one day I was in a hurry and only picked up the truck
keys. When I got home, I found that I had, inexplicably, locked the
door. However, it was less of a problem than might be imagined.

The reason I don't lock that door is that it swings into the garage, so
the hinges are exposed. There is also a large shelf of tools right
there. It's a matter of a minute or so to pick up a screwdriver and
remove the hinge pins, even when one is trying to be careful. I figure
that if thieves have managed to get into the garage, that door isn't
going to slow them down much.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Skitt - 21 May 2008 19:35 GMT
>> I don't carry a second set of keys and thus, inevitably, I will lock
>> myself out of the house at least once a year. My next door neighbors
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> that if thieves have managed to get into the garage, that door isn't
> going to slow them down much.

Same here.  There was a time when my wife and I arrived home and, pulling
into the garage, we saw a guy in the process of removing the hinge pins from
the door to the kitchen.  After confronting the guy (he claimed he had found
the door with its hinge pins removed and was putting them back for us), I
explained to him that now he had become a guardian of our house, as the next
time something went missing, we would know whom to look for first.  Anyway,
I recognized the guy as a fairly regular patron at one of the local watering
holes, so I ran him back into town and bought him a beer.  I never saw him
again after that.

Oh, yeah -- they guy had gotten into the garage by busting a flimsy side
door to it.
Signature

Skitt (AmE)

Default User - 21 May 2008 19:53 GMT
> > The reason I don't lock that door is that it swings into the garage,
> > so the hinges are exposed. There is also a large shelf of tools
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> pulling into the garage, we saw a guy in the process of removing the
> hinge pins from the door to the kitchen.  

[schnipp]

> Oh, yeah -- they guy had gotten into the garage by busting a flimsy
> side door to it.

My garage doesn't have an side door of its own, although there is one
in the laundry room that the garage leads into. The only entrance into
the garage from outside is the big door. I figure that it's probably
not the most likely entry point for a thief.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

tony cooper - 22 May 2008 04:50 GMT
>> > The reason I don't lock that door is that it swings into the garage,
>> > so the hinges are exposed. There is also a large shelf of tools
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>the garage from outside is the big door. I figure that it's probably
>not the most likely entry point for a thief.

My garage is attached to the house, but there's no entrance to the
house from the garage.  I wonder if some thief will break into the
garage and then find out he's no better off.  
Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Mike Barnes - 21 May 2008 22:51 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Default User wrote:
>The reason I don't lock that door is that it swings into the garage, so
>the hinges are exposed. There is also a large shelf of tools right
>there. It's a matter of a minute or so to pick up a screwdriver and
>remove the hinge pins, even when one is trying to be careful. I figure
>that if thieves have managed to get into the garage, that door isn't
>going to slow them down much.

A couple of hinge bolts would easily thwart that attack, but might lead
to more damaging attacks.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Default User - 21 May 2008 23:15 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Default User wrote:
> > The reason I don't lock that door is that it swings into the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> A couple of hinge bolts would easily thwart that attack, but might
> lead to more damaging attacks.

That's the thing. They'd be in the garage where the tools live, and you
have to figure the door will yield in some fashion.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Robin Bignall - 27 May 2008 22:32 GMT
> Default  wrote  on 20 May 2008 21:45:53 GMT:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>garage key in a fake rock in the garden. Complicated perhaps but
>it works well!

We had one of those fake rocks along the same lines, until we had a
dog.  He loves finding rocks and bringing them into the house.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

James Silverton - 27 May 2008 22:42 GMT
Robin  wrote  on Tue, 27 May 2008 22:32:41 +0100:

>> Default  wrote  on 20 May 2008 21:45:53 GMT:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> the garage and a garage key in a fake rock in the garden.
>> Complicated perhaps but it works well!

> We had one of those fake rocks along the same lines, until
> we had a dog.  He loves finding rocks and bringing them into
> the house.

No dog and I think my neighbor's dog is almost too small to
carry a fake rock. So far, so good!

.

Signature

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.Silverton.at.verizon.not

Oleg Lego - 28 May 2008 05:50 GMT
>> Default  wrote  on 20 May 2008 21:45:53 GMT:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>We had one of those fake rocks along the same lines, until we had a
>dog.  He loves finding rocks and bringing them into the house.

About 7 or 8 years ago, I bought a thermometer that could be opened to
store or retrieve a key. It sort of slid open like an old-style
child's pencil box. Once I moved to Saskatchewan, I found I no longer
needed it.

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 15:48 GMT
>... a small book
>of very difficult sudoku puzzles has crept in.

They were rather fun to solve in the TV contest, but I find the print
versions to be devilish time-wasters. As soon as I see one in the
paper or TV guide, I either quickly turn the page or, if I want to
read something on that page, rip out the puzzle, shred it, then
crumple up the bits.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

irwell - 20 May 2008 18:37 GMT
As soon as I see one in the
>paper or TV guide, I either quickly turn the page or, if I want to
>read something on that page, rip out the puzzle, shred it, then
>crumple up the bits.

I do the same thing with the Dilbert cartoon, for some reason can't
stand to look at it. Now Dennis the Menace is always good for a
chuckle.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Oleg Lego - 21 May 2008 08:22 GMT
> As soon as I see one in the
>>paper or TV guide, I either quickly turn the page or, if I want to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>stand to look at it. Now Dennis the Menace is always good for a
>chuckle.

I once ranted about a piece of poorly written software, and was asked
if I had deleted it from my hard drive. I responded that first I
copied it to a floppy, then deleted it from my hard drive, and
finally, burned the floppy. I was telling the truth. It was immensely
satisfying.

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

Chuck Riggs - 21 May 2008 15:49 GMT
>> As soon as I see one in the
>>>paper or TV guide, I either quickly turn the page or, if I want to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>finally, burned the floppy. I was telling the truth. It was immensely
>satisfying.

That reminds me of the satisfaction I once got from throwing a Rubik's
cube into a fireplace and watching it splinter into its constituent
parts.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 15:38 GMT
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>> How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>>> shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.

That is pure silliness, not that silliness is necessarily out of
place, here.

>> I read that last sentence far too quickly and conjured up a wonderful
>> picture of a sort of reverse kangaroo...
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>time flies.  16th Nov 2002:
>http://tinyurl.com/5hm6pt

Thank you, David. I remember that we did this topic before, and to far
better effect, at least so far. Jan Sand had some worthwhile things to
say on the matter.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Amethyst Deceiver - 21 May 2008 12:43 GMT
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> That is pure silliness, not that silliness is necessarily out of
> place, here.

I'm intrigues. Why is it pure silliness?
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Mike Barnes - 19 May 2008 20:09 GMT
In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!

Most men seem to manage.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Roland Hutchinson - 19 May 2008 22:40 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>>How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>
> Most men seem to manage.

...if you call this functioning!

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Mike Lyle - 19 May 2008 22:59 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>
> Most men seem to manage.

Jacket pockets.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Skitt - 19 May 2008 23:08 GMT
>>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>>
>> Most men seem to manage.
>
> Jacket pockets.

Jacket pockets?  What jacket?  Oh, I think I have one somewhere -- it is
part of a suit, as I recall.  I haven't been to a funeral in a while, so ...

Pants pockets do me just fine.

Signature

Skitt (AmE)
Jes' fine

Mike Barnes - 19 May 2008 23:22 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Mike Lyle wrote:
>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>>
>> Most men seem to manage.
>
>Jacket pockets.

Are you sure? ISTM that most men are jacketless for much of their lives.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Mike Lyle - 20 May 2008 13:03 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Mike Lyle wrote:
>>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Are you sure? ISTM that most men are jacketless for much of their
> lives.

Things have changed sartorially, I agree. But it has to get very hot for
me not to be wearing some sort of casual coat: fleece at the moment,
cottony-lineny if it ever warms up a bit.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

James Silverton - 20 May 2008 13:28 GMT
Mike  wrote  on Tue, 20 May 2008 13:03:38 +0100:

>> In alt.usage.english, Mike Lyle wrote:
>>>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> Are you sure? ISTM that most men are jacketless for much of
>> their lives.

> Things have changed sartorially, I agree. But it has to get
> very hot for me not to be wearing some sort of casual coat:
> fleece
> at the moment, cottony-lineny if it ever warms up a bit.

When I was a student, I'd never have thought the time would come
when a sports jacket or blazer would almost become formal wear.
I think it's about six months since I last wore either. Zippered
jackets of various weights are my normal attire.

Signature

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

HVS - 20 May 2008 13:33 GMT
On 20 May 2008, James Silverton wrote

>  Mike  wrote  on Tue, 20 May 2008 13:03:38 +0100:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I think it's about six months since I last wore either. Zippered
> jackets of various weights are my normal attire.

But -- Mike's point, I think -- your zippered jackets have pockets,
yes?  (That is, they function as your handbag.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

James Silverton - 20 May 2008 13:45 GMT
HVS  wrote  on Tue, 20 May 2008 13:33:09 +0100:

>>  Mike  wrote  on Tue, 20 May 2008 13:03:38 +0100:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> either. Zippered jackets of various weights are my normal
>> attire.

> But -- Mike's point, I think -- your zippered jackets have
> pockets, yes?  (That is, they function as your handbag.)

Oh, I agree! It was just an aside (OT if you will.)

Signature

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

Default User - 20 May 2008 21:06 GMT
> When I was a student, I'd never have thought the time would come when
> a sports jacket or blazer would almost become formal wear. I think
> it's about six months since I last wore either. Zippered jackets of
> various weights are my normal attire.

I never really wore those kinds of jacket, even when more formal
clothing was the norm at work. I have pretty much used hooded
sweatshirts as outerwear for the past 30 years or so. I do keep paper
napkins in the pockets of those, but no essential items such as keys or
money. Those go in pants pockets.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Oleg Lego - 20 May 2008 16:35 GMT
>> In alt.usage.english, Mike Lyle wrote:
>>>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>me not to be wearing some sort of casual coat: fleece at the moment,
>cottony-lineny if it ever warms up a bit.

When the temperature gets up around 10C, I shed the jacket and wear a
long-sleeved shirt over my t-shirt. Once it reaches about 15C, the
long sleeves are no longer required.

The lack of pockets is no problem. That's what pickup trucks are for.

Signature

roses are #FF0000
violets are #0000FF
all my base
are belong to you

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 16:32 GMT
>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>>
>> Most men seem to manage.
>
>Jacket pockets.

The gentleman's solution to the problem.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

irwell - 20 May 2008 18:39 GMT
>>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>>>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>The gentleman's solution to the problem.

Unless you happen to be an Italian gigolo,
they carry handbags.

--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Amethyst Deceiver - 20 May 2008 10:37 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
> >How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>
> Most men seem to manage.

You have bigger pockets. Seriously. My smart trousers only have front
pockets, and they are small.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

HVS - 20 May 2008 10:45 GMT
On 20 May 2008, Amethyst Deceiver wrote

>> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
>>> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You have bigger pockets. Seriously. My smart trousers only have
> front pockets, and they are small.

And men often wear jackets;  I've often compared wearing a sports
jacket to carrying a handbag.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Amethyst Deceiver - 20 May 2008 13:55 GMT
> On 20 May 2008, Amethyst Deceiver wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> And men often wear jackets;  I've often compared wearing a sports
> jacket to carrying a handbag.

I have a jacket today. Again, small pockets. Women are /expected/ to
have bags and therefore not given decent pockets. It's a conspiracy, I
tell you!
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

HVS - 20 May 2008 14:11 GMT
On 20 May 2008, Amethyst Deceiver wrote

>> On 20 May 2008, Amethyst Deceiver wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> /expected/ to have bags and therefore not given decent pockets.
> It's a conspiracy, I tell you!

You're supposed to carry just a clutch bag and have support staff to
carry your requisites, innit.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Nasti J - 20 May 2008 19:20 GMT
> You're supposed to carry just a clutch bag and have support staff to
> carry your requisites, innit.

Her Maj carries one w/handles, so as to signal the support troops:
"she uses the thing as a signaling device for her entourage. When she
shifts the bag from one arm to to the other, it means she's had enough
of these goings-on and is ready to blow the joint. "
Also, she is known to have a cell-phone, and an i-Pod; and to carry a
comb, a handkerchief, a small gold compact, and a tube of lipstick in
her handbag. and money on Sundays - a folded note of unknown
denomination, which she discreetly places in the collection plate when
she goes to church.
Roland Hutchinson - 20 May 2008 20:10 GMT
> Her Maj carries [...] money on Sundays - a folded note of unknown
> denomination, which she discreetly places in the collection plate

Hardly an unknown denomination: It's clearly Anglican, except when she's in
Scotland, when it's Presbyterian.  I wonder if she uses Scottish banknotes?

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

irwell - 20 May 2008 20:24 GMT
>> You're supposed to carry just a clutch bag and have support staff to
>> carry your requisites, innit.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>denomination, which she discreetly places in the collection plate when
>she goes to church.

And a packet of fags, or has she kicked the habit
since the death of Margaret?
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Mike Lyle - 20 May 2008 21:35 GMT
[...in Brenda's handbag...]>
> And a packet of fags, or has she kicked the habit
> since the death of Margaret?

Is it a PR myth then, that she's been a non-smoker, if not all her life,
then at the very least since her father died of it? If she does smoke, I
hope they're Turks, not stinkers.

Signature

Mike.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

HVS - 20 May 2008 21:43 GMT
On 20 May 2008, Mike Lyle wrote

> [...in Brenda's handbag...]>
>> And a packet of fags, or has she kicked the habit
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> her life, then at the very least since her father died of it? If
> she does smoke, I hope they're Turks, not stinkers.

I've seen Midnight express, and some Turks are real stinkers.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

the Omrud - 20 May 2008 23:10 GMT
> >> You're supposed to carry just a clutch bag and have support staff to
> >> carry your requisites, innit.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> And a packet of fags, or has she kicked the habit
> since the death of Margaret?

Smoke?  I'm not aware that she ever smoked.

Prince Philip took a novel approach to giving up - he walked into a room
full of journalists and told them that he'd quit, which left him with no
choice but to go through with it.

Signature

David
a Hilon, somewhere in England

LFS - 20 May 2008 16:03 GMT
> On 20 May 2008, Amethyst Deceiver wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> And men often wear jackets;  I've often compared wearing a sports
> jacket to carrying a handbag.

Keeps you warmer, though.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

John Kane - 20 May 2008 19:52 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, LFS wrote:
> >How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag!
>
> Most men seem to manage.

Tweed jacket is the male equivalent.

John Kane Kingston ON Canada
Sara Lorimer - 20 May 2008 15:34 GMT
> > How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
> > shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag! But
> only the very slim could emulate your feat.

I use one of these as a handbag:

<http://sherpani.us/product.aspx?bO3FscouH=1&GQd0EjaqX=3&pmdoXJC4W=37>
or
<http://tinyurl.com/5m7rah>

That, plus my pockets, is as close as I can get to handbag-free living.

Signature

SML

irwell - 20 May 2008 18:41 GMT
>> > How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>> > shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>That, plus my pockets, is as close as I can get to handbag-free living.

I bought my wife one of those small Ameribags, she loves it.
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Robin Bignall - 27 May 2008 22:39 GMT
>>> > How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>>> > shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>I bought my wife one of those small Ameribags, she loves it.

I use a fishing jacket, which has about eight pockets of various
sizes.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

Amethyst Deceiver - 21 May 2008 12:42 GMT
> >> I thought of it and rejected the idea. If placed in a back pocket,
> >> coins would fall out the first time you sat down. It is a ridiculous
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> How wonderful to be able to function entirely without a handbag! But
> only the very slim could emulate your feat.

I do pick the toys carefully. YB is happy with a plastic mobile phone a
lot of the time, or a key-ring. Or those klippit things from Lakeland.
Hours of pleasure from one of those, and they fit a pocket easily.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Chuck Riggs - 20 May 2008 15:27 GMT
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>How small are your pockets? I can keep coins, notes, a phone, lippy,
>shopping lists and small toys to distract YoungBloke in my back pockets.

What an attractive sight you must make.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Amethyst Deceiver - 21 May 2008 12:50 GMT
> >> I thought of it and rejected the idea. If placed in a back pocket,
> >> coins would fall out the first time you sat down. It is a ridiculous
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> What an attractive sight you must make.

People seem to think so, yes.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Chuck Riggs - 19 May 2008 14:03 GMT
>Hi,
>
>I want to name the purse for holding only coins.  What should I say?
>Coin bag or Coins bag or Coin purse or anything else?
>
>Mike

"Coin purse" is used in America, for some types of these. What does it
look like?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.