Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Parts of Speech

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mori - 29 May 2008 09:41 GMT
What parts of speech are "sport" and "utility" in the phrase "sport-
utility vehicles"?
Garrett Wollman - 29 May 2008 21:32 GMT
>What parts of speech are "sport" and "utility" in the phrase "sport-
>utility vehicles"?

"sport-utility" is a compound word; your question does not make any
sense in this context.  "sport-utility" is used as an adjective in the
phrase "sport-utility vehicles".

-GAWollman

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Donna Richoux - 30 May 2008 00:41 GMT
> >What parts of speech are "sport" and "utility" in the phrase "sport-
> >utility vehicles"?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -GAWollman

I wonder, Garrett. Not everything that sits in front a noun is an
adjective -- often it's another noun that we say is used attributively.
"Horse race" and so on. "Utility" in "A utility vehicle" would be a noun
used attributively. Not, say, like "A useful vehicle," where "useful" is
an adjective.

But what about that "sport"? "A sport utility" doesn't make any sense at
all. So the best I can think of is that it was supposed to be a "utility
vehicle" that was good for "sport". "Sport" would be another noun used
attributively.

But I don't know why the phrase was coined, and Wikipedia does not shed
much light.

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

Snidely - 30 May 2008 00:54 GMT
> > In article
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> But I don't know why the phrase was coined, and Wikipedia does not shed
> much light.

In the best tradition of American advertising, "it's 2 mints in 1!"

It's a sport vehicle (for going off road), and it's a utility vehicle
(for hauling your gear to where you go off).

Sometimes the join is between the front of one vehicle and the back of
the other (a la griffins) and sometimes it is side-to-side (Victor/
Victoria).

/dps
Garrett Wollman - 30 May 2008 04:08 GMT
>But I don't know why ["sport-utility vehicle"] was coined, and
>Wikipedia does not shed much light.

Because at least a few generations of these vehicles had a "utility"
trim level, without a rear window, and therefore fell into a
less-stringent classification ("light-duty truck") under the Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (known in Washington and Detroit as "CAFE")
standards.  A "light-duty truck" (commonly called a "light truck") is
defined as a vehicle of a certain size which is "(1) Designed
primarily for purposes of transportation of property or ***is a
derivation of such a vehicle***, or (2) Designed primarily for
transportation of persons and has a capacity of more than 12 persons,
or (3) Available with special features enabling off-street or off-
highway operation and use." (emphasis mine)

This allowed the gas-guzzlers to be sold in huge numbers without
inflating the domestic automakers' fleet fuel economy figures, so they
didn't have to pay the "gas-guzzler tax".  I suspect (but don't have
the requisite law library at hand to search) that clause 1 is the
original language and clauses 2 and 3 were added later.

-GAWollman
Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Garrett Wollman - 30 May 2008 04:17 GMT
>> [I wrote:]
>> "sport-utility" is a compound word; your question does not make any
>> sense in this context.  "sport-utility" is used as an adjective in the
>> phrase "sport-utility vehicles".

>I wonder, Garrett. Not everything that sits in front a noun is an
>adjective

In this case, the only way to prove it one way or the other would be
to look for early written uses of the word "sport-utility" and see if
it was used on its own, or just in the /sui generis/ combination
"sport-utility vehicle".[1]  My impression, which may be biased or
otherwise erroneous, is that "sport-utility" as a noun is a later
shortening of the full "sport-utility vehicle".

-GAWollman

[1] I took a shot at this in Google Books, but the only thing it
proved is that Google Books hasn't the faintest idea when most of the
stuff in it was published.
Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Glenn Knickerbocker - 31 May 2008 00:47 GMT
> But what about that "sport"? "A sport utility" doesn't make any sense at
> all. So the best I can think of is that it was supposed to be a "utility
> vehicle" that was good for "sport". "Sport" would be another noun used
> attributively.

I remember hearing "utility vehicle" used to describe trucks like the
Chevy Suburban and International Scout in the '70s, and "sport utility
vehicle" not until the mid-'80s for smaller, easier-handling versions
like the Jeep Cherokee and Toyota 4Runner.  People I know definitely
commented on the irony of using "sport" to describe ever larger trucks
like (at the time) the Chevy Tahoe and Ford Expedition when it had been
used ten years earlier to distinguish SUVs from larger, unwieldy trucks.

¬R
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.