"Uri":
> Wikipedia's definition of model is "a person whose occupation is to
> function as a living prop."
That's rather demeaning.
> What is a living prop?
"Prop" is a term from the stage, movies, and TV. It normally refers
to the objects that appear in a scene -- furniture, books, clothes,
cars, telephones, guns -- anything that you see in the background
or that the actors use or handle. The term is derived from "property",
because the props are usually the property of the company producing
the show. (In movies you will see a screen credit for person responsible
for the props. Sometimes it says "props" or "prop master", but it also
may read "property master".)
The person who wrote that definition was saying that the model is
serving the same purpose -- the model is just something to look at,
and the fact that he or she is alive is incidental.

Signature
Mark Brader | "Hitler made an elementary error when he chose not to
Toronto | dress his young National Socialists in lime-green catsuits
msb@vex.net | laced with twinkling fairy lights." --Anthony Lane
My text in this article is in the public domain.
Paul Wolff - 28 Sep 2008 21:08 GMT
>"Uri":
>> Wikipedia's definition of model is "a person whose occupation is to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>serving the same purpose -- the model is just something to look at,
>and the fact that he or she is alive is incidental.
I don't see it that way. A prop is a support. A model is hired to be a
living support on which clothes may be displayed to their advantage.

Signature
Paul
HVS - 28 Sep 2008 21:26 GMT
On 28 Sep 2008, Paul Wolff wrote
>> "Uri":
>>> Wikipedia's definition of model is "a person whose occupation
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> to be a living support on which clothes may be displayed to
> their advantage.
If the writer meant that, he or she should have used "living
mannequin"; as the writer chose to use "prop" -- which does indeed
have the common meaning of a piece of stage dressing -- I'm with
Mark.
It just goes to prove yet again that the Wikipedia model is a crap
method for constructing agreed-upon definitions.

Signature
Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
tony cooper - 28 Sep 2008 21:40 GMT
>On 28 Sep 2008, Paul Wolff wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>have the common meaning of a piece of stage dressing -- I'm with
>Mark.
I'm with Mark, too. A prop is used on stage to create a setting for
what is on featured display: the actors. The model is a setting for
what is on featured display: the clothing.
The model, though, contributes more than a stage prop.

Signature
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
John Varela - 29 Sep 2008 02:56 GMT
> If the writer meant that, he or she should have used "living
> mannequin"
Note definition 2, from MW:
John Varela - 29 Sep 2008 19:14 GMT
>> If the writer meant that, he or she should have used "living
>> mannequin"
>
> Note definition 2, from MW:
What happened here? My copy-and-paste didn't stick.
I'll try again, but if it doesn't work again, see
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mannequin
a
l
j
:,
f
s
s

Signature
John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.
John Holmes - 30 Sep 2008 13:53 GMT
>> Note definition 2, from MW:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> s
> s
It looks like a few bits of it stuck that time, John. Try using a bit
more glue.

Signature
Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au