Effin & Jeffin
|
|
Thread rating:  |
John Dean - 13 Dec 2008 13:23 GMT Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, Keppel & Betty? The local authority in Preston, Lancs, have decided to impose penalties for anti-social behaviour, including swearing in public which they coyly describe as "effin & jeffin".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3692394/City-centre-intr oduces-a-zero-tolerance-policy-against-swearing.html
http://tinyurl.com/55nrtm
"Messages against bad languages include "No 'Effin & 'Jeffin" and "No Aggro" which can be read on signs and banners across Preston, Lancashire. Other reminders are "No Pavement Pizza" which depicts a person being sick in the street and "Don't Pee Anti-Social" which shows someone urinating in a public place. The £20,000 'Respect our city' scheme is designed to reduce anti-social behaviour such as swearing, spitting, litter dropping and dog fouling. Police can give out fixed penalty notices of up to £80 for various public order offences while council officers can impose £75 on-the-spot fines for litter offences. "
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Django Cat - 13 Dec 2008 14:38 GMT > John Dean wrote
>From: "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> >Subject: Effin & Jeffin [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >reminders are "No Pavement Pizza" which depicts a person being sick in the >street In Glasgow the description is more phonetic: 'see Hughie and Ralph'.
DC --
Irwell - 13 Dec 2008 16:58 GMT > Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, > Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > order offences while council officers can impose £75 on-the-spot fines for > litter offences. " Effing and blinding is what I used to hear?
tinwhistler - 13 Dec 2008 18:58 GMT > Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, > Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > John Dean > Oxford The take-off in The Spoof has this topical rejoinder: Norman Springbok, spokesprat for the freedom and civil liberties campaign group Expletives-R-Us, told reporters "They can't do this. It's every Englishman's right to go out and get pissed-rotten drunk at Christmas, then stand in the middle of the street takin' a slash and gobbin' off at passers-by. It's all part of our traditional Yuletide festivities." -- Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Raymond O'Hara - 14 Dec 2008 04:23 GMT > Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, > Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > order offences while council officers can impose £75 on-the-spot fines for > litter offences. " A fine for puking? What do they expect you to do? You puke when you puke. As for public urination one should be discrete but here in Massachusetts we don't expect you to go in your pants either.
Django Cat - 14 Dec 2008 10:14 GMT > Raymond O'Hara wrote
>>"Messages against bad languages include "No 'Effin & 'Jeffin" and "No >>Aggro" which can be read on signs and banners across Preston, Lancashire. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >A fine for puking? What do they expect you to do? You puke when you puke. True, but in Northern towns on a Friday or Saturday night it's more of a lifestyle choice.
DC --
Robin Bignall - 14 Dec 2008 22:10 GMT >> Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, >> Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >As for public urination one should be discrete but here in Massachusetts we >don't expect you to go in your pants either. There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public lavatories, but we've been closing them down for decades. Many areas now have none -- those in supermarkets and garages being private and meant for customers. I've read that some councils offer money to local businesses such as supermarkets and restaurants to allow public access to restrooms.
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
Irwell - 14 Dec 2008 22:38 GMT >>> Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, >>> Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > businesses such as supermarkets and restaurants to allow public access > to restrooms. Borders is a chain of US bookstores, they have coffeeshops, comfy leather chairs, free headphones to listen to music CDs, and of course a wide range of books. To use the restrooms (WCs) one now has to see one of clerks and get a token, this because of vandalism, so even a hallowed bookshop is not immune.
tony cooper - 14 Dec 2008 23:14 GMT >Borders is a chain of US bookstores, they have coffeeshops, comfy leather >chairs, free headphones to listen to music CDs, and of course a wide range >of books. To use the restrooms (WCs) one now has to see one of clerks and >get a token, this because of vandalism, so even a hallowed bookshop is not >immune. The Borders in this area have not yet taken this step.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Chuck Riggs - 15 Dec 2008 10:34 GMT >>Borders is a chain of US bookstores, they have coffeeshops, comfy leather >>chairs, free headphones to listen to music CDs, and of course a wide range [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >The Borders in this area have not yet taken this step. From my memory of them, Borders primarily sells books for the Great Unwashed and almost never for the Saints and Scholars:
http://www.borders.com/online/store/Landing?kids=false&nav=5185&type=1
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Robin Bignall - 14 Dec 2008 23:22 GMT >>>> Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, >>>> Keppel & Betty? [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >get a token, this because of vandalism, so even a hallowed bookshop is not >immune. Many of the places that I have occasion to visit, except some supermarkets, have disabled toilets that are kept permanently locked. One either has to use a RADAR key (which most disabled people should have) or ask inside the establishment. For some reason, possibly connected with covert hatred of disabled people that has been reported before, toilets for the disabled are subject to frequent vandalism.
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
Adam Funk - 15 Dec 2008 13:06 GMT > Many of the places that I have occasion to visit, except some > supermarkets, have disabled toilets that are kept permanently locked. > One either has to use a RADAR key (which most disabled people should > have) or ask inside the establishment. For some reason, possibly > connected with covert hatred of disabled people that has been reported > before, toilets for the disabled are subject to frequent vandalism. I've been assuming that these toilets are locked because as single-occupancy rooms they would be better locations for taking drugs. (On a related note, some city-centre toilets have bluish lighting that is supposed to make it harder to spot your veins.)
 Signature The wonderful thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. [Grace Murray Hopper]
HVS - 15 Dec 2008 13:30 GMT On 15 Dec 2008, Adam Funk wrote
>> Many of the places that I have occasion to visit, except some >> supermarkets, have disabled toilets that are kept permanently [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > single-occupancy rooms they would be better locations for taking > drugs. I'd never thought of that; seems eminently logical.
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Robin Bignall - 15 Dec 2008 21:48 GMT >On 15 Dec 2008, Adam Funk wrote > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >I'd never thought of that; seems eminently logical. And for other things. Once, I was waiting for an occupied one when the door swung open and a teenage girl came out looking flushed and fastening her blouse, followed by a young man zipping up his trousers.
My first AUE boink was a meeting with Graeme Thomas in a hotel where he was running a Scrabble competition. There was a wedding reception going on in another room and the disabled toilet was occupied a long time by a perfectly able-bodied man who was changing into his dinner suit.
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
the Omrud - 15 Dec 2008 22:18 GMT > My first AUE boink was a meeting with Graeme Thomas in a hotel where > he was running a Scrabble competition. There was a wedding reception > going on in another room and the disabled toilet was occupied a long > time by a perfectly able-bodied man who was changing into his dinner > suit. Not a choral singer then. I have decades of practice at getting into my dinner suit in the most inconvenient places. I don't hang about.
 Signature David
TsuiDF - 16 Dec 2008 20:58 GMT > > My first AUE boink was a meeting with Graeme Thomas in a hotel where > > he was running a Scrabble competition. There was a wedding reception [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not a choral singer then. I have decades of practice at getting into my > dinner suit in the most inconvenient places. I don't hang about. Not an amateur flamenco dancer either. This year alone our entire troupe have changed into clothing a bit more complicated than dinner suits in: the minuscule kitchen of a rather crowded bar; the hallway of a very historic town hall; the smoking space of a local restaurant; the physiotherapy room of a retirement home.... In short, WIWAL we'd have thought we'd died and gone to heaven if we had a disabled toilet!
It's not really the clothes that are so tricky -- it's the lighting and the availability of mirrors for doing make-up and complicated hair ornaments that really gets to you.
cheers, S in B
the Omrud - 16 Dec 2008 22:30 GMT >>> My first AUE boink was a meeting with Graeme Thomas in a hotel where >>> he was running a Scrabble competition. There was a wedding reception [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > and the availability of mirrors for doing make-up and complicated hair > ornaments that really gets to you. Quite.
 Signature David
LFS - 16 Dec 2008 21:13 GMT >> Many of the places that I have occasion to visit, except some >> supermarkets, have disabled toilets that are kept permanently locked. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > drugs. (On a related note, some city-centre toilets have bluish > lighting that is supposed to make it harder to spot your veins.) I first encountered the blue lighting in Switzerland where it has been common in public toilets for at least the last decade. I haven't noticed it in the UK, though.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Nick - 17 Dec 2008 07:24 GMT > I first encountered the blue lighting in Switzerland where it has been > common in public toilets for at least the last decade. I haven't noticed > it in the UK, though. I have in a fair number of town centre pub toilets. And, rather to my disconcertenment, on Oxford buses (park and ride to city centre).
 Signature Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk Experimental version; http://canalplan.eu
Mark Brader - 18 Dec 2008 00:36 GMT Laura Spira:
>> I first encountered the blue lighting in Switzerland where it has been >> common in public toilets for at least the last decade. I haven't noticed >> it in the UK, though. "Nick":
> I have in a fair number of town centre pub toilets. And, rather to my > disconcertenment, Interesting wordenment.
> on Oxford buses (park and ride to city centre). On buses it is more likely to be used because drivers have complained about reflections when normal lighting is used. I have seen buses with dim blue lighting only near the front in a number of places.
 Signature Mark Brader | "And don't forget there were five separate computers msb@vex.net | in those days." Toronto | -- Bob NE20G3018 (Ira Levin, "This Perfect Day")
Raymond O'Hara - 20 Dec 2008 03:13 GMT >>>> Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? >>>> Wilson, [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > get a token, this because of vandalism, so even a hallowed bookshop is not > immune. I wandered into the Trader Vic's near Central Park and asked for directionas to the rest room. They informed me they were just for patrons, I informed him "I'll sh.t on your floor before I sh.t in my pants" they showed me the way to them.
Roland Hutchinson - 15 Dec 2008 03:32 GMT > There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small villages > were proud of the fact that they had decent public lavatories, but [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > businesses such as supermarkets and restaurants to allow public access > to restrooms. I think we've discussed that here before. It turns out to be a good deal all around: the council gets facilities for less than it would cost to build and maintain their own freestanding loos; the shops and restaurants get a subsidy that makes it worth their while to open their facilities to all, and they also get some extra customers who come to pee and stay (or return) to purchase.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Mike Lyle - 15 Dec 2008 21:08 GMT >> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > their facilities to all, and they also get some extra customers who > come to pee and stay (or return) to purchase. Or, in the case of the Richmond Waitrose, the shop would get a disgruntled queue of leg-crossed writhers waiting for the single lav. Mind you, the Tesco down the road has no provision at all for the bladderially overladen customer.
 Signature Mike.
John Dean - 15 Dec 2008 23:11 GMT >>> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >>> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Mind you, the Tesco down the road has no provision at all for the > bladderially overladen customer. Nor does our Co-op. They rebuilt the store several years ago and included a facility for washing your hands (literally, washing your hands) *in the middle of the store*. Presumably for those who got a little gritty from fondling the fruit and veg (literally, fruit and veg). Our Somerfield has a handy little bog, though, and it is placed so far back and is unsignposted that only hardy regulars know how to get to it, thereby reducing potential queues. And now, of course, Somerfield has been sold to the Co-op and we are waiting with various bits bated (predominantly breath) and crossed (legs and fingers in the main) to see which WC policy will survive the acquisition. And our City Council are already discussing toilet closure and use of private toilets as public:
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/headlines/3957295.Toilet_closures_investigated/ http://tinyurl.com/6l469h
"Cash-strapped Oxford City Council has a report which highlights a saving of £50,000 a year for three years if it closed 11 suburban toilets ... The council is also considering introducing charges at toilets and asking pubs and restaurants to open up their loos to the public."
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Irwell - 16 Dec 2008 00:06 GMT >>>> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >>>> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > council is also considering introducing charges at toilets and asking pubs > and restaurants to open up their loos to the public." 'Gardez loo' takes on a new meaning.
Roland Hutchinson - 16 Dec 2008 04:52 GMT >> "Cash-strapped Oxford City Council has a report which highlights a saving >> of £50,000 a year for three years if it closed 11 suburban toilets ... >> The council is also considering introducing charges at toilets and asking >> pubs and restaurants to open up their loos to the public." > > 'Gardez loo' takes on a new meaning. I'm still contemplating "suburban toilet".
Meanwhile, I very recently discovered that my local supermarket (an A&P "Fresh" store -- I wonder what they have in the non-Fresh ones) has a public convenience, has had it for years, identified by a conspicuous sign, located in a high-traffic area of the store, and I had walked past it hundereds of times without noticing it.
Necessity, as it is said, is the mother of invention.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
LFS - 16 Dec 2008 21:22 GMT >>>> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >>>> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > middle of the store*. Presumably for those who got a little gritty from > fondling the fruit and veg (literally, fruit and veg). The cause of considerable local puzzlement.
> Our Somerfield has a handy little bog, though, and it is placed so far back > and is unsignposted that only hardy regulars know how to get to it, thereby > reducing potential queues. I had no idea, thanks for the tip. I offer one in return, see below.
> And now, of course, Somerfield has been sold to the Co-op and we are waiting > with various bits bated (predominantly breath) and crossed (legs and fingers [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > council is also considering introducing charges at toilets and asking pubs > and restaurants to open up their loos to the public." In city centres I have found it useful to stride purposefully into the nearest large hotel (the posher the better) and seek out their facilities. The less formidable may choose to dissemble by speaking into a mobile phone and pretending to be en route to a business meeting: many people seem to conduct business in hotel lounges these days. For example, disembarking from the Oxford Tube at Marble Arch one can use the Marriott Park Lane which is conveniently near the bus stop (the loos are downstairs and are equipped with good soap and real towels).
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Mike Lyle - 16 Dec 2008 21:59 GMT [...]>
> In city centres I have found it useful to stride purposefully into the > nearest large hotel (the posher the better) and seek out their [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > stop (the loos are downstairs and are equipped with good soap and > real towels). Does the London office of American Express still have fine facilities downstairs? It was amusing to see American students having a "good wash" in there. Sudden horror: does the place even exist any more?
I was once with an Aus cousin (by marriage, I hasten to add) and his three-year-old son in the undergound car park of the Houses of Parliament (no, I don't remember why), when the 3-y-o reported a full bladder. Cousin-by-marriage selected a Rolls-Royce and got 3-y-o to disburse on one of its wheels.
 Signature Mike.
John Holmes - 20 Dec 2008 10:13 GMT > I was once with an Aus cousin (by marriage, I hasten to add) and his > three-year-old son in the undergound car park of the Houses of > Parliament (no, I don't remember why), when the 3-y-o reported a full > bladder. Cousin-by-marriage selected a Rolls-Royce and got 3-y-o to > disburse on one of its wheels. The near-side rear wheel, perchance?
 Signature Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
Maria C. - 16 Dec 2008 20:48 GMT >>> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >>> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Mind you, the Tesco down the road has no provision at all for the > bladderially overladen customer. I've missed some of this thread; if there were mentions of "lavs" or "restrooms" in US stores, I haven't seen them.
Nowadays, there are public restrooms (or "rest rooms," two words) in just about all retail outlets, including grocery stores and gas stations. There are signs pointing the way to them.
But in the past (say 30-40 years ago and beyond) public restrooms did not exist in most US stores, especially smaller ones; large department stores were the exception.[1]
Most, if not all, small stores had restrooms/toilets on the premises, but they were marked "Employees Only." Since employees often used that room for storing their purses, coats, etc., there was no way they were going to let a customer use it. (It was kept locked.)
Gas stations had public toilets, but they were reached via outside entrances only; sometimes they were simple "outhouses." Now you enter gas station restrooms them from inside the "store."[2] In my own experience, I'd say they're nice and clean at least 50% of the time.
Restrooms were almost always available in restaurants. (I'd say "always" but there were surely some exceptions somewhere.)
Also: What BrE posters call a "disabled" toilet would be a "handicap[ped] accessible" toilet (or simply the "handicapped") in the US. (I've heard some call it the "paraplegic" toilet or even the "handycrapper.") A "disabled toilet" would indicate, to many Americans, that the toilet is not working.
[1] And they were "pay" toilets. When empty, a little slide panel by the lock said "Vacant"; when they were in use, the little panel said "Occupied." You inserted a coin to get into a vacant stall. (A coin would not allow access to an Occupied stall.) When you slid the lock closed from inside, the "little panel" changed from "Vacant" to "Occupied." When the facility was crowded, women exiting a stall usually held the door open for the next woman in line so that she needed no coin. I may be forgetting a detail or two, but that's the way it all worked.
[2] A store inside a gas station is of the class called "convenience stores" (also known as "C-stores") among certain vendors.
 Signature Maria I've reread all the above, and probably missed a glaring error. Does that make me some classification of an "erring glarer"?
Mike Lyle - 16 Dec 2008 20:47 GMT [...]
> [1] And they were "pay" toilets. When empty, a little slide panel by > the lock said "Vacant"; when they were in use, the little panel said [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > needed no coin. I may be forgetting a detail or two, but that's the > way it all worked. [...]
The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered brass contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of those lovely old huge bronze pennies, hence the still-extant expression "spend a penny". When locked, the slide on the outside read not "Occupied" but "Engaged".
George Bernard Shaw listed it as one of his proudest achievements that, when a London County Councillor, he had successfully campaigned for the remission of the admission charge. (Or is that my memory doing its newish party trick?)
I feel sure I haven't imagined that some British public non-lav had the same devices to let one in for a penny. That capricious and hazy memory is trying to tell me it was Kew Gardens, but that doesn't seem right.
 Signature Mike.
LFS - 16 Dec 2008 21:28 GMT > [...] >> [1] And they were "pay" toilets. When empty, a little slide panel by [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > remission of the admission charge. (Or is that my memory doing its > newish party trick?) Barbara Castle subsequently did sterling work for ladies.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,895553,00.html
> I feel sure I haven't imagined that some British public non-lav had the > same devices to let one in for a penny. That capricious and hazy memory > is trying to tell me it was Kew Gardens, but that doesn't seem right. I'm sure that there were turnstiles operated by the insertion of a coin in non-lav places when I was young. Kew may well have been one, Southend Pier was probably another.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
the Omrud - 16 Dec 2008 22:34 GMT >> I feel sure I haven't imagined that some British public non-lav had >> the same devices to let one in for a penny. That capricious and hazy [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > in non-lav places when I was young. Kew may well have been one, Southend > Pier was probably another. In the 60s, Jephson Gardens in Leamington and Cromer Pier both admitted entrance through a turnstile on the insertion of a penny.
 Signature David
tony cooper - 17 Dec 2008 01:56 GMT >> I feel sure I haven't imagined that some British public non-lav had the >> same devices to let one in for a penny. That capricious and hazy memory [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >in non-lav places when I was young. Kew may well have been one, Southend >Pier was probably another. It required a penny to get into the stall in several places in Ireland and Scotland in 1969. I don't remember finding them in England, though. My wife was pregnant on that trip and spent several pennies.
Once, without a penny, my wife scooted under a door in Scotland. She slid through sidewise since that was a lower profile than on her back or front. The door was not a full door and stopped well-short of the floor. Almost an invitation to bypass the toll.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 16 Dec 2008 21:42 GMT >The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered brass >contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of those lovely >old huge bronze pennies, hence the still-extant expression "spend a >penny". When locked, the slide on the outside read not "Occupied" but >"Engaged". Here is one: http://www.pottostation.co.uk/images/Spend_A_Penny.jpg
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Mike Lyle - 16 Dec 2008 22:33 GMT >> The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered >> brass contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Here is one: > http://www.pottostation.co.uk/images/Spend_A_Penny.jpg Ah, Potto! Where the Prestons come from: the place must be real after all, and not an invention of the late Oliver Postgate.
But that's a v. fine example of Messrs Lockerbie and Wilkinson's handiwork. I don't think I ever saw one so sophisticated that it would accept two halfpennies. And I bet there won't be many present-day coin-op things still opping when a hundred years old, as I'm sure most or all of those would.
 Signature Mike.
Irwell - 16 Dec 2008 23:26 GMT >>> The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered >>> brass contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > coin-op things still opping when a hundred years old, as I'm sure most > or all of those would. The old Button "A" "B" telephone coin acceptors did a very good for their time.
Present day coin acceptors are more sophisticated, they measure thickness, diameter, magnetic content and weight. Decide the amount accepted, vend the product, give change and reject unacceptable coins.
Maria C. - 17 Dec 2008 00:35 GMT Mike Lyle wrote, in part:
> The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered > brass contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of > those lovely old huge bronze pennies, hence the still-extant > expression "spend a penny". When locked, the slide on the outside > read not "Occupied" but "Engaged". I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the coin involved was a dime.* (This was the the now-defunct J.L. Hudson Store in downtown Detroit.)
*A dime is ten cents. The coin box would have held more dimes than it could nickels (worth five cents), and thus would have meant emptying the box less often.
 Signature Maria C.
Barbara Bailey - 25 Dec 2008 22:06 GMT > I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, so > that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the coin [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > could nickels (worth five cents), and thus would have meant emptying the > box less often. Thee were still pay toilets in the rest rooms of the big department store (Goldblatts) in the town I grew up in (Aurora, Illinois) in the 60s. And yes, it was a dime. By the time I graduated from high school in 1976, Goldblatt's was long gone, and as far as I know, so were all the pay toilets in town.
Chuck Riggs - 26 Dec 2008 10:15 GMT >> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, so >> that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the coin [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Goldblatt's was long gone, and as far as I know, so were all the pay >toilets in town. I don't know about the ones at Goldblatts but it was my experience as a young man sometimes short of a dime that the collecting agent of most pay toilets can be subverted by either shimmying under the door or climbing over the enclosure. Problem solved.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Maria C. - 27 Dec 2008 20:48 GMT >>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, >>> so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > most pay toilets can be subverted by either shimmying under the door > or climbing over the enclosure. Problem solved. Please see my reply to Barbara. No doubt you're a better candidate than she would be about whether or not men/boys needed to pay for a urinial or just for a toilet.
And were there uniformed attendants in the mens room? I think there were in the ladies room at Hudson's -- at least sometimes. They offered towels after you'd washed your hands. Their main job may have been watching the ladies put money in the toilet admission boxes, though.
 Signature Maria C.
Sara Lorimer - 27 Dec 2008 21:40 GMT > And were there uniformed attendants in the mens room? I think there were > in the ladies room at Hudson's -- at least sometimes. They offered > towels after you'd washed your hands. Their main job may have been > watching the ladies put money in the toilet admission boxes, though. The last time I remeber seeing a restroom attendant was at a boink, of all places, held in a Harley Davidson Cafe, of all places.
 Signature SML
Maria C. - 27 Dec 2008 23:10 GMT >> And were there uniformed attendants in the mens room? I think there >> were in the ladies room at Hudson's -- at least sometimes. They [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The last time I remeber seeing a restroom attendant was at a boink, of > all places, held in a Harley Davidson Cafe, of all places. How was she dressed?
 Signature Maria C.
Sara Lorimer - 28 Dec 2008 00:07 GMT > > The last time I remeber seeing a restroom attendant was at a boink, of > > all places, held in a Harley Davidson Cafe, of all places. > > How was she dressed? I have a mental image of her wearing a polo shirt and khakis, but could be misremembering.
 Signature SML
Maria C. - 28 Dec 2008 02:59 GMT >>> The last time I remeber seeing a restroom attendant was at a boink, >>> of all places, held in a Harley Davidson Cafe, of all places. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I have a mental image of her wearing a polo shirt and khakis, but > could be misremembering. Oh. I was figuring at least /some/ leather.
 Signature Maria C.
Chuck Riggs - 28 Dec 2008 09:51 GMT >>> And were there uniformed attendants in the mens room? I think there >>> were in the ladies room at Hudson's -- at least sometimes. They [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >How was she dressed? If you're in parts of Europe the attendant can be of either sex.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Chuck Riggs - 28 Dec 2008 09:49 GMT >>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, >>>> so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >towels after you'd washed your hands. Their main job may have been >watching the ladies put money in the toilet admission boxes, though. Where there are attendants there is never, in my experience, a charge to use the room. The custom in such fancy places is to leave him or her a few coins, if you like, as you leave. Personally, I'd find it difficult not to.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Pat Durkin - 28 Dec 2008 15:47 GMT >>>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years >>>>> old, so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > her a few coins, if you like, as you leave. Personally, I'd find it > difficult not to. Well, I always thought it amounted to a kind of extortion, what with the attendant standing there offering a towel. (Kind of a "hint, hint, nudge, wink" so one couldn't miss the tip plate at the sink.)
Chuck Riggs - 29 Dec 2008 09:58 GMT >>>>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years >>>>>> old, so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >attendant standing there offering a towel. (Kind of a "hint, hint, >nudge, wink" so one couldn't miss the tip plate at the sink.) There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They provide a welcome service, as I see it, so I pay. Fair enough.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Pat Durkin - 29 Dec 2008 15:37 GMT >>>>>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years >>>>>>> old, so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They > provide a welcome service, as I see it, so I pay. Fair enough. You know, Chuck, when a guy stands in front of my exit door with a hand out (whether it hold a towel or a gat), it is extortion. If I don't wish to wash my hands, that's my business, and if I do so choose to wash, I can also choose to shake dry or use my shirt as a towel. And I shouldn't have to say "Excuse me" as I step around him.
Bah! Humbug! (Hope you had a good Christmas, Chuck.)
tony cooper - 29 Dec 2008 17:01 GMT >> There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these >> generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Bah! Humbug! (Hope you had a good Christmas, Chuck.) The bad guy here is the owner. Rather than employ someone to keep the restroom tidy, he puts someone in there that the customers pay to do the job.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Robin Bignall - 29 Dec 2008 21:28 GMT >>> There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these >>> generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >restroom tidy, he puts someone in there that the customers pay to do >the job. How does that differ from restaurants, where the Scrooge-ish owners make their wait staff depend on tips to make a living?
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
tony cooper - 30 Dec 2008 00:48 GMT >>>> There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these >>>> generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >How does that differ from restaurants, where the Scrooge-ish owners >make their wait staff depend on tips to make a living? If one person, part-time, could serve all of the tables the entire time the restaurant is open, then it would be the same.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Chuck Riggs - 30 Dec 2008 10:49 GMT >>>>> There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these >>>>> generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >If one person, part-time, could serve all of the tables the entire >time the restaurant is open, then it would be the same. The demands are different, obviously, but both waiters and cleaners deserve a return for the work they do. No one is in a better position to judge what is an equitable bonus for this work than the customer.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Chuck Riggs - 30 Dec 2008 10:43 GMT >>> There were no threats made, so there was no extortion, not that these >>> generally gentle people were in any position to be threatening. They [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >restroom tidy, he puts someone in there that the customers pay to do >the job. Would you like the job? I know I wouldn't. In addition to what the employer pays him, he certainly deserves a bonus from the user, especially if his service is exemplary.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Chuck Riggs - 30 Dec 2008 10:38 GMT >>>>>>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years >>>>>>>> old, so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] >wash, I can also choose to shake dry or use my shirt as a towel. And I >shouldn't have to say "Excuse me" as I step around him. Do you not appreciate a clean, well-lighted place to poo? If an attendant can make that possible, he at least deserves a few of my coins. That is not extortion; that is an exchange of money for service rendered.
>Bah! Humbug! (Hope you had a good Christmas, Chuck.) Thank you, Pat, but since my favourite day of this season is 2 January, I am looking forward to Friday.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Adam Funk - 06 Jan 2009 21:48 GMT >>You know, Chuck, when a guy stands in front of my exit door with a hand >>out (whether it hold a towel or a gat), it is extortion. If I don't [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > coins. That is not extortion; that is an exchange of money for service > rendered. That sounds reasonable, especially if it means I get a proper way to dry my hands instead of those useless, noisy, irritating electric dryers. (The people who procure those should not be allowed to have towels in their homes.)
 Signature I could show them the ansible, but it didn't make a very convincing Alien Artifact, being so incomprehensible as to fit in with hoax as well as with reality. (LeGuin 1969)
HVS - 06 Jan 2009 22:08 GMT On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote
> That sounds reasonable, especially if it means I get a proper > way to dry my hands instead of those useless, noisy, irritating > electric dryers. (The people who procure those should not be > allowed to have towels in their homes.) I agree -- hate the things -- but the new ones designed by Dyson (which I've used at Waterloo Station) seem to have greatly improved on the idea.
http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Leslie Danks - 06 Jan 2009 22:25 GMT > On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/ A few years ago, somewhere near Charing Cross station, I happened into a wine bar/restaurant whose gents' toilet sported a hot air hand drier of such ferocity and power that it must have once propelled the Concord. I suspect that whenever someone dried his hands, the lights started to go out all over Europe.
 Signature Les (BrE)
LFS - 06 Jan 2009 22:30 GMT > On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/ Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only encountered them at stations but I do hope they become more widely adopted.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
the Omrud - 07 Jan 2009 08:22 GMT >> On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only > encountered them at stations but I do hope they become more widely adopted. Yes indeed. Our favourite local noodle restaurant, Tampopo, has them.
OTOH, the dryers at Warwick service station sound like they're designed for wind tunnels.
 Signature David
Wood Avens - 07 Jan 2009 10:44 GMT >Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only >encountered them at stations but I do hope they become more widely adopted. If it's the same thing, I came across one at Gatwick Airport. It practically blew me across the room -- or at least, it pushed the skin across the backs of my hands, a weird and memorable sensation.
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
LFS - 07 Jan 2009 11:15 GMT >> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >> loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > practically blew me across the room -- or at least, it pushed the skin > across the backs of my hands, a weird and memorable sensation. The drying sensation was indeed rather unusual - I had this momentary vision of James Dyson inside the machine towelling my hands...
 Signature Laura, watching some very large snowflakes falling which must mean the temperature is rising... (emulate St. George for email)
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 07 Jan 2009 12:22 GMT >>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >>> loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >The drying sensation was indeed rather unusual - I had this momentary >vision of James Dyson inside the machine towelling my hands... 'citing, as Russell Brand would say.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
LFS - 07 Jan 2009 12:25 GMT >>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >>>> loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > 'citing, as Russell Brand would say. Who?
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 07 Jan 2009 12:55 GMT >>>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >>>>> loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Who? Just in case that is not a rhetorical question based on the fact that Brand has kept his head down since the "prank" phone call to Andrew Sachs -- him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Brand
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Mike Lyle - 07 Jan 2009 20:32 GMT >>>>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in >>>>>> public loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Brand has kept his head down since the "prank" phone call to Andrew > Sachs -- him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Brand Ghastly little campster. Watching the film of him and big-tongue pretending to apologize, I wondered if I could smell cocaine: it was that sort of I-walk-on-water behaviour. See also, I'm told, South American presidentissimos for a similar fuel.
Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the room.
 Signature Mike.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 07 Jan 2009 20:48 GMT >Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the >room. Good point.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Nick - 07 Jan 2009 20:53 GMT > Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact > more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the > room. Plus there's a fighting chance that you'll have got your hands dry, rather than stand behind someone for half a minute before wiping your hands on your trousers before walking out.
At work we have toilets with 3 urinals and 3 cubicals, 7 (count them!) hand basins, and 2 pathetic little hot air driers.
Just what sort of time/facility ratio did they have in mind?
 Signature Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk development version: http://canalplan.eu
Adam Funk - 07 Jan 2009 21:11 GMT >> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >> more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the >> room. Yes, that's been documented. I've also noticed that the toilets in hospitals in the UK always have paper towels (sometimes they also have electric driers, but not always).
> Plus there's a fighting chance that you'll have got your hands dry, > rather than stand behind someone for half a minute before wiping your [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Just what sort of time/facility ratio did they have in mind? The stinkers who designed the building are making getting your hands dry your problem rather than theirs.
 Signature This sig no verb.
Skitt - 07 Jan 2009 21:33 GMT >> At work we have toilets with 3 urinals and 3 cubicals, 7 (count >> them!) hand basins, and 2 pathetic little hot air driers. ObAUE: three what?
>> Just what sort of time/facility ratio did they have in mind? > > The stinkers who designed the building are making getting your hands > dry your problem rather than theirs. In my working career, I have not found those facilities unable to handle the needs of the clientele. If the cafeteria had a bad day, then maybe. Possibly it's all in the timing; maybe in the lack of socializing at times of need. Women might have different experiences regarding the latter.
 Signature Skitt (AmE)
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 07 Jan 2009 21:36 GMT >>> At work we have toilets with 3 urinals and 3 cubicals, 7 (count >>> them!) hand basins, and 2 pathetic little hot air driers. > >ObAUE: three what? 3 urinles and 3 cubicles?
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Glenn Knickerbocker - 08 Jan 2009 05:44 GMT > >> At work we have toilets with 3 urinals and 3 cubicals, > ObAUE: three what? You know, those cubical toilets, usually made of wood and built into small, unheated outbuildings.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 07 Jan 2009 21:23 GMT >> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >> more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Just what sort of time/facility ratio did they have in mind? How old is the building? I wonder whether there were roller towels originally which were replaced one-for-one by hot air dryers. Drying ones hands on a roller towel is much quicker than doing it with a hot air dryer.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
HVS - 07 Jan 2009 21:30 GMT On 07 Jan 2009, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote
>>> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are >>> in fact more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > dryers. Drying ones hands on a roller towel is much quicker than > doing it with a hot air dryer. The British Library has roller towels, bless 'em.
(Then again, archives need some sort of towelling, as hand driers are pretty useless when faced with the amount of soap and water needed to get archival dirt off your hands. I know of one that tried to eliminate paper towels, but they gave up when their month's stock of toilet paper kept disappearing within a couple of days.)
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Amethyst Deceiver - 08 Jan 2009 10:04 GMT > The British Library has roller towels, bless 'em. > > (Then again, archives need some sort of towelling, as hand driers > are pretty useless when faced with the amount of soap and water > needed to get archival dirt off your hands. I'm not sure how that follows. Hand driers don't have to get soap off your hands. They just have to get water off, regardless of how dirty your hands were to begin with. The bonus of towels, of course, is that poor washing practices mean you can see just how much dirt /wasn't/ washed off properly.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
HVS - 08 Jan 2009 11:18 GMT On 08 Jan 2009, Amethyst Deceiver wrote
>> The British Library has roller towels, bless 'em. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > of course, is that poor washing practices mean you can see just > how much dirt /wasn't/ washed off properly. Well, YMMV and all that, but the problem I find is that when I really have to scrub my hands and lower arms using a lot of soap -- say after working with volumes bound in perished red morocco, or handling really filthy building plans for a few hours -- I wind up with a *lot* of water to get rid of, and the hot air thing takes forever and a day to evaporate that amount of fluid.
To me, they work fine for a rinse-your-hands-with-a-bit-of-soap, but are useless for the half-a-bath-up-to-your-elbows jobs.
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
LFS - 07 Jan 2009 21:45 GMT >>> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >>> more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > which were replaced one-for-one by hot air dryers. Drying ones hands on a > roller towel is much quicker than doing it with a hot air dryer. Ugh, roller towels get very nasty when they are not replaced sufficiently often.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 00:11 GMT > Ugh, roller towels get very nasty when they are not replaced > sufficiently often. Have you encountered the type that provides a long roll of fresh cloth towelling enclosed in a large metal box (which takes up the used end as fresh is dispenesed)? It's the standard sort in North America, although paper towels or air driers must be more popular by a factor or hundreds if not thousands.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 08 Jan 2009 00:20 GMT >> Ugh, roller towels get very nasty when they are not replaced >> sufficiently often. > >Have you encountered the type that provides a long roll of fresh cloth >towelling enclosed in a large metal box (which takes up the used end as >fresh is dispenesed)? It's the standard sort in North America, It's the standard arrangement for cloth towelling in the UK too.
> although >paper towels or air driers must be more popular by a factor or hundreds if >not thousands.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 00:37 GMT >>> Ugh, roller towels get very nasty when they are not replaced >>> sufficiently often. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > It's the standard arrangement for cloth towelling in the UK too. Yes, but one has encountered, in recent years, the odd loop of toweling hung on a rod here and there in the UK in a few low-traffic loos. I've never seen that elsewhere.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
LFS - 08 Jan 2009 07:54 GMT >> Ugh, roller towels get very nasty when they are not replaced >> sufficiently often. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > paper towels or air driers must be more popular by a factor or hundreds if > not thousands. Yes, they're standard here too these days but all too often the used roll is not replaced quickly enough so there is no clean bit to pull out.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Nick - 08 Jan 2009 07:28 GMT >>> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >>> more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > which were replaced one-for-one by hot air dryers. Drying ones hands on a > roller towel is much quicker than doing it with a hot air dryer. Only a few years.
And while I'm here, I'll apologise for the cubicle error above. Perhaps if we reformed English spelling I wouldn't make howlers like that.
 Signature Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk development version: http://canalplan.eu
LFS - 07 Jan 2009 21:40 GMT >> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in fact >> more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Just what sort of time/facility ratio did they have in mind? Huh. If you're a woman, you spend an unbelievable proportion of your life queuing in loos.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Richard Bollard - 09 Jan 2009 04:16 GMT >>>>>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in >>>>>>> public loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs round the >room. And we can't have that. They should stop people breathing out for the same reason.
 Signature Richard Bollard Canberra Australia
To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.
Mike Lyle - 09 Jan 2009 16:07 GMT > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:32:38 -0000, "Mike Lyle" [...]
>> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in >> fact more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs >> round the room. > > And we can't have that. They should stop people breathing out for the > same reason. Only if they wipe their arses with their tongues. Great trick if you can do it.
 Signature Mike.
Richard Bollard - 13 Jan 2009 00:24 GMT >> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:32:38 -0000, "Mike Lyle" >[...] [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Only if they wipe their arses with their tongues. Great trick if you can >do it. Different set of orgs but the point is still valid isnit? I'm sceptical about germs being blown around the room. Even if they were, I'm sceptical that this presents any greater threat than other people's exhalations and what have you.
Personally I much prefer the paper anyway. You stop drying when you're dry not when the machine runs out of breath.
 Signature Richard Bollard Canberra Australia
To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.
CDB - 13 Jan 2009 13:59 GMT >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:32:38 -0000, "Mike Lyle" >> [...] >>>> Back to hand-driers. I've read somewhere that paper towels are in >>>> fact more hygienic, because the electric ones blow the micro-orgs >>>> round the room.
>>> And we can't have that. They should stop people breathing out for >>> the same reason.
>> Only if they wipe their arses with their tongues. Great trick if >> you can do it.
> Different set of orgs but the point is still valid isnit? I'm > sceptical about germs being blown around the room. Even if they > were, I'm sceptical that this presents any greater threat than other > people's exhalations and what have you.
> Personally I much prefer the paper anyway. You stop drying when > you're dry not when the machine runs out of breath. Unless the dispenser (sorry, sorry) runs out of paper. Back to the subject line: my recollection of the discussions of that idiom is that they have turned on the use of coin-operated locks on the booths; has anybody said that it is also a pun on "p."? Googlesearch says no, for whatever that's worth.
Mike Lyle - 13 Jan 2009 14:20 GMT [...]
> Unless the dispenser (sorry, sorry) runs out of paper. Back to the > subject line: my recollection of the discussions of that idiom is that > they have turned on the use of coin-operated locks on the booths; has > anybody said that it is also a pun on "p."? Googlesearch says no, for > whatever that's worth. In them days the abbr. for "penny" was "d.", so it's probably a fair 2c's worth.
 Signature Mike.
CDB - 13 Jan 2009 16:24 GMT > [...] >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> booths; has anybody said that it is also a pun on "p."? >> Googlesearch says no, for whatever that's worth.
> In them days the abbr. for "penny" was "d.", so it's probably a fair > 2c's worth. Ah. I did do a brief check with Gbooks (had to go out) and thought I had found a pre-decimalisation example (1908) but, on looking at it again, I see that "p." probably stood for pesos or the like. Too bad.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mU8dAAAAIAAJ&q=cost+%222+p.%22&dq=cost+%222+p .%22&lr=&pgis=1 http://tinyurl.com/8s5les
LFS - 07 Jan 2009 21:51 GMT >>>>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public >>>>>> loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > has kept his head down since the "prank" phone call to Andrew Sachs -- him: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Brand Ah yes. I am proud to say that, although I have heard the name, I wouldn't know him from Adam. James Dyson, on the other hand...
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Amethyst Deceiver - 07 Jan 2009 15:51 GMT > >Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation in public > >loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > practically blew me across the room -- or at least, it pushed the skin > across the backs of my hands, a weird and memorable sensation. I'm convinced they work partly by blowing the water off. Having looked down and seen droplets of water draining out of the bottom, that is.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
HVS - 07 Jan 2009 16:06 GMT On 07 Jan 2009, Amethyst Deceiver wrote
>>> Fantastic, aren't they? I don't often enter into conversation >>> in public loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > looked down and seen droplets of water draining out of the > bottom, that is. It's not "partly" -- that's precisely what it does. It's also why it's more efficient, as it doesn't need to heat the air to evaporate the water from your hands.
I can't find it now, but there's a fairly long Youtube clip where Dyson explains the thing.
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
HVS - 07 Jan 2009 16:07 GMT On 07 Jan 2009, HVS wrote
> On 07 Jan 2009, Amethyst Deceiver wrote > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > I can't find it now, but there's a fairly long Youtube clip > where Dyson explains the thing. Found it -- http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UiYptODDzE0
 Signature Cheers, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Amethyst Deceiver - 07 Jan 2009 15:48 GMT > > On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > loos but these seem to generate much approving chat. So far I've only > encountered them at stations but I do hope they become more widely adopted. Another vote for "Marvellous". And they have them in Tampopo (yet another Manchester noodle bar).
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
tyngewick.gawcott@ntlworld.com - 08 Jan 2009 16:08 GMT > In article <6si4c5F677j...@mid.individual.net>, > la...@DRAGONspira.fsbusiness.co.uk says... [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Another vote for "Marvellous". And they have them in Tampopo (yet > another Manchester noodle bar). Am I the only one to think that the choice of name, in the context of this discussion, is somewhat unfortunate.
-- TG
HVS - 08 Jan 2009 16:52 GMT On 08 Jan 2009, wrote
> On 7 Jan, 15:48, Amethyst Deceiver <s...@lindsayendell.co.uk> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Am I the only one to think that the choice of name, in the > context of this discussion, is somewhat unfortunate. No, but some of us just sniggered in private...
 Signature Cheers and fnarr, fnarr, Harvey CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Ian Jackson - 06 Jan 2009 22:32 GMT >On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/ Undoubtedly the noisiest hand driers (which were installed fairly recently) are in the toilets of Warwick Services, on the M40. When three or four of them are operating in unison, the noise level reminds me of the Concorde taking off, and must surely be in breach of several Elfin Safety regulations. My wife, who has tinnitus plus very sensitive high frequency hearing, absolutely dreads having to take a pit-stop there.
 Signature Ian
Richard Bollard - 09 Jan 2009 04:15 GMT >On 06 Jan 2009, Adam Funk wrote > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/ Looks good but do they really have to purify the air before blowing it? Mysophobia rampant.
 Signature Richard Bollard Canberra Australia
To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.
TsuiDF - 31 Dec 2008 18:12 GMT > >>>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, > >>>> so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > her a few coins, if you like, as you leave. Personally, I'd find it > difficult not to. Here the sole purpose of the attendant is to collect the fee for using the facilities. Must be a dismal job, albeit with the small pleasure of occasionally assaulting someone you believe hasn't paid. (I speak from experience as a victim of such an assault -- completely unwarranted, natch.)
Stephanie in Brussels
Maria C. - 27 Dec 2008 20:39 GMT >> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, >> so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> could nickels (worth five cents), and thus would have meant emptying >> the box less often. I should have added (for those outside the USA, who might not know it), that a dime is smaller in size than a nickel.
> Thee were still pay toilets in the rest rooms of the big department > store (Goldblatts) in the town I grew up in (Aurora, Illinois) in the > 60s. And yes, it was a dime. By the time I graduated from high school > in 1976, Goldblatt's was long gone, and as far as I know, so were all > the pay toilets in town. Just before Christmas, I was talking to my aunt, who is eight years older than I, about the subject (of pay toilets in Hudson's in the late 1940s). She confirmed that the price was a dime.
Now that I think about it more, that seems like a pretty high price. A dime would have bought a large candy bar in those days -- the kind that costs 65 or 70 cents (or more) now. A phone call cost a nickel then (in a phone booth). And a cup of coffee at the local GS was was a dime -- certainly no more than 15 cents.
In other words, a dime was not a particularly cheap price. It's no wonder that the ladies in the public restroom found ways to avoid paying. (Did the men pay anything for the use of a urinal? Just wondering.)
 Signature Maria C.
Chuck Riggs - 28 Dec 2008 09:57 GMT >>> I first encountered a "pay" toilet when I was around six years old, >>> so that would have been in the late 1940s. It seems to me that the [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >paying. (Did the men pay anything for the use of a urinal? Just >wondering.) In my drinking days I would have objected to paying a dime every time I used the toilet. Where there was an attendant, I reasoned that seasoned drinkers were deserving of a wholesale rate, so I'd tip every now and then, but generously.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs Near Dublin, Ireland
Steve Hayes - 17 Dec 2008 06:07 GMT >The old Sterlingetc pay-as-you-goes had marvellous over-engineered brass >contraptions on the doors. The visitor had to put in one of those lovely >old huge bronze pennies, hence the still-extant expression "spend a >penny". When locked, the slide on the outside read not "Occupied" but >"Engaged". Last time I was in the UK one had to spend a pound to get into a plastic chemical contraption on the station platform.
 Signature Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
tony cooper - 16 Dec 2008 21:39 GMT >>>> There was a time in Britain when local councils of even small >>>> villages were proud of the fact that they had decent public [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >just about all retail outlets, including grocery stores and gas >stations. There are signs pointing the way to them. Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the mother to take a child of either sex into the room and have privacy. Solves the problem of the father taking his daughter into the men's room or the mother taking the son into the women's room.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Wood Avens - 16 Dec 2008 21:48 GMT >Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >"family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the >mother to take a child of either sex into the room and have privacy. >Solves the problem of the father taking his daughter into the men's >room or the mother taking the son into the women's room. A two-holer might be better, if it meant that the small child was too busy to open the door while its parent is still, hmm, engaged.
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
Maria C. - 17 Dec 2008 00:42 GMT >> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > A two-holer might be better, if it meant that the small child was too > busy to open the door while its parent is still, hmm, engaged. A "two-holer," to me, means an outhouse (with two seats/holes). I remember wondering, when I was a kid, why there were two holes. Sharing a toilet was something I just wouldn't have done. (I was an only child, if that helps explain it.)
We encountered many outhouses when traveling in the 1940s & 1950s. There was also one on my uncle's farm at one time.
 Signature Maria C.
Skitt - 17 Dec 2008 01:02 GMT >>> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >>> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > We encountered many outhouses when traveling in the 1940s & 1950s. > There was also one on my uncle's farm at one time. The most interesting one in my life was an outhouse in the DP Camp in Germany. It was a well-ventilated and unheated brick building, divided in two halves, with separate entrances for men and women. The M/F accomodations were back to back, with about six holes in each half, but there were no dividers between thr side-by-side holes. The seating surface was at a slight slant, slanting down from back to front. The interesting part was that if one bent down to look horizontally from a hole to the hole on the other side, one could see a butt when one was there. The scenery had to be slightly different when looking from the other side.
 Signature Skitt (AmE)
tony cooper - 17 Dec 2008 02:01 GMT >>> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >>> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >a toilet was something I just wouldn't have done. (I was an only child, >if that helps explain it.) "One-holer" and "two-holer" certainly do come from describing outhouses. There was no toilet seat on the ones I've seen; just wooden surface. The advantage of a two-holer was that a dry surface might be available if a male had recently used it.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Pat Durkin - 17 Dec 2008 05:15 GMT >>>> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >>>> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > wooden surface. The advantage of a two-holer was that a dry surface > might be available if a male had recently used it. Seems to me we've visited this topic before, because I recall mentioning the cadillac of outhouses: the three-holer. Two large holes and a smaller one, for kids. In my mother's family the outhouse was a very social place.
Nick Spalding - 17 Dec 2008 11:25 GMT Pat Durkin wrote, in <gia1t8$ggu$1@news.albasani.net> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:15:25 -0600:
> >>>> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The > >>>> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > smaller one, for kids. In my mother's family the outhouse was a very > social place. <http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library/specialist.html> "Luke Harkins was my first customer. He heerd about me specializin' and decided to take a chance. I built fer him the average eight family, three holer. "
 Signature Nick Spalding BrE/IrE
Robin Bignall - 17 Dec 2008 22:42 GMT >>>>> Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The >>>>> "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >smaller one, for kids. In my mother's family the outhouse was a very >social place. I was an only child, and sharing a toilet was unthinkable. In fact, I was in my late twenties when I went to a party and a woman I had known since we were at school kept the lav door open while she peed because she didn't want to interrupt our conversation. I felt quite uncomfortable, even though I'd had a romp or two with her some years previously.
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
R H Draney - 18 Dec 2008 05:26 GMT Robin Bignall filted:
>I was an only child, and sharing a toilet was unthinkable. In fact, I >was in my late twenties when I went to a party and a woman I had known >since we were at school kept the lav door open while she peed because >she didn't want to interrupt our conversation. I felt quite >uncomfortable, even though I'd had a romp or two with her some years >previously. How far, exactly, does this taboo extend?...would you be unable to "do your duty" if the cat were sitting there watching you?...r
 Signature "You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!" "You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"
Robin Bignall - 18 Dec 2008 21:54 GMT >Robin Bignall filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >How far, exactly, does this taboo extend?...would you be unable to "do your >duty" if the cat were sitting there watching you?...r No, it's only humans. I don't want to watch them or have them watch me. I don't know whether it's a leftover from being painfully shy as a youngster.
 Signature Robin (BrE) Herts, England
Maria C. - 17 Dec 2008 00:35 GMT > Many stores now have three restrooms: men, women, and family. The > "family" restroom is a one-holer and allows either the father or the > mother to take a child of either sex into the room and have privacy. > Solves the problem of the father taking his daughter into the men's > room or the mother taking the son into the women's room. A story you might expect: I went into a "family" restroom at an airport once because the women's room was closed for cleaning, and I was desperate. The door didn't lock -- or perhaps I didn't lock it properly. Either way, no one was locked out, and I was speechless when a man with a couple of children came in. As I now remember it, I was done with my business, and was just washing my hands. (I hope I'm remembering it right.) I hurried out, with a feeling that "embarrassment" doesn't cover. "Chagrin" might.
I can't remember if the toilet was in a stall or just sitting there. I certainly won't go back to find out.
 Signature Maria C.
Mark Brader - 17 Dec 2008 06:59 GMT Maria Conlon:
> Nowadays, there are public restrooms (or "rest rooms," two words) in > just about all retail outlets, including grocery stores and gas [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > not exist in most US stores, especially smaller ones; large department > stores were the exception... Interesting. I expect to find public washrooms in stores only if the stores are quite large (not necessarily department stores; Indigo, which is similar to Barnes & Noble in the US, and Home Depot come to mind) or are connected to a gas station. I expect pubs/bars and sit-down restaurants to have them, as well as some fast-food restaurants, but in these places they are sometimes ask only customers to use them.
I wonder if there is variation by region or state or province or country or if either Maria or I is* just overgeneralizing.
*ObAUE: "is"? "am"? What?
 Signature Mark Brader | "Forgive me if I misunderstood myself, but Toronto | I don't think I was arguing in favour of that..." msb@vex.net | -- Geoff Butler
My text in this article is in the public domain.
tony cooper - 17 Dec 2008 13:33 GMT >Maria Conlon: >> Nowadays, there are public restrooms (or "rest rooms," two words) in [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >restaurants to have them, as well as some fast-food restaurants, but >in these places they are sometimes ask only customers to use them. All convenience stores in this area have restrooms available to the public. Most are freely available, but some are kept locked and a key must be requested at the counter. Key or no key depends on the neighborhood. The locked facilities are in the "bad" neighborhoods.
Some stores have locked restrooms because they want to see what the user is carrying before they admit them. This is done to prevent the user from going into the restroom to conceal merchandise in their clothing.
 Signature Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Pat Durkin - 17 Dec 2008 15:54 GMT > Maria Conlon: >> Nowadays, there are public restrooms (or "rest rooms," two words) in [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > *ObAUE: "is"? "am"? What? I just _know_ you wrote that entire paragraph with the goal of ending up with that conundrum.
In this case, I would say that proximity is the determiner. . ."am".
Iain - 17 Dec 2008 22:47 GMT > Effin & Jeffin - up there with Flotsam & Jetsam? Laurel & Hardy? Wilson, > Keppel & Betty? My favourite ever instance of the phrase: http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=PwHrxELHX18
~Iain
|
|
|