Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

disssimilar

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
thedarkman - 30 Dec 2008 15:38 GMT
it is not dissimilar from the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"

it is not dissimilar to the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"

which is correct?
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2008 17:28 GMT
> it is not dissimilar from the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>
> it is not dissimilar to the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>
> which is correct?

"To", in my American English.

You're reminding me of "in the darkmans clip and kiss", by the way.

--
Jerry Friedman can't remember the rest of it.
Ian Jackson - 30 Dec 2008 17:45 GMT
In message
<4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>> it is not dissimilar from the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>--
>Jerry Friedman can't remember the rest of it.

If it was "different", correct BrE would be "from" (often incorrectly
"to"). AmE seems to have settled the argument by using "than" (which
seems to be creeping into BrE).

Of course, there's no argument about "similar", which is universally
"to". However, equating "dissimilar" to "different", and trying to use
the BrE "from" sounds wrong. Like AmE, it's obviously "to".

I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".
Signature

Ian

jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2008 18:25 GMT
On Dec 30, 12:45 pm, Ian Jackson
<ianREMOVETHISjack...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09...@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".

The prescribed AmE is "different from".  "Different than" has about
the same status here as "different to" has on your side, except that
some prescriptivists accept "than" when followed by a clause; the AHD
gives "The campus is different than it was 20 years ago."

http://www.bartleby.com/61/53/D0215300.html

--
Jerry Friedman

--
Jerry Friedman
Ian Jackson - 30 Dec 2008 19:24 GMT
In message
<7c8974e9-47c5-4349-98a5-ac2e1d6c434c@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>On Dec 30, 12:45 pm, Ian Jackson
><ianREMOVETHISjack...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>--
>Jerry Friedman

Noted. Of course, when followed by a clause, "from" often requires the
addition of something like "how" or a "that which", as in "The campus is
different from how it was 20 years ago", "This car is different from
that which I used to drive".
Signature

Ian

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 30 Dec 2008 18:30 GMT
>In message
><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".

Four of the quotations in the OED are:

   1802 E. PARSONS Myst. Visit II. 154 A wish of her own dissimilar with any
   expressed wish of his.

   1819 W. TAYLOR in Monthly Rev. LXXXIX. 78 Short lucubrations, not
   dissimilar from those of the Spectator.

   1848 C. BRONTË J. Eyre xii, A new picture..it was dissimilar to all the
   others hanging there.

   1876 HUMPHREYS Coin-Coll. Man. vi. 69 An entirely new style of
   coinage..which..was..dissimilar from the Roman.

So, there we have it: dissimilar "with", "from" or "to". Pick your take.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Don Aitken - 30 Dec 2008 23:50 GMT
>In message
><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>"to"). AmE seems to have settled the argument by using "than" (which
>seems to be creeping into BrE).

The idea that "different to" is any less correct than "different from"
in BrE was dismissed by Fowler as a "superstition" and "mere pedantry"
eighty years ago. He quotes the statement in the OED that it is found
in "writers of all ages". I don't think I've ever seen it seriously
argued that he was wrong.

Signature

Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"

Ian Jackson - 31 Dec 2008 08:42 GMT
>>In message
>><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>in "writers of all ages". I don't think I've ever seen it seriously
>argued that he was wrong.

You can follow "similar" with "if/when compared to". As you can do the
same with "different", I suppose you could argue that it is logical to
say "different to".
Signature

Ian

Nick Spalding - 31 Dec 2008 11:08 GMT
Ian Jackson wrote, in <TGBHyMDKCzWJFwcz@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:42:50 +0000:

> >>In message
> >><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> same with "different", I suppose you could argue that it is logical to
> say "different to".

On the other hand you can't say "differs to", I can't anyway; maybe that
is where the opposition to "different to" comes from.
Signature

Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE

Ian Jackson - 31 Dec 2008 11:47 GMT
>Ian Jackson wrote, in <TGBHyMDKCzWJFwcz@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:42:50 +0000:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>On the other hand you can't say "differs to", I can't anyway; maybe that
>is where the opposition to "different to" comes from.

Possibly. But while there is the verb "to differ", there is no
equivalent "to similar".
Signature

Ian

CDB - 30 Dec 2008 20:44 GMT
[dissimilar to]

> You're reminding me of "in the darkmans clip and kiss", by the way.

[Jerry Friedman can't remember the rest of it]

Embarrassment of choice, innit.

http://books.google.com/books?id=fxWfE1JLUIMC&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=%22in+the+dark
mans+clip+and+kiss%22&source=web&ots=snbP-97sHh&sig=yKS9LETHi4OSEb8ROxepBjc7pXY&
hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result

http://tinyurl.com/795fhb

http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Farmer-MusaPedestris/the-maunders-praise-of-his-stro
wling-mort.html

http://tinyurl.com/9qgguv
Prai Jei - 30 Dec 2008 18:30 GMT
thedarkman set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:

> it is not dissimilar from the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>
> it is not dissimilar to the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>
> which is correct?

Any triple letter is definitely incorrect so it's "dissimilar".
Signature

ξ:) Proud to be curly

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.