In message
<4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>> it is not dissimilar from the Elton John composition "Song For Guy"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>--
>Jerry Friedman can't remember the rest of it.
If it was "different", correct BrE would be "from" (often incorrectly
"to"). AmE seems to have settled the argument by using "than" (which
seems to be creeping into BrE).
Of course, there's no argument about "similar", which is universally
"to". However, equating "dissimilar" to "different", and trying to use
the BrE "from" sounds wrong. Like AmE, it's obviously "to".
I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".

Signature
Ian
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2008 18:25 GMT
On Dec 30, 12:45 pm, Ian Jackson
<ianREMOVETHISjack...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09...@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".
The prescribed AmE is "different from". "Different than" has about
the same status here as "different to" has on your side, except that
some prescriptivists accept "than" when followed by a clause; the AHD
gives "The campus is different than it was 20 years ago."
http://www.bartleby.com/61/53/D0215300.html
--
Jerry Friedman
--
Jerry Friedman
Ian Jackson - 30 Dec 2008 19:24 GMT
In message
<7c8974e9-47c5-4349-98a5-ac2e1d6c434c@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>On Dec 30, 12:45 pm, Ian Jackson
><ianREMOVETHISjack...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>--
>Jerry Friedman
Noted. Of course, when followed by a clause, "from" often requires the
addition of something like "how" or a "that which", as in "The campus is
different from how it was 20 years ago", "This car is different from
that which I used to drive".

Signature
Ian
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 30 Dec 2008 18:30 GMT
>In message
><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>I'm glad to hear that AmE isn't "than".
Four of the quotations in the OED are:
1802 E. PARSONS Myst. Visit II. 154 A wish of her own dissimilar with any
expressed wish of his.
1819 W. TAYLOR in Monthly Rev. LXXXIX. 78 Short lucubrations, not
dissimilar from those of the Spectator.
1848 C. BRONTË J. Eyre xii, A new picture..it was dissimilar to all the
others hanging there.
1876 HUMPHREYS Coin-Coll. Man. vi. 69 An entirely new style of
coinage..which..was..dissimilar from the Roman.
So, there we have it: dissimilar "with", "from" or "to". Pick your take.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
Don Aitken - 30 Dec 2008 23:50 GMT
>In message
><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>"to"). AmE seems to have settled the argument by using "than" (which
>seems to be creeping into BrE).
The idea that "different to" is any less correct than "different from"
in BrE was dismissed by Fowler as a "superstition" and "mere pedantry"
eighty years ago. He quotes the statement in the OED that it is found
in "writers of all ages". I don't think I've ever seen it seriously
argued that he was wrong.

Signature
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
Ian Jackson - 31 Dec 2008 08:42 GMT
>>In message
>><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>in "writers of all ages". I don't think I've ever seen it seriously
>argued that he was wrong.
You can follow "similar" with "if/when compared to". As you can do the
same with "different", I suppose you could argue that it is logical to
say "different to".

Signature
Ian
Nick Spalding - 31 Dec 2008 11:08 GMT
Ian Jackson wrote, in <TGBHyMDKCzWJFwcz@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:42:50 +0000:
> >>In message
> >><4b81b476-af85-4f99-a83d-ca6a5ef09b25@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> same with "different", I suppose you could argue that it is logical to
> say "different to".
On the other hand you can't say "differs to", I can't anyway; maybe that
is where the opposition to "different to" comes from.

Signature
Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE
Ian Jackson - 31 Dec 2008 11:47 GMT
>Ian Jackson wrote, in <TGBHyMDKCzWJFwcz@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:42:50 +0000:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>On the other hand you can't say "differs to", I can't anyway; maybe that
>is where the opposition to "different to" comes from.
Possibly. But while there is the verb "to differ", there is no
equivalent "to similar".

Signature
Ian
[dissimilar to]
> You're reminding me of "in the darkmans clip and kiss", by the way.
[Jerry Friedman can't remember the rest of it]
Embarrassment of choice, innit.
http://books.google.com/books?id=fxWfE1JLUIMC&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=%22in+the+dark
mans+clip+and+kiss%22&source=web&ots=snbP-97sHh&sig=yKS9LETHi4OSEb8ROxepBjc7pXY&
hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result
http://tinyurl.com/795fhb
http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Farmer-MusaPedestris/the-maunders-praise-of-his-stro
wling-mort.html
http://tinyurl.com/9qgguv