Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Grammarian's blog

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lew - 01 Jan 2009 20:14 GMT
I've just been reading my friend Christine Janson's blog about the public
(ab)use of English these days,
<http://ccjcrotchets.blogspot.com/>,
and some of her upcoming articles that I was privileged to read in advance of
their posting.

I don't normally favor blogspot, but her articles are witty and delightful
expositions on English grammar and usage, with the titular crotchety attitude
toward those who ignore good grammar and style either through ignorance or
indifference.

I have no financial interest whatsoever in her blog, and keep Javascript
turned off for blogspot whenever I do visit it.  I just enjoy her expert
writing, and suspect that many denizens of a.u.english will as well.

Signature

Lew
I am terrified lest I have made in this post the same sorts of errors.

Django Cat - 01 Jan 2009 22:53 GMT
> Lew wrote

>I've just been reading my friend Christine Janson's blog about the public
>(ab)use of English these days, <http://ccjcrotchets.blogspot.com/>,
>and some of her upcoming articles that I was privileged to read in advance of
>their posting.
>
>I don't normally favor blogspot,

That's a shame.

>but her articles are witty and delightful
>expositions on English grammar and usage, with the titular crotchety attitude
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I have no financial interest whatsoever in her blog, and keep Javascript
>turned off for blogspot whenever I do visit it.

Why?

DC
--
Lew - 01 Jan 2009 23:58 GMT
Lew wrote:
>> I don't normally favor blogspot,

> That's a shame.

Too many people post scams and plagiarized "free e-books" there, then spam
Usenet to advertise their crap.  This is so prevalent that it has made me
cautious of those who use it.  I don't see why that's "a shame", though.  It's
not like I'm missing much.

Lew wrote:
>> I have no financial interest whatsoever in her blog, and keep Javascript
>> turned off for blogspot whenever I do visit it.

> Why?

Why don't I have a financial interest in Christine's blog?  Because it would
be silly - it's not a for-pay site and there isn't any money to share.
Because it's not really my business to start with.  "Damn it, Jim, I'm a
doctor, not a bricklayer!"  Because I provide no value to that blog for which
I deserve compensation.

Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the blogs
just fine without it.

Signature

Lew

Django Cat - 02 Jan 2009 08:50 GMT
> Lew wrote

>>Why?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
>blogs just fine without it.

That's what my 'why' was about.  Blogspot is especially prone to people adding
javascript routines?  Javascript inherently delivers
annoying/objectionable/offensive/malicious material?

DC, happily bloging on blogspot since 2002
--
Lew - 03 Jan 2009 03:12 GMT
Lew wrote:
>> Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
>> blogs just fine without it.

> That's what my 'why' was about.  Blogspot is especially prone to people adding
> javascript [sic] routines?  Javascript inherently delivers
> annoying/objectionable/offensive/malicious material?

You tell me.  The burden of proof is on enablement, not disablement.

Signature

Lew

Django Cat - 03 Jan 2009 03:20 GMT
> Lew wrote

>Lew wrote:
>>>Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>You tell me.  The burden of proof is on enablement, not disablement.

I'm sorry, that's far too clever for me.  I'd just like to know why you choose
to disable Javascript for some sites, and why Blogger sites in particular.

DC
--
Steve Hayes - 03 Jan 2009 03:49 GMT
>Lew wrote:
>>> Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>You tell me.  The burden of proof is on enablement, not disablement.

Proof of what?

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Lew - 03 Jan 2009 05:53 GMT
>> Lew wrote:
>>>> Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Proof of what?

An assertion.  Enablement: "One should enable Javascript".  Disablement: "One
should disable Javascript."  It was a bit of poetic license, I admit.  What I
was saying was that I need an affirmative reason to enable Javascript, whereas
Django Cat was asking why I failed to enable it.  Lacking a good reason to
turn it on, I leave it off.

Signature

Lew

Andreas Waldenburger - 03 Jan 2009 06:26 GMT
> >> Lew wrote:
> >>>> Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> failed to enable it.  Lacking a good reason to turn it on, I leave it
> off.

But why make such a big point of it?

/W

Signature

My real email address is constructed by swapping the domain with the
recipient (local part).

Django Cat - 03 Jan 2009 11:29 GMT
> Lew wrote

>>Proof of what?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>whereas Django Cat was asking why I failed to enable it.  Lacking a good
>reason to turn it on, I leave it off.

You must lose a lot of functionality, especially if you need to fill forms in.

Do you leave images turned off in your browser as well?  I've taken to saving
electricity by turning the screen off while I watch TV.  I'm thinking about
going the whole way and leaving the sound off as well.

DC
--
Roland Hutchinson - 04 Jan 2009 05:33 GMT
>> Lew wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> electricity by turning the screen off while I watch TV.  I'm thinking
> about going the whole way and leaving the sound off as well.

Now on your computer, you can save energy on the LCD by setting your screen
to white lettering on a white background.

For even more savings, turn off the backlight.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Django Cat - 04 Jan 2009 10:17 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson wrote

>> Do you leave images turned off in your browser as well?  I've taken to
>> saving
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>For even more savings, turn off the backlight.

I'll take that sound advice, Roland.  Have you tried http://www.blackle.com/ ?

DC
--
Donna Richoux - 04 Jan 2009 22:47 GMT
> http://www.blackle.com/

Interesting idea, but no matter how I set it, it returns answers (for
me) in Dutch. Ordinary Google, I can set to English. Is there some way
around this?

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

J. J. Lodder - 07 Jan 2009 13:00 GMT
> > http://www.blackle.com/
>
> Interesting idea, but no matter how I set it, it returns answers (for
> me) in Dutch. Ordinary Google, I can set to English. Is there some way
> around this?

Strange. For me it returns mostly English results,

Jan
Roland Hutchinson - 05 Jan 2009 05:55 GMT
>> Roland Hutchinson wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I'll take that sound advice, Roland.  Have you tried
> http://www.blackle.com/ ?

It only saves energy on CRT displays.  How very quaintly second-millennium.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Steve Hayes - 04 Jan 2009 04:22 GMT
>>> Lew wrote:
>>>>> Why do I keep Javascript turned off at blogspot?  Because I can read the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Django Cat was asking why I failed to enable it.  Lacking a good reason to
>turn it on, I leave it off.

OK.

I disable Javascript by default, using the "Noscript" add-on for Firefox.

Last month was the first full month I had used it, and the notice that I had
run out of bandwidth and needed to buy more came on 21 December, whereas
previously I used to get it about the 10th-13th of the month.

By blocking scripts that run bandwidth-hogging things like videos and
podcasts, it has saved me quite a lot of money, but Noscript also lets me turn
on Javascript for some sites or pages, partly or fully. I usually have it
partly tuned on for Blogspot, so that it blocks video and audio, but lets me
see widgets that show who visited the blog etc.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Steve Hayes - 02 Jan 2009 05:04 GMT
>I've just been reading my friend Christine Janson's blog about the public
>(ab)use of English these days,
><http://ccjcrotchets.blogspot.com/>,
>and some of her upcoming articles that I was privileged to read in advance of
>their posting.

Thanks for the tip.

>I don't normally favor blogspot, but her articles are witty and delightful
>expositions on English grammar and usage, with the titular crotchety attitude
>toward those who ignore good grammar and style either through ignorance or
>indifference.

Blogspot is a public host, so the quality of the content will vary according
to the individual bloggers.

>I have no financial interest whatsoever in her blog, and keep Javascript
>turned off for blogspot whenever I do visit it.  I just enjoy her expert
>writing, and suspect that many denizens of a.u.english will as well.

Blogspot is one of the few sites where I do permit Javascript, though not for
everything. I blog video and podcasts everywhere, since they consume
bandwidth, and are rarely worth the extra cost.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Steve Hayes - 02 Jan 2009 05:20 GMT
>Blogspot is one of the few sites where I do permit Javascript, though not for
>everything. I blog video and podcasts everywhere, since they consume
>bandwidth, and are rarely worth the extra cost.

That should read "block" not "blog".

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.