Hi,
I was reading "The Returning of the Melting Pot" by Arthur
Schlesinger.
The article is available on this page:
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0101/article_8.shtml
--------------------------
These developments portend a new turn in American life. Instead of a
transformative nation with a new and distinct identity, America
increasingly sees itself as preservative of old identities, We used to
say e puribus unum. Now we glorify pluribus and belittle unum. The
melting pot yields to the Tower of Babel.
The new turn has had marked impact on the universities. Very little
agitates academia more these days than the demands of passionate
minorities for revision of the curriculum: [...]
--------------------------
The syntax of "Very little agitates academia more these days than the
demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum" is
odd to me, especially the part of "more these days than ..."
Does it mean
[the demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum]
agitates academia in a greater degree than the new turn?
Can anyone explain it?
Regards
Tacia
Leslie Danks - 07 Jan 2009 19:31 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> [the demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum]
> agitates academia in a greater degree than the new turn?
No; the "new turn" is described in the first paragraph you cite. The
sentence "Very little agitates ..." is the _outcome_ of the "new turn".
Perhaps a slight adjustment makes the sentence clearer:
"These days, very little agitates academia more than the
demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum" ?
> Can anyone explain it?
I tried...

Signature
Les (BrE)
Don Phillipson - 07 Jan 2009 19:34 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> [the demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum]
> agitates academia in a greater degree than the new turn?
Not quite. Read the paragraph this way:
1. "Very little agitates X more" = "What agitates X most"
2. AS's first paragraph says American life has turned (= changed
direction.) American life used to privilege common all-American
characters; American life now privileges selected minority or
non-American characters.
3. AS's second paragraph describes the character of this "turn"
in universities, which now are "agitated" by "demands of passionate
minorities" that the curriculum be revised to suit their programmes
or preferences.
It is not particularly clear, but AS is now a tired old professor. I think
he is making two unrelated points.
(a) Quiet campuses: when he was an active academic, universities
reformed themselves demographically (mainly by admitting black
and female students equally with white men) without becoming
agitated. (Agitation occurred only at a few Deep South universities
that tried to exclude black students.) But passion about social
or demographic reform is now accepted (normal) everywhere.
(b) Curriculum. When leading universities reformed themselves
as in (a) the curriculum did not change. But the passionate
nowadays demand that the curriculum itself be altered to
recognize the special interests of blacks, feminists, sexual
nonconformists, etc.

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Roland Hutchinson - 07 Jan 2009 19:43 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Can anyone explain it?
It means:
Now and in the very recent past ("these days"), very few things ("very
little") agitate academia to a greater degree than [the demands of
passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum] does. ("does" =
agitate academia).
Clear now?

Signature
Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Mike Lyle - 07 Jan 2009 20:06 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> [the demands of passionate minorities for revision of the curriculum]
> agitates academia in a greater degree than the new turn?
[...]
Not quite. The demands of minorities /represent/ the "new turn". So he's
saying "Few things agitate universities more than minorities' demands
for curriculum change". These demands agitate universities more than
most other things do.
I detest the word "academia", by the way; but it's perfectly safe to
ignore me.

Signature
Mike.
Skitt - 07 Jan 2009 20:09 GMT
Mike Lyle wrote, in very small part:
> I detest the word "academia", by the way; but it's perfectly safe to
> ignore me.
Well, you can always use Rey's version of the word.

Signature
Skitt (AmE)
Robin Bignall - 07 Jan 2009 22:36 GMT
>Mike Lyle wrote, in very small part:
>
>> I detest the word "academia", by the way; but it's perfectly safe to
>> ignore me.
>
>Well, you can always use Rey's version of the word.
Apropos, it's Saint Reinhold's day today, patron saint of the stone
masons who built large parts of the buildings in which academia
operates.

Signature
Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England
Steve Hayes - 08 Jan 2009 02:29 GMT
>Hi,
Yes, academia prefers "Good morning".

Signature
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
Alan Jones - 08 Jan 2009 14:05 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Can anyone explain it?
"These days" is a separate adverb phrase, which could be placed at the
beginning of the sentence. The meaning is roughly "Currently something that
greatly agitates academia are the demands ...."
Alan Jones