Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Perhaps Off Topic / liberalism and conservative

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tacia - 08 Jan 2009 02:02 GMT
Hi,

I was reading /Hailing While Black/ by Shelby Steele.
The article is available here:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1000422,00.html

----------
In Manhattan recently I attempted something that is thought to be all
but impossible for a black man: I tried to hail a cab going uptown
toward Harlem after dark. And I'll admit to feeling a new nervousness.
This simple action--black man hailing cab--is now a tableau in
America's ongoing culture war. __If no cab swerves in to pick me up,
America is still a racist country, and the entire superstructure of
contemporary liberalism is bolstered. If I catch a ride, conservatives
can breath easier.__ So, as I raise my hand and step from the curb,
much is at stake.
----------
(The first paragraph)

I don't quite understand the political context, and I kinda fail to
comprehend the part within the underscores.
And I don't mean to incense anyone... :-|

Best Wishes
Tacia
Fred - 08 Jan 2009 02:53 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> comprehend the part within the underscores.
> And I don't mean to incense anyone... :-|

Well get rid of the 'kinda' then.
tony cooper - 08 Jan 2009 03:23 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> comprehend the part within the underscores.
>> And I don't mean to incense anyone... :-|

I'm not sure what your difficulty is, but it could be because you live
in country that uses "liberal" and "conservative" differently than we
do in the United States.  

A formal explanation, copied from a website, is:  

Today the word "liberalism" is used differently in different
countries. (See Liberalism worldwide.) One of the greatest contrasts
is between the usage in the United States and usage in the rest of the
world, most sharply in Continental Europe.[30] In the US, liberalism
is usually understood to refer to modern liberalism, as contrasted
with conservatism. American liberals endorse regulation for business,
a limited social welfare state, and support broad racial, ethnic,
sexual and religious tolerance, and thus more readily embrace
Pluralism, and affirmative action. In Europe, on the other hand,
liberalism is characterized by beliefs in free trade and limited
government; it is not only contrasted with conservatism and Christian
Democracy, but also with socialism and social democracy. In some
countries, European liberals share common positions with Christian
Democrats.

A less formal explanation - and one more to the point of this article
- is that US liberals tend to think that racism has not been
eradicated in the US, and US conservatives think that everything that
needs to be done to eradicate racism has been done.  

If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
then this is a sign that racism is less prevalent today, and the
conservative's views are correct.  If no cab will stop, this is a sign
that racism is still a problem and the liberal view is correct.

The test is, of course, completely bogus.  The results are more likely
to be determined by the individual attitude of the cab driver and not
any sign of changing social attitudes in general.  Steele is writer,
though, and needs something to write about.  Without a "hook", he has
no story.

The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
will endanger him (prejudice based on all blacks being criminals) or
that he will not be compensated adequately (prejudice based on blacks
not tipping as generously as whites).  The cab driver's attitude may
be based solely on wanted short hops and not long drives. Or that he's
about to go off-shift.  Or that he thinks that tourists of any color
are better tippers.  

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 04:21 GMT
> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> about to go off-shift.  Or that he thinks that tourists of any color
> are better tippers.

Let me guess, Tony: you've never actually been a black man trying to hail a
cab.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

tony cooper - 08 Jan 2009 04:46 GMT
>> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
>> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Let me guess, Tony: you've never actually been a black man trying to hail a
>cab.

Good guess.  However, I have ridden in many Manhattan cabs.  To set up
a Manhattan cab driver as some sort of indicator of racial attitude in
the US is completely bogus.  The cab driver is most likely to be of
some racial/ethnic minority himself, not American, or not
representative of Americans in general.  

Yet, Steele is projecting the possible outcome of the hailing to be
indicative of a nationwide attitude change or non-change in racial
perception.  He's willing to say the liberals are right, or the
conservatives are right, based on the actions of someone who is not
representative of either group.

All he can conclude is that it is easier, or it is not easier, for a
black man to get a Manhattan cab driver to take a fare to Harlem.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 05:19 GMT
>>> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
>>> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> some racial/ethnic minority himself, not American, or not
> representative of Americans in general.

Nonetheless, the legendary unwillingness of many NYC cabbies to pick up
African-American fares or to take fares to certain neighborhoods is widely
regarded as (among other things) symbolic of American lack of political
will to ensure that public services are offered on a non-discriminatory
basis.

> Yet, Steele is projecting the possible outcome of the hailing to be
> indicative of a nationwide attitude change or non-change in racial
> perception.  He's willing to say the liberals are right, or the
> conservatives are right, based on the actions of someone who is not
> representative of either group.

He's speaking in symbolic terms, too.  He is also speaking tongue-in-cheek,
which is evident from the full article even if your ironimeter can't detect
it in the opening sentences quoted by the OP.

> All he can conclude is that it is easier, or it is not easier, for a
> black man to get a Manhattan cab driver to take a fare to Harlem.

Yes, that's what a purely scientific analysis might deduce, after repeated
sampling.  Steele makes it clear that what he is doing in the article is
meditating on racism and liberalism (and his own journey to conservatism)
as he collects a single data point on a particular day.  He clearly is
aware that the fact that he got picked up by the first cab that day doesn't
guarantee that he won't be passed by on a future ocassion, as has happend
in the past.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

tony cooper - 08 Jan 2009 05:41 GMT
>>>> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
>>>> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>will to ensure that public services are offered on a non-discriminatory
>basis.

I really don't understand that thinking.  I can see how it is symbolic
of how the City of New York is unwilling to ensure, but not how this
can be extrapolated to a symbol of "American lack of political will".

>> Yet, Steele is projecting the possible outcome of the hailing to be
>> indicative of a nationwide attitude change or non-change in racial
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>which is evident from the full article even if your ironimeter can't detect
>it in the opening sentences quoted by the OP.

The OP is questioning the political context involving liberals and
conservatives. I attempted to deal with that, but I thought it was
necessary to point out that this is not a valid indicator of changes.
I didn't feel it was necessary to comment on the tone of the article.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 06:40 GMT
>>>>> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
>>>>> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> of how the City of New York is unwilling to ensure, but not how this
> can be extrapolated to a symbol of "American lack of political will".

New York is itself symbolic of America.

It's also not the only town in which black men have encountered difficulty
hailing cabs.

>>> Yet, Steele is projecting the possible outcome of the hailing to be
>>> indicative of a nationwide attitude change or non-change in racial
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> necessary to point out that this is not a valid indicator of changes.
> I didn't feel it was necessary to comment on the tone of the article.

And I, on the other hand, felt it _was_ necessary to examine the tone of the
article and point out that the author was not in any way intending to
represent the one incident he was narrating as a definitive, scientific
test of a precise hypothesis.

In other words, you, he, and I are agreed on the objective merits of
his "test".

We can leave it at that, I think.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

R H Draney - 08 Jan 2009 07:49 GMT
Roland Hutchinson filted:

>> I really don't understand that thinking.  I can see how it is symbolic
>> of how the City of New York is unwilling to ensure, but not how this
>> can be extrapolated to a symbol of "American lack of political will".
>
>New York is itself symbolic of America.

It's only New Yorkers who think so....r

Signature

"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"

tony cooper - 08 Jan 2009 14:59 GMT
>Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>It's only New Yorkers who think so....r

I almost posted the same comment.  I doubt if many people in Wichita
or Amarillo are aware of the problems blacks have in hailing taxis in
Manhattan.  There are things about New York City that are recognized
as symbolic of America all across the country, but not everything that
goes on there is.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Skitt - 08 Jan 2009 22:05 GMT
>> Roland Hutchinson filted:

>>>> I really don't understand that thinking.  I can see how it is
>>>> symbolic of how the City of New York is unwilling to ensure, but
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> as symbolic of America all across the country, but not everything that
> goes on there is.

You just made me remember an acquaintance of mine, back from the late 1960s
in Seattle.  About him was written:
===================
This was [Harry] McFadden's last tournament; in little more than a week he'd
be dead, for, as I'd mentioned in Vol. IV, he'd be fatally shot outside his
cab by a passenger he may have struggled with. Dr. Michael Scott told me
that Harry was a tough guy and, though he sometimes worked bad
neighborhoods, had vowed never to give in to anyone who'd threaten him.
Michael said that all the cab drivers in Seattle showed up to pay their
respects at his funeral, and that a table tennis flower setting was
arranged: a large bed of  carnations, red with a white center (to represent
the red rubber racket and the white ball). Michael himself offered a $5,000
reward for information leading to the capture of the killer, and he was
eventually found, arrested, and convicted.
====================
Ref.: http://www.usatt.org/articles/history06/history06_05.shtml

I had played Harry many times with very meager success.  He was a good guy.
I had left Seattle by the time of his demise, but I heard about it when it
happened.

Signature

Skitt (AmE)

CDB - 08 Jan 2009 15:40 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson filted:

>>> I really don't understand that thinking.  I can see how it is
>>> symbolic of how the City of New York is unwilling to ensure, but
>>> not how this can be extrapolated to a symbol of "American lack of
>>> political will".

>> New York is itself symbolic of America.

> It's only New Yorkers who think so....r

Some others do too.  Osama didn't choose New York for his symbolic
castration of your country any more randomly than he chose Washington
for his symbolic rape.
Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 16:09 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> It's only New Yorkers who think so....r

And people in other countries.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

the Omrud - 08 Jan 2009 16:17 GMT
>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> And people in other countries.

*Some* people in other countries.

Signature

David

Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 18:44 GMT
>>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> *Some* people in other countries.

Yes, that's what I meant by my unquantified "people" -- but thank you for
the necessary clarification.

Not all New Yorkers think so, either!

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Garrett Wollman - 08 Jan 2009 21:04 GMT
>>>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>>> New York is itself symbolic of America.
>>>> It's only New Yorkers who think so....r
>>> And people in other countries.
>> *Some* people in other countries.
>Not all New Yorkers think so, either!

Sure.  Some of them understand that Boston is the Hub of the Solar
System.

-GAWollman

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Roland Hutchinson - 08 Jan 2009 22:04 GMT
>>>>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>>>> New York is itself symbolic of America.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Sure.  Some of them understand that Boston is the Hub of the Solar
> System.

Of the Universe, rather!

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Garrett Wollman - 09 Jan 2009 03:26 GMT
>> [I wrote:]
>> Sure.  Some of them understand that Boston is the Hub of the Solar
>> System.
>
>Of the Universe, rather!

That's not how Holmes put it.

-GAWollman

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Roland Hutchinson - 09 Jan 2009 06:16 GMT
>>> [I wrote:]
>>> Sure.  Some of them understand that Boston is the Hub of the Solar
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> That's not how Holmes put it.

A good point.  I believe, however, that he has been outvoted by generations
of Greater Bostonians by now.  Well, a couple of generations, anyway, since
galaxies got themselves discovered 'n' stuff.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Chuck Riggs - 09 Jan 2009 15:01 GMT
>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>And people in other countries.

And by people circling the planet.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

R H Draney - 09 Jan 2009 18:35 GMT
Chuck Riggs filted:

>>> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>And by people circling the planet.

Looking for a place to park the saucer?...r

Signature

"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"

Chuck Riggs - 10 Jan 2009 11:27 GMT
>Chuck Riggs filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Looking for a place to park the saucer?...r

They'd by wise, as all Martians are, to park it outside the city and
take the train in.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Roland Hutchinson - 10 Jan 2009 14:22 GMT
>>Chuck Riggs filted:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> They'd by wise, as all Martians are, to park it outside the city and
> take the train in.

I understand that they generally park at Grovers Mill and take catch train
at Princeton Junction.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

J. J. Lodder - 10 Jan 2009 22:02 GMT
> >Chuck Riggs filted:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> They'd by wise, as all Martians are, to park it outside the city and
> take the train in.

Why bother, when you can land anywhere right in the city centre?
Like this one, parked on the Netherlands Railways main office building.
<http://www.panoramio.com/photo/140791>
(see google earth for a top view)

Jan
Chuck Riggs - 08 Jan 2009 17:30 GMT
>>>>>> The test is also bogus because the cab driver's attitude will be based
>>>>>> on several factors, and not just that taking a black man to Harlem
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>It's also not the only town in which black men have encountered difficulty
>hailing cabs.

Correct, sir. When I drove for Silver Spring Taxi near Washington,
D.C., few of the white drivers would venture into the African-American
sections of the city. Even as a lily-white white man, I did and never
had a problem, but that may be because I am either fearless or
foolish. The only problems I had were with the occasional obstreperous
white person who thought I'd overcharged by going the long way.

<snip>
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Arcadian Rises - 08 Jan 2009 11:37 GMT
[...]

> I have ridden in many Manhattan cabs. �To set up
> a Manhattan cab driver as some sort of indicator of racial attitude in
> the US is completely bogus. �The cab driver is most likely to be of
> some racial/ethnic minority himself, not American, or not
> representative of Americans in general. �

Those minorities are also people, made of flesh and blood; like any
other people, they may be racist too, even against their own race.
J. J. Lodder - 08 Jan 2009 22:48 GMT
> >> Hi,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> countries, European liberals share common positions with Christian
> Democrats.

Indeed. The Netherlands for example
have a party (about 20% of the vote) that calls itself liberal,
and that attempts to monopolize the term liberal. [1]
Politically they are conservatives, and are members
(with the British conservatives) of the conservative fraction
in the european parliament.
(conservative on economic matters, liberal on human rights issues)

Jan

[1] The party calls itself VVD, volkspartij voor vrijheid en democracy,
(lit. People's Party for Freedom and Democracy)
so naive Americans going by the words may take them for commies.
John Holmes - 09 Jan 2009 08:38 GMT
> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> about to go off-shift.  Or that he thinks that tourists of any color
> are better tippers.

Your arguments are entirely bogus. It is the combined attitudes of all
the passing cab drivers that is being tested. "If no cab swerves in to
pick me up..." was what it said, and if that happens it is not because
of merely a single driver's convenience of the moment.

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

tony cooper - 09 Jan 2009 14:01 GMT
>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>pick me up..." was what it said, and if that happens it is not because
>of merely a single driver's convenience of the moment.

You feel that the author is going to stand on a Manhattan street
corner, hail cabs, decline to get in any who stop for him, and remain
there hailing more cabs because he's running a survey of the racial
attitudes of cab drivers?  

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Roland Hutchinson - 09 Jan 2009 17:30 GMT
>>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
>>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> there hailing more cabs because he's running a survey of the racial
> attitudes of cab drivers?

No, but keeping statistics on how many cabs pass him, on average, before one
picks him up would yield meaningful data over the long run.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Arcadian Rises - 09 Jan 2009 18:50 GMT
> >>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
> >>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> No, but keeping statistics on how many cabs pass him, on average, before one
> picks him up would yield meaningful data over the long run.

What meaningful data?

Suppose during a 15 minutes wait there were four empty cabs that
passed him. One was driven by a racist driver who refused to pick him
up on the grounds that he was Black. The other three didn't pick him
up for three other different reasons such as previous commitment,
driver's diarrhea and driver not seeing the man hailing the cab. All
we know is that four drivers did not pick him up.  Of course, you're
free to draw any meaningful conclusions you want, including that
everything happens for a reason, there are no coincidences and the
like.
Roland Hutchinson - 10 Jan 2009 02:15 GMT
>> >>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
>> >>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> everything happens for a reason, there are no coincidences and the
> like.

Well, you need a control as well -- such as a white man wearing the same
suit hailing cabs in the next block.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Arcadian Rises - 10 Jan 2009 10:58 GMT
> >> >>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
> >> >>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Well, you need a control as well -- such as a white man wearing the same
> suit hailing cabs in the next block.

Then replace "diarrhea" with mistaking the white man for an old
acquaintance, or driver's change of mind due to suddenly remembering a
pressing financial obligation.

My point is that statistics cannot possibly take into account all
circumstances, or, as someone else more famous said before, statistics
can help you prove whatever you want to prove.
Mike Lyle - 10 Jan 2009 22:41 GMT
[...]

> My point is that statistics cannot possibly take into account all
> circumstances, or, as someone else more famous said before, statistics
> can help you prove whatever you want to prove.

That isn't statistics.

Signature

Mike.

J. J. Lodder - 11 Jan 2009 10:04 GMT
> My point is that statistics cannot possibly take into account all
> circumstances, or, as someone else more famous said before, statistics
> can help you prove whatever you want to prove.

If you can take all circumstances into account
you don't need or want statistics,

Jan
tony cooper - 09 Jan 2009 19:28 GMT
>>>> If the cab picks the writer (an African-American) and agrees to take
>>>> him to Harlem (a predominately African-American area of New York City,
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>No, but keeping statistics on how many cabs pass him, on average, before one
>picks him up would yield meaningful data over the long run.

You really think that's what he had in mind?  Be just his luck to be
picked up by the first.

I'm not even sure it would be meaningful to note how many passed him
by.  I've hailed NYC cabs, and watched several go by without stopping.
I don't know whether they missed my hand wave, whether I wasn't giving
the proper NYC hand wave, whether they were unable to cut across the
necessary lane, or whether my off-the-rack suit tipped me off as a
moderate tipper.  Could be they were busy feeding their goat and
didn't see me.  

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Arcadian Rises - 08 Jan 2009 12:15 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Best Wishes
> Tacia

Take it as metaphorical language, or as a parable, not as a scientific
proof or rational inference of the claim the author makes. Such claim
doesn't even hold the experimental value of the parallel made by some
observers between the Halloween costumes and the outcome of the
presidential election the costumes allegedly predict.

This is an opinion article, not scientific research; the author has
the constitutional right to make any parallels and draw any inference
he wants in order to support his opinion. There is no penalty for
unsubstantiated claims or totally outlandish  parallels and
inferences.

.
Hatunen - 08 Jan 2009 09:11 GMT
>This is an opinion article, not scientific research; the author has
>the constitutional right to make any parallels and draw any inference
>he wants in order to support his opinion. There is no penalty for
>unsubstantiated claims or totally outlandish  parallels and
>inferences.

But don't forget that other Americans have the constitutional
right to publicly state their opinion that an author is full of
sh.t and making unsubstantiated statements.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

tinwhistler - 08 Jan 2009 19:50 GMT
> > Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> .

Not only is there no penalty for unsubstantiated claims or totally
outlandish  parallels and inferences, but that appears to be the
direction in which most of the rewards in publishing and MSM lie.  The
Gawker blog today discusses a view that the name reporters and pundits
minimize the wrongs of white collar criminals like Madoff out of
professional courtesy -- everyone rich is scrambling to sell their
soul as fast as possible, no?
--
Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.