Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Crossword Bob's Fiction Workshop

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
elanders - 11 Jan 2009 10:09 GMT
I've listed sentences from my manuscript with Bob's edits following so
we can all benefit from his vast crossword puzzle publishing background:

I wrote --

"Accompanying the six coaches were a detachment of King's dragoons"

-------------------------------------------->
Bob's edit:

[Were they in the coaches or alongside? If the latter -- and that's what
the preceding paragraph suggests -- they were accompanying those in the
coaches, not the coaches.

--------------------------------------------->

But ...

"Accompanying the motorcade ..."
http://tinyurl.com/6tu2do

*******************************************************

I wrote --

"12 slim-waisted men bristling with sword, pistol, and
campaign gear ..."

--------------------------------------------->

Bob's edit:

"Bristle" implies some sort of aggressiveness.  I'd say "wearing," which
is neutral. Surely they weren't arriving to attack the palace.

---------------------------------------------->

But ...

"Bristling with weapons..."
http://tinyurl.com/77rfgx

*********************************************************

"Poor, Franz was looking ..."

Of course the comma after Poor is a typo. No matter, Bob treats it as if
it were intentional:

--------------------------------------------->
Bob's edit:

 Poor, [It's early in 2009, but this is a strong
contender for dumbest comma of the year]

---------------------------------------------->

More from Bob's fiction workshop coming directly.

EG
HVS - 11 Jan 2009 10:21 GMT
On 11 Jan 2009, elanders wrote

> I've listed sentences from my manuscript with Bob's edits
> following so we can all benefit from his vast crossword puzzle
> publishing background:

We're supposed to credit the views of an ex-hack?

The quality of your writing speaks volumes as to why that's your job
status.
elanders - 11 Jan 2009 10:24 GMT
> On 11 Jan 2009, elanders wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The quality of your writing speaks volumes as to why that's your job
> status.  

Thank you.

And if you work as hard as I did, one day you'll be an ex-hack too.

EG
Don Phillipson - 11 Jan 2009 11:23 GMT
> I wrote --
>
> "Accompanying the six coaches were a detachment of King's dragoons"

Classic howler . . .   The subject of the verb is detachment, a
singular noun, with which the verb were/was must agree in number.

Signature

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

elanders - 11 Jan 2009 15:09 GMT
>> I wrote --
>>
>> "Accompanying the six coaches were a detachment of King's dragoons"
>
> Classic howler . . .   The subject of the verb is detachment, a
> singular noun, with which the verb were/was must agree in number.

It was correct in the excerpt I posted. Check it out if you don't
believe me, it's still up.

Accompanying the six coaches was a detachment of King's dragoons: 12
slim-waisted men bristling with sword, pistol, and campaign gear.

Last night I was sleepy when I rewrote it here.

EG
Raymond O'Hara - 11 Jan 2009 14:36 GMT
> I've listed sentences from my manuscript with Bob's edits following so we
> can all benefit from his vast crossword puzzle publishing background:
>
> I wrote --
>
> "Accompanying the six coaches were a detachment of King's dragoons"

It would be 'the' King's dragoons.
There is no regt known as King's dragoons
'
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.