>What an abomination. I've just heard it in connection with the local
>discovery of a rare Roman coin by a 'metal detectorist' ie the person who
>swings the 'metal detector'. Couldn't call them both 'metal detectors'
>apparently even though they are.
>It's in OED and well established on-line.
>< shudder >
I consider myself a good expectorist.
Hawking it up.
>>What an abomination. I've just heard it in connection with the local
>>discovery of a rare Roman coin by a 'metal detectorist' ie the person who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>< shudder >
>I consider myself a good expectorist.
Surprising that "ejaculist" gets not a single hit on Google.
>Hawking it up.
Being groomed to become a dogmatician.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany

Signature
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
> >What an abomination. I've just heard it in connection with the local
> >discovery of a rare Roman coin by a 'metal detectorist' ie the person who
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I consider myself a good expectorist.
> Hawking it up.
...but there is some history here - the person who operates a typewriter used to
be "a typewriter", now of course they are a typist (except they probably aren't
using typewriters anymore).
------
GC.
Pat Durkin - 27 Feb 2004 21:43 GMT
> > >What an abomination. I've just heard it in connection with the local
> > >discovery of a rare Roman coin by a 'metal detectorist' ie the person who
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> be "a typewriter", now of course they are a typist (except they probably aren't
> using typewriters anymore).
I think it was just a month ago when we were discussing "The Shootist".
Mark Brader - 27 Feb 2004 22:25 GMT
Gwilym Calon:
> ...but there is some history here - the person who operates a
> typewriter used to be "a typewriter", now of course they are
> a typist (except they probably aren't using typewriters anymore).
Similarly, a "computer" used to be a person who computed. Based on
some things I've read that were written around 1949, there was a
short period about then when a reasonable person might have guessed
that the standard term for what we now call computers was going to
be "electronic brains".

Signature
Mark Brader, Toronto "Email isn't worth the paper it's
msb@vex.net printed on" -- Brian T. Schellenberger
John Dean - 28 Feb 2004 00:21 GMT
> Gwilym Calon:
>> ...but there is some history here - the person who operates a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> that the standard term for what we now call computers was going to
> be "electronic brains".
'computer' was a job description in UK Social Security. It certainly existed
as far back as the Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance in the 60s
and probably went back further than that. Entitlement to Sickness benefit
was determined by a 'rater' who established the basic weekly rate of
entitlement and the 'computer' calculated what was owing each week. By hand,
of course - no computers, no hand-held calculators and the hand-cranked
adding machine never left the Cashier's office.

Signature
John Dean
Oxford
sage - 28 Feb 2004 02:23 GMT
> > Gwilym Calon:
> >> ...but there is some history here - the person who operates a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> of course - no computers, no hand-held calculators and the hand-cranked
> adding machine never left the Cashier's office.
Was the "hand-cranked adding machine"" the same as a comptometer? Operators
of these machines were much in demand in the late 50s.
Cheers, Sage
John Dean - 28 Feb 2004 12:51 GMT
>>> Gwilym Calon:
>>>> ...but there is some history here - the person who operates a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Was the "hand-cranked adding machine"" the same as a comptometer?
> Operators of these machines were much in demand in the late 50s.
No. My Mother was a comptometer operator (her term) in the 1930s. She
returned to part time employment in the 60s and had to use a non-electric
adding machine and had a hell of a time sorting it out.
A comptometer keyboard typically looks like this :-
http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/operating_a_comptometer.html
which is why it required special training and was a skilled operation.
The early adding machines had the kind of keyboard we're now used to on
hand-held calculators and had separate function keys. But you still had to
crank a handle to tell it you were ready for the answer. Similar to this:
http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/imperial_office_master_add-lis.html

Signature
John Dean
Oxford
Irwell - 28 Feb 2004 16:42 GMT
>>>> Gwilym Calon:
>>>>> ...but there is some history here - the person who operates a
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>crank a handle to tell it you were ready for the answer. Similar to this:
>http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/imperial_office_master_add-lis.html
Before joining the army in WW2 I worked at the Ford
plant in Eccles, they were mass producing the Rolls Royce
Merlin engines for Spitfires and Lancaster bombers,
The number crunching in the engineering department was
done by banks of comptometer operators, to me. as a young
tenager, it seemed amazing how they could operate so fast
without even looking at the machines.
John Dean - 28 Feb 2004 00:24 GMT
>>> What an abomination. I've just heard it in connection with the local
>>> discovery of a rare Roman coin by a 'metal detectorist' ie the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> typewriter used to be "a typewriter", now of course they are a typist
> (except they probably aren't using typewriters anymore).
Pity they didn't become typewriterists. I remember the Brit Civil Service
switching from typewriters to word processors and PCs in the 80s. We still
called the operators typists and for several years that was their official
grade.

Signature
John Dean
Oxford
[ ... ]
> I consider myself a good expectorist.
> Hawking it up.
Kinda makes you wonder what sort of superpowers Hawkman[1] really
had.
[1] <http://www.cvalley.net/~canote/hawkman.html>

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Nucular loogies, perhaps