Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"insentient" the right word here?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rittmanp - 22 Jan 2009 20:11 GMT
Pardon my brain fade, but I can’t seem to find a word to finish my
sentence. See the following passage:

Lyell opposed the idea of the jump from non-rational animals to
rational humans, as being too much of a jump for his uniformitarianism
to accommodate. If species could transmigrate from non-rational to
rational beings, why couldn’t other such leaps take place in the
animal, plant, and ______ worlds?

The word I’m looking for means “non-animal or –plant life.” I’d use
“insentient,” but I’m not sure that it means the exact same thing; it
is a bit pedantic as well. Is there any (other) word that refers to
all non-living matter—water, earth, rocks, etc.?
rittmanp - 22 Jan 2009 20:16 GMT
OK "inanimate" seems to do.  Any others?
Martin Ambuhl - 22 Jan 2009 20:57 GMT
> Pardon my brain fade, but I can’t seem to find a word to finish my
> sentence. See the following passage:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> is a bit pedantic as well. Is there any (other) word that refers to
> all non-living matter—water, earth, rocks, etc.?

The cliche has "mineral" in that slot, although inanimate, inorganic,
nonorganic, lifeless, and non-living are all probably better. But [in-,
non-]organic suffer from the mass confusion over the term "organic".
Don Aitken - 22 Jan 2009 21:20 GMT
>Pardon my brain fade, but I can’t seem to find a word to finish my
>sentence. See the following passage:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>is a bit pedantic as well. Is there any (other) word that refers to
>all non-living matter—water, earth, rocks, etc.?

I would prrefer "non-sentient". But that use of "transmigrate" is
wrong. Souls transmigrate (or not). Species transmute or transform (or
not).

Signature

Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"

Don Phillipson - 22 Jan 2009 22:09 GMT
> Pardon my brain fade, but I can’t seem to find a word to finish my
> sentence. See the following passage:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> is a bit pedantic as well. Is there any (other) word that refers to
> all non-living matter—water, earth, rocks, etc.?

Yes, "inanimate" and "mineral" are classic terms -- but neither
is usually presented as potentially sentient.

Instead of explaining Lyell in terms he probably did not use
(e.g. jump, transmigrate) can you find a sufficiently short
passage in which Lyell makes this point in his own language?

Signature

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

rittmanp - 22 Jan 2009 23:25 GMT
> Yes, "inanimate" and "mineral" are classic terms -- but neither
> is usually presented as potentially sentient.

That's ok--the third category would only be for items that are not
sentient, or even potentially so. So either of these terms
("inanimate" and "mineral") would work, with "inanimate" getting the
edge, b/c I want to include everything that is material but not
living--"mineral" usually doesn't include water, or at least, not
prima facie.

> Instead of explaining Lyell in terms he probably did not use
> (e.g. jump, transmigrate) can you find a sufficiently short
> passage in which Lyell makes this point in his own language?

> --
> Don Phillipson
> Carlsbad Springs
> (Ottawa, Canada)

I am reading a book that is summarizing Darwin's contemporaries and
predecessors, so I only have a short quote from him, but nothing that
is as to the point as my sentence was.
Arcadian Rises - 23 Jan 2009 01:47 GMT
> > Yes, "inanimate" and "mineral" are classic terms -- but neither
> > is usually presented as potentially sentient.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> living--"mineral" usually doesn't include water, or at least, not
> prima facie.

Then you're looking for a word to encompass all the elements of the
Periodic Table.
Mark Brader - 23 Jan 2009 02:26 GMT
P. Rittmanp:
> Pardon my brain fade, but I can't seem to find a word to finish my
> sentence. See the following passage:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The word I'm looking for means "non-animal or -plant life." I'd use
> "insentient," but I'm not sure that it means the exact same thing...

I've never heard "insentient"; I'd form the opposite of "sentient"
as "non-sentient".  I only know it from science fiction, in which
"sentient" basically refers to species with enough intelligence to
be considered "people" as opposed to "animals".

> Is there any (other) word that refers to all non-living matter--
> water, earth, rocks, etc.?

As you said, "non-living".  Or "inanimate."
Signature

Mark Brader    |    "... There are three kinds of death in this world.
Toronto        |         There's heart death, there's brain death, and
msb@vex.net    |         there's being off the network."  -- Guy Almes

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Arcadian Rises - 23 Jan 2009 03:46 GMT
> P. Rittmanp:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> As you said, "non-living". �Or "inanimate."

Both "non-living" and "inanimate" bring to my mind cemeteries or
morgues.
Cece - 23 Jan 2009 21:44 GMT
> > P. Rittmanp:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Not to mine.  "Non-sentient" brings to my mind creatures who are not
self-aware (SF fan here).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.