I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses have
found a need to remind all anchors, announcers, and reporters to watch
their English usage since the wrong word can (and does) lead to making
them look stupid.
Lately, I've heard "potential possibility" more than once. That's
overkill, innit?
*Or should that be "potential"?

Signature
Maria C.
From a list of bad puns: Two cannibals are eating a clown. One says to
the other, "Does this taste funny to you?"
HVS - 26 Jan 2009 19:01 GMT
On 26 Jan 2009, Maria C. wrote
> I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential"
> on broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the
> bosses have found a need to remind all anchors, announcers, and
> reporters to watch their English usage since the wrong word can
> (and does) lead to making them look stupid.
My guess is that it comes from the legal guys putting the fear of god
in them: "Make sure you put 'potential' or 'alleged' in front of
anything that could even remotely be construed as a statement of
fact".

Signature
Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Skitt - 26 Jan 2009 19:51 GMT
> I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
> broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> *Or should that be "potential"?
Yes, and those usages are becoming iconic.

Signature
Skitt (AmE)
imagining things?
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 26 Jan 2009 21:35 GMT
> > I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
> > broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Yes, and those usages are becoming iconic.
In a legendary way.
--
Jerry Friedman, neither legendary nor mythical.
Chuck Riggs - 27 Jan 2009 17:17 GMT
>> I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
>> broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Yes, and those usages are becoming iconic.
Go away!

Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland
Arcadian Rises - 26 Jan 2009 19:59 GMT
> I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
> broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Lately, I've heard "potential possibility" more than once. That's
> overkill, innit?
Yes, but I find "real possibility" much more offensive to my sense of
proper usage.
> --
> Maria C.
> From a list of bad puns: Two cannibals are eating a clown. One says to
> the other, "Does this taste funny to you?"
One canibal to his dinner companion: "I don't like my mother-in-law"
The other:"So eat the vegetables instead.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 26 Jan 2009 21:50 GMT
>I have noticed a rise in the number of times I hear "potential" on
>broadcast/cable news programs lately. Probable* reason: the bosses have
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>*Or should that be "potential"?
"Potential overkill" might be safer.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
Scott H - 27 Jan 2009 18:57 GMT
> Lately, I've heard "potential possibility" more than once. That's
> overkill, innit?
It could refer to something that is not yet a possibility but might become
one -- for example, the possibility of a tornado in a potential
thunderstorm.
val189 - 27 Jan 2009 19:12 GMT
Potential possibility - is that like a definite maybe?
The redundancies don't bug me as much as the "Yeah"s or sentences
which begin " The (noun) is when....." or "This is what happened."
Arcadian Rises - 27 Jan 2009 20:42 GMT
> Potential possibility - is that like a definite maybe?
No, it's like a "perhaps maybe".