Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / February 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

more hyphen woes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Melissa - 26 Feb 2009 17:05 GMT
How about hyphenation for this passage?

...and of the now nearly constant rolling capital campaigns...
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 26 Feb 2009 18:07 GMT
> How about hyphenation for this passage?
>
> ...and of the now nearly constant rolling capital campaigns...

Fine with no hyphens, IMO (unlike most of the others).  Not very
impressive, though, as I'd have thought rolling campaigns were
supposed to be truly constant.

--
Jerry Friedman
Mike Lyle - 26 Feb 2009 21:30 GMT
>> How about hyphenation for this passage?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> impressive, though, as I'd have thought rolling campaigns were
> supposed to be truly constant.

I'm unhappy when I see (or catch myself using) "constant" for
"continual", which seems to be the intention here. It rarely causes
misunderstanding, but it does dilute a good word. The substitution would
call for the removal of "nearly".

Signature

Mike.

jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 28 Feb 2009 05:12 GMT
On Feb 26, 2:30 pm, "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle...@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
> jerry_fried...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> How about hyphenation for this passage?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> misunderstanding, but it does dilute a good word. The substitution would
> call for the removal of "nearly".

I appreciate the comment, but "constant" versus "continual" has never
succeeded in making an impression on my thick skull.

--
Jerry Friedman
Chuck Riggs - 28 Feb 2009 11:25 GMT
>On Feb 26, 2:30 pm, "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle...@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>I appreciate the comment, but "constant" versus "continual" has never
>succeeded in making an impression on my thick skull.

They are so similar I can't tell which one is being diluted, according
to Mike.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs
Near Dublin, Ireland

Mark Brader - 27 Feb 2009 01:33 GMT
Melissa Lind:
> How about hyphenation for this passage?
>
> ...and of the now nearly constant rolling capital campaigns...

I don't know what it means.  If "rolling" modifies "capital",
they should be joined by a hyphen.  If "rolling" modifies
"campaign", it's correct as it stands.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto                "In my case, self-absorption is
msb@vex.net                          completely justified."    -- LAURA

Nick - 27 Feb 2009 07:11 GMT
> Melissa Lind:
>> How about hyphenation for this passage?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> they should be joined by a hyphen.  If "rolling" modifies
> "campaign", it's correct as it stands.

But if "rolling" modifies "campaign" then "nearly constant" is redundant.  The
whole point of a rolling campaign is that it keeps going.
Signature

Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk
          development version: http://canalplan.eu

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.