The dot on the 'i'
|
|
Thread rating:  |
James Hogg - 29 Apr 2009 14:47 GMT I was just looking at "Troy and Homer" by Joachim Latacz on Google Books, http://tinyurl.com/d8evvq, and reading the bit about how Rolf Hachmann expressed his doubts as to whether the site excavated by Schliemann could ever be proved to be Troy.
Latacz writes: "and the 'other sources', the dot on the 'i' demanded by Hachmann, had still to be found"
I wonder if Latacz (or his translator) was being naughty here. The site bore the name Hisarlik, and in Turkish there is no dot on the second 'i'.
 Signature James
John Dean - 29 Apr 2009 15:04 GMT > I was just looking at "Troy and Homer" by Joachim Latacz on > Google Books, http://tinyurl.com/d8evvq, and reading the bit [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > The site bore the name Hisarlik, and in Turkish there is no dot > on the second 'i'. I think we're being metaphorical. Hachmann is presumed to want the i's dotted and the t's crossed. This may be a conversion into an English idiom of an idiom from another language, though I'd assume Latacz and Hachmann both generally express themselves in German.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
James Hogg - 29 Apr 2009 15:16 GMT >> I was just looking at "Troy and Homer" by Joachim Latacz on >> Google Books, http://tinyurl.com/d8evvq, and reading the bit [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >I think we're being metaphorical. Yes, but dead metaphors have a way of coming to life in certain contexts: a metaphorical dotless 'i' in the same paragraph as a real Turkish dotless 'i' seems to rule out poor Hisarlik forever.
>Hachmann is presumed to want the i's >dotted and the t's crossed. This may be a conversion into an English idiom >of an idiom from another language, though I'd assume Latacz and Hachmann >both generally express themselves in German. It makes me wonder what the original said.
 Signature James
tinwhistler - 29 Apr 2009 15:23 GMT > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:04:34 +0100, "John Dean" > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > -- > James Maybe the original said that Schliemann did not have the *tittle* to Troy? -- Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
James Silverton - 29 Apr 2009 16:03 GMT James wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:16:01 +0200:
>>> I was just looking at "Troy and Homer" by Joachim Latacz on >>> Google Books, http://tinyurl.com/d8evvq, and reading the bit [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> >> I think we're being metaphorical.
> Yes, but dead metaphors have a way of coming to life in > certain contexts: a metaphorical dotless 'i' in the same > paragraph as a real Turkish dotless 'i' seems to rule out poor > Hisarlik forever.
>> Hachmann is presumed to want the i's >> dotted and the t's crossed. This may be a conversion into an >> English idiom of an idiom from another language, though I'd >> assume Latacz and Hachmann both generally express themselves >> in German.
> It makes me wonder what the original said. Incidentally, I was surprised at how recent is the expression "dot the i". The OED says defining the verb "dot": "b. To put the dot (·) over the letter i or j. to dot the i's (fig.): to fill in the particulars, to particularize minutely.
1849 THACKERAY in Scribner's Magi. I. 557/1 I have..dotted the i's. 1865 "
 Signature
James Silverton Potomac, Maryland
Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
James Silverton - 29 Apr 2009 16:11 GMT James wrote to James Hogg on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:23 -0400:
>>>> I was just looking at "Troy and Homer" by Joachim Latacz on >>>> Google Books, http://tinyurl.com/d8evvq, and reading the bit [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >>> >>> I think we're being metaphorical.
>> Yes, but dead metaphors have a way of coming to life in >> certain contexts: a metaphorical dotless 'i' in the same >> paragraph as a real Turkish dotless 'i' seems to rule out >> poor Hisarlik forever.
>>> Hachmann is presumed to want the i's >>> dotted and the t's crossed. This may be a conversion into an >>> English idiom of an idiom from another language, though I'd >>> assume Latacz and Hachmann both generally express themselves >>> in German.
>> It makes me wonder what the original said.
> Incidentally, I was surprised at how recent is the expression "dot the > i". The OED says defining the verb "dot": > "b. To put the dot (·) over the letter i or j. to dot the i's > (fig.): to fill in the particulars, to particularize minutely.
> 1849 THACKERAY in Scribner's Magi. I. 557/1 I have..dotted the > i's. 1865 " I know I should not reply to my own post but I just noticed that the OED's Thackeray quotation uses " i's " for multiples of the letter. I seem to remember many posts deprecating the use of an apostrophe for plurals.
 Signature
James Silverton Potomac, Maryland
Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
James Hogg - 29 Apr 2009 16:24 GMT > James wrote to James Hogg on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:23 -0400: >> Incidentally, I was surprised at how recent is the expression "dot the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >seem to remember many posts deprecating the use of an apostrophe for >plurals. In the case of "i's" it would be rather unfortunate if the apostrophe were omitted.
 Signature James
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 29 Apr 2009 17:14 GMT > James wrote to James Hogg on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:23 -0400: > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >seem to remember many posts deprecating the use of an apostrophe for >plurals. It's not only the Thackeray quotation. The OED uses that form too.
This version is better: http://www.joe-ks.com/phrases/phrasesD.htm
Dot your 'i's and cross your 't's
or, using the convention I'd use here in AUE:
Dot your "i"s and cross your "t"s
However, the conventions used by the OED save space without sacrificing comprehensibility.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
James Silverton - 29 Apr 2009 18:22 GMT Peter wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:14:50 +0100:
>> James wrote to James Hogg on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:23 -0400: >> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] >> of the letter. I seem to remember many posts deprecating the >> use of an apostrophe for plurals.
> It's not only the Thackeray quotation. The OED uses that form > too.
> This version is better: > http://www.joe-ks.com/phrases/phrasesD.htm
> Dot your 'i's and cross your 't's
> or, using the convention I'd use here in AUE:
> Dot your "i"s and cross your "t"s
> However, the conventions used by the OED save space without > sacrificing comprehensibility. One extra single or double quote seems a small price.
 Signature James Silverton Potomac, Maryland
Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
Don Aitken - 29 Apr 2009 18:25 GMT > James wrote to James Hogg on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:23 -0400: > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >seem to remember many posts deprecating the use of an apostrophe for >plurals. Most of the deprecators make an exception, as I would myself, where the item pluralised is a letter. Without the apostrophe, the sentence would be pretty incomprehensible.
 Signature Don Aitken Mail to the From: address is not read. To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
James Hogg - 29 Apr 2009 16:21 GMT > James wrote on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:16:01 +0200: > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >1849 THACKERAY in Scribner's Magi. I. 557/1 I have..dotted the i's. 1865 >" A fuller version of Thackeray's quotation is found in the OED under "cross": "I have..crossed the t's and dotted the i's"
I'm sure someone used it before that.
One thing leads to another when you consult a dictionary. I looked at "jot" and "tittle". The former is the Greek "iota" while "tittle" could be applied to various additions to letters (accents, tilde [same word], cedilla) including the dot on the 'i'.
"1538 ELYOT, Punctus, seu punctum, a poynte or tytle. 1552 HULOET, Tytle or prycke in letters, punctus."
The use of the word "prycke" reminded me that the Swedes still use the word "prick" for dots on letters. The former prime minister Göran Persson was rumoured to have introduced himself in English as "Göran, that's Goran with two pricks".
 Signature James
Amethyst Deceiver - 30 Apr 2009 12:17 GMT
> The use of the word "prycke" reminded me that the Swedes still > use the word "prick" for dots on letters. The former prime > minister Göran Persson was rumoured to have introduced himself in > English as "Göran, that's Goran with two pricks". The Swedish is 'pricka' (singular) and prickar (plural).
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
Jens Brix Christiansen - 30 Apr 2009 12:31 GMT Amethyst Deceiver skrev:
> The Swedish is 'pricka' (singular) and prickar (plural). Not quite. The indefinite singular is "prick".
There is also a verb "att pricka" which means "to dot" or "to prick". The present tense of the verb is "prickar" and the past tense is "prickade".
 Signature Jens Brix Christiansen
James Hogg - 30 Apr 2009 13:14 GMT >Amethyst Deceiver skrev: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >There is also a verb "att pricka" which means "to dot" or "to prick". >The present tense of the verb is "prickar" and the past tense is "prickade". And Prick is a Swedish surname. Here's Magnus of that ilk: http://www.eniro.se/query?search_word=magnus+prick&geo_area=&what=all
 Signature James
Mike Mooney - 30 Apr 2009 15:11 GMT > Goran with two pricks He used to manage the England football team.
Mike M
John Dean - 01 May 2009 00:06 GMT >> Goran with two pricks > > He used to manage the England football team. ITYM ' *they* used to ...'
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Evan Kirshenbaum - 29 Apr 2009 16:53 GMT > Incidentally, I was surprised at how recent is the expression "dot the > i". The OED says defining the verb "dot": [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 1849 THACKERAY in Scribner's Magi. I. 557/1 I have..dotted the > i's. 1865 " Google Books pushes it back a few decades:
[Attn Jesse Sheidlower: OED antedating]
You will perceive that I am not very particular in crossing my t's and dotting my i's, but you will please to correct that, as well as some errours I may have committed in quoting the poets and such fellows...
Horace De Monde, "The Club-Room", _The Portico_, Jan., 1817
Had you not much better have dotted your i's, than made a useless dash.
_The Leodiensian_, Feb., 1828
We do not think that he could satisfy the banker, by directing his attention to the mere formation of the letters, that the name upon a bill was a good name; or that he could convince the lover, by an examination of the delicate scrawl of his mistress, that the manner in which she crossed her T's, or dotted her I's, rendered it quite evident that she would make a very unfitting spouse.
_The Edinburgh Literary Journal_, 5/23/1829
Have we not dotted the i's and crossed the t's, and mended the punctuation of a dozen articles, more or less?
_The American Monthly Magazine_, December, 1830
The Senate has heretofore been what it was intended to be--a body of calm, reflecting men, not disturbed by any agitation originating with themselves, but having time to regulate and check those of the other branch--having in fact a much more elevated and useful duty to perform than merely to dot the i's and cross the t's of the other body.
_Proceedings and Debates of the Virginia State Convention, of 1829-1830_, 1830
It even shows up in an early urban legend:
I think this rivals the celebrated story of the Dutch commercial house, who saved five hundred dollars a month by directing their clerks to cease dotting the i's, and crossing the t's, in keeping the books.
_Proceedings of the Royal Asiatic Society_, July, 1836
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |The law of supply and demand tells us 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |that when the price of something is Palo Alto, CA 94304 |artificially set below market level, |there will soon be none of that thing kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com |left--as you may have noticed the (650)857-7572 |last time you tried to buy something |for nothing. http://www.kirshenbaum.net/ | P.J. O'Rourke
Mark Brader - 30 Apr 2009 06:40 GMT James Hogg:
>>> Latacz writes: >>> "and the 'other sources', the dot on the 'i' demanded by [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >>> The site bore the name Hisarlik, and in Turkish there is no dot >>> on the second 'i'.
> ...dead metaphors have a way of coming to life in certain > contexts: a metaphorical dotless 'i' in the same paragraph as a > real Turkish dotless 'i' seems to rule out poor Hisarlik forever. Not if there is a dot on the *first* "i". Dotted and dotless I are both letters in Turkish; they're just *different* letters (so "I" is not the capital of "i").
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto | "...ordinarily, a 65-pound alligator in an apartment msb@vex.net | would be news." --James Barron, New York Times
Christian Weisgerber - 29 Apr 2009 19:44 GMT > Latacz writes: > "and the 'other sources', the dot on the 'i' demanded by > Hachmann, had still to be found" > > I wonder if Latacz (or his translator) was being naughty here. This looks like a literal translation of "das i-Tüpfelchen" or "das Tüpfelchen auf dem i", a common German expression meaning something like "final flourish".
 Signature Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Peter Brandt Nielsen - 30 Apr 2009 10:22 GMT > This looks like a literal translation of "das i-Tüpfelchen" or "das > Tüpfelchen auf dem i", a common German expression meaning something > like "final flourish". Also an idiom in Danish, for what it's worth: "prikken over i'et".
Lars Enderin - 30 Apr 2009 15:49 GMT >> This looks like a literal translation of "das i-Tüpfelchen" or "das >> Tüpfelchen auf dem i", a common German expression meaning something >> like "final flourish". > > Also an idiom in Danish, for what it's worth: "prikken over i'et". In Swedish: Pricken över i'(e)t.
Steffen Buehler - 30 Apr 2009 13:34 GMT >> Latacz writes: >> "and the 'other sources', the dot on the 'i' demanded by [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Tüpfelchen auf dem i", a common German expression meaning something > like "final flourish". Which Boris Becker irritated 20 years ago: "das wäre dann das i auf dem, äh, auf dem ..."
But seriously: the fact that "Hisarlik" has no dot on the second i is for almost sure *not* the reason Latacz chose this metapher. This would be very far-fetched, almost no German would understand the pun.
Regards Steffen
|
|
|