>>And how sad to learn of the death this week of U.A. Fanthorpe, who
>>should really have been the first female poet laureate.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.english.emory.edu/classes/paintings&poems/uccello.html

Signature
Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk
development version: http://canalplan.eu
>>> And how sad to learn of the death this week of U.A. Fanthorpe, who
>>> should really have been the first female poet laureate.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> and not "pose" and "properly" (the latter of which feels more like a
> lot of the later lines, like "built-in//obsolescence".
It's actually a technical difficulty. I agree it's an ugly line-break,
but it seems to me that it was her only way to keep the sentence
running: breaking after "pose" --or after "chance" --would have forced
an unwanted pause.
> There's something about my brain that cannot be stilled from asking
> these questions when reading it, which distracts from the poem itself.
Sure. And there's nothing wrong with that, except that it commits one to
reading several times, or learning it by heart, which one may quite
reasonably not want to do.
> For those who heard it, where the line-breaks at all audible when she
> was reading it?
I don't think so.
But isn't it a wonderfully un-self-centred piece? Self-obsessed poets
tend to give me the pip.
I love the bits of characterisation: the unpoetic boys'-toys expert, for
example, allows himself the thoroughly prosaic economy of "and/or". I
doubt if that's been used much in poetry...

Signature
Mike.