>I posted a new blog post and started wondering is "3 UPS" correct or
>should I say "3 UPSs" or "3 UPS's"?
>
>Max Limitz
>http://maxlimitz.blogspot.com/2009/05/is-three-ups-enough.html
The conventional plural form would be UPSs or UPSes. UPS's is not
considered good.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
R H Draney - 18 May 2009 17:53 GMT
BrE filted:
>>I posted a new blog post and started wondering is "3 UPS" correct or
>>should I say "3 UPSs" or "3 UPS's"?
>
>The conventional plural form would be UPSs or UPSes. UPS's is not
>considered good.
...where you live.
....r

Signature
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 18 May 2009 18:09 GMT
>BrE filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>...where you live.
Yes. I very nearly didn't make any comment on "UPS's". I quite like the
idea of the possessive plural UPS's's.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
>I posted a new blog post and started wondering is "3 UPS" correct or
>should I say "3 UPSs" or "3 UPS's"?
Dunno whether it's correct or not, but my habit is to write
'UPSs' and pronounce it 'upsez'. The version with the
apostrophe is intelligible but glaring (and yah, my eyes
would flit too and fro for an instant in an attempt to find
justification for its actually being a possessive, just in
case you had intended "[the] 3 UPSs' [batteries were all
dead]", for example, and had merely misplaced the apostrophe
by one position). "3 UPS" makes logical sense but would
also be the form most likely to lead to confusion, depending
on the context.

Signature
D. Glenn Arthur Jr./The Human Vibrator, dglenn@panix.com
Due to hand/wrist problems my newsreading time varies so I may miss followups.
"Being a _man_ means knowing that one has a choice not to act like a 'man'."
http://www.panix.com/~dglenn/ http://dglenn.livejournal.com