Multiples of names ending in s
|
|
Thread rating:  |
James Harris - 25 May 2009 14:34 GMT Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names ending in the letter s? For example,
* Three people called Peter: Three Peters (not Peter's) * Three people called James: <what?>
Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.
Any ideas?
James
Jens Brix Christiansen - 25 May 2009 15:30 GMT James Harris skrev:
> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names > ending in the letter s? For example, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Any ideas? What makes "three Jameses" less obvious than "three Peters"?
A suburbanite trying to keep up with the Joneses would probably also try to keep up with the Jameses if Pat and Tricia James were to move in next door instead.
 Signature Jens Brix Christiansen
Adrian Bailey - 25 May 2009 16:10 GMT > Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names > ending in the letter s? For example, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity > but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect. I think "three Jameses" is better, but so is "three Baileys" (three glasses of Baileys).
The right choice depends on clarity and euphony. "Three James" could be mistaken for "three Janes". "Three Baileyses" sounds ridiculous.
Adrian
Lars Eighner - 25 May 2009 17:06 GMT In our last episode, <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, the lovely and talented James Harris broadcast on alt.usage.english:
> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names > ending in the letter s? For example,
> * Three people called Peter: Three Peters (not Peter's) > * Three people called James: <what?>
> Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity > but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.
> Any ideas? Form the plural by adding s or es. Do not change the base spelling of the name (three Judys, not three Judies). Except for not changing the base spelling, the choice should be influence by the rules for adding s and es to ordinary nouns, with a bias toward s in questionable cases (that is, there is no reason to agonize over names ending in o).
 Signature Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> usenet@larseighner.com 124 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term. Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.
Don Phillipson - 25 May 2009 17:22 GMT > Form the plural by adding s or es. Do not change the base spelling of the > name (three Judys, not three Judies). I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of England probably write "eight Henries" as often as "eight Henrys."
 Signature Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)
Mark Brader - 25 May 2009 19:47 GMT Don Phillipson:
> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of > England probably write "eight Henries" as often as "eight Henrys." So let's count:
"eight Henrys" 340 "eight Henries" 129
kings "eight Henrys" 273 kings "eight Henries" 97
kings england "eight Henrys" 87 kings england "eight Henries" 5
Hmm.
 Signature Mark Brader "Succeed, and you'll be remembered for a very long time. Toronto Fail, and you'll be remembered even longer." msb@vex.net -- Hel Faczel (John Barnes: ...the Martian King)
My text in this article is in the public domain.
R H Draney - 25 May 2009 21:43 GMT Mark Brader filted:
>Don Phillipson: >> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Hmm. She wouldn't have a Willie or a Sam?...
(Since Noone else was going to say it)....r
 Signature A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. An optometrist asks whether you see the glass more full like this?...or like this?
James Hogg - 25 May 2009 21:53 GMT There was a kind of hush until R H Draney <dadoctah@spamcop.net> wrote:
>Mark Brader filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > >(Since Noone else was going to say it)....r You can download that whole song free if you want a new ringtone: http://www.peternoone.com/downloads/index.html
 Signature James
Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 00:21 GMT > Mark Brader filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > She wouldn't have a Willie or a Sam?... Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
That's 8 kg m?/C? for those of you keeping score in fundamental units, who hopefully will have a clearer intuition about what a square coulomb looks like than I do.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson
He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba," ... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy. --Newark (NJ) Star Ledger ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )
Richard Chambers - 26 May 2009 01:00 GMT > Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries. > > That's 8 kg m²/C² for those of you keeping score in fundamental units, who > hopefully will have a clearer intuition about what a square coulomb looks > like than I do. 1 coulomb is (approximately) 6*10^18 electrons arranged in a line. 1 square coulomb is therefore 3.6*10^37 electrons arranged on a square.
What does it look like? Usually, it is surrounded by an electric-blue halo and bright flashes, similar to what you see when a London tube train goes over some points.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 01:48 GMT >> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries. >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Richard Chambers Leeds UK. ObAmericanCulturalReference: Thank you, Dr. Science!
 Signature Roland Hutchinson
He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba," ... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy. --Newark (NJ) Star Ledger ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )
Evan Kirshenbaum - 26 May 2009 04:24 GMT >>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries. >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > ObAmericanCulturalReference: Thank you, Dr. Science! He's not a real doctor.
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |He who will not reason, is a bigot; 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |he who cannot is a fool; and he who Palo Alto, CA 94304 |dares not is a slave. | Sir William Drummond kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 13:48 GMT >>>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > He's not a real doctor. He has a master's degree.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson
He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba," ... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy. --Newark (NJ) Star Ledger ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )
Evan Kirshenbaum - 26 May 2009 15:18 GMT >>>>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > He has a master's degree. In science!
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |Of course, over the first 10^-10 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |seconds and 10^-30 cubic Palo Alto, CA 94304 |centimeters it averages out to |zero, but when you look in kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com |detail.... (650)857-7572 | Philip Morrison
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Evan Kirshenbaum - 25 May 2009 22:25 GMT > Don Phillipson: >> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of England [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > kings england "eight Henrys" 87 > kings england "eight Henries" 5 If you look at Google Books, however, the ratio drops to 69:35 in favor of "Henrys", and only 16:10 from 1930 on. If I get rid of the number and add a word like "throne", I see
henrys throne 651 henries throne 634
(Some of each are what would now be "Henry's") going back to a 1698 reference to "The War between the two Henries".
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |If the human brain were so simple 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |That we could understand it, Palo Alto, CA 94304 |We would be so simple |That we couldn't. kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
james - 25 May 2009 17:28 GMT In message <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, James Harris <james.harris.1@googlemail.com> writes
>Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names >ending in the letter s? For example, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Any ideas? Three people each called James.
KISS
 Signature James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk http://www.pbase.com/jamesfollett
James Hogg - 25 May 2009 19:11 GMT Quoth james <james@marage.demon.co.uk>, and I quote:
>In message ><d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Three people each called James. To be specific: Follett, Silverton and Harris.
 Signature James Hogg keeping up with the Jameses
Jerry Friedman - 26 May 2009 15:57 GMT > In message > <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5...@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > KISS Are you suggesting that "three people each called James" is simpler than "three Jameses"? If so, you and I have different definitions of "simple". In addition to more words and more complicated syntax, the "each called James" version brings up the complication of whether you need a comma after "people". (I'd say you do.)
-- Jerry Friedman
james - 26 May 2009 19:05 GMT In message <74badc36-9432-4003-b53b-9f397c16e228@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>> In message >> <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5...@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Are you suggesting that "three people each called James" is simpler >than "three Jameses"? I've allowed quite a lot of the garbage I write to be read aloud. The Silent Vulcan has been grinding away on BBC Radio 7 for nearly six months now and is set for another eight weeks.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jshr
For this reason I avoid syllabic sounds -- that is any clumsy sound that's likely to result in the hapless reader's teeth getting in the way of clear pronunciation. 'Jameses' is a word that offends my sense of elegance and order.
 Signature James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk http://www.pbase.com/jamesfollett
Jerry Friedman - 29 May 2009 00:23 GMT > In message > <74badc36-9432-4003-b53b-9f397c16e...@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > of clear pronunciation. 'Jameses' is a word that offends my sense of > elegance and order. Got it. The real principle is KIE&OS.
-- Jerry Friedman
Richard Chambers - 26 May 2009 00:14 GMT > Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names > ending in the letter s? For example, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity > but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect. We have a friend with whom we regularly play Bridge. She often invites us (the Chamberses), as well as another couple, the Farmers, to play at her house. [That makes five participants for a game that requires four players, but we have ways of dealing with that particular difficulty]. At the end of one evening, she suggested that the next session should be held at the Farmers' -- that/s the way she talks -- and that the one after that should be at the Chamberses'. There's more to your question than meets the eye.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
|
|
|