Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / May 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multiples of names ending in s

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Harris - 25 May 2009 14:34 GMT
Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
ending in the letter s? For example,

 * Three people called Peter: Three Peters (not Peter's)
 * Three people called James: <what?>

Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity
but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.

Any ideas?

James
Jens Brix Christiansen - 25 May 2009 15:30 GMT
James Harris skrev:
> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
> ending in the letter s? For example,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Any ideas?

What makes "three Jameses" less obvious than "three Peters"?

A suburbanite trying to keep up with the Joneses would probably also try
to keep up with the Jameses if Pat and Tricia James were to move in next
door instead.

Signature

Jens Brix Christiansen

Adrian Bailey - 25 May 2009 16:10 GMT
> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
> ending in the letter s? For example,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity
> but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.

I think "three Jameses" is better, but so is "three Baileys" (three glasses
of Baileys).

The right choice depends on clarity and euphony. "Three James" could be
mistaken for "three Janes". "Three Baileyses" sounds ridiculous.

Adrian
Lars Eighner - 25 May 2009 17:06 GMT
In our last episode,
<d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, the
lovely and talented James Harris broadcast on alt.usage.english:

> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
> ending in the letter s? For example,

>   * Three people called Peter: Three Peters (not Peter's)
>   * Three people called James: <what?>

> Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity
> but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.

> Any ideas?

Form the plural by adding s or es.  Do not change the base spelling of the
name (three Judys, not three Judies).  Except for not changing the base
spelling, the choice should be influence by the rules for adding s and es to
ordinary nouns, with a bias toward s in questionable cases (that is, there
is no reason to agonize over names ending in o).

Signature

       Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> usenet@larseighner.com
           124 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
  Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.

Don Phillipson - 25 May 2009 17:22 GMT
> Form the plural by adding s or es.  Do not change the base spelling of the
> name (three Judys, not three Judies).

I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of
England probably write "eight Henries" as often as "eight Henrys."

Signature

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Mark Brader - 25 May 2009 19:47 GMT
Don Phillipson:
> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of
> England probably write "eight Henries" as often as "eight Henrys."

So let's count:

"eight Henrys"                 340
"eight Henries"                129

kings "eight Henrys"           273
kings "eight Henries"           97

kings england "eight Henrys"    87
kings england "eight Henries"    5

Hmm.
Signature

Mark Brader     "Succeed, and you'll be remembered for a very long time.
Toronto          Fail, and you'll be remembered even longer."
msb@vex.net             -- Hel Faczel (John Barnes: ...the Martian King)

My text in this article is in the public domain.

R H Draney - 25 May 2009 21:43 GMT
Mark Brader filted:

>Don Phillipson:
>> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Hmm.

She wouldn't have a Willie or a Sam?...

(Since Noone else was going to say it)....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

James Hogg - 25 May 2009 21:53 GMT
There was a kind of hush until R H Draney <dadoctah@spamcop.net>
wrote:

>Mark Brader filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>(Since Noone else was going to say it)....r

You can download that whole song free if you want a new ringtone:
http://www.peternoone.com/downloads/index.html

Signature

James

Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 00:21 GMT
> Mark Brader filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> She wouldn't have a Willie or a Sam?...

Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.

That's 8 kg m?/C? for those of you keeping score in fundamental units, who
hopefully will have a clearer intuition about what a square coulomb looks
like than I do.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Richard Chambers - 26 May 2009 01:00 GMT
> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
>
> That's 8 kg m²/C² for those of you keeping score in fundamental units, who
> hopefully will have a clearer intuition about what a square coulomb looks
> like than I do.

1 coulomb is (approximately) 6*10^18 electrons arranged in a line.
1 square coulomb is therefore 3.6*10^37 electrons arranged on a square.

What does it look like?  Usually, it is surrounded by an electric-blue halo
and bright flashes, similar to what you see when a London tube train goes
over some points.

Richard Chambers       Leeds   UK.
Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 01:48 GMT
>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Richard Chambers       Leeds   UK.

ObAmericanCulturalReference: Thank you, Dr. Science!

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Evan Kirshenbaum - 26 May 2009 04:24 GMT
>>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ObAmericanCulturalReference: Thank you, Dr. Science!

He's not a real doctor.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |He who will not reason, is a bigot;
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |he who cannot is a fool; and he who
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |dares not is a slave.
                                      |              Sir William Drummond
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Roland Hutchinson - 26 May 2009 13:48 GMT
>>>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> He's not a real doctor.

He has a master's degree.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Evan Kirshenbaum - 26 May 2009 15:18 GMT
>>>>> Not on yer life. Just the usual 8000 millihenries.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> He has a master's degree.

In science!

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |Of course, over the first 10^-10
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |seconds and 10^-30 cubic
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |centimeters it averages out to
                                      |zero, but when you look in
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |detail....
   (650)857-7572                      |            Philip Morrison

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Evan Kirshenbaum - 25 May 2009 22:25 GMT
> Don Phillipson:
>> I have not counted, but people writing about the kings of England
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> kings england "eight Henrys"    87
> kings england "eight Henries"    5

If you look at Google Books, however, the ratio drops to 69:35 in
favor of "Henrys", and only 16:10 from 1930 on.  If I get rid of the
number and add a word like "throne", I see

  henrys throne    651
  henries throne   634

(Some of each are what would now be "Henry's") going back to a 1698
reference to "The War between the two Henries".

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |If the human brain were so simple
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |That we could understand it,
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |We would be so simple
                                      |That we couldn't.
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

james - 25 May 2009 17:28 GMT
In message
<d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
James Harris <james.harris.1@googlemail.com> writes
>Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
>ending in the letter s? For example,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Any ideas?

Three people each called James.

KISS
Signature

James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk
http://www.pbase.com/jamesfollett

James Hogg - 25 May 2009 19:11 GMT
Quoth james <james@marage.demon.co.uk>, and I quote:

>In message
><d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5210@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Three people each called James.

To be specific: Follett, Silverton and Harris.

Signature

James Hogg
keeping up with the Jameses

Jerry Friedman - 26 May 2009 15:57 GMT
> In message
> <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5...@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> KISS

Are you suggesting that "three people each called James" is simpler
than "three Jameses"?  If so, you and I have different definitions of
"simple".  In addition to more words and more complicated syntax, the
"each called James" version brings up the complication of whether you
need a comma after "people".  (I'd say you do.)

--
Jerry Friedman
james - 26 May 2009 19:05 GMT
In message
<74badc36-9432-4003-b53b-9f397c16e228@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> writes
>> In message
>> <d83954b6-045a-4cb6-9c00-4db1d3aa5...@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Are you suggesting that "three people each called James" is simpler
>than "three Jameses"?

I've allowed quite a lot of the garbage I write to be read aloud. The
Silent Vulcan has been grinding away on BBC Radio 7 for nearly six
months now and is set for another eight weeks.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jshr

For this reason I avoid syllabic sounds -- that is any clumsy sound
that's likely to result in the hapless reader's teeth getting in the way
of clear pronunciation. 'Jameses' is a word that offends my sense of
elegance and order.
Signature

James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk
http://www.pbase.com/jamesfollett

Jerry Friedman - 29 May 2009 00:23 GMT
> In message
> <74badc36-9432-4003-b53b-9f397c16e...@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> of clear pronunciation. 'Jameses' is a word that offends my sense of
> elegance and order.

Got it.  The real principle is KIE&OS.

--
Jerry Friedman
Richard Chambers - 26 May 2009 00:14 GMT
> Are there standard ways to write and to speak multiples of names
> ending in the letter s? For example,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Probably the latter would be pronounces as three Jameses for clarity
> but three Jamess with the double s is clearly incorrect.

We have a friend with whom we regularly play Bridge. She often invites us
(the Chamberses), as well as another couple, the Farmers, to play at her
house. [That makes five participants for a game that requires four players,
but we have ways of dealing with that particular difficulty]. At the end of
one evening, she suggested that the next session should be held at the
Farmers' -- that/s the way she talks -- and that the one after that should
be at the Chamberses'. There's more to your question than meets the eye.

Richard Chambers       Leeds   UK.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.