
Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
> > Is "line regiment" an infantry regiment, in BrE?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> also "the right of the line," a position of special honour reserved
> for specially brave formations.
Thank you.
Marius Hancu
>> Is "line regiment" an infantry regiment, in BrE?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Yes, just so,
No, not entirely. A line regiment is one that could be deployed in the
battle lines and could, therefore, be from any of the main disciplines -
infantry, cavalry and, less frequently, artillery. It differentiates a unit
from the service or logistical outfits like the above mentioned ASC and such
as the Pay Corps, Medical Service, Corps of Transport and so on. A 'line
regiment' is essentially a fighting regiment.
> cf. the way Julius Caesar or Wellington deployed
> men for battle in a "thin red line," mostly infantry.
The Romans deployed in greater depth than a 'thin red line' and Wellington
was a master of using a variety of formations - cf the famous squares which
defeated the French cavalry at Waterloo.
> also "the right of the line," a position of special honour reserved
> for specially brave formations.
In the British Army the 'right of the line' is a traditional honour. It
doesn't vary according to achievement and is based on longevity rather than
achievement together with snobbery (cavalry regiments first you know and all
that rot).:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Army_order_of_precedence
Note that, eg, the Engineers and Signals take precedence over the Foot
Guards (cf Alexander, Hercules, Hector, Lysander et al) but service corps
generally go on the far left (and are expected to speak only when spoken
to).

Signature
John Dean
Oxford
Marius Hancu - 13 Jul 2009 14:55 GMT
> >> Is "line regiment" an infantry regiment, in BrE?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> as the Pay Corps, Medical Service, Corps of Transport and so on. A 'line
> regiment' is essentially a fighting regiment.
OK.
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Nick Spalding - 13 Jul 2009 15:00 GMT
John Dean wrote, in <7c0scdF23njd7U1@mid.individual.net>
on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:45:07 +0100:
> >> Is "line regiment" an infantry regiment, in BrE?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> generally go on the far left (and are expected to speak only when spoken
> to).
"The function of cavalry in battle is to add tone to what would
otherwise be merely a vulgar brawl."
Variously attributed to Punch, Wellington and Churchill among others.

Signature
Nick Spalding
BrE/IrE
Marius Hancu - 13 Jul 2009 15:24 GMT
> "The function of cavalry in battle is to add tone to what would
> otherwise be merely a vulgar brawl."
>
> Variously attributed to Punch, Wellington and Churchill among others.
Fine quotation. Now pls tell us your take for "tone" in it:-)
Marius Hancu