Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

As perhaps I should

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 14 Jul 2009 10:05 GMT
Hello:

Isn't a "have" missing right at the end?

Everything seems past time here.

---
The extent to which Stringham had resolved to settle his own career
was brought home to me one morning, through the unexpected agency of
Quiggin, next to whom I fond myself sitting, when attending one of
Brightman's lectures, at which I had not been appearing so regularly
as perhaps I should.

Anthony Powell, A Dance to the Music of Time, p. 139
---

--
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Derek Turner - 14 Jul 2009 10:47 GMT
> Hello:
>
> Isn't a "have" missing right at the end?

Completely optional, I would say (BrE)

> Everything seems past time here.

irrelevant the 'have' is implied if not written.
Marius Hancu - 14 Jul 2009 10:51 GMT
> > Isn't a "have" missing right at the end?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> irrelevant the 'have' is implied if not written.

OK, need to write down this somewhere:-)

Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Derek Turner - 14 Jul 2009 11:00 GMT
> OK, need to write down this somewhere
>
> Thanks.
> Marius Hancu

Funny thing is I would almost certainly /say/ 'should have' probably
write it too and then edit it on re-reading.
Eric Walker - 14 Jul 2009 12:07 GMT
[...]

> OK, need to write down this somewhere:-)

The question of what is and what isn't acceptable ellipsis is one of the
trickiest of all, and there's little to be done for it (as with the
unrelated but also difficult issue of which prepositions go idiomatically
with which verbs) save read, read, and read some more.

With ellipses, the safe rule is if there is any nontrivial doubt about
whether virtually all readers or listeners will readily and correctly
supply the elided words, don't omit them.

Signature

Cordially,
Eric Walker, Owlcroft House
http://owlcroft.com/english/

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 14 Jul 2009 11:21 GMT
>Hello:
>
>Isn't a "have" missing right at the end?
>
>Everything seems past time here.

In BrE it is fine the way it is. The "have" at the end is understood.
I'll risk the comment that it might not be "best style" to include it.

>---
>The extent to which Stringham had resolved to settle his own career
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Anthony Powell, A Dance to the Music of Time, p. 139
>---

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

CDB - 14 Jul 2009 15:17 GMT
> Isn't a "have" missing right at the end?

> Everything seems past time here.

> ---
> The extent to which Stringham had resolved to settle his own career
> was brought home to me one morning, through the unexpected agency of
> Quiggin, next to whom I fond myself sitting, when attending one of
> Brightman's lectures, at which I had not been appearing so regularly
> as perhaps I should.

> Anthony Powell, A Dance to the Music of Time, p. 139
> ---

Wouldn't a BrE speaker have said "should have done" instead of "should
have", in that context anyway?  I think the word "should" here is
simple past tense, as it can sometimes be: they did exactly as they
should.
Paul Wolff - 14 Jul 2009 20:23 GMT
>Marius Hancu wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>simple past tense, as it can sometimes be: they did exactly as they
>should.

The "have", and then the "done", are both optional. But we need to
distinguish between off-the-cuff speech and considered prose.  I think
that in speech I'd probably do as Marcus suggested -- "so regularly as I
should have", but then I wouldn't have uttered all that other formal
structured sentence content beforehand.  Given the rest of the text, "as
I should" is better than the alternatives.  In speech, I'd never in a
thousand years be jawing about "the unexpected agency of Quiggin".
Signature

Paul

Roland Hutchinson - 17 Jul 2009 05:01 GMT
> >Marius Hancu wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> I should" is better than the alternatives.  In speech, I'd never in a
> thousand years be jawing about "the unexpected agency of Quiggin".

I'd finish it "...should have been", which can be shortened to "should
have" or just "should" in AmE as I speak her.

I'd expect BrE to offer the further alternative of "should have been
doing."

Signature

Roland Hutchinson

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.