have your picture took!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Arne H. Wilstrup - 16 Jul 2009 11:37 GMT The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have your picture took" - how on earth does this concur with the grammatical issues in English. I would have said "...have your picture taken" - but ".. took" in this sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? Doesn't it?
the Omrud - 16 Jul 2009 11:46 GMT > The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have > your picture took" - how on earth does this concur with the grammatical > issues in English. > I would have said "...have your picture taken" - but ".. took" in this > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? You can't judge song lyrics by the standards of formal English. Without looking it up, I would wager a small sum that "took" rhymes with the last line of the previous line. Song writers do this all the time.
 Signature David
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 16 Jul 2009 12:22 GMT >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among >> one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >looking it up, I would wager a small sum that "took" rhymes with the >last line of the previous line. Song writers do this all the time. Also "took" has only one syllable. "Taken" has two.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
PHTE - 16 Jul 2009 23:51 GMT On Jul 16, 7:22 am, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <m...@peterduncanson.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:46:44 GMT, the Omrud > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Peter Duncanson, UK > (in alt.usage.english) That reminds me of the tale of the man who, on the strength of the words of the song "April In Paris", visited Paris in April. He found it awful. The weather was cold and rainy, and the chestnuts were not in blossom. So he sought out the composer of the song and upbraided him for the misleading lyrics to the song. The song writer tersely replied, "'May In Paris' doesn't scan."
Peter H. Ten Eyck USA
Prai Jei - 18 Jul 2009 21:16 GMT PHTE set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum:
> That reminds me of the tale of the man who, on the > strength of the words of the song "April In Paris", [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Peter H. Ten Eyck > USA So if I ever go to southern California - and it rains - I can't sue the songwriter?
 Signature ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
R H Draney - 19 Jul 2009 03:02 GMT Prai Jei filted:
>So if I ever go to southern California - and it rains - I can't sue the >songwriter? Especially in light of the rest of the song....r
 Signature A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. An optometrist asks whether you see the glass more full like this?...or like this?
Athel Cornish-Bowden - 17 Jul 2009 18:40 GMT >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > with the last line of the previous line. Song writers do this all the > time. In addition, "have your picture took" is quite standard colloquial English. I wouldn't be in the least surprised to hear it in everyday speech, and many of the people who would say it know perfectly well that it isn't grammatical.
 Signature athel
Chuck Riggs - 18 Jul 2009 14:30 GMT >>> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >>> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >speech, and many of the people who would say it know perfectly well >that it isn't grammatical. Are you sure?
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs, who speaks AmE, lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE
Maria Conlon - 16 Jul 2009 12:04 GMT > The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - > among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to > have your picture took" - how on earth does this concur with the > grammatical issues in English. It's an old (and fairly common) usage, still heard from time to time. Ungrammatical, yes, but...
In songs, "took" (as opposed to "taken") may be used for the meter or for a rhyme, or simply to fit in with the times (of the musical play).
> I would have said "...have your picture taken" - but ".. took" in this > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very > ackward? Doesn't it? Well, "took," in this case, is not correct usage, but with songs, the meaning, rhythm, connotation, mood, and overall memorability matter more. (You may also encounter poor grammar in novels which protray how people actually talk at times.)
 Signature Maria Conlon
Skitt - 16 Jul 2009 18:50 GMT >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > more. (You may also encounter poor grammar in novels which protray how > people actually talk at times.) I have noticed that people on the Judge Judy show use expressions like "I had went" and "we had took" most of the time. It's not the most educated segment of the society that is seen on the show, but the show provides a good exhibition of how that part of the society communicates.
 Signature Skitt (AmE)
Cece - 16 Jul 2009 20:07 GMT > >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - > >> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Not just in front of Judge Judy. I've been hearing this in scripted speech on drama TV shows, from characters rather above those folks), and on news shows, from the reporters and anchors as well as from the newsmakers (of all levels) and the observers.
Don Phillipson - 16 Jul 2009 20:53 GMT > >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - > >> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > segment of the society that is seen on the show, but the show provides a > good exhibition of how that part of the society communicates. The difference, however, is that the words for "Meet Me in St. Louis" were written by a librettist or studio scriptwriter with probably a near-perfect grasp of grammar in English and a couple more languages . . . who knew that "having your picture took" was a common rural solecism that established just the right social ambience for this song. (I'd risk a medium-sized bet that screenwriter Sidney Howard of Gone With the Wind never in his life heard anyone speak like Hattie McDaniel/Mammy -- but this dialogue seemed to the studio chiefs right for this screenplay.)
 Signature Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)
CDB - 16 Jul 2009 22:11 GMT >>>> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" >>>> - among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says >>>> ".... to have your picture took" - how on earth does this concur >>>> with the grammatical issues in English.
>> I have noticed that people on the Judge Judy show use expressions >> like "I had went" and "we had took" most of the time. It's not >> the most educated segment of the society that is seen on the show, >> but the show provides a good exhibition of how that part of the >> society communicates.
> The difference, however, is that the words for "Meet Me in St. > Louis" were written by a librettist or studio scriptwriter with [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > McDaniel/Mammy -- but this dialogue seemed to the studio chiefs > right for this screenplay.) The song , originally called "Meet me in St. Louis, Louis", is actually about forty years older than the movie. Wikipedia has the lyrics:
Verse 1 When Louis came home to the flat He hung up his coat and his hat He gazed all around But no wifey he found So he said, "Where can Flossie be at?" A note on the table he spied He read it just once, then he cried It ran, "Louis, dear," "It's too slow for me here," "So I think I will go for a ride..."
[edit] Verse 2 The dresses that hung in the hall Were gone, she had taken them all She took all his rings And the rest of his things The picture he missed from the wall "What, moving?" the janitor said "Your rent is paid three months ahead!" "What good is the flat?" Said poor Louis, "Read that!" And the janitor smiled as he read...
[edit] Chorus Meet me in St. Louis, Louis, Meet me at the Fair Don't tell me the lights are shining Anyplace but there We will dance the "Hoochie-Koochie" I will be your "Tootsie-Wootsie" If you will meet me in St. Louis, Louis, Meet me at the Fair.
[edit] Verse 3 Lew Woods was the name of a horse, that ran at the New Orleans course, I played him one day for a dollar each way, and I charged it to profit and loss; He started to run in the wet, the son of a gun's running yet, That crazy old skate, he made straight for the gate, and I hollered, "Hey Lew! don't forget."
[edit] Verse 4 There came to the gay tenderloin, a Jay who had money to burn, The poor simple soul showed a girlie his roll, and she said, "for some wine dear, I yearn." A bottle and bird right away, she touched him then said, "I can't stay." He sighed, "Tell me, sweet, where can you and I meet?" and the orchestra started to play.
[edit] Verse 5 The clerks in the bank said, "It's queer, did anyone see the cashier? It's way after time, and we haven't a dime, we can't open the safe 'till he's here." The President shook his gray head, "Send out for an expert," he said, The door's opened wide, not a cent was inside, just a card, that was all, and it read:
[edit] Verse 6 In church sat a man near the door, asleep, he was starting to snore, The Minister rose, and he said, "We will close singing, Meet on the Beautiful Shore." The man in the back then awoke, he caught the last words that he spoke; He said, "Parson White, you can meet me alright, but The Beautiful Shore is a joke."Verse 1 When Louis came home to the flat He hung up his coat and his hat He gazed all around But no wifey he found So he said, "Where can Flossie be at?" A note on the table he spied He read it just once, then he cried It ran, "Louis, dear," "It's too slow for me here," "So I think I will go for a ride..."
[edit] Verse 2 The dresses that hung in the hall Were gone, she had taken them all She took all his rings And the rest of his things The picture he missed from the wall "What, moving?" the janitor said "Your rent is paid three months ahead!" "What good is the flat?" Said poor Louis, "Read that!" And the janitor smiled as he read...
[edit] Chorus Meet me in St. Louis, Louis, Meet me at the Fair Don't tell me the lights are shining Anyplace but there We will dance the "Hoochie-Koochie" I will be your "Tootsie-Wootsie" If you will meet me in St. Louis, Louis, Meet me at the Fair.
[edit] Verse 3 Lew Woods was the name of a horse, that ran at the New Orleans course, I played him one day for a dollar each way, and I charged it to profit and loss; He started to run in the wet, the son of a gun's running yet, That crazy old skate, he made straight for the gate, and I hollered, "Hey Lew! don't forget."
[edit] Verse 4 There came to the gay tenderloin, a Jay who had money to burn, The poor simple soul showed a girlie his roll, and she said, "for some wine dear, I yearn." A bottle and bird right away, she touched him then said, "I can't stay." He sighed, "Tell me, sweet, where can you and I meet?" and the orchestra started to play.
[edit] Verse 5 The clerks in the bank said, "It's queer, did anyone see the cashier? It's way after time, and we haven't a dime, we can't open the safe 'till he's here." The President shook his gray head, "Send out for an expert," he said, The door's opened wide, not a cent was inside, just a card, that was all, and it read:
[edit] Verse 6 In church sat a man near the door, asleep, he was starting to snore, The Minister rose, and he said, "We will close singing, Meet on the Beautiful Shore." The man in the back then awoke, he caught the last words that he spoke; He said, "Parson White, you can meet me alright, but The Beautiful Shore is a joke."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meet_Me_in_St._Louis,_Louis
The language is certainly intended, as Don says, to convey a certain ambiance and attitude, but I would call it raffishly proletarian rather than rural.
I came across the article while looking unsuccessfully for the line that Arne asked about. Then I looked again at his post and saw that he had said it was in another song from that musical, or maybe from that book of songs. Since I didn't think that I had anything useful to add to what had already been said, I gave up the search at that point.
John Dean - 17 Jul 2009 14:31 GMT >>>> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >>>> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > knew that "having your picture took" was a common rural solecism > that established just the right social ambience for this song. Except that the song "Meet Me in St Louis" doesn't include any reference to having your picture took and, as I suggested elsethread, none of the other songs in the musical do either. I'm offering "Hello Dolly" for the source of those lyrics.
> (I'd > risk a medium-sized bet that screenwriter Sidney Howard of Gone With > the Wind never in his life heard anyone speak like Hattie > McDaniel/Mammy -- Other, of course, than Hattie herself who had been playing maid / cook characters to the same template for the best part of a decade in over a dozen movies. As long as he'd seen a couple or three of those, he knew what was wanted. Indeed, he could have written the part in standard English and relied on Hattie to do the business with the dialect and accent. As she was the child of former slaves, one wonders whence Hattie drew her standard 'maid' character. Certainly, she was quoted as saying "I loved Mammy, I think I understood her because my own grandmother worked on a plantation not unlike Tara".
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Egbert White - 16 Jul 2009 23:24 GMT >>> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >>> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >segment of the society that is seen on the show, but the show provides a >good exhibition of how that part of the society communicates. When I was a child, I used to hear women who were changing clothes behind a closed door say, "Don't come in here unless you want to get your picture took." (What they actually would say in the prevalent dialect would be "wanna gitcher pitcher took.")
It was several years later that it dawned on me what the expression meant. It no doubt started with a joke about a surprised topless female holding her breast with the nipple pointing at the surpriser and saying, "Stand still and let me take your picture."
Has "get your picture took" been used in that way in other parts of the world?
 Signature Egbert White WAmE
John O'Flaherty - 17 Jul 2009 00:54 GMT >>>> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >>>> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >Has "get your picture took" been used in that way in other parts of >the world? Maybe it's just me, but I thought it referred more to a box camera...
 Signature John
John Varela - 17 Jul 2009 22:21 GMT > >When I was a child, I used to hear women who were changing clothes > >behind a closed door say, "Don't come in here unless you want to get [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Maybe it's just me, but I thought it referred more to a box camera... I understand the expression the same way.
 Signature John Varela Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email
CDB - 17 Jul 2009 14:29 GMT [...]
> When I was a child, I used to hear women who were changing clothes > behind a closed door say, "Don't come in here unless you want to get > your picture took." (What they actually would say in the prevalent > dialect would be "wanna gitcher pitcher took.")
> It was several years later that it dawned on me what the expression > meant. It no doubt started with a joke about a surprised topless > female holding her breast with the nipple pointing at the surpriser > and saying, "Stand still and let me take your picture."
> Has "get your picture took" been used in that way in other parts of > the world? It seems a little earthy to say that to a child, especially back in the day. I would have taken it for a reference to mug shots.
Paul Wolff - 17 Jul 2009 17:54 GMT >Egbert White wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >It seems a little earthy to say that to a child, especially back in >the day. I would have taken it for a reference to mug shots. ITYM "jug shots".
 Signature Paul
Egbert White - 17 Jul 2009 21:50 GMT >[...] > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >It seems a little earthy to say that to a child, especially back in >the day. <snip>
In our culture it wouldn't normally be said to a child. It would be said to an adult and perchance overheard by a child.
I had heard it enough times to know it meant "I'm undressed," but it wasn't till years later that there dawned on me the probable reason for it to mean that.
 Signature Egbert White WAmE
Hatunen - 16 Jul 2009 19:25 GMT >> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - >> among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >more. (You may also encounter poor grammar in novels which protray how >people actually talk at times.) I've heard it used, and used it myself, in a jocular way, as in, "C'mon guys. Line up and get your picture took."
 Signature ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
R H Draney - 16 Jul 2009 21:12 GMT Hatunen filted:
>I've heard it used, and used it myself, in a jocular way, as in, >"C'mon guys. Line up and get your picture took." It's more like "gitcher pitcher took", innit?...r
 Signature A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. An optometrist asks whether you see the glass more full like this?...or like this?
Richard Chambers - 16 Jul 2009 14:31 GMT > The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have your [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? > Doesn't it? If this is all that is worrying you about a mere song, all I can say is that you aint seen nuttin' yet.
A couple of years ago in Blackpool, a man with a camera, a tripod, and a canvas sack, approached me and asked if I wanted my photo took. I said yes, so he suggested that I should to take off my shirt and vest. He then brought out his snake, a 3-metre python, which coiled around my chest, shoulders and neck. I still have the photo from that memorable day out.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
the Omrud - 16 Jul 2009 16:40 GMT > A couple of years ago in Blackpool, a man with a camera, a tripod, and a > canvas sack, approached me and asked if I wanted my photo took. I said yes, > so he suggested that I should to take off my shirt and vest. We need to remind otherpondians that a vest is an undershirt, not part of a 3-piece suit.
Furthermore, I guess that this was mid summer in Blackpool (is it still the most visited resort in Europe?) where a vest is most necessary, at least until global warming reaches Lancashire.
 Signature David
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 16 Jul 2009 17:09 GMT >Blackpool (is it still >the most visited resort in Europe?) Some years ago I read a statement that Blackpool had more tourist visitors per year than the whole of Greece.
According to Wikipedia, drawing on a BBC report, the number of people visiting Blackpool had dropped from 17 million in 1992 to 10 million in 2007.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Amethyst Deceiver - 17 Jul 2009 10:13 GMT > > The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among > > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have your [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > out his snake, a 3-metre python, which coiled around my chest, shoulders and > neck. I still have the photo from that memorable day out. Good grief! My travel-mate was telling me today about how she went to Blackpool a couple of years ago with friends and one of them, knowing that she has a huge phobia of snakes, said "stay close to me and DON'T LOOK RIGHT". Being a normal human being she automatically turned her head and saw a man with no shirt and a snake draped around him. She shot across four lanes of traffic and the tram lines to get to the beach and still isn't sure how she didn't get hit by anything. She had no conscious thought other than "got to get away from the snake".
I wonder if the man was you.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
Richard Chambers - 17 Jul 2009 11:42 GMT > I wrote:-
>> A couple of years ago in Blackpool, a man with a camera, a tripod, and a >> canvas sack, approached me and asked if I wanted my photo took. I said [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > I wonder if the man was you. Probably not me. I certainly did not see anybody panic. Admittedly, I was too busy suppressing my own panic to notice what anybody else might be doing.
I absolutely love the "public panic" type of headline we sometimes get in our daily newspapers. There is an excellent one today in the Yorkshire Evening Post (Leeds edition). It is:-
"Tarantula loose in Leeds Wood".
Now that would really cause me to panic. It also sells newspapers. I have a wood near where I live.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
R H Draney - 17 Jul 2009 18:02 GMT Richard Chambers filted:
>> Good grief! My travel-mate was telling me today about how she went to >> Blackpool a couple of years ago with friends and one of them, knowing [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >Now that would really cause me to panic. It also sells newspapers. I have a >wood near where I live. My response to such a headline would be "slow news day"...if you want to panic *me* with an animal-related story, mention that someone's allowing packs of geese to run around freely...popular scare stories here concern either rabid bats (the ten-year-old children of the animal kingdom; their very mobility allows them a lot of opportunities to both contract and spread disease) or swarming bees....
Which leads me to wonder about our relationship with bees in general...a whole industry exists whereby humans take extraordinary precautions against these dangerous creatures while encouraging them to collect nearby our own settlements, just so we can steal the fruits of their labor...who was it, I wonder, that first risked stinging to discover that they're hoarding sticky sweets?...and could that discovery have had some impact on the legends of dragons hoarding treasure?...r
 Signature A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. An optometrist asks whether you see the glass more full like this?...or like this?
Richard Chambers - 17 Jul 2009 21:59 GMT > Which leads me to wonder about our relationship with bees in general...a > whole [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > sweets?...and could that discovery have had some impact on the legends of > dragons hoarding treasure?...r A couple of months ago there was a programme about bees on BBC television. It concerned the fact that beehives are being deserted by the bees, to an alarming extent. As a result, beekeeping is endangered. If beekeeping is endangered, then so is the whole process of pollination, with serious consequences (starvation, ultimately) to mankind. The endangerment of bees is going on both in the USA and in Europe. While there have always been problems with bees deserting their hives, it has never before been anything like as frequent as it has become in the last few years. The usual "easy" explanations of pollution and/or global warming demonstrably do not fit the facts.
One thing that I found amazing from this programme was the fact that the sale of honey (especially in the USA) often amounts to less than 50% of the earnings of a large commercial beekeeper. The programme showed large trans-America trucks being loaded with (literally) tons of beehives in eastern USA, and being transported across America to pollinate the almond orchards in western USA. California has square miles of almond orchards, grown as a monoculture. The difficulty with a monoculture is that almond blossom lasts for a month or so. From the point of view of a bee, this means one month of glut, and eleven months of starvation. For this reason, the local bees cannot cope with an almond orchard. If I remember correctly, the eastern-USA beekeepers charge $100 per week per hive for the services of their bees, and at the end of the almond season transport their bees to another region of the USA on the next pollination project, for a different crop. One theory of why the bees are deserting their hives is that they become confused by all this geographical disturbance. But, for the present, nobody really knows why the bees are deserting.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
Robert Bannister - 18 Jul 2009 01:58 GMT >> Which leads me to wonder about our relationship with bees in general...a >> whole [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > become confused by all this geographical disturbance. But, for the present, > nobody really knows why the bees are deserting. My impression from what I've seen of this in the news, was that the bees were dying, not just deserting the hive. I hope you're right.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Richard Chambers - 18 Jul 2009 14:20 GMT >> A couple of months ago there was a programme about bees on BBC >> television. It concerned the fact that beehives are being deserted by the [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > My impression from what I've seen of this in the news, was that the bees > were dying, not just deserting the hive. I hope you're right. I believe that my posting is an accurate summary of what the television programme told us. The problem is that, in great numbers, the beehives are suddenly being deserted. Because there are no dead bodies on which to perform an autopsy, the cause of the problem is still unknown. For this reason, desertions are a worse problem than actual deaths of bees in their hives.
According to the programme, Australia does not have the same problem yet. The programme showed beehives being loaded onto aeroplanes in Australia, to be flown to USA on pollination contracts. I hope that the problem is not caused by an unknown bee disease, or parasite, endemic in America and Europe. If it is, the disease will presumably spread to Australia when the bees return from the USA.
Richard Chambers Leeds UK.
Chuck Riggs - 18 Jul 2009 14:45 GMT >>> Which leads me to wonder about our relationship with bees in general...a >>> whole [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >My impression from what I've seen of this in the news, was that the bees >were dying, not just deserting the hive. I hope you're right. From what I read in "The Economist" some issues back and on the Internet today, colony collapse disorder is probably caused by a virus. Knowing that may be a start towards a solution, anyway.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs, who speaks AmE, lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 18 Jul 2009 15:08 GMT >>My impression from what I've seen of this in the news, was that the bees >>were dying, not just deserting the hive. I hope you're right. > >From what I read in "The Economist" some issues back and on the >Internet today, colony collapse disorder is probably caused by a >virus. Knowing that may be a start towards a solution, anyway. I think that is for some value of "probably", unless there has been a breakthrough recently.
In a document from the British Beekeepers' Association proposing government-funded research projects: http://www.britishbee.org.uk/files/bbka-research-concepts.pdf
Honey Bee Health Research Concepts January 2009
There is a global problem with honey bee health
Existing disease threats are not fully understood and new problems such as CCD are as yet unexplained and unresolved.
Research is urgently needed to elucidate disease issues and to provide solutions.
Substantially increased Government funding is required to provide the GBP8+ million needed to finance a programme of research to confront the problems.
Beekeeping in the UK contributes over GBP165 million p.a. to the economy and has a nil service provision cost. .... In the UK, the vast majority of honey bee colonies are managed by amateur beekeepers, who pursue the activity for pleasure rather than profit. In contrast to the USA and other countries, where there are substantial commercial beekeeping sectors and thus financial incentive to re?]generate lost honey bee colonies, in the UK, amateurs with their 4 or 5 colonies, cannot recover from high year on year losses and as was seen when the varroa mite arrived on these shores in the early 1990s, will result in many beekeepers giving up the craft, with a further notable effect on bee stocks. If we lose beekeepers, we lose bee colonies. Given the honey bee?'s dependence on beekeepers for their survival there are few if any wild honey bee colonies left, due to the ravages of varroa and the inability of beekeepers to treat feral colonies.
Assuming that there is a single cause for the loss of honey bees it has to be one which affects bees in both large scale commercial and very small scale amateur operations.
The uncertainties about cause(s) appear to be reflected in the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Chuck Riggs - 19 Jul 2009 15:04 GMT >>>My impression from what I've seen of this in the news, was that the bees >>>were dying, not just deserting the hive. I hope you're right. [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] >article: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder Would you assume more than one cause? Since the problem arose rather suddenly, if I'm not mistaken, I would not. I continue to agree with the sources I mentioned yesterday, which implicated a virus. In any case, I'd rule out the cell phone radiation, mentioned in the Wiki-wacky article.
 Signature
Regards,
Chuck Riggs, who speaks AmE, lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE
Hatunen - 18 Jul 2009 18:22 GMT >One thing that I found amazing from this programme was the fact that the >sale of honey (especially in the USA) often amounts to less than 50% of the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >become confused by all this geographical disturbance. But, for the present, >nobody really knows why the bees are deserting. Much of Western irrigated farmland is in desert or near-desert. The heavily farmed San Joaquin Valley of California is, by nature, a vast desert but with irrigation it is a major US grower of produce, particular in the winter.
This means there aren't many native plants to keep bees fit and healthy. So bees have to be brought in at certain times of the growing season. Stacks of beehives at teh edges of irrigated fields is a common sight out here in the West.
Calfornia agriculture is mostly agri-business with huge areas under cultivation. The disappearing bee problem is a major fear of those businesses.
Those growers not part of major agri-business companies work through co-operatives, some of which are well-known in the USA. Sunkist citrus is a co-operative of Arizona and California citrus growers. Blue Diamond almonds come from a co-operative of almons growers. Sun Maid makes a number of products, the best known probably being Sun Maid raisins.
I'm not sure whether bees have to be brought in from out-of-state. California has a year round growing season with two or three growing cycles a year. The variety of plants used would seem to make it possible for California beekeepers to keep the state supplied with bees.
 Signature ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
John Dean - 16 Jul 2009 14:50 GMT > The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - > among one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very > ackward? Doesn't it? Are you sure it was "Meet me in St Louis"? I don't remember it from there but it was certainly in "Hello Dolly" (and thence to WALL-E.)
"Put on your Sunday clothes when you feel down and out Strut down the street and have your picture took"
In which case the short answer to your question is that it's there to rhyme with "look" since "look" wouldn't rhyme with "taken". A longer answer is that these lines are sung by Cornelius and Barnaby, the young, would-be men about town, and this may be the lyricist's way of indicating their patois. It's a musical - they sing stuff like "gonna" and "way back when". It's often non-standard. It don't always concur with the grammatical issues.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Glenn Knickerbocker - 16 Jul 2009 17:05 GMT > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have > your picture took" - how on earth does this concur with the grammatical > issues in English. It doesn't. It's dialect.
> sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? Nope, just folksy. Another common expression using this form is "get took" meaning to be swindled.
¬R
Mark Brader - 16 Jul 2009 20:05 GMT Arne Wilstrup:
> > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have > > your picture took" - how on earth does this concur with the grammatical > > issues in English. Glenn Knickerbocker:
> It doesn't. It's dialect.
> > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? > Nope, just folksy. ... Yep. In the context of the musical, it might make you think of ordinary small-town folks who aren't bothered to use posh affectations like "taken".
And it also might rhyme with "look". Two advantages for the price of one!
In the movie "The Public Eye", set in New York in the 1930s, Joe Pesci's character likes say to say "Everybody likes to get their picture took." He speaks with a Brooklyn accent (at least, I think it's Brooklyn) and this is one more way of marking himself as an ordinary guy, not upper-crust.
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto | "Jargon leakage is getting to be a real problem; msb@vex.net | sb should do sth about it." --R.H. Draney
My text in this article is in the public domain.
Stefan Ram - 17 Jul 2009 12:02 GMT >Nope, just folksy. Another common expression using this form is "get >took" meaning to be swindled. Is this similar to »be had« as in »I've been had.«?
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 17 Jul 2009 12:21 GMT >>Nope, just folksy. Another common expression using this form is "get >>took" meaning to be swindled. > > Is this similar to »be had« as in »I've been had.«? Yes.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Prai Jei - 18 Jul 2009 21:14 GMT "Arne H. Wilstrup" <ahw> set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum:
> The old American musical has the titlesong "Meet me in St.Louis" - among > one of the other songs in this muscial a sentence says ".... to have [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > sentence must - even for native American speakers - sound very ackward? > Doesn't it? "The world is made up of two kinds of people - dem as takes and dem as gets took." - Harry Mathias Hoxsey, osteopath
 Signature ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
|
|
|