CDB wrote on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:11:45 -0400:
>> Are there better current alternatives to
>> "make a crooked face at someone"
>> (including slang)
>> which is well represented in Shakespeare?
> I don't think anybody has mentioned "mop and mow" yet. Maybe there's
> a reason it's hard to find in OneLook. It means "to
> pout", roughly: to make a sad face and thrusst out the lower lip
> (from Dutch "moppen", to pout, and French "moue", a pout, says
> my SOED3). Both the old Webster's* at OneLook define it as
> "to pull a wry face".
> It's Shakespearian too, but I'm sure I used to see it in
> Victorian novels -- Dickens probably used it. If you have OED
> access, there's probably lots more.
Is there are a technical term for emphasis by repetition like "mop and
mow"? Off hand, "hue and cry" comes to mind as another example.

Signature
James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland
Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
CDB - 29 Jul 2009 21:49 GMT
> CDB wrote on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:11:45 -0400:
>
>>> Are there better current alternatives to
>>> "make a crooked face at someone"
>>> (including slang)
>>> which is well represented in Shakespeare?
>> I don't think anybody has mentioned "mop and mow" yet. Maybe
>> there's a reason it's hard to find in OneLook. It means "to
>> pout", roughly: to make a sad face and thrusst out the lower lip
>> (from Dutch "moppen", to pout, and French "moue", a pout, says
>> my SOED3). Both the old Webster's* at OneLook define it as
>> "to pull a wry face".
>> It's Shakespearian too, but I'm sure I used to see it in
>> Victorian novels -- Dickens probably used it. If you have OED
>> access, there's probably lots more.
> Is there are a technical term for emphasis by repetition like "mop
> and mow"? Off hand, "hue and cry" comes to mind as another example.
Good question (can't say). I feel sure it's been thoroughly discussed
here, but when I tried to search the archives, for nothing more
demanding than the word "synonymous", I got only 19 hits, all of them
from this year. Not good.
Expletive pairings (/ Eks'plitIv/)? Synergic doublets? There were no
hits at all for either of those nouns.
Paul Wolff - 29 Jul 2009 23:06 GMT
>James Silverton wrote:
>> CDB wrote on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:11:45 -0400:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>Expletive pairings (/ Eks'plitIv/)? Synergic doublets? There were no
>hits at all for either of those nouns.
Come, let us make an honourable retreat; though not with bag and
baggage, yet with scrip and scrippage.
<http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org/views/plays/play_view.php?WorkID=as
youlikeit&Act=3&Scene=2&Scope=scene> Line 1272/3.

Signature
Paul