I can't seem to find the answer I'm looking for CMS 15. Should I
capitalize the names of methods or models? For example: the Bull’s Eye
Model for Affective Development and the Torrance Tests of Creative
Thinking.
I assume that these should remain capitalized but something such as
"the meta-cognitive model" would remain lower cased...
your thoughts?
Leslie Danks - 30 Aug 2009 22:11 GMT
> I can't seem to find the answer I'm looking for CMS 15. Should I
> capitalize the names of methods or models? For example: the Bull?s Eye
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> your thoughts?
The safest approach in cases like these is to see what other
(authoritative) sources do, especially those close to you. Most (if not
all) of my Google hits for "Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking" are
capitalised; some have the (R) character after Torrance. I got no hits
for "Bull?s Eye Model for Affective Development"--did you make it up?
I agree that "the meta-cognitive model" should remain lower cased. As a
general guideline, I would expect expressions including proper names to
be capitalised and anonymous processes not to be; but I would not rely on
that in practice.

Signature
Les (BrE)
Melissa - 30 Aug 2009 22:29 GMT
I got no hits
> for "Bull?s Eye Model for Affective Development"--did you make it up?
No, but the book I'm copyediting cites it from a 2009 source, so it
must be too new to have many hits.
> I agree that "the meta-cognitive model" should remain lower cased. As a
> general guideline, I would expect expressions including proper names to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Les (BrE)
Thank you Les for the advice! Much appreciated!
Django Cat - 31 Aug 2009 10:28 GMT
> I got no hits
Not this one?
http://www.kpgt.org/subsite/documents/Olenchak_Spring_2009_Part_I.pdf
That apostrophe needed shuffling...
DC
--
Don Phillipson - 31 Aug 2009 16:24 GMT
> I got no hits
> > for "Bull?s Eye Model for Affective Development"--did you make it up?
>
> No, but the book I'm copyediting cites it from a 2009 source, so it
> must be too new to have many hits.
Except in a community of psychiatrists, this is a bad title or name
because it suggests it might be a mistake for Effective Development
(a much more common phrase.) We must suppose it has something
to do with the psych. concept known as Affect (and that their jargon
permits calling the development or alteration of affect Affective
Development.)

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Eric Walker - 31 Aug 2009 02:51 GMT
> I can't seem to find the answer I'm looking for CMS 15. Should I
> capitalize the names of methods or models? For example: the Bull’s Eye
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> your thoughts?
My thoughts are that you would most likely be using such constructions in
relatively formal documents, for which there must exist some specified
style guide ()such as the _Chicago_), from which guide you should seek
enlightenment. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_guide

Signature
Cordially,
Eric Walker, Owlcroft House
http://owlcroft.com/english/
John Kane - 31 Aug 2009 17:01 GMT
> I can't seem to find the answer I'm looking for CMS 15. Should I
> capitalize the names of methods or models? For example: the Bull’s Eye
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> your thoughts?
Yes to both althoiugh I have not heard of the Bull's Eye Model. The
Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking is an established test/set of
tests, I forget which and if the context agrees then the Bull's Eye
etc would be similar.
You might want to check in the Buro's Mental Measurement Yearbook if
you have access to it. Most universities should have it and it is
available on-line for a fee. However a quick check suggests Bull's Eye
is not in the MMY.
John Kane - 31 Aug 2009 17:03 GMT
> I can't seem to find the answer I'm looking for CMS 15. Should I
> capitalize the names of methods or models? For example: the Bull’s Eye
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> your thoughts?
You might want to cross check this with the American Psychological
Association style manual.
John Kane Kingston ON Canada