Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / October 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

one... he or she/one...they

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
thanasis - 27 Oct 2009 15:46 GMT
Hi to all,

which one of the following is considered to be more correct in formal
English writing.
one... he or she or
one...they?

For example:

One can succeed in his or her life provided that he or she is diligent and
hard-working.

One can succeed in their lives provided that they are diligent and
hard-working.

Thanks in advance

Thanasis
James Hogg - 27 Oct 2009 15:59 GMT
> Hi to all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> One can succeed in their lives provided that they are diligent and
> hard-working.

In British English that would be:

One can succeed in one's life provided that one is diligent and
hard-working.
or more simply
One can succeed in life provided that one is diligent and hard-working.

No need to change the subject in mid-sentence.

Signature

James

thanasis - 27 Oct 2009 16:18 GMT
Many thanks

what about american english?

>> Hi to all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> No need to change the subject in mid-sentence.
Stan Brown - 27 Oct 2009 19:03 GMT
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:46:52 +0200 from thanasis <invalid@thanasis.gr>:

> Hi to all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> One can succeed in their lives provided that they are diligent and
> hard-working.

Neither of the above.

The first one could be changed to "... in one's life ..." and would
be correct though extremely formal.

"Lives" in the second one is clearly wrong.

It is best to avoid the whole issue of gendered pronouns in third
person, because anything you do will annoy a substantial number of
people. Unless the context is quite formal, the second person is a
good way out:

"You can succeed in your life if you are diligent and work hard."

Signature

Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
                                  http://OakRoadSystems.com
Shikata ga nai...

Steve Hayes - 27 Oct 2009 19:42 GMT
>Hi to all,
>
>which one of the following is considered to be more correct in formal
>English writing.
>one... he or she or
>one...they?

Neither.

Its one... one

>For example:
>
>One can succeed in his or her life provided that he or she is diligent and
>hard-working.

One can succeed in one's life provided that one is diligent and hard working.

Think of "one" as being like "you and I" or "we"

We can succeed in our lives provided that he or she is hard working -- why
should our success depend on someone else's work?

>One can succeed in their lives provided that they are diligent and
>hard-working.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Thanasis

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Skitt - 27 Oct 2009 20:30 GMT
> "thanasis" wrote:

>> which one of the following is considered to be more correct in formal
>> English writing.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> We can succeed in our lives provided that he or she is hard working
> -- why should our success depend on someone else's work?

Oy!
Signature

Skitt (AmE)

John Lawler - 27 Oct 2009 20:31 GMT
> Hi to all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanasis

Neither is incorrect, exactly. Which one one
uses depends on how formal one wants to be.

'One ... he or she' is stultifyingly formal, and
guarantees no one will read further with interest,
or memory. It smacks of official boilerplate.  If
that's one's goal, go for it.

'One ... they' is normal English.  However, many
peevologists froth at its use, so it's the one to
use if one likes watching people spew flecks of
foam from their mouths.

One'll have gathered by now that the use of
the indefinite pronoun 'one' in *any* variety of
English should be avoided, except between
consenting adults. As with most English usage
questions, if one is a native speaker and one
has to ask whether a construction is correct,
one should find another way to say it instead.

-John Lawler                     http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler
Getting an education is a bit like a communicable sexual
 disease.  It makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs, and
 then you have the urge to pass it on. -- Terry Pratchett
John Kane - 27 Oct 2009 20:39 GMT
> > Hi to all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>   disease.  It makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs, and
>   then you have the urge to pass it on. -- Terry Pratchett

I would say "their life" rather than their lives in this case.

John Kane, Kingston ON Canada
Mark Brader - 27 Oct 2009 22:07 GMT
John Lawler:
> 'One ... he or she' is stultifyingly formal ...
> 'One ... they' is normal English.

I'm surprised to hear John say this without qualification.  I don't
believe I'm the only one who would say that both versions are just
wrong.  In formal usage, for me, it can only be "one ... one".
(And in *normal*, informal, English, of course it's "you ... you".)
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto | "I conducted a Usenet poll ... on this subject ...
msb@vex.net          |  Laura is single.  By a 2-1 margin."  --Ken Perlow

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Jerry Friedman - 28 Oct 2009 00:08 GMT
> John Lawler:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> wrong.  In formal usage, for me, it can only be "one ... one".
> (And in *normal*, informal, English, of course it's "you ... you".)

You aren't the only one--I agree completely.  In my view of American
English, "One... he or she" and "One... they" are both like wearing
white socks with a navy suit.  If you have a reason to put on the
suit, you have the same reason to put on the socks that go with it.
(Unless you're clowning.)

--
Jerry Friedman wrote that in normal English.
thanasis - 28 Oct 2009 01:00 GMT
On Oct 27, 7:46 am, "thanasis" <inva...@thanasis.gr> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanasis

Neither is incorrect, exactly. Which one one
uses depends on how formal one wants to be.

'One ... he or she' is stultifyingly formal, and
guarantees no one will read further with interest,
or memory. It smacks of official boilerplate.  If
that's one's goal, go for it.

'One ... they' is normal English.  However, many
peevologists froth at its use, so it's the one to
use if one likes watching people spew flecks of
foam from their mouths.

One'll have gathered by now that the use of
the indefinite pronoun 'one' in *any* variety of
English should be avoided, except between
consenting adults. As with most English usage
questions, if one is a native speaker and one
has to ask whether a construction is correct,
one should find another way to say it instead.

My intention is to get a high grade in essay writing for the examination
ECPE (American English). Could you please tell what is the best way so as to
get a high grade?

Thanks
Thanasis

-John Lawler                     http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler
Getting an education is a bit like a communicable sexual
 disease.  It makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs, and
 then you have the urge to pass it on. -- Terry Pratchett
Jerry Friedman - 28 Oct 2009 04:42 GMT
...

> news:8e020085-ccaf-4dff-8bcf-a403c01bccbd@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 7:46 am, "thanasis" <inva...@thanasis.gr> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > one... he or she or
> > one...they?
...

> My intention is to get a high grade in essay writing for the examination
> ECPE (American English). Could you please tell what is the best way so as to
> get a high grade?

"One... one's".  And "oneself" if necessary.

I think explaining your intention is very helpful.

--
Jerry Friedman
Peter Moylan - 28 Oct 2009 05:44 GMT
> One'll have gathered by now that the use of
> the indefinite pronoun 'one' in *any* variety of
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>   disease.  It makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs, and
>   then you have the urge to pass it on. -- Terry Pratchett

I didn't even see your last question until Jerry quoted it, because it
was mixed in with what John Lawler had written. You would be doing
yourself a favour if you configured your newsreader to quote properly.

Signature

Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.      http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.

Default User - 28 Oct 2009 19:30 GMT
> I didn't even see your last question until Jerry quoted it, because
> it was mixed in with what John Lawler had written. You would be doing
> yourself a favour if you configured your newsreader to quote properly.

It's more than configuration. It's another round of the Outlook
Express/Google Groups incompatibility. He'll need to install OE
Quotefix, get a different newsreader, or figure some way to
unambigously differentiate the quotes.

Brian

Signature

Day 268 of the "no grouchy usenet posts" project

thanasis - 28 Oct 2009 01:02 GMT
Hi,

My intention is to get a high grade in essay writing for the examination
ECPE (American English). Could you please tell what is the best way to write
the above phrase, so as to
get a high grade?

Thanks
Thanasis
Steve Hayes - 28 Oct 2009 02:31 GMT
>'One ... he or she' is stultifyingly formal, and
>guarantees no one will read further with interest,
>or memory. It smacks of official boilerplate.  If
>that's one's goal, go for it.

It sounds highly informal to me, and in fact downright wrong.

>'One ... they' is normal English.  However, many
>peevologists froth at its use, so it's the one to
>use if one likes watching people spew flecks of
>foam from their mouths.

Equally informal andf equally wrong.

One should not drive when one is drunk.

... is OK.

But one SHOULD drive when one is sober and he and she are drunk.

If it's he OR she, then there is the possibilty  that one of them could be
sober and the other drunk, so one could drive and so could the other sober
one.

One SHOULD drive when one is sober and they are drunk, because then one is the
only sober member of the party.

There are probably less formal ways of putting it, but what the heck, it's
only an example.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Nick - 28 Oct 2009 09:38 GMT
>>'One ... he or she' is stultifyingly formal, and
>>guarantees no one will read further with interest,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Equally informal andf equally wrong.

"One" is to me (BrE) heavily formal.  Misusing it, by treating it as
"you" or "a person" later doesn't make it informal, it just makes the
sentence weird.

I can't think when I last used this (non-numeric) "one" in writing or
speech.
Signature

Online waterways route planner: http://canalplan.org.uk
          development version: http://canalplan.eu

John Holmes - 31 Oct 2009 06:05 GMT
> Neither is incorrect, exactly. Which one one
> uses depends on how formal one wants to be.

Using "one" can easily become very awkward, which is probably why people
tend to reserve if for more formal writing, when they have time to think
carefully about how to use it neatly.

As an aside:
One-One was a racehorse.
Two-Two was one, too.
One-One won one race,
Two-Two won one, too.

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

Eric Walker - 28 Oct 2009 02:54 GMT
> which one of the following is considered to be more correct in formal
> English writing.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> One can succeed in their lives provided that they are diligent and
> hard-working.

If one begins with "one", one is *obliged* to carry it on through:

 One can succeed in one's life provided that one is diligent and hard-
 working.

Note that such use of "one" is a bit tedious; the most frequent uses are
in publications where the natural word is "I" but editorial policy
forbids articles in the first-person.  (Silly, but at least once upon a
time, not uncommon: "One tried on one's new hat.")

It is a separate consideration that in sound English, whether or not
"formal", "they" can only be used with a plural antecedent, no matter
what the lazy or adventurous tell you.

In cases where the sex of a person is indeterminate, there are numerous
ways to work around the "he or she" matter--Garner, in "A Dictionary of
Modern American Usage" (at "Sexism") lists five.  The commonest and
easiest is to make the subject plural to begin with ("Students should do
their work diligently"); another is to write around an explicit subject
("Success in life can be had by diligence and hard work").  Moreover,
when it is simply necessary, it is not so awful as all that.

See also http://owlcroft.com/english/they.shtml

Signature

Cordially,
Eric Walker, Owlcroft House
http://owlcroft.com/english/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.