Hello:
Could he refer to anything but _financial_ "wealth/poverty?" I don't
think it's about a "wealth of evidence."
-----
[Strether meets Mme Vionnet, Chad's friend, at a party. It seems he's
being able to answer at least some of his own questions about her. He
had just learned Miss Gostrey, his friend, knew her, but didn't tell
him anything about it.]
Strether wondered to find Miss Gostrey already involved, feeling that
he missed a link; but feeling also, with small delay, how much he
should like to talk with her of Madame de Vionnet on this basis of
evidence.
The evidence as yet in truth was meagre; which, for that matter, was
perhaps a little why his expectation had had a drop. There was somehow
not quite a wealth in her; and a wealth was all that, in his
simplicity, he had definitely prefigured. Still, it was too much to be
sure already that there was but a poverty.
Henry James, The Ambassadors, p. 132
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/432/432-h/432-h.htm
-----
--
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Cheryl - 30 Nov 2009 11:27 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Thanks.
> Marius Hancu
It's not really clear to me. I don't think it means financial wealth,
and I agree with you that 'wealth of evidence' doesn't quite fit. Maybe
it refers to his expectations of her. He had expected a great deal from
her (of what? Social connections? Affection? I'm not sure); now thought
that she didn't 'quite' have that wealth he had, in his
simplicity/naivety expected her to have, but he was still sure she had
too much of whatever it was to be poor in that respect.

Signature
Cheryl