Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2010

Rice has consistently supported the illegitimate International
Criminal Court's (ICC) arrest warrant for Sudanese President Bashir,
issued in March 2009. Up to this point, the U.S. has refused to give
up its own sovereignty to become part of the British-created imperial
world government court.

Congress Throws Rice at Gration

The attacks on Gration during his testimony at the Dec. 3 hearing are
the direct product of Rice's growing influence in the Obama
Administration, as Obama acts more and more like a puppet of British
policy. Witness Obama's behavior at the failed Copenhagen Climate
Conference, in his support for the British oligarchy's demands for
population reduction. Obama is also suffering the steepest loss of
approval from the American population of any American President at
this time in his Presidency, due to his murderous economic and health-
care policies. The shift inside the Obama camp was evident in the
treatment of Gration, and Gration's own inability to respond
truthfully under fire. Committee chairman Payne, who continues to lead
the campaign against Sudan in the Congress, invited Sen. Sam Brownback
(R-Kan.) to take the point against Gration in the hearing. In a mean-
spirited display of Aristotelian logic chopping, Brownback succeeded
in backing Gration into a corner over allegations of "ongoing"
genocide
http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html
http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf -- Brits Hate Shakespeare, Why?

thus:
did you ever see the electronics book,
_There Are No Electrons_??...  below,
you are putting your "Annum Miraculum 1905" verbiage
of "the photon" into the expewrimenters' mouth,
when it is completely useless in the wave-front formalism
of Young, Huyghens, Fizeau, Fresnel et al.

there is no vacuum for the aether to fill-up,
as Pascal would or could (or did) eventually deduce
from his "plenum" experiment with his what-became-a-barometer.

one neither needs Pauli's matrix/particle dual
to Schroedinger's wave equation, although "one is permitted
to abuse it," as a nicety for linear algebra, or Matlab, or
"Mathematica" from the Wolframites

thus:
yeah, the photo-electrical effect, like when
Moon hits your eye like cheese-pizza-sans-topping,
the only thing that "requires" a photon -- or
the "collapse of schroedinger's wave-function."  or,
name another phenomenon.

thus:
Randi made a big mess of the Bienveniste's homeopathy experiments, as
if
there is no possible scientific justification for it, or catalyzed
fusion,
for that matter -- just cuz he could!

Chomsky has amuzing things to say about Washo et al;
I just wish that the "left" wouldn't worship him!...  I mean,
Noam, not Washo.

I think that "semiotics" got off on a clown shoe,
when Korbyzski (sp.?) introduced his joke-language,
E-prime (which is really just English as a Second Language,
no formal training attained .-)

thus:
that herring was bloodied.  so, why do you need aether,
to make the water fill the void, left by the ball --
you were referring to the wet stuff; eh?...  as for
your allegorical "photons," the dual usage of them,
to show the properties of light-cum-waves that Young showed
-- thereby destroying Newton's corpuscular "theory" and
its exact-opposite index of refraction ... or
try Descartes' bungle of Snell's law in l'OEuvre, below --
is just too many quanta to deal with, as well
as teh problem of the Broglie/Bohm "guide wave" stuff; better,
to look at the properties of wave-guides, as in lasers and
microwave technology.  but, I agree,
about the splitting of the "photon" into two "photons!"

thus:
at least, Uncle Al has done an actual experiment,
as any one can see on his webpage; some day,
I'll see if I can grok it.

so, what in Hell is an "open proof?..."  well,
there's a lot of confusion over "inductive & deductive"
mathematical proof, which are actully isomorphic:
the Mathematics Magazine article even gives a formula,
to convert one into another.

thus:
yeah, tell that to Aristarchus and Gauss; while
you're at the seance, be sure to ask Minkowski
to retract his silly statement about phase-space --
we Wanabi electronics folks are senstiive to this,
like Dayton C. Miller was, actually

anyway, I am not wont to use your particular language,
which is bound to a century of Copenhagenskoolin' and
Schroedinger's poor, jokey cat!

as for antimatter,
there is no way to dystinguish the light from it, because
there is only one kind of light per Dirac:
waves!...  yes, one can use a "dual" formalism
of "ray-tracing the photon" viz the brachistochrone, but
that is of no more interest,
than the dual-column proofs in projective geometry.

thus:
HAMLET: Ay, marry why was he sent into England?
GRAVEDIGGER: Why, because a' was mad: a' shall recover
his wits there; or, if a' do not, 'tis no great matter there.
HAMLET: Why?
GRAVEDIGGER: Twill not be seen in him there;
there the men are as mad as he.
(Hamlet, V.i. 144-149)

thus:
the curvature of space was "classically" proven, or
empirically, by Aristarchus (with a cohort at the same longitude,
different lattitude, same approx. time) and Gauss
(who invented the theodolite, to do it, in a survey
of (the disputed) Alsace-Lorraine for the French goment).

thus:
Lorenz found that they were deterministic, not fuzzy, but
every little bit counts; especially,
when you consider the vicisitudes of the manufacture
of floating-point processing-ware from the spec
(IEEE-755, -855;
the first is an article in Computer magazine, 1980 issue .-)

thus:
garbage up; garbage back down.  like I said,
Minkowski couldn't take-back his spiel
about phase-space.

thus:
in California, primarily the gangs constitute the only militia,
per the second amendment (you can look-up the case-law on that,
a digest re the Constitution on Lexis-Nexis, where
it is pretty clear that the "right to bear arms" includes
the wearing of long-sleeved shirts; likewise,
it exposes the liberal-media-owned-by-consWervatives silliness,
where they always confuse "separation of church & state"
with the foundational dysestablishmentarianism in A#1 -- yeah,
they really, always do that, cuz TJ said the six words !-)

so, what is this remarkable Madison/Marx patrimony,
that we exist under?...  of course,
they were contemporaries, and Marx actually supported Henry Clay,
for a while, til he was subverted by The Veiled Librarian
at the British Library, in London.  and, here,
you can look-up the past publications where this stuff was put,
in *The Campaigner* magazine (it is no-longer called that,
since the goment forced a bogus ch.13 bankruptcy on it, and
several other Larouchiac pubs.: http://www.wlym.com/drupal/campaigners
)).

thus:
I didn't know that Zeeman made such an experiment, although
I had read of Fizeau's (using high-pressure & -velocity water
in a tube of some sort; did Z verify that?)  I woulnd't put
in the terms of either SR or mpc, because it's really more akin
to general relativity viz-a-vu the "curvature of space"
-- not of time, the big PLONK from Minkowski-THEN-he-died --
and that is what surfer's cited essay & figures dyscuss.
  Read it & sleep on the un-nullities of Michelson & Morley et al
(small, but quite regular; and, you can say "entrainment," if
you must, iff only to evoke Eisntein's gedankenspiel ... and,
we'll just ignore, that "eq. (B)" was derived by Lorentz,
firstly, if also from "the" theory .-)

--l'OEuvre, http://wlym.com
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon.pdf
FCUK Copenhagen free carbon-credit trade rip-off;
put a tariff on imported energy!

Wolfgang Schwanke wrote (30-12-2009 09:19):

Don't forget the octopi.

Well, they're certainly not 'dumb'.

There was only one paper about dolphin communication at the conference
(the discussion after each paper was inscribed and included, so you
could look it up), and I don't recall anyone ever claiming to have
caused dolphins to acquire a symbolic language.

Ms. Pepperberg and her parrot were based at Northwestern U for many
years, and not surprisingly got lots of attention in the Chicago
press. One thing that was perfectly clear was that _no one_ was ever
allowed to meet the bird.

That may have changed when she moved to a different university; there
is a book by a journalist about her, which I had no interest in
reading. Perhaps s/he became convinced that the parrot could speak
English.