> In a sentence I read, "I understand in practice a department may
> ...." How would that be different from writing "I understand that in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> “that” simply implied or is there some subtle difference in meaning
> of which I am ignorant? To my ear the latter sounds better.
There are lots of contexts where "that" can be omitted. In some cases
it may be advisable not to omit the "that" in writing, if it will
prevent ambiguity. In this case you might have to reread the sentence
when you realise that the writer isn't claiming to understand a
department.

Signature
James
Jerry Friedman - 15 Jan 2010 03:28 GMT
> > In a sentence I read, "I understand in practice a department may
> > ...." How would that be different from writing "I understand that in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> when you realise that the writer isn't claiming to understand a
> department.
And that it's probably not, "I understand in practice that a
department may..."
--
Jerry Friedman