>Embarrassingly, I am just now getting around to reading Douglas Adams's
>"The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul." A house is described thusly: "The
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>500 shares be a lot? Was it a reliable but boring investment? Something
>else?
The background is that the telephone service in the UK was originally
provided by the Post Office. In 1984 the telecommunications division of
the PO was privatised. Shares were sold explicitly to private investors,
ordinary citizens, the general public, rather than through the stock
exchange. For many people they were the first shares they ever owned,
and for many they were the last.
The presence of "five hundred British Telecom shares" would be as much
an symbol of the spirit of the times, passing fashions, as "a set of
Dylan albums that was complete up to 'Blood on the Tracks'".
From:
http://www.btplc.com/Thegroup/BTsHistory/Privatisationinfosheetissue2.pdf
Telecommunications Act 1984
....
The concept of whether enterprises were public or private had become
of 50.2 per cent of shares in British Telecom went smoothly. As a
result the Government authorised the largest marketing campaign ever
for the sale of a new share issue to provide information, but more
importantly to create widespread interest in the shares. In this
respect the policy was successful with full subscription and wider
share ownership being achieved.
One of the main motivations behind such an issue of shares is the
desire to spread share ownership as widely as possible throughout
the population with the aim of building support for the Government
by creating vested interests in the process. The partial sale of the
Government’s share holding in an enterprise has the added benefit of
positively contributing to the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement
(PSBR). Once the Government holding has fallen below 50 per cent
then any future capital borrowed is exempt from the PSBR, a figure
that the Conservatives were keen to reduce.
The sale of 50.2 per cent of shares in British Telecom in 1984 was
revolutionary in its scale and experimental in its marketing.
Ultimately it was not just British Telecom that was being sold, but
the whole concept of privatisation.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 18 Jan 2010 19:00 GMT
Sorry, there was a line missing:
The concept of whether enterprises were public or private had become
an election issue so it was vital for the Government that the sale
of 50.2 per cent of shares in British Telecom went smoothly. As a
result the Government authorised the largest marketing campaign ever
for the sale of a new share issue to provide information, but more
importantly to create widespread interest in the shares. In this
respect the policy was successful with full subscription and wider
share ownership being achieved.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
Prai Jei - 20 Jan 2010 18:30 GMT
Peter Duncanson (BrE) set the following eddies spiralling through the
space-time continuum:
> The presence of "five hundred British Telecom shares" would be as much
> an symbol of the spirit of the times, passing fashions, as "a set of
> Dylan albums that was complete up to 'Blood on the Tracks'".
Or a Sinclair C5 parked outside.

Signature
ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
> Embarrassingly, I am just now getting around to reading Douglas Adams's
> "The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul." A house is described thusly: "The
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 500 shares be a lot? Was it a reliable but boring investment? Something
> else?
British Telecom (now just "BT") was privatised in 1984. So many people
applied for the share issue that individuals were allocated no more than
a token number of shares, no matter how many the wanted. I wouldn't be
surprised to hear that it was 500.
Have you read "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"? You probably
should read that first.

Signature
David
Sara Lorimer - 19 Jan 2010 22:39 GMT
> Have you read "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"? You probably
> should read that first.
I haven't. But now I'm a bit further along and the book isn't really
drawing me in; I might not finish it.

Signature
SML
Garrett Wollman - 19 Jan 2010 23:18 GMT
>> Have you read "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"? You probably
>> should read that first.
>
>I haven't. But now I'm a bit further along and the book isn't really
>drawing me in; I might not finish it.
I did finish /Tea-Time/ but felt rather the same. The earlier book
(cited by David above) was much better. It was also made into a
reasonably accurate radio play that occasionally resurfaces on BBC
Radio 7.
-GAWollman

Signature
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
R H Draney - 19 Jan 2010 23:29 GMT
Garrett Wollman filted:
>>> Have you read "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"? You probably
>>> should read that first.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>reasonably accurate radio play that occasionally resurfaces on BBC
>Radio 7.
Bits of the first Dirk Gently book were also re-used from the unaired Doctor Who
story "Shada"....r

Signature
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?
the Omrud - 20 Jan 2010 10:09 GMT
> Garrett Wollman filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Bits of the first Dirk Gently book were also re-used from the unaired Doctor Who
> story "Shada"....r
And some of the basic story was taken from Adams' Doctor Who story "City
of Death". I recognised it half way through the book and guessed the
ending, but it's still a good book. The final throwaway non-plot point
involving music still makes me grin when I think of it.

Signature
David
Prai Jei - 20 Jan 2010 18:28 GMT
the Omrud set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:
> British Telecom (now just "BT") was privatised in 1984. So many people
> applied for the share issue that individuals were allocated no more than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Have you read "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"? You probably
> should read that first.
ISTR 800 (the 500 was actually with British Gas, the next one that That
Great Charmer (anag.) tried out. I joined in the fun on both occasions, but
after a while I found I needed the money so I sold the little bits of paper
to somebody who advertised in one of the newspapers and I had some cash
back.
Certainly those who ordered silly numbers of shares, something like
>150,000, got nowt.

Signature
ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
>Embarrassingly, I am just now getting around to reading Douglas Adams's
>"The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul." A house is described thusly: "The
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>500 shares be a lot? Was it a reliable but boring investment? Something
>else?
Prolly something to do with Margaret Thatcher's privatisation mania.

Signature
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk