Donna Richoux filted:
>> ----
>> What could the ginger-haired man do to her anyway?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>anyway?" It's still not the greatest sentence. The commas are needed
>there to set off "sometimes wobbly from work".
In that form, yes, but in Malarkey's phrasing, the comma after "work" is
absolutely wrong....r

Signature
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?
HVS - 04 Feb 2010 18:20 GMT
On 04 Feb 2010, R H Draney wrote
> Donna Richoux filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> In that form, yes, but in Malarkey's phrasing, the comma after
> "work" is absolutely wrong....r
Indeed; he's tripped up because the last attribute is a phrase
rather than a single word.
If you simply swap the "weak" and "wobbly from work" adjectives --
"What could the ginger-haired, sometimes wobbly from work, and weak
man do to her anyway?" -- it's obvious that you can't put a comma
after the final adjective.
(Well, you *can*, of course, but not without showing that you're
crap at punctuation.)

Signature
Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Marius Hancu - 04 Feb 2010 18:44 GMT
> On 04 Feb 2010, R H Draney wrote
>
> > Donna Richoux filted:
> >>> ----
> >>> What could the ginger-haired man do to her anyway?
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> man do to her anyway?" -- it's obvious that you can't put a comma
> after the final adjective.
Great point.
Thank you all.
Marius Hancu
Glenn Knickerbocker - 04 Feb 2010 22:26 GMT
> Donna Richoux filted:
> >> "What could the ginger-haired, weak, and sometimes wobbly from work,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In that form, yes, but in Malarkey's phrasing, the comma after "work" is
> absolutely wrong....r
My thought is that it's absolutely required, actually. A phrase like
"wobbly from work" isn't normally used attributively. You'd have to
mark it as an ad-hoc compound by hyphenating it (and in speech by saying
it faster and setting it off with pauses). In this context, I'd say
it's a parenthetical expression that should be set off with commas on
both sides.
¬R
R H Draney - 04 Feb 2010 22:56 GMT
Glenn Knickerbocker filted:
>> Donna Richoux filted:
>> >> "What could the ginger-haired, weak, and sometimes wobbly from work,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>it's a parenthetical expression that should be set off with commas on
>both sides.
Would Charlie Brown have lusted after "that cute, little, red haired, girl"?...r

Signature
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?
Eric Walker - 05 Feb 2010 02:05 GMT
[...]
> Would Charlie Brown have lusted after "that cute, little, red haired,
> girl"?...r
Good example. The difference is between parallel adjectives, which each
apply equally and independent of the others, and which are thus separated
by commas, and superposed adjectives, which build a little train of
thought (the example Follett gives is "his battered old canvas fishing
hat", which is not a hat that is battered, old, canvas, and fishing).

Signature
Cordially,
Eric Walker, Owlcroft House
http://owlcroft.com/english/