Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / February 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Theater" vs. "Theatre" (spelling)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Berkeley Brett - 10 Feb 2010 20:00 GMT
As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
show Ingmar Bergman films from those that are more likely to show
Arnold Schwarzenegger films, the latter using the spelling
"theater."  (Though not all "fine arts" movie houses use the spelling
"theatre".)

The "Landmark Theatre" chain is an example of this:

http://www.landmarktheatres.com/

Any thoughts on this usage?

P.S. At least one of the Landmark Theatres -- the Shattuck Cinema in
Berkeley, California -- now has COMFY CHAIRS!  I suspect this upgrade
will be coming to some of the others, too:

=== begin quoted text ===

In 2009, the Shattuck Cinemas completed a comprehensive remodel, with
new spacious and luxurious theatre seating in all auditoriums, new
lighting design, carpets and paint. Two auditoriums have been
transformed into Landmark’s exclusive Screening Lounge™, with unique
seating options of home-style couches, loveseats, chairs and ottomans,
from the LoveSac® company. Upgrades in the lobby and concession area
were included in the extensive makeover....

=== end quoted text ===

Was just there yesterday -- the beanbag chairs down front can easily
accommodate two people apiece.  The other comfy chairs really are
comfortable.

--
Brett (in Berkeley, California, USA)
http://www.electoralmaps.org/
Pictorial election results for every U.S. Presidential Election from
George Washington to Barack Obama.
Cece - 10 Feb 2010 21:44 GMT
> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Pictorial election results for every U.S. Presidential Election from
> George Washington to Barack Obama.

The British spelling is more refined, doncha know.  Stage theatres and
art theatres, but entertainment theaters.
tony cooper - 10 Feb 2010 23:05 GMT
>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
>> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>The British spelling is more refined, doncha know.  Stage theatres and
>art theatres, but entertainment theaters.

Any difference between "theater" and "theatre" in this area is purely
the developer's idea of what to put on the sign.  We have both
"theaters" and "theatres" that show Adam Sandler movies.  Our one "art
house" is the Enzian Theater.  

Glancing at the list of places that put on live performances, they are
all "theatres" if they have the word in their name.  However, the
newspaper columnist that reviews plays provides "theater reviews".

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

JimboCat - 11 Feb 2010 18:19 GMT
> >> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> >> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> "theaters" and "theatres" that show Adam Sandler movies.  Our one "art
> house" is the Enzian Theater.  

'Round here we also have "shoppes" and "shops", not to mention
"emporiums" (not "emporia"!) and even a few "centres". Some people
just seem to think it looks more classy that way.

A local grocery chain takes the cake with their "Olde World Shoppe",
where they sell, among other things, cakes. I don't _think_ they put
an "e" at the end of "world", but I'm not sure...I've always called it
the "oldy worldy shoppy".

Jim Deutch (JimboCat)
--
"I don't care if I never grow old:
gonna flame, gonna burn, take one quick turn,
and be gone like James Dean"
-- Greg Brown
Roland Hutchinson - 18 Feb 2010 03:37 GMT
> 'Round here we also have "shoppes" and "shops", not to mention
> "emporiums" (not "emporia"!) and even a few "centres". Some people just
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "e" at the end of "world", but I'm not sure...I've always called it the
> "oldy worldy shoppy".

Not "ye oldy worldy shoppy"?

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Django Cat - 11 Feb 2010 19:48 GMT
> > As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> > seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> The British spelling is more refined, doncha know.  Stage theatres and
> art theatres, but entertainment theaters.

Yeah, fine, triffic.  Anyway, here in the UK a theatre is somewhere you
go to see actors performing in a play; movies are shown in cinemas.

DC

--
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 11 Feb 2010 20:17 GMT
>> > As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
>> > seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>Yeah, fine, triffic.  Anyway, here in the UK a theatre is somewhere you
>go to see actors performing in a play; movies are shown in cinemas.

Except at:
 Stoke-on-Trent Film Theatre
 Glasgow Film Theatre
 Queen's Film Theatre, Belfast
 Leiston Film Theatre [Suffolk]
 Reading Film Theatre
 Stafford Film Theatre
 Whitgift Film Theatre, Grimsby
 etc.

The National Film Theatre in London now appears to be called BFI
Southbank.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Django Cat - 11 Feb 2010 21:56 GMT
> >> > As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling
> "theatre" >> > seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> The National Film Theatre in London now appears to be called BFI
> Southbank.

Well, apart from them, obviously.

--
annily - 12 Feb 2010 01:13 GMT
>>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
>>> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Yeah, fine, triffic.  Anyway, here in the UK a theatre is somewhere you
> go to see actors performing in a play; movies are shown in cinemas.

Same for me in Australia, although I think the US influence is seeing
"theatre" become more common for "movies" (or "films" as we used to call
them before the US influence). Even though we have the US influence for
"theatre" vs "cinema", we haven't adopted their spelling yet.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

HVS - 12 Feb 2010 09:10 GMT
On 11 Feb 2010, Django Cat wrote

> Anyway, here in the UK a theatre is somewhere you go to see
> actors performing in a play; movies are shown in cinemas.

Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England I quickly
discovered that calling them "movies" was considered a bit
pretentious -- film-school-wannabes watched movies, while normal
people went to the pictures to see a film.

This came a quite a surprise to me, as my usage in Canada had been
the reverse -- artsy-fartsy types watched films;  me and the guys
went to the movies.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Django Cat - 12 Feb 2010 20:44 GMT
> On 11 Feb 2010, Django Cat wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> pretentious -- film-school-wannabes watched movies, while normal
> people went to the pictures to see a film.

You're probably right there, Harvey.  Where'd I put my latte
frappuccino and Observer colour supplement?

DC
--
HVS - 12 Feb 2010 23:46 GMT
On 12 Feb 2010, Django Cat wrote

>> On 11 Feb 2010, Django Cat wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> You're probably right there, Harvey.  Where'd I put my latte
> frappuccino and Observer colour supplement?

Ah, yes -- the bolour supplement, sboolboys who suffered traumas, and
silly bunts, wot?

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

John Varela - 12 Feb 2010 20:53 GMT
> Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England I quickly
> discovered that calling them "movies" was considered a bit
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the reverse -- artsy-fartsy types watched films;  me and the guys
> went to the movies.

When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression that
Brits viewed flicks.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email

Hatunen - 12 Feb 2010 22:06 GMT
>> Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England I quickly
>> discovered that calling them "movies" was considered a bit
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression that
>Brits viewed flicks.

So did American university students. I first heard the usage in
1955 in Williamstown, Massachusetts.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

John Varela - 13 Feb 2010 19:39 GMT
> >> Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England I quickly
> >> discovered that calling them "movies" was considered a bit
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> So did American university students.

That would be university students in America, not students at
American University?

> I first heard the usage in
> 1955 in Williamstown, Massachusetts.

I was in Boston and when we went to a "Carry On" or an Alec Guinness
movie we liked to say we were going to a flick. That's the only time
we used the word.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email

James Silverton - 13 Feb 2010 19:53 GMT
John  wrote  on 13 Feb 2010 19:39:19 GMT:

> >>> Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England
> >>> I quickly discovered that calling them "movies" was
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> So did American university students.

> That would be university students in America, not students at
> American University?

>> I first heard the usage in
>> 1955 in Williamstown, Massachusetts.

> I was in Boston and when we went to a "Carry On" or an Alec
> Guinness movie we liked to say we were going to a flick.
> That's the only time we used the word.

At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
flick". There were a number of other words in common use that struck a
recent arrival from Britain as strange or antiquated, like haberdasher,
chap, "a la mode" for "with ice-cream" and "pop" for soda.

Signature

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

tony cooper - 13 Feb 2010 21:05 GMT
>At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
>flick". There were a number of other words in common use that struck a
>recent arrival from Britain as strange or antiquated, like haberdasher,
>chap, "a la mode" for "with ice-cream" and "pop" for soda.

"Catch a flick" was the cool thing to say in my youf.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Hatunen - 15 Feb 2010 05:45 GMT
>At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
>flick". There were a number of other words in common use that struck a
>recent arrival from Britain as strange or antiquated, like haberdasher,
>chap, "a la mode" for "with ice-cream" and "pop" for soda.

The last is, of course, a regionalism.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Mark Brader - 16 Feb 2010 19:20 GMT
James Silverton:
>> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
>> flick". There were a number of other words in common use that struck a
>> recent arrival from Britain as strange or antiquated, like haberdasher,
>> chap, "a la mode" for "with ice-cream" and "pop" for soda.

Dave Hatunen:
> The last is, of course, a regionalism.

No, "soda" for "pop" is a regionalism. :-)
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto | "I conducted a Usenet poll ... on this subject ...
msb@vex.net          |  Laura is single.  By a 2-1 margin."  --Ken Perlow

John Varela - 17 Feb 2010 01:01 GMT
> James Silverton:
> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> No, "soda" for "pop" is a regionalism. :-)

No, "soda" and "pop" for "soft drink" are regionalisms.

Signature

John Varela

R H Draney - 17 Feb 2010 05:46 GMT
John Varela filted:

>> James Silverton:
>> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>No, "soda" and "pop" for "soft drink" are regionalisms.

No, "soft drink" is marketing-speak....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Evan Kirshenbaum - 17 Feb 2010 06:04 GMT
> John Varela filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> No, "soft drink" is marketing-speak....r

I take "soft drink" to be a broader category: pretty much anything
that isn't "hard liquor" except for things like water and milk.
Lemonade, iced tea, and juice are all "soft drinks", but not "soda" or
"pop".  MWCD11 adds "usually carbonated".  It also dates it to
ca. 1880 (as does the OED), which sounds a bit early for "marketing
speak".

The 1897 _American Encyclopædic Dictionary_ defines it as "any drink
which is intended to refresh, but contains no alcohol or intoxicating
constituent".  A bit earlier, in 1860, I see "soft drink, such as ale
and porter" contrasted with whisky.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |To express oneself
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |In seventeen syllables
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |Is very diffic
                                      |            Tony Finch
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Chuck Riggs - 17 Feb 2010 14:29 GMT
>> John Varela filted:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Lemonade, iced tea, and juice are all "soft drinks", but not "soda" or
>"pop".  

No way.

>MWCD11 adds "usually carbonated".  It also dates it to
>ca. 1880 (as does the OED), which sounds a bit early for "marketing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>constituent".  A bit earlier, in 1860, I see "soft drink, such as ale
>and porter" contrasted with whisky.

Soft drinks are those drinks that are normally dispensed in a soft
drinks machine, Coca Cola, Pepsi, Seven-Up, Canada Dry, Kickapoo Joy
Juice and few more. They do not, when I've seen the term, include any
of the juice drinks, lemonade included.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Evan Kirshenbaum - 17 Feb 2010 15:11 GMT
>>I take "soft drink" to be a broader category: pretty much anything
>>that isn't "hard liquor" except for things like water and milk.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Juice and few more. They do not, when I've seen the term, include
> any of the juice drinks, lemonade included.

Whereas I would have used exactly the same argument and pointed out
that soft drinks machines, around here at least, nearly always include
at least lemonade and some sort of flavored iced tea and often include
things like a non-carbonated fruit punch (e.g., Hawaiian Punch).

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |It's gotten to the point where the
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |only place you can get work done is
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |at home, because no one bugs you,
                                      |and the best place to entertain
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |yourself is at work, because the
   (650)857-7572                      |Internet connections are faster.
                                      |              Scott Adams
   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

John Varela - 17 Feb 2010 22:16 GMT
> Whereas I would have used exactly the same argument and pointed out
> that soft drinks machines, around here at least, nearly always include
> at least lemonade and some sort of flavored iced tea and often include
> things like a non-carbonated fruit punch (e.g., Hawaiian Punch).

That's a relatively recent phenomenon, where "recent" means "within
the last several decades".

Signature

John Varela

Mark Brader - 17 Feb 2010 23:26 GMT
Evan Kirshenbaum:
> Whereas I would have used exactly the same argument and pointed out
> that soft drinks machines, around here at least, nearly always include
> at least lemonade and some sort of flavored iced tea and often include
> things like a non-carbonated fruit punch (e.g., Hawaiian Punch).

What's a "soft drinks machine"?  I mean, *you're* calling it that
and then reasoning from this fact, but it's not as if it's labeled
as one.

As far as I'm concerned, what you call the machine is determined by the
large label for the major-brand drink it contains -- in other words,
typically it's either a Coke machine or a Pepsi machine, no matter what
other beverages it may happen to contain.
Signature

Mark Brader    |    "I do not want to give the impression I spend all
Toronto        |     my time on the Internet, but in the right hands
msb@vex.net    |     it is a wondrous tool, and in the wrong hands
              |     it is an even better one."       -- Cecil Adams

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Chuck Riggs - 18 Feb 2010 12:47 GMT
>Evan Kirshenbaum:
>> Whereas I would have used exactly the same argument and pointed out
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>typically it's either a Coke machine or a Pepsi machine, no matter what
>other beverages it may happen to contain.

Not in Europe.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Chuck Riggs - 18 Feb 2010 12:46 GMT
>>>I take "soft drink" to be a broader category: pretty much anything
>>>that isn't "hard liquor" except for things like water and milk.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>at least lemonade and some sort of flavored iced tea and often include
>things like a non-carbonated fruit punch (e.g., Hawaiian Punch).

I'll give you Hawaiian Punch as a soft drink, but not, IMO, lemonade
or flavoured ice tea. I can't explain my reasoning on this.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

John Varela - 17 Feb 2010 22:17 GMT
> Soft drinks are those drinks that are normally dispensed in a soft
> drinks machine, Coca Cola, Pepsi, Seven-Up, Canada Dry, Kickapoo Joy
> Juice and few more. They do not, when I've seen the term, include any
> of the juice drinks, lemonade included.

Absolutely. Your list omits RC Cola and Nehi Orange.

Signature

John Varela

Chuck Riggs - 18 Feb 2010 12:48 GMT
>> Soft drinks are those drinks that are normally dispensed in a soft
>> drinks machine, Coca Cola, Pepsi, Seven-Up, Canada Dry, Kickapoo Joy
>> Juice and few more. They do not, when I've seen the term, include any
>> of the juice drinks, lemonade included.
>
>Absolutely. Your list omits RC Cola and Nehi Orange.

Those two, too.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

sjdevnull@yahoo.com - 17 Feb 2010 06:32 GMT
> > James Silverton:
> > >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> No, "soda" and "pop" for "soft drink" are regionalisms.

Not really.   "Soda" covers America fully, and refers solely to
carbonated beverages--it's in the minority in parts of the Midwest,
but still in use and well understood.  There's no part of the country
where it doesn't enjoy some currency.  Calling it regional is a
mistake.

"Soft drink"  varies widely, meaning only carbonated drinks in some
areas but in others referring to any non-alcoholic drink.  It's a
national term, but a regional synonym for "soda" or "pop".

"Pop" is regionally limited, and will cause confusion in some parts of
the US.

"Coke" outside of the South is used only for Coca-Cola, but regionally
can mean any soda/soft drink/pop.  "Tonic" is a (fading) Boston and
Maine localism.  I've heard claims that "dope" is a North Carolina
localism for the same, but I was born in North Carolina and my parents
live there and I've never heard it; perhaps it is limited to certain
parts of the state, or is outdated.
Evan Kirshenbaum - 17 Feb 2010 15:54 GMT
>> > James Silverton:
>> > >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> carbonated beverages--it's in the minority in parts of the Midwest,
> but still in use and well understood.

When I grew up in Chicago in the '70s, the word would have been well
understood to refer to a drink with flavored syrup, carbonated water,
and ice cream.  My dad tells the story of being on a business trip to
Boston, ordering a "chocolate soda" and being very confused when the
waitress brought him a can of Yoo-Hoo[1].  There was "cream soda", but
I think we rationalized that as tasting more "ice-cream-y".  We knew
"soda-pop" as an old-fashioned word for "pop", and would probably have
figured "soda" out from that.  I suspect it's better understood now.

[1] In Boston, the drink he wanted is, I believe, a "frappe".

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |If I am ever forced to make a
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |choice between learning and using
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |win32, or leaving the computer
                                      |industry, let me just say it was
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |nice knowing all of you. :-)
   (650)857-7572                      |              Randal Schwartz

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

John Varela - 17 Feb 2010 22:33 GMT
> >> > James Silverton:
> >> > >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> "soda-pop" as an old-fashioned word for "pop", and would probably have
> figured "soda" out from that.  I suspect it's better understood now.

Right. A "soda' is what you get at the ice cream parlor.

> [1] In Boston, the drink he wanted is, I believe, a "frappe".

A Boston frappe is what elsewhere is called a milkshake.

Signature

John Varela

sjdevnull@yahoo.com - 17 Feb 2010 22:47 GMT
> "sjdevn...@yahoo.com" <sjdevn...@yahoo.com> writes:
> >> > James Silverton:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> [1] In Boston, the drink he wanted is, I believe, a "frappe".

A frappe has no carbonated water--it's what most of the US calls a
"milk shake", just milk + ice cream + flavor.  20+ years ago, you
would very occasionally hear "cabinet" used, too (that's a Rhode
Island influence), but it seems to have died out almost completely in
Boston.  I wouldn't be surprised if you still hear it in RI, though.

In Boston, syrup + carbonated water + ice cream or a soda/pop/soft
drink + ice cream is an ice cream soda or (especially if the liquid is
root beer) a float.

Elsewhere  I've heard "(color) cow" variations, like "black cow" for a
root beer float, "white cow" for Sprite+vanilla ice cream, etc, but
they're not much used in New England that I can remember.

There was a place in Pittsburgh that served a "Boston cooler" made of
ginger beer + ice cream, but that's not something I ever heard of in
Boston.  Unlike a normal ice cream soda, they completely blended the
ice cream into the ginger beer.
Chuck Riggs - 18 Feb 2010 12:52 GMT
>>> > James Silverton:
>>> > >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>[1] In Boston, the drink he wanted is, I believe, a "frappe".

"Pop", for a soft drink, is a regional Americanism, I believe.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Default User - 18 Feb 2010 18:07 GMT

> "Pop", for a soft drink, is a regional Americanism, I believe.

Here's the old map. Unfortunately it's from 2003, so doubtlessly things
have changed in the intervening years.

<http://www.popvssoda.com/countystats/total-county.html>

Brian

Signature

Day 381 of the "no grouchy usenet posts" project

Chuck Riggs - 19 Feb 2010 12:00 GMT
>> "Pop", for a soft drink, is a regional Americanism, I believe.
>
>Here's the old map. Unfortunately it's from 2003, so doubtlessly things
>have changed in the intervening years.
>
><http://www.popvssoda.com/countystats/total-county.html>

Since "pop" is largely confined to states in the Flyover Zone, it is
no wonder I have seldom heard it.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Frank ess - 17 Feb 2010 17:56 GMT
>>> James Silverton:
>>>>> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Carolina and my parents live there and I've never heard it; perhaps
> it is limited to certain parts of the state, or is outdated.

Here y' go:
http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/308-the-pop-vs-soda-map/
John Varela - 17 Feb 2010 22:33 GMT
> Not really.   "Soda" covers America fully, and refers solely to
> carbonated beverages--it's in the minority in parts of the Midwest,
> but still in use and well understood.  There's no part of the country
> where it doesn't enjoy some currency.  Calling it regional is a
> mistake.

I have never used either "soda" or "pop" and WIWL never heard either
of the terms, so I dispute the "There's no part of the country..."
claim.

> "Soft drink"  varies widely, meaning only carbonated drinks in some
> areas but in others referring to any non-alcoholic drink.  It's a
> national term, but a regional synonym for "soda" or "pop".

See my response to Evan.

> "Pop" is regionally limited, and will cause confusion in some parts of
> the US.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> live there and I've never heard it; perhaps it is limited to certain
> parts of the state, or is outdated.

In Atlanta they say "Co-Cola" for Coca-Cola. I had heard of that but
didn't believe it until I actually heard an Atlantan say it.

Signature

John Varela

R H Draney - 18 Feb 2010 02:26 GMT
John Varela filted:

>In Atlanta they say "Co-Cola" for Coca-Cola. I had heard of that but
>didn't believe it until I actually heard an Atlantan say it.

It's actually more like "Co?Cola", where the ? is a rare AmE glottal stop, isn't
it?...in Japanese, it'd be represented by a "chiisai tsu" which is
transliterated in English by doubling the following consonant....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

John Varela - 18 Feb 2010 16:45 GMT
> John Varela filted:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it?...in Japanese, it'd be represented by a "chiisai tsu" which is
> transliterated in English by doubling the following consonant....r

Almost 60 years ago I attended a boarding school in southern
Tennessee; there were a half-dozen or more boys from Atlanta and I
never noticed any of them saying "Co-Cola". It was not until a few
years ago, when I was doing some genealogical research, that I
discovered some second cousins from Atlanta living elsewhere in
Virginia and in Maryland. We met one day for lunch and I heard one
of them -- a college professor, widow of the college president, and
a long time resident of the Shenandoah Valley -- say "Co-Cola".
That's the only time I've heard it said by a native Atlantan.

So I'm unable to comment on glottal stops in Atlanta. However, at
that same boarding school there was a boy from Pittsburgh who said
"bottle" with a golttal stop, "bo'le". And in college I had a
roommate from Brooklyn who did the same with "bottle" and similar
words in -tle.

Signature

John Varela

Jerry Friedman - 18 Feb 2010 19:16 GMT
> John Varela filted:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it?...in Japanese, it'd be represented by a "chiisai tsu" which is
> transliterated in English by doubling the following consonant....r

Does that mean it's geminated?

--
Jerry Friedman
Hatunen - 18 Feb 2010 20:31 GMT
>> James Silverton:
>> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>No, "soda" and "pop" for "soft drink" are regionalisms.

Don't forget parts of the South where "coke" is a regionalim for
any carbonated soft drink.

Bubba: "Gimme a coke."

Barkeep: "What kind?"

Bubba: "Make it a Dr Pepper."

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Jerry Friedman - 17 Feb 2010 14:57 GMT
> James Silverton:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> No, "soda" for "pop" is a regionalism. :-)

Well said.

--
Jerry Friedman
Robert Lieblich - 18 Feb 2010 02:57 GMT
> James Silverton:
> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> No, "soda" for "pop" is a regionalism. :-)

"Soda pop," anyone?

Apropos (Yo, Chuck) of flicks -- At Dartmouth, same era as James (one
movie house in town, with one screen): "Let's flick out."  I have no
recollection of ever hearing it after my departure from Hanover.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Be careful about writing FLICK in all-caps

R H Draney - 18 Feb 2010 05:56 GMT
Robert Lieblich filted:

>Apropos (Yo, Chuck) of flicks -- At Dartmouth, same era as James (one
>movie house in town, with one screen): "Let's flick out."  I have no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Bob Lieblich
>Be careful about writing FLICK in all-caps

Quite right...for this very reason, the very use of the word was prohibited by
the Comics Code Authority, lest the ink run together and treat fans of Archie
and Jughead to a word they didn't cover in Sunday School...in a crime comic, you
couldn't even use it to describe the act of knocking ashes off the end of a
burning cigarette....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Frank ess - 19 Feb 2010 03:08 GMT
> Robert Lieblich filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> describe the act of knocking ashes off the end of a burning
> cigarette....r

I obtained this personalized plate in 1970 or so.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/92/218527693_790933cd71_o.jpg

It's still on a 1967 MGB GT parked behind the house, where it awaits
restoration or a lightning strike - the latter more likely to occur
first.

Signature

Frank ess

sjdevnull@yahoo.com - 18 Feb 2010 05:56 GMT
> > James Silverton:
> > >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> "Soda pop," anyone?

"Soda pop" is both unambiguous and probably unnatural everywhere,
unless there's some region I'm missing where it still has currency.

Having lived in the east, south, midwest, and west, I still maintain
that "soda" is the closest thing to a still-used national term for
carbonated sweet beverages, that "soft drink" is probably second, and
that both "pop" and "Coke" in this sense are very clearly regionalisms
and likely to meet blank stares in pretty large parts of the US.  Most
of the online "pop vs. soda" maps appear to bear that out, too; "soda"
and "soft drink" are  in a minority in some parts of the country, but
still in regular currency, while "pop" and "coke" have large blank
areas on the maps outside of their home zones.
Chuck Riggs - 18 Feb 2010 15:15 GMT
>> James Silverton:
>> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>movie house in town, with one screen): "Let's flick out."  I have no
>recollection of ever hearing it after my departure from Hanover.

Yo, Blair, I mean Bob, was this in the "Let's pig out" era?
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Robert Lieblich - 19 Feb 2010 02:32 GMT
> >> James Silverton:
> >> >> At Cornell in the late 50s, I remember people saying "Let's take in a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Yo, Blair, I mean Bob, was this in the "Let's pig out" era?

I honestly don't remember.  I've known and used "pig out" for many,
many years, but I don't think I knew it in high school, and my memory
doesn't fetch it up for college, but of course you can't trust memory
with something like this.

Dartmouth's college slang was just a bit different from that of most
other undergraduate institutions.  What's "econ" in most places was
"eccy" at Dartmouth.  (In retrospect, our gay economics instructor
should have been "eccy homo," but I never encountered it.)  When I was
a student there, there was no grade of C.  You could get a C plus or a
C minus, but not a C. (And your GPA could go as high as 5, because a c
plus was 3 and a C minus was 2.)  In the vernacular, those two grades
were "hook plus" and "hook minus."  If those were heard elsewhere, it
wasn't by me.

I left Dartmouth after my sophomore year.  The language barrier was
but a minor contributor to my decision.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Go, Indians!

Chuck Riggs - 19 Feb 2010 12:11 GMT
<snip>

>You could get a C plus or a
>C minus, but not a C. (And your GPA could go as high as 5, because a c
>plus was 3 and a C minus was 2.)  In the vernacular [of Dartmouth College], those two grades
>were "hook plus" and "hook minus."  If those were heard elsewhere, it
>wasn't by me.

What a learning resource AUE is. I had always thought that "a hook"
and its cousins were unique to the grounds, as Mr Jefferson called
them, of the University of Virginia.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Hatunen - 15 Feb 2010 05:44 GMT
>> >> Maybe this usage has changed, but when I moved to England I quickly
>> >> discovered that calling them "movies" was considered a bit
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>That would be university students in America, not students at
>American University?

I would have capitalized "University" if I had meant American
University.

>> I first heard the usage in
>> 1955 in Williamstown, Massachusetts.

Which has a college, not a university. Oh, well...

>I was in Boston and when we went to a "Carry On" or an Alec Guinness
>movie we liked to say we were going to a flick. That's the only time
>we used the word.

In my particular case we were going to the Williamstown Theater
to see "Gung Din", which was treated as an audience participation
movie.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Mike Barnes - 12 Feb 2010 23:45 GMT
John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net>:
>When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression that
>Brits viewed flicks.

This Brit went to "the flicks", to watch films.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

HVS - 12 Feb 2010 23:57 GMT
On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote

> John Varela <OLDlamps@verizon.net>:
>> When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression
>> that Brits viewed flicks.
>
> This Brit went to "the flicks", to watch films.

ISTR that when I asked some friends about this c.1983 -- we were all
in our early 30s -- the consensus was that the safe version was that
one went to the pictures to watch films.

No one suggested "the flicks", so I suspect by then it was a period
term for post-war peeps, at least in the south of England.  (They
agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
vocabulary.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Django Cat - 13 Feb 2010 10:53 GMT
> On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
> vocabulary.)

In fact we do say 'going to the pictures' in our house and I do say
'movie', though Mrs C gets quite heated about this and tells me it's
'film'.  Lets just hope she doesn't notice that I've started replying
to the question 'How are you?' with 'Good' over the last year or so.  I
blame those chaps on the wireless, personally.

DC

--
HVS - 13 Feb 2010 10:56 GMT
On 13 Feb 2010, Django Cat wrote

-snip-

> In fact we do say 'going to the pictures' in our house and I do
> say 'movie', though Mrs C gets quite heated about this and tells
> me it's 'film'.  Lets just hope she doesn't notice that I've
> started replying to the question 'How are you?' with 'Good' over
> the last year or so.  I blame those chaps on the wireless,
> personally.

I do hope you've not started telling her to have a nice day...

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Chuck Riggs - 14 Feb 2010 14:05 GMT
>> On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>to the question 'How are you?' with 'Good' over the last year or so.  I
>blame those chaps on the wireless, personally.

I generally say "film" for movies that are better than average, but I
never say "the pictures" or, even more old-fashioned, "the picture
show".
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Skitt - 14 Feb 2010 19:41 GMT
> "Django Cat" wrote:
>>>> John Varela wrote:

>>>>> When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression
>>>>> that Brits viewed flicks.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> never say "the pictures" or, even more old-fashioned, "the picture
> show".

Not to forget the "moving picture show".
Signature

Skitt (AmE)

John Varela - 14 Feb 2010 22:30 GMT
> > "Django Cat" wrote:
> >>>> John Varela wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Not to forget the "moving picture show".

That would be "movin' pitcha show".

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email

Frank ess - 15 Feb 2010 04:05 GMT
>>>>>> John Varela wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> That would be "movin' pitcha show".

Also familiar: "moo'm pitch'".

We were economical: "Goin' to the show?"

Signature

Frank ess

Chuck Riggs - 15 Feb 2010 12:00 GMT
>> "Django Cat" wrote:
>>>>> John Varela wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Not to forget the "moving picture show".

That's so old, I had forgotten it, Alec, but I do remember the great
film, "The Last Picture Show".
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Chuck Riggs - 13 Feb 2010 12:42 GMT
>On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
>vocabulary.)

My college friends and I called them flicks in the sixties, in
Virginia.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Steve Hayes - 14 Feb 2010 04:53 GMT
>>No one suggested "the flicks", so I suspect by then it was a period
>>term for post-war peeps, at least in the south of England.  (They
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>My college friends and I called them flicks in the sixties, in
>Virginia.

My friends and I called them "scopes" in the sixties, in Natal.

Though "films" and "movies" were also used.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Zhang Dawei - 13 Feb 2010 13:55 GMT
> ISTR that when I asked some friends about this c.1983 -- we were all
> in our early 30s -- the consensus was that the safe version was that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
> vocabulary.)

"The flicks" was in use in Cheshire and Lincolnshire in my and my
relatives' experience at least as far back as the 1960s. So, it may
well have extended from the south of England as far north as the
current East Midlands (Lincolnshire) and the south part of the North
West (Cheshire) regions of England.
Signature

Zhang Dawei: Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Please use the Reply-To field for my email address, which is certain
to remain valid for 2 weeks from the posting of this message.

HVS - 13 Feb 2010 14:23 GMT
On 13 Feb 2010, Zhang Dawei wrote

>> ISTR that when I asked some friends about this c.1983 -- we
>> were all in our early 30s -- the consensus was that the safe
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "The flicks" was in use in Cheshire and Lincolnshire in my and
> my relatives' experience at least as far back as the 1960s.

Were you still using it in the 1980s?  That's when I had the
discussion about "movies" vs "pictures" with other people in my age
group (born in the late 1940s and early 1950s), and I don't recall
anyone suggesting it as a then-current usage.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Zhang Dawei - 13 Feb 2010 16:22 GMT
>> "The flicks" was in use in Cheshire and Lincolnshire in my and
>> my relatives' experience at least as far back as the 1960s.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> group (born in the late 1940s and early 1950s), and I don't recall
> anyone suggesting it as a then-current usage.

In the 1980s, it was still used very occasionally in my hearing, but
my memory of its use then is that it was a slightly "old fashioned"
term, and possibly used to indicate someone a bit out of touch with
modern idioms. So, that might suggest an experience similar to yours.
Signature

Zhang Dawei: Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Please use the Reply-To field for my email address, which is certain
to remain valid for 2 weeks from the posting of this message.

Hatunen - 15 Feb 2010 05:41 GMT
>>> "The flicks" was in use in Cheshire and Lincolnshire in my and
>>> my relatives' experience at least as far back as the 1960s.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>term, and possibly used to indicate someone a bit out of touch with
>modern idioms. So, that might suggest an experience similar to yours.

It was already an old-fashioned thing when I first heard it used
in the Williamstown, Mass, area in the mid-1950s. I wasn't sure
what it meant and was told it was short for "flickers", which was
even then a quaint term for the days of silent movies and
projectors that made the images flicker.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Mike Barnes - 15 Feb 2010 08:07 GMT
Hatunen <hatunen@cox.net>:

>>>> "The flicks" was in use in Cheshire and Lincolnshire in my and
>>>> my relatives' experience at least as far back as the 1960s.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>even then a quaint term for the days of silent movies and
>projectors that made the images flicker.

Whereas I learned somehow that "the flicks" came from the movies we made
ourselves, by drawing successive "frames" on page corners of our
exercise books, and flicking through them.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Hatunen - 15 Feb 2010 05:39 GMT
>On 13 Feb 2010, Zhang Dawei wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>group (born in the late 1940s and early 1950s), and I don't recall
>anyone suggesting it as a then-current usage.

Thre is an Internet business called "NetFlix" which rents DVDs
for a flat monthly fee. I don't know if this is a USA only
thing....

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Robin Bignall - 13 Feb 2010 21:42 GMT
>On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
>vocabulary.)

Mike and Tony have the timing about right.  I was brought up in the
1940s to use  "cinema" or "pictures", and to see a "film", but never a
"movie" although we knew the word.  In the 1950s I heard "flicks" used
quite often, but not recently.
Signature

Robin
(BrE)
Herts, England

Wood Avens - 14 Feb 2010 18:15 GMT
>>On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>"movie" although we knew the word.  In the 1950s I heard "flicks" used
>quite often, but not recently.

I don't remember that we ever "viewed" them, though.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Mike Lyle - 15 Feb 2010 19:52 GMT
>>> On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> I don't remember that we ever "viewed" them, though.

I'd say one "saw" a film or play, "watched" a TV prog, and "viewed"
things like slides or 3D pairs which needed a "viewer" that could only
be used by one person at a time.

Signature

Mike.

Wood Avens - 15 Feb 2010 21:25 GMT
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:42:18 +0000, Robin Bignall

>>> Mike and Tony have the timing about right.  I was brought up in the
>>> 1940s to use  "cinema" or "pictures", and to see a "film", but never
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>things like slides or 3D pairs which needed a "viewer" that could only
>be used by one person at a time.

Oh yes, I'd forgotten those.  But I think we "looked at" them, rather
than "viewed" them.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Chuck Riggs - 16 Feb 2010 12:20 GMT
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:42:18 +0000, Robin Bignall
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Oh yes, I'd forgotten those.  But I think we "looked at" them, rather
>than "viewed" them.

We looked at, not viewed, slides, too.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Frank ess - 15 Feb 2010 21:27 GMT
>>>> On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> things like slides or 3D pairs which needed a "viewer" that could
> only be used by one person at a time.

"Heard" Joan Baez in concert. "Saw" the cirque Pollack Bros. on-stage
at the Shrine Auditorium. "Rode" the Chicagoan. "Took" the bus from
Wichita Falls to L.A., but "rode" it all the way. "Ate at" Taix, and
at Lawry's, and at the Brown Derby. "Dug" Dave van Ronk at the Ash
Grove. "Watched" Steve Allen on local TV. "Banged" old Whatsername('s
"box")."Took a class" from Baxter at USC. "Drove" Route 66. "Grokked"
the ineffable in Pirates Alley, NO. "Stood up" as best man at a
wedding.

Busy kid, back in the day.
Joe Fineman - 15 Feb 2010 22:13 GMT
> On 12 Feb 2010, Mike Barnes wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> agreed, though, that "movie" wasn't part of their everyday
> vocabulary.)

Curiously, at Caltech (southern California) in the 1950s, we said
"Let's flick out".
Signature

---  Joe Fineman    joe_f@verizon.net

||:  Here's to the happiest days of my life,                :||
||:  Spent in the arms of another man's wife -- my mother.  :||
Percival P. Cassidy - 13 Feb 2010 21:56 GMT
>> When I was in college in the 1950s we were under the impression that
>> Brits viewed flicks.

> This Brit went to "the flicks", to watch films.

ISTR that in UK in the 1950s and 1960s we went to "the cinema" or to
"the pictures," but I don't recall now what it was that we saw there.
Arriving in Adelaide in 1963, I found that people went to see "a
fillum"; I don't recall them mentioning where they were going to see it
-- although, now that I think of it, it was probably the drive-in most
of the time.

Perce
alan - 10 Feb 2010 21:44 GMT
> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> --
> Brett (in Berkeley, California, USA)

I've been there and found the seats to be the most UN-comfy I've ever
encountered.  They make you feel sort of folded-in upon and there's no way
to sit up straight in them.  When I find out the movie is being shown in the
"Screening Lounge" I make it a point to wait until it comes to another
theatre . . .
Frank ess - 10 Feb 2010 22:10 GMT
>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling
>> "theatre" seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> movie is being shown in the "Screening Lounge" I make it a point to
> wait until it comes to another theatre . . .

Your description corresponds to the seating I first found in a
"Thing-20"-style group of shoebox theaters quite a few years ago, and
which was responsible for my continuing antipathy to seeing films in
film venues. Even the old "Loge" seats were better. I think Barkley
Brett's comfy seats /must/ be different from yours.

Signature

Frank ess

alan - 10 Feb 2010 22:30 GMT
>>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling
>>> "theatre" seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> venues. Even the old "Loge" seats were better. I think Barkley Brett's
> comfy seats /must/ be different from yours.

Nope ----- the seats Berkley Brett is talking about are at the Shattuck
Cinema in Berkeley, and that's the theatre I'm talking about.  Super-soft,
super-yielding foam rubber padding with no support at all.
Signature

alan (in Albany, California, USA)

Jonathan Morton - 10 Feb 2010 23:26 GMT
> Nope ----- the seats Berkley Brett is talking about are at the Shattuck
> Cinema in Berkeley, and that's the theatre I'm talking about.  Super-soft,
> super-yielding foam rubber padding with no support at all.

Is that the seats or the occupants?

Regards

Jonathan
tony cooper - 10 Feb 2010 23:08 GMT
>I've been there and found the seats to be the most UN-comfy I've ever
>encountered.  They make you feel sort of folded-in upon and there's no way
>to sit up straight in them.  When I find out the movie is being shown in the
>"Screening Lounge" I make it a point to wait until it comes to another
>theatre . . .

I don't recall being to a theater/theatre where the chairs were
noticeably uncomfortable, but there are some that I won't go back to
because of the floor.  When you almost pull a hamstring getting your
shoe unstuck from the floor, you tend to mark that place off your
list.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Roland Hutchinson - 11 Feb 2010 04:26 GMT
>>I've been there and found the seats to be the most UN-comfy I've ever
>>encountered.  They make you feel sort of folded-in upon and there's no
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I don't recall being to a theater/theatre where the chairs were
> noticeably uncomfortable,

Four words: BAM Majestic, Brooklyn, balcony.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

annily - 11 Feb 2010 05:42 GMT
> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The "Landmark Theatre" chain is an example of this:

Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
live and learn.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

Garrett Wollman - 11 Feb 2010 06:15 GMT
>Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
>live and learn.

"Centre" is used in many of the same places and for the same reasons.
It's "Newton Centre" but "Middleboro Center".

-GAWollman
Signature

Garrett A. Wollman    | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers.         | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993

annily - 11 Feb 2010 06:35 GMT
>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
>> live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> -GAWollman

Yes, I've noticed that with Centre Street in Manhattan (thanks
originally to the TV show "100 Centre Street").

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

Steve Hayes - 11 Feb 2010 08:22 GMT
>Yes, I've noticed that with Centre Street in Manhattan (thanks
>originally to the TV show "100 Centre Street").

I once met a judge whose court was in Centre Street, and I think it may even
have been at number 100. And when he have his address he always said it was
spelt like that, because even in Namibia (where I met him) people know that
Americans spell centre "center".

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Steve Hayes - 11 Feb 2010 08:20 GMT
>Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
>live and learn.

There may even be an instance of a homber dying and becoming a sombre spectre,
if you look hard enough.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

annily - 11 Feb 2010 10:09 GMT
>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
>> live and learn.
>
> There may even be an instance of a homber dying and becoming a sombre spectre,
> if you look hard enough.

Homber? That's a new one on me, and OED lists it as a variant of
hambargh, which is obsolete.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

musika - 11 Feb 2010 10:55 GMT
>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Homber? That's a new one on me, and OED lists it as a variant of
> hambargh, which is obsolete.

We're talking about "er" and "re" endings - try hombre.

Signature

Ray
UK

annily - 11 Feb 2010 11:27 GMT
>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> We're talking about "er" and "re" endings - try hombre.

I thought of that, but the pronunciations would be quite different,
unlike the other "er" and "re" endings we were talking about.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

musika - 11 Feb 2010 14:35 GMT
>>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I thought of that, but the pronunciations would be quite different,
> unlike the other "er" and "re" endings we were talking about.

Yes, but it was an attempt at levity.

Signature

Ray
UK

Roland Hutchinson - 11 Feb 2010 15:42 GMT
>>>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Yes, but it was an attempt at levity.

Americans will occasionally attempt levity by pronouncing "centre" and
"theatre", as in (say) the Mudville Centre mall, home of the Mudville
Repertoire Theatre as "sentry" and "Thee-at-tree" (/Ti-/) to poke fun at
their pretentiousness when used in American English.

I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one in
New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from pre-
Webster days rather than attempts at conveying an upmarket image through
imported spelling.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

John Varela - 11 Feb 2010 17:35 GMT
> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one in
> New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from pre-
> Webster days rather than attempts at conveying an upmarket image through
> imported spelling.

I'm sure that's the case in the instance of Centreville, Virginia,
but I nevertheless feel compelled to pronounce it Cent-revel.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email

Chuck Riggs - 12 Feb 2010 12:40 GMT
>> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one in
>> New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from pre-
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I'm sure that's the case in the instance of Centreville, Virginia,
>but I nevertheless feel compelled to pronounce it Cent-revel.

What a dump, as Bette Davis might have called it. Yes, I know, she was
talking about a room or a house, I forget which, in the film, but the
principle applies.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 11 Feb 2010 17:43 GMT
>>>>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>Webster days rather than attempts at conveying an upmarket image through
>imported spelling.

I see that the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood uses the "pretentious"
spelling even though it is less than a decade old.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Kodak_theatre.450px.jpg

Codesigner of that building was Theatre Project Consultants. Looking at
the company's portfolio of projects in North America it seems that
"Theatre" is used much more often than "Theater" in the names of their
clients buildings.

The company started in the UK and expanded into the US. I assume that
that would have little effect of their clients choice of spelling.
http://www.theatreprojects.com/projects/browse_projects/region/north_america

Some of the buildings are Centers. Those in Canada are Centres.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Roland Hutchinson - 15 Feb 2010 04:41 GMT
>>>>>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>>>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> I see that the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood uses the "pretentious"
> spelling even though it is less than a decade old.

Pretension has no correlation with age, Grasshopper.  Not good ol'
American pretension (finest money can buy), at any rate.  Your
kilometrage may vary.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Django Cat - 11 Feb 2010 20:12 GMT
> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:12:24 +1030, annily
> <annily@annily.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Mudville Repertoire Theatre as "sentry" and "Thee-at-tree" (/Ti-/) to
> poke fun at their pretentiousness when used in American English.

Ah.  We were only doing the Alice's Restaurant "Massacree" here just
lately.  A 40 year mystery is cleared up for me.

DC
--
Roland Hutchinson - 18 Feb 2010 03:55 GMT
>> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:12:24 +1030, annily
>> <annily@annily.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Ah.  We were only doing the Alice's Restaurant "Massacree" here just
> lately.  A 40 year mystery is cleared up for me.

I am not certain that I ever recognized the connection, but I believe you
are on to something.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Donna Richoux - 11 Feb 2010 21:02 GMT
> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one in
> New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from pre-
> Webster days rather than attempts at conveying an upmarket image through
> imported spelling.

Even when you mean to type Centre Street, it's hard, isn't it?
Chuck Riggs - 12 Feb 2010 12:41 GMT
>> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one in
>> New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from pre-
>> Webster days rather than attempts at conveying an upmarket image through
>> imported spelling.
>
>Even when you mean to type Centre Street, it's hard, isn't it?

Yes.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Roland Hutchinson - 15 Feb 2010 04:41 GMT
>>> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one
>>> in New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Yes.

And yes.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Mike Barnes - 15 Feb 2010 08:06 GMT
Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:

>>>> I suspect, however, that a few of the Center Streets (such as the one
>>>> in New York) and possibly some geographic names are survivals from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>And yes.

It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

the Omrud - 15 Feb 2010 09:05 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson<my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
> that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.

And don't get me started on THRU <shudder>.

Signature

David

Chuck Riggs - 15 Feb 2010 12:04 GMT
>> Roland Hutchinson<my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>And don't get me started on THRU <shudder>.

Since you had to mention thru, I'll remind you of LITE.
Signature


Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

Garrett Wollman - 15 Feb 2010 17:01 GMT
>It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
>that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.

I'm curious.  What programming language has "center" as a keyword?
COBOL?

-GAWollman

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman    | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers.         | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993

Adam Funk - 15 Feb 2010 17:21 GMT
>>It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>>"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
>>that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.
>
> I'm curious.  What programming language has "center" as a keyword?
> COBOL?

I can't think of any programming languages as such, but HTML and
related things (XHTML, CSS) use "center".

Signature

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?

Steve Hayes - 15 Feb 2010 17:39 GMT
>>It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>>"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
>>that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.
>
>I'm curious.  What programming language has "center" as a keyword?
>COBOL?

HTML - not programming, but markup.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Mike Barnes - 15 Feb 2010 18:26 GMT
Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>:

>>It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>>"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
>>that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.
>
>I'm curious.  What programming language has "center" as a keyword?
>COBOL?

It doesn't have to be a keyword in the programming language. For
instance when programming in JavaScript or PHP I'm quite likely to have
to type HTML keywords such as "center" and "color". And if I spell them
normally, the program doesn't work.

Some other words that I have to remember to spell weirdly are dialogue,
despatch, authorise, maximise, minimise, tokenise, (that's enough "ise"s
for now), grey, favourite, catalogue, and licence.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Bob Martin - 16 Feb 2010 08:39 GMT
>>It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>>"centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
>>that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.
>
>I'm curious.  What programming language has "center" as a keyword?
>COBOL?

Rexx does*, but as it was written by a Brit it allows "centre" and "center".

(* : not as a keyword but as a built-in function)
Roland Hutchinson - 18 Feb 2010 03:52 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
> that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.

I managed to misspell PROCEDURE consistently and repeatedly in the first
assignment I did for my Intro to Programing class as a college freshman.

I think I got back the longest error listing of anyone in the class on
the first run.  (It was punched cards and greenbar printouts in those
days, of course.)

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

R H Draney - 18 Feb 2010 05:58 GMT
Roland Hutchinson filted:

>> It's also hard for us right-ponders to type "center" when we mean
>> "centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>the first run.  (It was punched cards and greenbar printouts in those
>days, of course.)

Bad word to have that particular problem with...messes up every single program
in either PL/I or COBOL....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Roland Hutchinson - 19 Feb 2010 06:47 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Bad word to have that particular problem with...messes up every single
> program in either PL/I or COBOL....r

Indeed, it was in fact a very PL/I-subset-like language that had been
developed for teaching programming.  Whizzed through trayfuls of little
student programs 3 or 4 times a day on the campus mainframe.  Kicked 'em
out if they used more than a second of CPU time on the assumption that
they were stuck in a loop.  (For one assignment I managed to write an
elegantly expressed but inefficient program that took longer, and they
gave me some extra CPU time.  Hey--they gonna let me write recursive
procedures, I'm gonna use 'em.  Efficiency is a compiler issue, right?)

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Mike Barnes - 18 Feb 2010 07:55 GMT
Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>I managed to misspell PROCEDURE consistently and repeatedly in the first
>assignment I did for my Intro to Programing class as a college freshman.
>
>I think I got back the longest error listing of anyone in the class on
>the first run.  (It was punched cards and greenbar printouts in those
>days, of course.)

My university maths tutor in the 60s had a stack of used fanfold paper
to write on the back of. It was about four inches thick and looked like
a compiler listing where every line started with the word ERROR. This
did not make a very good impression on me. Only later did it occur to me
that he might have been testing the compiler that he'd written.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Adam Funk - 18 Feb 2010 19:25 GMT
> My university maths tutor in the 60s had a stack of used fanfold paper
> to write on the back of. It was about four inches thick and looked like
> a compiler listing where every line started with the word ERROR. This
> did not make a very good impression on me. Only later did it occur to me
> that he might have been testing the compiler that he'd written.

"If it didn't fail the unit tests, are you sure you changed anything?"

(recent facetious comment at work)

Signature

hmmmm: sounds like the same DLL hell problem my cousin had.  try
deleting all DLLs in your Windows/system32 directory and see what
happens.                                           (Bryce Utting)

Roland Hutchinson - 19 Feb 2010 06:54 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>>I managed to misspell PROCEDURE consistently and repeatedly in the first
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> did not make a very good impression on me. Only later did it occur to me
> that he might have been testing the compiler that he'd written.

Heck, we (70s) wrote _everything_ (except, usually, assignments to turn
in) on the back of used fanfold.  You could always find a supply for the
taking at the Comp Center.  Once, one of my classmates retrieved a big
stack of a botched run of someones program on "thesis paper" -- heavy,
high-rag-content, greenbar-less fanfold intended for archival-quality
printouts.  This he conserved in some manner for use on special occasions.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

R H Draney - 19 Feb 2010 09:10 GMT
Roland Hutchinson filted:

>>>I think I got back the longest error listing of anyone in the class on
>>>the first run.  (It was punched cards and greenbar printouts in those
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>high-rag-content, greenbar-less fanfold intended for archival-quality
>printouts.  This he conserved in some manner for use on special occasions.

Shortly after I started the job I held for twenty-five years, I heard greenbar
printouts referred to as "watermelon paper"...I've yet to find a better
descriptive name for the stuff....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Mike Barnes - 19 Feb 2010 09:47 GMT
R H Draney <dadoctah@spamcop.net>:
>Shortly after I started the job I held for twenty-five years, I heard greenbar
>printouts referred to as "watermelon paper"...I've yet to find a better
>descriptive name for the stuff....r

We didn't often have reason to refer to it by name, but if it had one,
it was "music paper".

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Roland Hutchinson - 21 Feb 2010 05:30 GMT
> R H Draney <dadoctah@spamcop.net>:
>>Shortly after I started the job I held for twenty-five years, I heard
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> We didn't often have reason to refer to it by name, but if it had one,
> it was "music paper".

Hm, bit of a namespace collision that would have been around my
department.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson       

He calls himself "the Garden State's leading violist da gamba,"
... comparable to being ruler of an exceptionally small duchy.
--Newark (NJ) Star Ledger  ( http://tinyurl.com/RolandIsNJ )

Nick - 20 Feb 2010 16:48 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@verizon.net>:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "centre". Programming in American-designed languages requires us to do
> that sort of thing a *lot*. It's not good for us.

It's a bloody pain that's what it is.  It's not quite so bad in
languages that give errors, but HTML and CSS just quietly ignore "align:
centre" or "colour: pink".  You can spend /forever/ working out what's
causing them to fail.

REXX had it right.
Signature

Online waterways route planner            | http://canalplan.eu
Plan trips, see photos, check facilities  | http://canalplan.org.uk

John Dunlop - 20 Feb 2010 17:52 GMT
Nick:

> It's a bloody pain that's what it is.  It's not quite so bad in
> languages that give errors, but HTML and CSS just quietly ignore "align:
> centre" or "colour: pink".

HTML can't give errors because it's just a notation, a data format. It
can't do anything.

> You can spend /forever/ working out what's causing them to fail.

You can run your stylesheet through a CSS checker, which will report
<centre>, <colour>, <grey>, and so on.

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

I can't think of anything like this in HTML that isn't deprecated, but
it's worth validating anyway to catch any other syntax errors.

http://validator.w3.org/

Signature

John

Jerry Friedman - 12 Feb 2010 21:13 GMT
> > <ann...@annily.invalid> typed:
> >>> <ann...@annily.invalid> typed:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Repertoire Theatre as "sentry" and "Thee-at-tree" (/Ti-/) to poke fun at
> their pretentiousness when used in American English.

A shopping center in the town I grew up in is now Towne Centre,
pronounced "townie sentry" by all right-thinking residents.  A free
pun is available because it's on Chagrin Boulevard.

--
Jerry Friedman
Mark Brader - 13 Feb 2010 08:38 GMT
Jerry Friedman:
> A shopping center in the town I grew up in is now Towne Centre,
> pronounced "townie sentry" by all right-thinking residents.

There used to be one around here called Towne and Countrye.  This was
enough of a mouthful that it never occurred to me to add any more
syllables to the pronunciation.  These days it's called Centerpoint
(yes, with an "er").  It is located at Yonge and Steeles.  Steeles
is the city limit of Toronto.
Signature

Mark Brader    |    "... you're a detective, you like mysteries."
Toronto        |    "I hate mysteries.  What I like are *solutions*."
msb@vex.net    |                   --Barbara Paul, "The Apostrophe Thief"

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Jerry Friedman - 13 Feb 2010 15:01 GMT
> Jerry Friedman:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> syllables to the pronunciation.  These days it's called Centerpoint
> (yes, with an "er").

The spelling is always more glamo(u)rous on the other side of the
fence

> It is located at Yonge and Steeles.  Steeles
> is the city limit of Toronto.

How strange--it makes sense.

--
Jerry Friedman
R H Draney - 13 Feb 2010 17:59 GMT
Mark Brader filted:

>Jerry Friedman:
>> A shopping center in the town I grew up in is now Towne Centre,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>(yes, with an "er").  It is located at Yonge and Steeles.  Steeles
>is the city limit of Toronto.

I used to live on a street called Osborn and work at an office complex called
The Pointe...I figure there's some Law of Conservation of Silent E's
involved....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

annily - 12 Feb 2010 01:05 GMT
>>>>>> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at
>>>>>> all. I live and learn.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Yes, but it was an attempt at levity.

Yes, which went against my logical thinking, I guess :)

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

John Dean - 11 Feb 2010 15:22 GMT
>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
>> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
> live and learn.

I recollect there was some detailed discussion here about this, with
instances of US 'theatre', a couple of years ago but I can't locate it in
Google Deja. I think Tony was involved.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Django Cat - 11 Feb 2010 20:02 GMT
> > > As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling
> > > "theatre" seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> instances of US 'theatre', a couple of years ago but I can't locate
> it in Google Deja. I think Tony was involved.

That's usually a safe bet...

DC

--
rwalker - 11 Feb 2010 21:43 GMT
>> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
>> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Wow. I didn't know the "theatre" spelling was used in the US at all. I
>live and learn.

Well, if a person is writing home to mother about seeing a play, they
likely will write "theater."  Advertisers like to name things
"Theatre", I suspect, in order to make their venue stand out somehow.
I'd bet that at least 95% or more of Americans use the "theater"
spelling.
John - 11 Feb 2010 13:00 GMT
> As near as I can tell (in the U.S. at least), the spelling "theatre"
> seems to be used to distinguish those cinemas that are more likely to
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Pictorial election results for every U.S. Presidential Election from
> George Washington to Barack Obama.

I thought that "theatre" was the British spelling, and "theater" was
the US spelling.
Derek Turner - 11 Feb 2010 22:16 GMT
> The "Landmark Theatre" chain is an example of this:
>
> http://www.landmarktheatres.com/
>
> Any thoughts on this usage?

Yep. You septics oughta learn to spell proper.
R H Draney - 12 Feb 2010 03:16 GMT
Derek Turner filted:

>> The "Landmark Theatre" chain is an example of this:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>Yep. You septics oughta learn to spell proper.

Should that be "propre"?...r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Berkeley Brett - 12 Feb 2010 09:04 GMT
Many interesting thoughts here.  Thank you all for them!

Another instance of something like what we are discussing:

I find the use of the French "Parc" instead of the English "Park" a
tad pretentious:

http://www.parc55hotel.com/

Even so, I'd probably stay there if I could find the right discount
coupon....

--
Brett (in Berkeley, California, USA)
http://www.electoralmaps.org/
Pictorial election results for every U.S. Presidential Election from
George Washington to Barack Obama.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 12 Feb 2010 12:08 GMT
>Many interesting thoughts here.  Thank you all for them!
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Even so, I'd probably stay there if I could find the right discount
>coupon....

There is a business known as Center Parcs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_Parcs

   Center Parcs[1] is a European network of holiday villages
   incorporating* a UK based company which runs holiday villages in
   Britain and a sister enterprise that operates in numerous locations
   in continental Europe.

   [1] The spelling Center Parcs, the official name, is incorrect in
   every language. In British English, spelling rules prescribe Centre
   Parks, in American English Center Parks (see spelling differences),
   and in French Centre Parcs.

* "Incorporating" is not quite correct. The UK and European companies
are now distinct. As Wikip says: "Centerparcs Europe and Centerparcs UK
share only history, name and logo".

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Bob Martin - 12 Feb 2010 14:58 GMT
>[1] The spelling Center Parcs, the official name, is incorrect in
>every language. In British English, spelling rules prescribe Centre
>Parks, in American English Center Parks (see spelling differences),
>and in French Centre Parcs.

but Center Parcs is Dutch!
Adam Funk - 13 Feb 2010 21:12 GMT
> There is a business known as Center Parcs:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_Parcs
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> are now distinct. As Wikip says: "Centerparcs Europe and Centerparcs UK
> share only history, name and logo".

I didn't know that.  A Dutch colleague told me that the company
started there (and that he used to go there a lot as a kid), and I got
the impression that at the UK sites I've been to, the outdoors staff
have workwear that "looks European" (it reminded me of the green suits
at Hoogovens, but with outside pockets).

Signature

Their tags shall blink until the end of days.
                                   BoM 12:10

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.