What does this sound like?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Masa - 18 Feb 2010 08:55 GMT I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific one. But it must be clear for English speaking people, I guess. So let me test.
How does the following strike your ears?
http://www.lightstriking.com/test/09.wav
annily - 18 Feb 2010 09:26 GMT > I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific > one. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://www.lightstriking.com/test/09.wav Sounds a bit like "blade" or "played" to my old ears. In context it may be interpreted as something else.
 Signature Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia, which may or may not influence my opinions.
John Holmes - 18 Feb 2010 10:36 GMT >> I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific >> one. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Sounds a bit like "blade" or "played" to my old ears. In context it > may be interpreted as something else. I don't hear a p or b at the beginning. It sounds like "laid" or perhaps "lathe" to me.
 Signature Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
James Hogg - 18 Feb 2010 10:43 GMT >>> I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific >>> one. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I don't hear a p or b at the beginning. It sounds like "laid" or perhaps > "lathe" to me. I heard "laid" too.
 Signature James
Masa - 18 Feb 2010 11:11 GMT Thank you very much. THe results are very, very interesting.
I picked up this sound from a textbook for English listening practice for us. And this sound is used in the charpter on the test of "s, th", which requests us to reply whether it is s or th.
The answer is "LATHE".
But many Japaese, I guess, may take it as "LALE". Even some take it as RAIL.
annily - 18 Feb 2010 11:59 GMT > Thank you very much. THe results are very, very interesting. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > The answer is "LATHE". Even knowing the answer, I find it difficult to pick up the "th" sound, but my ears are rather waxed up ATM :).
I don't know where I got the initial "p" or "b" sound from. I certainly don't hear it now.
 Signature Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia, which may or may not influence my opinions.
John Dunlop - 18 Feb 2010 15:10 GMT annily:
>> The answer is "LATHE". > > Even knowing the answer, I find it difficult to pick up the "th" sound, > but my ears are rather waxed up ATM :). I don't even hear the /l/. It still sounds like "may" to me.
 Signature John
Evan Kirshenbaum - 18 Feb 2010 16:58 GMT > annily: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't even hear the /l/. It still sounds like "may" to me. That's what I get, with perhaps a shading toward "made".
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |Giving money and power to government 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |is like giving whiskey and car keys Palo Alto, CA 94304 |to teenage boys. | P.J. O'Rourke kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Masa - 18 Feb 2010 17:32 GMT I couldn't hear any sound at the tail of the word. Do you catch any of it, or just feel it?
Masa - 18 Feb 2010 17:55 GMT > I couldn't hear any sound at the tail of the word. > Do you catch any of it, or just feel it? It comes to my ear as "LAY". Interestingly, all of you responding are common in not picking up"LAY" or any other similar ones. Whether you hear it as made, laid, lathe, or played, what's common with them is you notice a sound at the tail of the worl not heard to me who therefore listen to it as "LAY".
So, my next question is what is a diffrence between "LAY" and the other words you picked up, which are commonly with any sound at the tail of the word whether it is "th" or "d".
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 18 Feb 2010 20:05 GMT >> I couldn't hear any sound at the tail of the word. >> Do you catch any of it, or just feel it? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >other words you picked up, which are commonly >with any sound at the tail of the word whether it is "th" or "d". There is at least a rough "click" sound at the end of the "lay" sound. It is easy to hear that as some sort of consonant. I have isolated that sound: http://www.peterduncanson.net/temp/09end.wav
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Ilpo - 20 Feb 2010 12:58 GMT On 18 helmi, 22:05, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <m...@peterduncanson.net> wrote:
> >It comes to my ear as "LAY". I heard it as "lays", although the "eI" sound may be somewhat longer in "lathe" than in "lays". But I kept listening to "lay" and "lathe" back and forth on my Longman's CD, and to me the beginning of "lathe" sounds exactly the same as "lay". But I'm another non-native, so there are probably things that I either miss or imagine. Masa, you told that you have reuploaded the clip so that it is now more complete. I don't know if it was originally even shorter, but it still appears to be ending immaturely. The clip itself is 2.9 sec, but the word ends at 1.0 sec, and the rest is silence. What I hear at the end of the word is a hint of a "z" sound, which I don't hear in "lathe" on the Longman's CD, but it could be down to the clip itself, or my ears.
> There is at least a rough "click" sound at the end of the "lay" sound. > It is easy to hear that as some sort of consonant. > I have isolated that sound:http://www.peterduncanson.net/temp/09end.wav I didn't recognise any "click" on my Longman's CD, on either American or British English sample. When I click that link the browser tells me that the webpage cannot be found. Peter, I don't know if you've moved or removed the clip, but I'd love to hear it.
Ilpo
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 20 Feb 2010 14:27 GMT >On 18 helmi, 22:05, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <m...@peterduncanson.net> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >that the webpage cannot be found. Peter, I don't know if you've moved >or removed the clip, but I'd love to hear it. It's back there, now. http://www.peterduncanson.net/temp/09end.wav
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Ilpo - 20 Feb 2010 18:39 GMT > >On 18 helmi, 22:05, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <m...@peterduncanson.net> > >wrote:
> >> There is at least a rough "click" sound at the end of the "lay" sound. > >> It is easy to hear that as some sort of consonant. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > It's back there, now.http://www.peterduncanson.net/temp/09end.wav Many thanks. I have a vague feeling that I may be hearing something of that kind there, perhaps. What I still don't quite get is how to create such a click, or why. These are probably the kind of things that tell native speakers from non-natives, however fluent and flawless the latter otherwise are (neither applies to me, alas). Nevertheless, I'm not going to lose my sleep over this.
Ilpo
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 20 Feb 2010 19:06 GMT >> >On 18 helmi, 22:05, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <m...@peterduncanson.net> >> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >flawless the latter otherwise are (neither applies to me, alas). >Nevertheless, I'm not going to lose my sleep over this. I got the impression that the sound as I heard it was a bit rough. It might have been subject to electronic distortion somewhere, possibly before being digitized.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
CDB - 18 Feb 2010 21:30 GMT >> I couldn't hear any sound at the tail of the word. >> Do you catch any of it, or just feel it? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > other words you picked up, which are commonly > with any sound at the tail of the word whether it is "th" or "d". The recording was cut before the release phase of the closing sound, which is important for identifying its place of articulation. From the sound of the vowel, the tongue isn't moving forward for a y-glide at the end of the word, as it would be for "lay". The sound indicates to me that the mouth is closing, as it would be for a stop or fricative formed at the front of the mouth ("t", "d", or "th", for example). The length (duration) of the vowel is greater than it would be if the consonant were unvoiced. I hear the word as "lave" or "lathe", with "laid/lade" as a less-likely possibility.
In normal conversation, context and habit are more important to understanding than that kind of detail. Speakers often produce words that vary slightly from such standards. Hearers choose the meaning that corresponds best with the meaning of the other words, often without noticing anything wrong; or they may think that the person speaking has an accent.
Masa - 18 Feb 2010 23:55 GMT > The recording was cut before the release phase of the closing sound, > which is important for identifying its place of articulation. Reading this, I've got it uploaded again. I'm afraid that the previous one might have been cut before the word was completed, or the last tip of the tail might have been cut. But in fact I'm not sure whether it was or not. Anyway it's been uploaded again after doing a recordoing from the source long enough to cover the whole.
Pat Durkin - 19 Feb 2010 00:25 GMT >> The recording was cut before the release phase of the closing >> sound, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > uploaded again after doing a recordoing from > the source long enough to cover the whole. It does sound a bit more complete...so, again, I hear what I think is "lathe".
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 19 Feb 2010 00:42 GMT >>> The recording was cut before the release phase of the closing >>> sound, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >It does sound a bit more complete...so, again, I hear what I think is >"lathe". I too hear "lathe".
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
CDB - 19 Feb 2010 01:22 GMT [>>> CDB:]
>>>> The recording was cut before the release phase of the closing >>>> sound, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> > I too hear "lathe". Yes, that's clearer.
John Holmes - 19 Feb 2010 07:26 GMT >> It does sound a bit more complete...so, again, I hear what I think is >> "lathe". >> > I too hear "lathe". Yes, definitely lathe now, rather than laid. That's much clearer, and it doesn't sound foreign-accented at all. It could be a native speaker.
 Signature Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
Lars Enderin - 18 Feb 2010 12:02 GMT > Thank you very much. THe results are very, very interesting. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > The answer is "LATHE". When you have only these choices, the answer must be LATHE, which is a reasonable interpretation of the sound bite.
Pat Durkin - 18 Feb 2010 14:06 GMT >>> I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a >>> specific [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I don't hear a p or b at the beginning. It sounds like "laid" or > perhaps "lathe" to me. I agreed upon first hearing the sound. People might hear "lay, laid, lave" or even "laze", since the of the man's tone of voice leads one to feel the ending is spoken lazily.
Athel Cornish-Bowden - 18 Feb 2010 12:11 GMT > I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific > one. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://www.lightstriking.com/test/09.wav Hmm. To me it sounded a bit like "where is", or pehaps "very". However, others have suggested "lathe", and now that I know that that is what it's supposed to be I can just about recognize it.
 Signature athel
aquachimp - 20 Feb 2010 12:11 GMT > I've recorded one word, which is hard for us to catch as a specific > one. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://www.lightstriking.com/test/09.wav I just kept hearing "nave" even though I knew what it should be.
|
|
|