Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / February 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What does this sound like? (2)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Masa - 19 Feb 2010 01:25 GMT
I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
Acutally, it doesn't sound to me like the answer.

it must be clear for English speaking people, I guess.
How does the following strike your ears?

http://www.lightstriking.com/test/13.wav

This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
a word.
CDB - 19 Feb 2010 02:51 GMT
> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
> a word.

I hear "th".  I am North American, and what I hear is the word "moth",
spoken with a North American Accent.
Masa - 19 Feb 2010 03:00 GMT
> I hear "th".  I am North American, and what I hear is the word "moth",
> spoken with a North American Accent.

Right, the answer given by the textbook is  "MOTH".

but, TH doesn't reach my ear at all.
It's a big mystery how you hear or catch "TH" so clearly in this case,
while
for you, we may be a mystery with our being unable to get the
consonant that must be obvious to you.
Pat Durkin - 19 Feb 2010 03:27 GMT
>> I hear "th".  I am North American, and what I hear is the word
>> "moth",
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> for you, we may be a mystery with our being unable to get the
> consonant that must be obvious to you.

I also hear the final sound as "th".  I clearly hear the word "moth".
The "th" is much clearer with this speaker, (more aspirated) than with
the speaker of "lathe".

Signature

      Pat Durkin
durkinpa at msn.com
      Wisconsin

Masa - 19 Feb 2010 04:32 GMT
Our theory is that we focus more on vowals in our language system so
that we tend to cut a certain range of consonants
you use.

As to this "MOTH",  it's possible that I'm catching "TH" , but it
might hear as another sound, although
I don't know yet.
We tend to take many of your consonants as vowels as experts say.
So, this "TH" might be buried in the vowels amplied in my ear.

Very interesting.

I exprience a strange thing sometimes. That is , as I listen to a
certain word  like "MOTH" in this instance countlessly,  or
repeatedly, the consonant which have been altogether unhearable
suddenly come out clear in my ear.
annily - 19 Feb 2010 06:10 GMT
> Our theory is that we focus more on vowals in our language system so
> that we tend to cut a certain range of consonants
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> repeatedly, the consonant which have been altogether unhearable
> suddenly come out clear in my ear.

At my age, with loss of high frequencies, I often have trouble
distinguishing consonants anyway.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

Masa - 19 Feb 2010 06:17 GMT
> At my age, with loss of high frequencies, I often have trouble
> distinguishing consonants anyway.
>
> --

You mean. even english-speaking natives become harder to catch
consonants at older age?

Here is  "TH" sound I've caught.  Otherwise, I couldn't have found
it.

http://www.lightstriking.com/test/15.wav
R H Draney - 19 Feb 2010 09:12 GMT
Masa filted:

>> At my age, with loss of high frequencies, I often have trouble
>> distinguishing consonants anyway.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>You mean. even english-speaking natives become harder to catch
>consonants at older age?

I think the loss of hearing in higher frequencies (and the resulting difficulty
in catching fricatives) is language-independent...it may well be
species-independent....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

R H Draney - 19 Feb 2010 06:51 GMT
Masa filted:

>Our theory is that we focus more on vowals in our language system so
>that we tend to cut a certain range of consonants
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>repeatedly, the consonant which have been altogether unhearable
>suddenly come out clear in my ear.

Final consonants are often hard to distinguish, even for English
speakers...since Japanese doesn't use them (with the questionable exception of
"-n"), it's understandable that you might miss them since your ingrained
tendency is not to expect them....

Expecting words to end in vowels might also account for your sometimes hearing
the final of "LATHE" as a vowel, since it's a voiced consonant...(there's even a
school of thought that considers the "H" sound a "voiceless vowel", colored by
whatever vowel it's adjacent to)...personally, I didn't hear the final consonant
of "LATHE" at all, but I do hear the one in "MOTH"; perhaps the speaker
emphasized the latter more *because* it's unvoiced and would therefore tend to
be lost....r

Signature

A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?

Cheryl - 19 Feb 2010 12:15 GMT
>> I hear "th".  I am North American, and what I hear is the word "moth",
>> spoken with a North American Accent.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> for you, we may be a mystery with our being unable to get the
> consonant that must be obvious to you.

Sometimes it's hard to hear sounds that don't exist in your native
language. I've noticed myself in my attempts to learn other languages
that two sounds can seem identical to me even though a native speaker is
saying them, and assures me that they are different.

I found the 'th'  very clear in that example, more so than in the last one.

Signature

Cheryl

Donna Richoux - 19 Feb 2010 12:42 GMT
> How does the following strike your ears?
>
> http://www.lightstriking.com/test/13.wav
>
> This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
> a word.

That one sounds very clearly like "moth" to me.

The other one you gave us (lathe) sounded to me like "lay". I could not
hear any ending consonant at all.

As I'm sure you know, there are two "th" sounds and you have given us
one of each. "Lathe" should have the voiced sound of "the", "this," and
so on. "Moth" should have the unvoiced sound of "thick" and "thin".

In your "lathe" recording, I would expect to hear the hum or buzz of the
"voiced" sound. It would be at least as  noticeable as the breathy
tongue-teeth "th" part. I don't hear any of it.

I can't get the soundfile to save separately, so to hear another
pronunciation of "lathe", go to this page and click on the red speaker
symbol:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lathe

Signature

Best wishes -- Donna Richoux
An American living in the Netherlands

John Holmes - 20 Feb 2010 00:07 GMT
> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
> a word.

It sounds like the name Martha without the final vowel.

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

annily - 20 Feb 2010 02:01 GMT
>> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
>> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> It sounds like the name Martha without the final vowel.

That would be the American accent.

Signature

Long-time resident of Adelaide, South Australia,
which may or may not influence my opinions.

John Holmes - 20 Feb 2010 04:30 GMT
>>> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
>>> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> That would be the American accent.

Probably, but with one word in isolation it is hard to tell what the
accent is, and we weren't told what to expect, So that's just how it
strikes my ears.

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

Athel Cornish-Bowden - 20 Feb 2010 11:22 GMT
> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
> a word.

Without looking first at what others have said, it sounds like the way
a BrE speaker would pronounce the Dutch name Maas, i.e. "mast"
(southern England, not USA) without the t, or as some English Roman
Catholics (but not usually other people) pronounce "mass". I had
difficulty in deciding whether the final consonant was an s (/s/) or an
unvoiced th (/T/).
Signature

athel

aquachimp - 20 Feb 2010 11:52 GMT
> I know the answer as it is said in my textbook, but
> knowint it is a  different matter from how it hears like.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This test focuses on  a consonant at the tail of
> a word.

On a relatively low volume setting I couldn't quiet make out the "th"
and thought it was "moss". It was more obvious louder, but either way
it sounded like someone with a dreadfully heavy head-cold.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.