
Signature
Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> A poetic description of a suspender-belt, I'd say.
Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
"technology":-)
BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."
Thank you all.
Marius Hancu
Wood Avens - 20 Feb 2010 17:50 GMT
>> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
>"technology":-)
Oh, absolutely. And today. Google "suspender belt".

Signature
Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
Django Cat - 21 Feb 2010 09:26 GMT
> >> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black
> skin in >> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> Oh, absolutely. And today. Google "suspender belt".
But probably not while you're at work...
--
Jerry Friedman - 20 Feb 2010 17:51 GMT
> > >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> > >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
> "technology":-)
I'd guess they're still used now by women who intend to disturb the
equilibrium of male private investigators--and, more frequently, by
women in male imaginations.
> BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."
I feel sure it's a typo.
--
Jerry Friedman
Amethyst Deceiver - 21 Feb 2010 19:10 GMT
>> > >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>> > >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>equilibrium of male private investigators--and, more frequently, by
>women in male imaginations.
I used to prefer them because if you get a ladder in stockings you
only lose one leg, rather than a pair. I still prefer them but tend to
wear trousers.

Signature
Wet Yorks via Watford, London, York and Cambridge
Ian Dalziel - 20 Feb 2010 18:44 GMT
>BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."
Confirms that that's what's printed - not that it's right!

Signature
Ian D
Cheryl - 20 Feb 2010 22:41 GMT
>>> What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>>> the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thank you all.
> Marius Hancu
That can't be right. It must refer to the tops of those stockings that
stay up by themselves (in theory, anyway) with the help of a band of
extra elastic at their tops.
Like these:
http://www.stockingstore.com/thigh-highs-holdups-kneehighs-s/27.htm
I don't think books are edited nearly as well as they use to be, but
surely the editor would have realized that she can't be going around
holding up her stockings with her hands!

Signature
Cheryl
Marius Hancu - 20 Feb 2010 23:02 GMT
> >>> What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> >>> the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> http://www.stockingstore.com/thigh-highs-holdups-kneehighs-s/27.htm
I think that's a very probable solution. Perhaps she had patterned
some _black hands_ with the fingers downwards in those _elastic
bands_, as to retain the stockings from falling down, in a sexy
design:-)
> I don't think books are edited nearly as well as they use to be, but
> surely the editor would have realized that she can't be going around
> holding up her stockings with her hands!
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Glenn Knickerbocker - 21 Feb 2010 04:20 GMT
>BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."
But it says "wide black hands." That doesn't fit too well with the
possible figurative senses. I agree with the others that it must be a
typo.
¬R Blather, Rinse, Repeat.
http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/telecom.html