Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / February 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vachss: hands

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 20 Feb 2010 17:04 GMT
Hello:

What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
capability?"

---
[Strega's disrobing in the car for the P.I. Burke to demonstrate she's
not wired -- and more.]

Her panties were a tiny black wisp, the dark stockings held up by
black hands across her thighs.

Andrew Vachss, Strega, p. 123
----
--
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Jonathan Morton - 20 Feb 2010 17:17 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Her panties were a tiny black wisp, the dark stockings held up by
> black hands across her thighs.

Marius, are you sure it's not "bands"? They sound like stay-ups to me.

Regards

Jonathan
Wood Avens - 20 Feb 2010 17:20 GMT
>Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Andrew Vachss, Strega, p. 123
>----

A poetic description of a suspender-belt, I'd say.  

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Marius Hancu - 20 Feb 2010 17:34 GMT
> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> A poetic description of a suspender-belt, I'd say.

Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
"technology":-)

BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."

Thank you all.
Marius Hancu
Wood Avens - 20 Feb 2010 17:50 GMT
>> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
>"technology":-)

Oh, absolutely.  And today.  Google "suspender belt".

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Django Cat - 21 Feb 2010 09:26 GMT
> >> >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black
> skin in >> >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> Oh, absolutely.  And today.  Google "suspender belt".

But probably not while you're at work...

--
Jerry Friedman - 20 Feb 2010 17:51 GMT
> > >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> > >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Still used in 1970s-80s? Just not sure of the chronology of the
> "technology":-)

I'd guess they're still used now by women who intend to disturb the
equilibrium of male private investigators--and, more frequently, by
women in male imaginations.

> BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."

I feel sure it's a typo.

--
Jerry Friedman
Amethyst Deceiver - 21 Feb 2010 19:10 GMT
>> > >What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>> > >the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>equilibrium of male private investigators--and, more frequently, by
>women in male imaginations.

I used to prefer them because if you get a ladder in stockings you
only lose one leg, rather than a pair. I still prefer them but tend to
wear trousers.
Signature

Wet Yorks via Watford, London, York and Cambridge

Ian Dalziel - 20 Feb 2010 18:44 GMT
>BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."

Confirms that that's what's printed - not that it's right!

Signature

Ian D

Cheryl - 20 Feb 2010 22:41 GMT
>>> What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
>>> the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thank you all.
> Marius Hancu

That can't be right. It must refer to the tops of those stockings that
stay up by themselves (in theory, anyway) with the help of a band of
extra elastic at their tops.

Like these:

http://www.stockingstore.com/thigh-highs-holdups-kneehighs-s/27.htm

I don't think books are edited nearly as well as they use to be, but
surely the editor would have realized that she can't be going around
holding up her stockings with her hands!

Signature

Cheryl

Marius Hancu - 20 Feb 2010 23:02 GMT
> >>> What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> >>> the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> http://www.stockingstore.com/thigh-highs-holdups-kneehighs-s/27.htm

I think that's a very probable solution. Perhaps she had patterned
some _black hands_ with the fingers downwards in those _elastic
bands_, as to retain the stockings from falling down, in a sexy
design:-)

> I don't think books are edited nearly as well as they use to be, but
> surely the editor would have realized that she can't be going around
> holding up her stockings with her hands!

Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Glenn Knickerbocker - 21 Feb 2010 04:20 GMT
>BTW, the version at Google Books confirms "hands."

But it says "wide black hands."  That doesn't fit too well with the
possible figurative senses.  I agree with the others that it must be a
typo.

¬R                  Blather, Rinse, Repeat.
http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/telecom.html
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 20 Feb 2010 17:22 GMT
>Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Andrew Vachss, Strega, p. 123
>----
My immediate thought is that there is a typo in the original: "hands"
should be "bands".

If "hands" is correct it might be a metaphorical use to refer to the
straps of a suspender belt. Or maybe something else.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Mark Brader - 21 Feb 2010 01:36 GMT
Peter Duncanson:
> My immediate thought is that there is a typo in the original: "hands"
> should be "bands".

Could be, certainly.  Just last night I noticed that a considerable
number of the copies of the Articles of Association on the Web have
"bath" in place of "hath".

> If "hands" is correct it might be a metaphorical use to refer to the
> straps of a suspender belt.

That's what I first assumed.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto          "... people are *always* doing stuff ...
msb@vex.net                    that I wish were typos"  --Marcy Thompson

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Ian Dalziel - 20 Feb 2010 17:29 GMT
>Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Andrew Vachss, Strega, p. 123
>----

Typo for "bands"?
Signature


Ian D

James Hogg - 20 Feb 2010 18:01 GMT
>> Hello:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Typo for "bands"?

Could it be something like this?
http://declubz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/helping-hand-bras.jpg

Signature

James

Jerry Friedman - 20 Feb 2010 17:36 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Andrew Vachss, Strega, p. 123

No doubt you know, or the narrator explains, that "strega" is Italian
for "witch"?  Just making sure.

--
Jerry Friedman
Marius Hancu - 20 Feb 2010 18:16 GMT
> > What kind of hands are these? BTW, there's no one with a black skin in
> > the car. Stocking "support system" or just patterns with no supporting
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> No doubt you know, or the narrator explains, that "strega" is Italian
> for "witch"?  Just making sure.

Thanks. Vachss as much as says it.

Marius Hancu
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.