Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / May 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Onager

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Dean - 28 May 2010 23:32 GMT
Onager
A crossword favourite
But not known to this solver ...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-world/2010/05/28/crossword-clue-help-internet
-search-sparks-porn-deluge-115875-22291013/


http://tinyurl.com/39t56kg

"A great-grandad was left shaken after he was bombarded with porn when he
looked for help with a crossword clue on the internet.
Retired engineer Jack Sedgewick, 89, typed "Wild Asian a.s (6)" into a
search engine and was given links to dozens of images of naked women.
Jack, from Basingstoke, Hants, clicked through a number of sites trying to
find the answer but was stunned at the results.
He said: "I have been left shaken by the whole experience. I did not even
know this sort of stuff existed."
Jack, who was at home with wife Hilda, 86, finally found the answer,
"onager", by changing his search to "donkey sanctuaries"."

I think his quickness of mind in coming up with this version of events when
his wife crept up behind him and saw what was on his screen is commendable.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

HVS - 28 May 2010 23:50 GMT
On 28 May 2010, John Dean wrote

> Onager
> A crossword favourite
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> when his wife crept up behind him and saw what was on his screen is
> commendable.

A great tee-hee story, innit.  (I tried to find an on-line link to it when
I read it in our local (Basingstoke) paper yesterday, but couldn't locate
one;  glad it made the nationals.)

(In the version I read, the thing that rang true for him as a crossword
solver was a side comment that after finding the answer, his reaction was
"I should have got that" -- it's definitely my usual reaction when I'm told
a solution I didn't get.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

mm - 29 May 2010 08:00 GMT
>A great tee-hee story, innit.  (I tried to find an on-line link to it when
>I read it in our local (Basingstoke) paper yesterday, but couldn't locate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>"I should have got that" -- it's definitely my usual reaction when I'm told
>a solution I didn't get.)

Other comments;
Onagers were native to the entire Mediterranean area.
Any milirary history buff could tell you that, the Romans named a
small catapult after it because it had a nasty kick.
 ----
I just put "wild asian a.s" (without the quotes) into Altavista, and
the first response listed was "Onager - Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia."  The second was "Asian Wild a.s (Equus hemionus kulan)
- Asian Wild a.s ..." And the third was "BBC - Wildlife Finder - Asian
wild a.s (video, facts and news)."  The fourth and fifth were porn
sites.  The sixth was about onagers again.

--Jeff
 ---

On Google, the first hit was about this story, the second was the
Wikipedia article about "onager".
Sorry, that was "wild asian a.s" in quotes. Without the quotes,
Wikipedia was first (and I don't use any safe filters).

 ---

Signature

Posters should say where they live, and for which area
they are asking questions. I was born and then lived in
Western Pa.   10 years
Indianapolis   7 years
Chicago          6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore       26 years

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 29 May 2010 00:04 GMT
>Onager
>A crossword favourite
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>I think his quickness of mind in coming up with this version of events when
>his wife crept up behind him and saw what was on his screen is commendable.

He should have used the Clusty search engine. I just tried it with that
phrase and was informed 'The term "wild asian a.s" has been removed from
your query because the adult filter is on'.

None of the first 20 results seemed to mention onagers.

The first result is of the appointment of a new speaker of the
parliament in Somalia, Mr Hassan.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

HVS - 29 May 2010 00:10 GMT
On 29 May 2010, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote

> He should have used the Clusty search engine. I just tried it with that
> phrase and was informed 'The term "wild asian a.s" has been removed from
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The first result is of the appointment of a new speaker of the
> parliament in Somalia, Mr Hassan.

For this group, that's almost even better.  (But it does mean you're saying
he should have used a search engine that figures Somalia's in Asia.....)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 29 May 2010 00:48 GMT
>On 29 May 2010, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>For this group, that's almost even better.  (But it does mean you're saying
>he should have used a search engine that figures Somalia's in Asia.....)

After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.

Yippy has an interestingly slanted Censorship policy:
http://clusty.com/censorship

   Yippy.com, its sub-domains and other web based products (such as but
   not limited to the Yippy Browser) may censor search results, web
   domains and IP addresses. That is, Yippy may remove from its output,
   in an ad-hoc manner, all but not limited to the following:
   
      1. Politically-oriented propaganda or agendas
      2. Pornographic Material
      3. Gambling content
      4. Sexual products or sites that sell same
      5. Anti-Semitic views or opinions
      6. Anti-Christian views or opinions
      7. Anti-Conservative views or opinions
      8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions
      9. Sites deemed inappropriate for children

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Robert Bannister - 29 May 2010 04:11 GMT
>> On 29 May 2010, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>        8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions
>        9. Sites deemed inappropriate for children

Good to see that you can still lambaste the Muslims, Hindus and others
without fear, but I'm not sure whether the USA is still against sovereigns.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Garrett Wollman - 29 May 2010 08:06 GMT
>> Yippy has an interestingly slanted Censorship policy:
>> http://clusty.com/censorship

>>        8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions

>Good to see that you can still lambaste the Muslims, Hindus and others
>without fear, but I'm not sure whether the USA is still against sovereigns.

They should, of course, have written "Anti-Sovereign-USA views or
opinions", by which they mean the judicial writings of Anthony Kennedy
J.  Also anyone who speaks in favor of multilateral organizations that
aren't dominated by the U.S., such as the U.N. and its agencies, or
who advocates the shocking notion that international treaties like the
Geneva Conventions are binding on the U.S. and not just on brown
people.

-GAWollman

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman    | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers.         | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993

Steve Hayes - 29 May 2010 08:43 GMT
>After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.

That's a pity.

It used to be quite useful.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Nick - 29 May 2010 12:29 GMT
>>On 29 May 2010, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>        8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions
>        9. Sites deemed inappropriate for children

So removing Anti-Conservative views isn't a politically-oriented agenda?
Or do they exclude their own policy from their search results?
Signature

Online waterways route planner            | http://canalplan.eu
Plan trips, see photos, check facilities  | http://canalplan.org.uk

Peter Moylan - 29 May 2010 14:27 GMT
> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>        8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions
>        9. Sites deemed inappropriate for children

Overall, this list appears to point to ownership by the US religious
right, but number 5 doesn't seem to fit the pattern. Is there some
conservative Christian group that holds that Jews are just Christians in
disguise, in the same way that Islam has a special status for "people of
the book"?

Signature

Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.      http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 29 May 2010 14:55 GMT
>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>disguise, in the same way that Islam has a special status for "people of
>the book"?

Some, at least, Conservative Christians would accept that Jews are God's
Chosen People even though they have not (yet) accepted Christ.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Peter Moylan - 29 May 2010 15:50 GMT
>>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Some, at least, Conservative Christians would accept that Jews are God's
> Chosen People even though they have not (yet) accepted Christ.

Doesn't the "God's chosen people" label imply that Christians - the ones
that rejected Judaism - are not among the chosen? It seems to me that
one cannot truly be a Christian unless one has rejected those parts of
the Old Testament that are in conflict with the New Testament.

Signature

Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.      http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.

Murray Arnow - 29 May 2010 16:25 GMT
>>>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>one cannot truly be a Christian unless one has rejected those parts of
>the Old Testament that are in conflict with the New Testament.

I wasn't aware that the original Christians rejected Judaism. They had
an interpretation of Judaism, among many others of the time. When
Christians went after gentile converts, things got confusing and mohels
were no longer necessary.
Steve Hayes - 29 May 2010 20:51 GMT
>>> Some, at least, Conservative Christians would accept that Jews are God's
>>> Chosen People even though they have not (yet) accepted Christ.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Christians went after gentile converts, things got confusing and mohels
>were no longer necessary.

Historically, Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism both arose from Second-Temple
Judaism, and came to differ both from it and from each other.

Most Christians regarded themselves as the true heirs of and Rabbinic Jews as
deviants, and vice versa.

But in the nineteeth century a certain section of Christians dev eloped a
theology called "dispensationalism", according to which history is divided
into a number of "dispensations", and that certain parts of the Bible apply to
one dispensation, but not any of the others. One section of these
dispensationalist latched on to the idea that the formation of the modern
State of Israel in 1948 was significant in the dispensationalist scheme of
things, and that it was an essential prerequisite for the Second Coming of
Christ. They therefore favour policies that support the state of Israel. Some
may call them "conservative", but that's a fuzzy label. Call them
Pre-Millennial Dispensationalist Christian Zionists if you want to be more
accurate.

Ob-thread: like a.ses, they tend to bray a lot.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 29 May 2010 16:26 GMT
>>>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>one cannot truly be a Christian unless one has rejected those parts of
>the Old Testament that are in conflict with the New Testament.

Some Christians believe that there is no conflict between the Old and
New Testaments.

Then there is Dispensationalism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism

   Dispensationalism is a Protestant evangelical tradition based on a
   biblical hermeneutic that sees a series of chronologically
   successive "dispensations" or periods in history in which God
   relates to human beings in different ways under different Biblical
   covenants. As a system, dispensationalism is rooted in the writings
   of John Nelson Darby and the Brethren Movement. The theology of
   dispensationalism consists of a distinctive eschatological "end
   times" perspective, as all dispensationalists hold to
   premillennialism and most hold to a pretribulation rapture.
   Dispensationalists believe that the nation of Israel is distinct
   from the Church, and that God will fulfill His promises to national
   Israel. These promises include the land promises, which in the
   future result in a millennial kingdom where Christ, upon His return,
   will rule the world from Jerusalem for a thousand years. In
   other areas of theology, dispensationalists hold to a wide range of
   beliefs within the evangelical and fundamentalist spectrum.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Jeffrey Turner - 31 May 2010 00:16 GMT
>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> disguise, in the same way that Islam has a special status for "people of
> the book"?

It may have to do with Israel's special foreign policy relationship
with the US, or Israel's history of fighting terrorism, or Israel's
special role in The End Times [TM], but anti-Semitism is now frowned
upon by (at least) large segments of the Christian Right.

--Jeff

Signature

Love consists of overestimating
the differences between one woman
and another.  --George Bernard Shaw

Adam Funk - 31 May 2010 19:37 GMT
> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>        8. Anti-Sovereign USA views or opinions
>        9. Sites deemed inappropriate for children

Is the Youth International Party still around, and could they sue
"Yippy" for TM infringement?

Signature

When Elaine turned 11, her mother sent her to train under
Donald Knuth in his mountain hideaway.         [XKCD 342]

R H Draney - 31 May 2010 21:32 GMT
Adam Funk filted:

>> After that search I noticed that Clusty has been taken over by Yippy.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Is the Youth International Party still around, and could they sue
>"Yippy" for TM infringement?

I think Hanna-Barbera could probably go after both of them:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yippee,_Yappee_and_Yahooey

....r

Signature

"Oy!  A cat made of lead cannot fly."
- Mark Brader declaims a basic scientific principle

Ray OHara - 29 May 2010 03:49 GMT
> On 29 May 2010, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> saying
> he should have used a search engine that figures Somalia's in Asia.....)

Onagers were native to the entire Mediterranean area.
Any milirary history buff could tell you that, the Romans named a small
catapult after it because it had a nasty kick.
HVS - 29 May 2010 08:48 GMT
On 29 May 2010, Ray OHara wrote

>> (But it does mean you're saying he should have used a search engine
>> that figures Somalia's in Asia.....)
>
> Onagers were native to the entire Mediterranean area.

I don't think of Somalia as being Mediterranean, though.

> Any milirary history buff could tell you that, the Romans named a small
> catapult after it because it had a nasty kick.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Jeffrey Turner - 29 May 2010 04:26 GMT
>> Onager
>> A crossword favourite
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> phrase and was informed 'The term "wild asian a.s" has been removed from
> your query because the adult filter is on'.

I just put "wild asian a.s" (without the quotes) into Altavista, and the
first response listed was "Onager - Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia."  The second was "Asian Wild a.s ( Equus hemionus kulan )
- Asian Wild a.s ..." And the third was "BBC - Wildlife Finder - Asian
wild a.s (video, facts and news)."  The fourth and fifth were porn
sites.  The sixth was about onagers again.

--Jeff

Signature

Love consists of overestimating
the differences between one woman
and another.  --George Bernard Shaw

annily - 29 May 2010 05:23 GMT
>>> Onager
>>> A crossword favourite
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> wild a.s (video, facts and news)."  The fourth and fifth were porn
> sites.  The sixth was about onagers again.

On Google, the first hit was about this story, the second was the
Wikipedia article about "onager".
annily - 29 May 2010 05:25 GMT
>>>> Onager
>>>> A crossword favourite
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> On Google, the first hit was about this story, the second was the
> Wikipedia article about "onager".

Sorry, that was "wild asian a.s" in quotes. Without the quotes,
Wikipedia was first (and I don't use any safe filters).
Murray Arnow - 29 May 2010 10:43 GMT
>> Peter Duncanson wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>On Google, the first hit was about this story, the second was the
>Wikipedia article about "onager".

Your Google works differently from mine. My first listing for "onager"  
was the Wikipedia article on the animal and after that a slew of
references to a Roman catapult.
annily - 29 May 2010 13:47 GMT
>>> Peter Duncanson wrote:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> was the Wikipedia article on the animal and after that a slew of
> references to a Roman catapult.

I wasn't searching for "onager". I was searching for "wild asian a.s".
HVS - 29 May 2010 14:36 GMT
On 29 May 2010, annily wrote

>>> On Google, the first hit was about this story, the second was the
>>> Wikipedia article about "onager".
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I wasn't searching for "onager". I was searching for "wild asian a.s".

Two clarifications need to be made on this, both of which are in the original
story in the local paper (which I suspect is where the nationals picked it up
from):

"But when he typed the two words into search engine Yahoo,"

So it's clear that even if the crossword clue was "wild asian a.s", he
searched on *two* words, not three, and he was using Yahoo, not Google.

I just did a search on "asian a.s", both with and without quotes, on
yahoo.com (which redirects to the Yahoo UK/Ireland site):  for me, the first
page of 10 hits searching either way are pure porn -- neither "onager" nor
this story makes an appearance.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

HVS - 29 May 2010 14:38 GMT
On 29 May 2010, HVS wrote

> Two clarifications need to be made on this, both of which are in the
> original story in the local paper (which I suspect is where the
> nationals picked it up from):
>
> "But when he typed the two words into search engine Yahoo,"

-snip-

Sorry -- forgot to link to the story in the local paper (which is a weekly;  
it appeared in the issue published last Thursday):

http://www.basingstokegazette.co.uk/news/local/8190683.X_rated_answer_to_Jack
_s_clue_search/

http://tinyurl.com/32u99hz

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

annily - 30 May 2010 02:45 GMT
> On 29 May 2010, annily wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> page of 10 hits searching either way are pure porn -- neither "onager" nor
> this story makes an appearance.

Yes, I noticed those details in the story. Google with "asian a.s" (with
or without quotes) also gives porn sites for the first few, but does
have the Wikipedia entry for "onager" at 8 or 9.
HVS - 30 May 2010 09:04 GMT
On 30 May 2010, annily wrote

>> I just did a search on "asian a.s", both with and without quotes, on
>> yahoo.com (which redirects to the Yahoo UK/Ireland site):  for me, the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> or without quotes) also gives porn sites for the first few, but does
> have the Wikipedia entry for "onager" at 8 or 9.

If that's what Google is doing, it's a good illustration of the different
algorithms -- Yahoo (which is what the guy used) doesn't turn up anything
except lewd sites for the first 100 hits (I gave up scanning them at that
point;  makes your eyes bleed);  the animal also doesn't appear on Bing until
arount hit No. 23 or so (third page of results).

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Steve Hayes - 29 May 2010 08:39 GMT
>He should have used the Clusty search engine. I just tried it with that
>phrase and was informed 'The term "wild asian a.s" has been removed from
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>The first result is of the appointment of a new speaker of the
>parliament in Somalia, Mr Hassan.

Most of the results on Google seemed to mention either onagers or the guy who
was searching for them or noth. Only one or two were porn sites.

On the other hand, I posted a picture of a cute a.s on my blog the other day:

http://methodius.blogspot.com/2010/05/cute-ass.html

and I typed in "cute a.s" and the first page of results were all porn sites.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Prai Jei - 29 May 2010 18:15 GMT
John Dean set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:

> Jack, who was at home with wife Hilda, 86, finally found the answer,
>  "onager", by changing his search to "donkey sanctuaries"."

The thought just struck me - has this word been topped and tailed to
produce "nag"?
Signature

ξ:) Proud to be curly

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

James Hogg - 29 May 2010 19:28 GMT
> John Dean set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
> continuum:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The thought just struck me - has this word been topped and tailed to
> produce "nag"?

Not according to OED, which suggests a completely different origin:
"uncertain". First recorded c. 1336. There's a possible early modern
Dutch cognate.

Signature

James

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.