
Signature
Love consists of overestimating
the differences between one woman
and another. --George Bernard Shaw
> > Could there be a comma after "peeled?" Any difference in meaning?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> None of the three instances of "peeled" could be followed by a comma.
Oh, my! Confusion.
It's the 2nd one I was talking about. Now, about that one, isn't it in
a situation similar to "bloody," thus an adjective _not_ in the last
position (which is "left") preceding a noun? I mean, "bloody" is
followed by a comma.
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Donna Richoux - 31 May 2010 01:30 GMT
> > > Could there be a comma after "peeled?" Any difference in meaning?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> position (which is "left") preceding a noun? I mean, "bloody" is
> followed by a comma.
There are some compounds so strong -- from semantic role and from
frequent use, I suppose -- that you would never put a comma before them.
"Left arm" is a lot like a two-word phrase that would be hyphenated or
closed if it was made of two nouns, like back seat, back-seat, backseat
discussed elsewhere.
You wouldn't say "a cluttered, dirty, back seat." That would imply that
"back" was just as minor and optional in its role as "cluttered" and
"dirty." When actually it plays an important role in identifying which
seat.

Signature
Best -- Donna Richoux
Marius Hancu - 31 May 2010 10:59 GMT
> > > > Could there be a comma after "peeled?" Any difference in meaning?
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> "dirty." When actually it plays an important role in identifying which
> seat.
Now I'm getting it.
Thank you, Donna.
Marius Hancu