Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / September 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Baldacci: extraordinary

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 28 Sep 2010 11:21 GMT
Hello:

Shouldn't this be:
"His job had not involved [the] normal; it had encompassed [the]
extraordinary"?

----
Ross had seen thousands of faces just like that and had paid little
attention to any of them. His job had not involved normal; it had
encompassed extraordinary.

David Baldacci, Stone Cold
----
--
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
the Omrud - 28 Sep 2010 11:51 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> attention to any of them. His job had not involved normal; it had
> encompassed extraordinary.

I read this as:

- His job had not involved "normal"; it had encompassed "extraordinary".

Signature

David

CDB - 28 Sep 2010 13:46 GMT
>> Shouldn't this be:
>> "His job had not involved [the] normal; it had encompassed [the]
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> - His job had not involved "normal"; it had encompassed
> "extraordinary".
Yes.  There is probably a reference to the words, or to "normal", at
least, in the text not too far before the quoted passage.  For a
stand-alone sentence in standard English, I agree with your
suggestion.
Mark Brader - 28 Sep 2010 19:22 GMT
Marius Hancu asks about:
>> Ross had seen thousands of faces just like that and had paid little
>> attention to any of them. His job had not involved normal; it had
>> encompassed extraordinary.

"David" answers:
> I read this as:
>
> - His job had not involved "normal"; it had encompassed "extraordinary".

Right.  As I said in the "Meyer: as in" thread, In informal usage it's
common to omit quotation marks that express a use/mention distinction.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto     |    "Strange commas are enshrined in
msb@vex.net              |     the US Constitution."     --James Hogg

Lewis - 28 Sep 2010 15:57 GMT
> Hello:

> Shouldn't this be:
> "His job had not involved [the] normal; it had encompassed [the]
> extraordinary"?

Either is correct, but the feeling is quite different to my ear. I
prefer the quoted version as it feels to me as if it is more expansive.

> ----
> Ross had seen thousands of faces just like that and had paid little
> attention to any of them. His job had not involved normal; it had
> encompassed extraordinary.

Signature

When we woke up that morning we had no way of knowing that in a matter
of hours we'd changed the way we were going. Where would I be now? Where
would I be now if we'd never met? Would I be singing this song to
someone else instead?

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.