Is this sentence ambiguous:
1-He suggested that a session be held secretly.
a-the session was to be secret
b-the suggesting was done secretly
I have learnt the term 'attachment ambiguity' from John Lawler. I
think this is what he would call a right-branching sentence. But I
doubt that it is ambiguous. I think it could only mean 'a'. But I am
not sure.
bob - 30 Sep 2010 09:37 GMT
> Is this sentence ambiguous:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> doubt that it is ambiguous. I think it could only mean 'a'. But I am
> not sure.
To me it is completely unambiguous, with meaning a being the only one
I would understand by it. For b, it would have to be "He secretly
suggested..." or "He suggested secretly..."
Robin
Don Phillipson - 30 Sep 2010 12:21 GMT
> Is this sentence ambiguous:?
>
> 1-He suggested that a session be held secretly.
>
> a-the session was to be secret
> b-the suggesting was done secretly
Ambiguity is easily avoided by appropriate rephrasing, e.g.
He suggested a secret session be held.
He suggested meeting in secret.
(or if truly intended, He secretly suggested a meeting.
Good English style discourages three successive words
with initial S as in "secretly suggested a session.")
The grammatical point is that adverbs usually characterize
verbs (as adjectives characterize nouns.) Thus the adverb
secretly directs the reader towards the verbs suggest or
hold, rather than to the noun session.
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Garrett Wollman - 30 Sep 2010 19:02 GMT
>Is this sentence ambiguous:
>
>1-He suggested that a session be held secretly.
>
>a-the session was to be secret
>b-the suggesting was done secretly
It is not ambiguous to me. For it to be (b), the adverb would habve
to be prior to the "that". However, I wouldn't use the adverb
"secretly" here; more likely an adverbial PP like "in secret" or
moving it into the NP as "a secret session". (There are circumstances
in which the last might have a different meeting.)
-GAWollman

Signature
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
John Lawler - 30 Sep 2010 20:08 GMT
> Is this sentence ambiguous:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> doubt that it is ambiguous. I think it could only mean 'a'. But I am
> not sure.
As various people have pointed out, it's unlikely that
the suggesting was secret. But not impossible.
Certainly some people might say it that way.
Even though they would be ill-advised to, because
most people would interpret it the other way.
And, yes, it's an attachment ambiguity. The adverb
can attach to either clause. That's why adverbs
can be moved around to so many places in the
sentence -- to avoid such ambiguities.
As for "right-branching", that just means that
dependent clauses come after the clause
they're attached to. The two parses are:
S[He suggested secretly]
that S[a session be held]
S[He suggested
that S[a session be held secretly]]
(S[...] indicates a clause)
A+, Navi.
-John Lawler http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day,
but set fire to him and he's warm for the
rest of his life." -- Terry Pratchett