> I just came across "forecasted" in a publication, and it does
> seem to be written that way intentionally, and not a mistake.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Google finds some 2.8 million instances so it does appear
> to be fairly common.
According to the Merriam-Webster On-Line Dictionary forecasted is an
acceptable alternative form: "Inflected Form(s): forecast also
fore·cast·ed; fore·cast·ing"
I must also say that both forms feel OK to me.
Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
CV - 19 Oct 2005 09:11 GMT
> I must also say that both forms feel OK to me.
Which is as good a reference as any. Thanks.
CV