> to build a life around it.
> - John Gardner
>> What does date from the Renaissance is the appearance of men [and
>> women] who made a considerable point about their individuality -
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> sub-text. Maybe it doesn't mean anything at all about what it's
> purportedly referring to.
Its interesting that there is not quite enough there to campel with. Marilyn
Yalom wrote well on gender parity in History of the Wife, and continued the
theme with Birth of the Chess Queen, a title which addresses European women
as leaders and progressive intellectuals factoring to a point of equity with
men, from about 1000-1600; all this with a parallel and symbolic development
of the Queen in chess.
Interestingly, the 'Queen' piece was originally male, 'a Minister', and
weak. Yalom says that women's engagement in the world as intellectual equals
actually terminated at the time of the Renaissance, and declined somewhat
thereafter.
The first writing above indicates rather than demonstrates that Elizabethan
life was less self-conscious than is our own, and mostly lacking in ironical
forms of expression, while gaining a directness to expression to which we
would be unaccustomed.
Phil
Mike Lyle - 09 Dec 2005 17:08 GMT
>>> What does date from the Renaissance is the appearance of men [and
>>> women] who made a considerable point about their individuality -
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>> to build a life around it.
>>> - John Gardner
[...]
> The first writing above indicates rather than demonstrates that
> Elizabethan life was less self-conscious than is our own, and
mostly
> lacking in ironical forms of expression, while gaining a directness
> to expression to which we would be unaccustomed.
You puzzle me. If, that is, we are to take the very individualistic
Elizabethans as Renaissance figures. (To that extent I see Gardner's
position, without conceding it: what I'm not happy with is the
implicit notion that the Middle Ages lacked individualism.) And, of
course, the time of the first Elizabeth was a great age of irony,
sarcasm, word-play, and visual and verbal mazes.

Signature
Mike.