> Not my ideal at all. "What university did you
> graduate from?" is perfectly formal and perfectly understandable and
> perfectly normal for reasonable speakers.

Signature
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
>>Whose "ideal" is this?
>
> It is a longstanding principle in English that sentences ending in
> prepositions should be avoided, although such constructions have been
> common for almost as long.
This is utter bullshit. Prepositions at teh end of sentences are as old
as English.
Latinising grammarians in the 17th and 18th century tried to shoehorn
english grammar into the model fo their perfect model latin, but english
refuses to fit into this model - precisely because it isn't Latin.
Do the following judgement of Franke is absolutely correct.
>>It's definitely stilted and broomstick-up-the-
>>a.s English, AFAIC.
>
> It doesn't look that way to me. I suppose it depends on the circles
> within which one normally moves.
You seem to move in some rather strange circles - considering some of
the things you've said recently I think you'd probably get on like a
house on fire with those German English teachers I mentioned earlier who
regard American English as a barbarous dialect.
>>Not my ideal at all. "What university did you
>>graduate from?" is perfectly formal and perfectly understandable and
>>perfectly normal for reasonable speakers.
>
> Sure, but it's not as perfect as the construction I gave.
This is pure subjectivism - it's got no basis in English grammar whether
considered historically or in its contemporary form.
>>So why isn't "By which university were you graduated?" your ideal?
>
> It's just as acceptable.
A purely American usage - in British English the verb "graduate" is
usually intransitive.
Einde O'Callaghan
Mxsmanic - 21 Apr 2004 05:26 GMT
> This is utter bullshit. Prepositions at teh end of sentences are as old
> as English.
Read what I wrote.

Signature
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
CyberCypher - 21 Apr 2004 07:41 GMT
Mxsmanic wrote on 20 Apr 2004:
>> This is utter bullshit. Prepositions at teh end of sentences are
>> as old as English.
>
> Read what I wrote.
You don't write well enough to make yourself clear. Perhaps you ought
to find a writing teacher.

Signature
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor.
For email, ehziuh htiw rehpycrebyc ecalper.
Mxsmanic - 21 Apr 2004 19:49 GMT
> You don't write well enough to make yourself clear.
I write very well indeed, compared to most Anglophones.
> Perhaps you ought to find a writing teacher.
And stop teaching myself?

Signature
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
CyberCypher - 22 Apr 2004 00:42 GMT
Mxsmanic wrote on 21 Apr 2004:
>> You don't write well enough to make yourself clear.
>
> I write very well indeed, compared to most Anglophones.
Even if you have to say so yourself.
>> Perhaps you ought to find a writing teacher.
>
> And stop teaching myself?
Especially.

Signature
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor.
For email, ehziuh htiw rehpycrebyc ecalper.
Mxsmanic - 22 Apr 2004 04:29 GMT
> Even if you have to say so yourself.
This is what I've been told.
> Especially.
You don't want anyone who disagrees with you to teach?

Signature
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Einde O'Callaghan - 21 Apr 2004 20:40 GMT
>>This is utter bullshit. Prepositions at teh end of sentences are as old
>>as English.
>
> Read what I wrote.
I was referring to the first part of your sentence, to wit: "It is a
longstanding principle in English that sentences ending in
prepositions should be avoided", which is utter bullshit. This was an
opinion originally voiced by a group of grammarians who felt that Latin
was a perfect language and English should become more like Latin. It has
been parroted by subsequent generations of "teachers" too lazy to
develop their own opinions based on the actual history and development
of the English language. You seem to be one of them.
Einde O'Callaghan
Mxsmanic - 22 Apr 2004 04:33 GMT
> I was referring to the first part of your sentence, to wit: "It is a
> longstanding principle in English that sentences ending in
> prepositions should be avoided", which is utter bullshit.
You're saying that teachers only began to recommend this in January?
> This was an opinion originally voiced by a group of
> grammarians who felt that Latin was a perfect language
> and English should become more like Latin.
Sure, but that happened a long time ago.
> It has been parroted by subsequent generations of "teachers"
> too lazy to develop their own opinions based on the actual
> history and development of the English language. You seem
> to be one of them.
No, I simply make an observation. I do prefer to avoid putting
prepositions at the end of a sentence if possible, but I don't tell
students that this is forbidden, nor do I even say that they should
avoid it.
I see much worse in coursebooks. Yesterday I taught a lesson that
attempted to teach many highly questionable "differences" between
infinitives and -ing forms following verbs. Sorry, but there isn't
really any practical difference between "I started to talk" and "I
started talking," no matter what the coursebook says, and I told
students this. (There are a few exceptions, mentioned in the lesson,
but most of the lesson was bogus, and I told students so.)

Signature
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Enrico C - 21 Apr 2004 10:42 GMT
>>>Whose "ideal" is this?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> english grammar into the model fo their perfect model latin, but english
> refuses to fit into this model - precisely because it isn't Latin.
<snip>
David Crystal, in "The English Language" (Penguin), writes
| "this rule was first introduced in the seventeenth
| century, but as we have seen it has been ignored, notably in recent
| years by Churchill, who found it something 'up with which he would not
| put'. In formal English, the rule tends to be followed; but in
| informal usage, final prepositions are normal."

Signature
Enrico C