Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / ESL Teaching / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

On condtition he attend

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Django Cat - 14 Jul 2004 23:31 GMT
I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.

This came up today from the London Times:-

"the judge ordered that he attend a community training course".

I don't need to debate that this is bona fide English, thank you.  
However, a student asked "why not 'he attend*s*'?"

Any assistance from colleagues in different time zones on how to explain
this to the student, to let me go to bed without trawling the grammar
books, most gratefully received and I'll owe you one.

Cheers
DC
John  Ings - 15 Jul 2004 00:20 GMT
>I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>this to the student, to let me go to bed without trawling the grammar
>books, most gratefully received and I'll owe you one.

I'm going to take a guess at this, and risk getting jumped on by
Einde or Django.  To my ear, "attends" implies a past tense, as in "he
attends community training courses", while "attend" implies a future
tense. He is expected to attend next week, not "attends next week".

Cringing in the expectation of brickbats....
Django Cat - 15 Jul 2004 00:37 GMT
>> I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Cringing in the expectation of brickbats....

No brickbats from me John, thanks for your idea, I suspect the word
'subjuctive' may come up soon ...
DC
CyberCypher - 15 Jul 2004 04:15 GMT
Django Cat wrote on 14 Jul 2004:

[...]
> No brickbats from me John, thanks for your idea, I suspect the
> word 'subjuctive' may come up soon ...

Yes, "subjunctive" is the answer to your question. It's a hypothetical.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor.
For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.

mike morgan - 15 Jul 2004 21:05 GMT
> I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Cheers
> DC

Being a student of English I would feel fully satisfied with a bit simpler
explanation of this grammar problem. I would say that the verb in its
infinitive form after 'he' in this very case is a result of omitting
'should' which... should otherwise be used. Needless to say, 'should' is
always followed by an infinitive.

Regards, Mike

PS. Franke aka 'CC', did you get my e-mail?
PS.2. Sorry for priving here
Einde O'Callaghan - 16 Jul 2004 01:02 GMT
>>I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> 'should' which... should otherwise be used. Needless to say, 'should' is
> always followed by an infinitive.

"Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
nowadays, except in more formal English. It is, I understand, more
common in the US.

We still find examples of the subjunctive in some standard phrases such
as "God bless you".

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
mike morgan - 16 Jul 2004 18:42 GMT
> "Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
> explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Regards, Einde O'Callaghan

Undoubtedly you - English teachers - are right, but from a foreign student's
point of view it may be easier to understand if the following problem was
explained in my way. I wanted to point out that "should" wasn't mistakenly
omitted here but may (or may not) be found in this construction right before
a verb and this is why the verb must be used in infinitive. We can use the
same construction without "should" (fully aware omitting it) but the verb
must remain in infinitive. Thus, what we obtain is: "...that he <should>
attend...". I hope I'm right.

Regards, Mike
Django Cat - 16 Jul 2004 20:03 GMT
>> "Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
>> explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Regards, Mike

In fact it looks like you're right Mike - COBUILD Grammar certainly bears
you out:-

(after an example "He proposes that the governement should hold an
enquiry")

"Note that when you leave out the modal, the verb in the reported clause
still has the form it would have if the modal were present.  This use of
the base form is sometimes called the subjunctive."  COBUILD Grammer p 325.

'Should' is a modal verb, and 'base form' is what COBUILD calls the
infinitive without 'to'.

The original example was:-

"the judge ordered that he attend a community training course"

I don't hear a vast difference in:-

"the judge ordered that he should attend a community training course"

except maybe it's one more word than we need.

Sorted.  This is the sort of thing that usually falls into the 'most
students don't really need to know this' category, but given that these
students are tyro translators I'll take it back to class next week.

Thanks Mike, Franke, Einde and John, have a good weekend.

Django
John  Ings - 16 Jul 2004 20:20 GMT
>> "Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
>> explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> We still find examples of the subjunctive in some standard phrases such
>> as "God bless you".

>Undoubtedly you - English teachers - are right, but from a foreign student's
>point of view it may be easier to understand if the following problem was
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>must remain in infinitive. Thus, what we obtain is: "...that he <should>
>attend...". I hope I'm right.

Personally I'm in awe of those who can analyse sentence structures and
apply words like 'subjunctive' and 'past pluperfect participle' to the
dissected bits!

Anyhow, my dictionary has these hopefully edifying notes about
subjunctives,

**********
Usage. The subjunctive mood of the verb, once used extensively in
English, has largely disappeared today. The subjunctive survives,
though by no means consistently, in sentences with conditional clauses
contrary to fact and in subordinate clauses after verbs like wish:
If the house were nearer to the road, we would hear more traffic
noise.
I wish I were in Florida.

The subjunctive also occurs in subordinate that clauses after a main
clause expressing recommendation, resolution, demand, etc.:
We ask that each tenant take(not takes) responsibility for keeping the
front door locked.
It is important that only fresh spinach be (not is) used.

The subjunctive occurs too in some established or idiomatic
expressions:
So be it.
Heaven help us.
God rest ye merry, gentlemen.
Werein the phrase as it were, meaning "in a way,' is a subjunctive:
His apology, as it were, sounded more like an insult.

*********
Einde O'Callaghan - 16 Jul 2004 20:28 GMT
>>"Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
>>explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> must remain in infinitive. Thus, what we obtain is: "...that he <should>
> attend...". I hope I'm right.

I would say that the rule of thumb you use (not grammatical rule, I
hasten to add) depends to a certain extent on the language(s) spoken by
your students. Since in many languages there is a subjunctive form (and
in some, e.g. German, a subjunctive would often be used in this type of
structure) this may be the easiest way for students to remember what to do.

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
Bill Bonde ( ``There's sunshine in my stomach'' ) - 16 Jul 2004 20:41 GMT
> > "Should" isn't necessary here and hasn't been omitted because, as Franke
> > explained, this is a subjunctive - a tense used fairly rarely in Britain
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> omitted here but may (or may not) be found in this construction right before
> a verb and this is why the verb must be used in infinitive.

It's not the infinitive but the subjunctive form. The problem in English
is that a lot of forms have fallen together and can't be distinguished
by just looking at the word in isolation. I found some more examples
here: http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/excerpts.html

#begin quote
I suggest [that he leave].

I beg [that he return the money].

I demanded [that she give me her files].

We asked [that Marsha tell the truth].

Beth moved [that the meeting be adjourned].

I insist [that you be quiet].

I require [that term papers be turned in on time].
#end quote

> We can use the
> same construction without "should" (fully aware omitting it) but the verb
> must remain in infinitive. Thus, what we obtain is: "...that he <should>
> attend...". I hope I'm right.

You are certainly free to analyse a language in any manner you see fit,
although conciseness of rules and minimum of exceptions are features
usually considered better.

Signature

"If writers knew whose mouths would end up spewing out their works,

they'd cut off their hands." +-Gerard Depardieu, "Pure Formality"

mike morgan - 15 Jul 2004 21:14 GMT
> I've got an advanced group of translation and interpreting students.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Cheers
> DC

Being a student of English I would propose a bit simpler yet more pertinent,
IMHO, explanation to this problem. The verb 'attend' after 'he' is used in
its infinitive form in this case because of omitting the word 'should'
that... should otherwise be used. Needless to say, 'should' is always
followed by an infinitive.

Regards, Mike

PS. (sorry for priving) Franke aka 'CC' in short, did you get my e-mail?
mike morgan - 15 Jul 2004 21:20 GMT
erm... didn't mean to send it twice but I was informed by the automatic
e-mail controller that my post will not be posted due to some weird stuff
and so I did it again in a slightly altered form as I had forgotten to make
a copy. Sorry for repeating myself.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.