Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / ESL Teaching / March 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sentence scrutiny

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
3sages@earthlink.net - 26 Mar 2005 02:18 GMT
Is this sentence a student wrote correct?

    What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.
John  Ings - 26 Mar 2005 03:35 GMT
>Is this sentence a student wrote correct?
>
>     What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
>coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.

No.

Not only is the sentence not correct, I don't think he has the
technology correct either.
3sages@earthlink.net - 26 Mar 2005 04:44 GMT
Hi and thanks,

Would you explain exactly why the sentence is not correct?

Thank you.

Howard
3sages@earthlink.net - 26 Mar 2005 13:22 GMT
Thank you John. That's where I thought the problem in the sentence was,
but

    (1) isn't coils the real subject of "are," meaning that "are" is
correct and

    (2) doesn't "what" at the start of the sentence refer to the
coils, making "transfer"
         also correct?

I'm not sure, but couldn't the sentence be reworked as "Coils, which
are a unique magnetic field system, are what transfer the power from
the sources to the guide-ways?

This is the source of my original doubt, so I wanted to state it fully.

Thank you.

Howard
John  Ings - 26 Mar 2005 14:57 GMT
> I'm not sure, but couldn't the sentence be reworked as "Coils, which
>are a unique magnetic field system, are what transfer the power from
>the sources to the guide-ways?

As an English sentence, that's acceptable.

Technically it's nonsense.
Coils are found everywhere in electrical and electronic systems, and
are therefor not unique. Nor in this case are they being used to
transfer power. Of course if this is just an exercise in the
construction of a sentence, you may not care about that.
Tomasz Dryjanski - 30 Mar 2005 16:17 GMT
>>What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
>>coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.

> Technically it's nonsense.
> Coils are found everywhere in electrical and electronic systems, and
> are therefor not unique. Nor in this case are they being used to
> transfer power. Of course if this is just an exercise in the
> construction of a sentence, you may not care about that.

These are not coils that are unique, but the magnetic field system.
Make a tube of coils, and put a magnet inside. If several conditions
are fulfilled, you may accelerate the magnet, and increase its
kinetic energy. Thus transfer the energy from some source
to the magnet.

T. D.

PS. Would you mind correcting my language mistakes, if there are any?
John  Ings - 30 Mar 2005 19:15 GMT
>>>What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
>>>coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>These are not coils that are unique, but the magnetic field system.

Yes.

>Make a tube of coils, and put a magnet inside. If several conditions
>are fulfilled, you may accelerate the magnet, and increase its
>kinetic energy. Thus transfer the energy from some source
>to the magnet.

But a transfer of power is not what's unique. It's using this system
to levitate an move a train that's unique.

To summarize: Cables are used to transfer power from a power supply to
a system of coils. These coils are so arranged as to not only levitate
the train so it has no physical contract with the guiderail, but also
cause it to accelerate down the guideway and to brake when necessary.

>PS. Would you mind correcting my language mistakes, if there are any?

You might have said: "It is not the coils that are unique, but the
magnetic field system."
3sages@earthlink.net - 31 Mar 2005 02:42 GMT
Or "It is not the coils but the magnetic field system that is unique."
Tomasz Dryjanski - 31 Mar 2005 08:19 GMT
>>>>What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
>>>>coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.

>>Make a tube of coils, and put a magnet inside. If several conditions
>>are fulfilled, you may accelerate the magnet, and increase its
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But a transfer of power is not what's unique. It's using this system
> to levitate an move a train that's unique.

I only claim that the sentence is technically OK. The unique magnetic
field system transfers energy from the sources indeed.

> To summarize: Cables are used to transfer power from a power supply to
> a system of coils. These coils are so arranged as to not only levitate
> the train so it has no physical contract with the guiderail, but also
> cause it to accelerate down the guideway and to brake when necessary.

It does not contradict the above.

> You might have said: "It is not the coils that are unique, but the
> magnetic field system."

This was my doubt. Thank you.
Was my version incorrect, or just clumsy?

T. D.
John  Ings - 31 Mar 2005 14:48 GMT
>>>>>What transfer the power from the sources to the guide-ways are
>>>>>coils, which are a unique magnetic field system.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>I only claim that the sentence is technically OK. The unique magnetic
>field system transfers energy from the sources indeed.

But a transfer of energy is not the goal. Moving the train is.
Your explanation has the wrong emphasis.

>> To summarize: Cables are used to transfer power from a power supply to
>> a system of coils. These coils are so arranged as to not only levitate
>> the train so it has no physical contract with the guiderail, but also
>> cause it to accelerate down the guideway and to brake when necessary.
>
>It does not contradict the above.

But addresses the subject more pertinently.

>> You might have said: "It is not the coils that are unique, but the
>> magnetic field system."
>
>This was my doubt. Thank you.
>Was my version incorrect, or just clumsy?

Both, but not so badly that it could not be understood.
John Ramsay - 26 Mar 2005 10:32 GMT
John Ings wrote:

> >Is this sentence a student wrote correct?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Not only is the sentence not correct, I don't think he has the
> technology correct either.

Adding an 's' to transfer makes the sentence more grammatical.

Probably should be 'is' rather than 'are'.

As for the technology: consider the ferrite rod/induction coil
radio antenna which does effectively combine magnetism and coils.

Or all the stuff Tesla did with inductance coils -:)

John Ramsay
John  Ings - 26 Mar 2005 13:24 GMT
>> >Is this sentence a student wrote correct?
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Probably should be 'is' rather than 'are'.

Resulting in "  What transfers the power from the sources to the
guide-ways are coils, which is a unique magnetic field system."

I presume the Maglev system is what he's talking about.
See http://www.acmaglev.com/technology.htm

Cables would be used to move power from the power sources to the
coils. The coils are used to levitate the train, not transfer power to
the guide way.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.